Solid tungsten carbide has better thermal conductivity than brass so while it isn’t a CHT, it will be no worse than a normal nozzle. Also, there are *hardened* CHT nozzles meant for printing abrasives at high flow. Also keep in mind that high flow doesn’t mean fast printing, for fiber filled filaments you’re likely printing parts that need strength so larger nozzle orifices will provide that, and naturally need higher flow because volumetric flow scales cubically with nozzle orifice

A CHT core with diamondback Tip would be the absolute pinnacle of 3D printer Nozzles.

@@KevinFibichCloudSeeds basically you’re describing “bozzle”

Soon if not already. It's a diamond so any temp your hotend can reach. Yes good for CF Nylon and any other material. Yes will work in both standard and high temp Revo

well you are just wrong and should probably look into metallurgy a bit before you say anything else stupid. Also the nozzle has plenty of other benefits at all temperature ranges.

@@iamsobanned before dishing out insults and making yourself look like the fool, maybe check e3d’s own website stating that brass nozzles max temp is 300C.

@@iamsobanned plus the whole industry has graduated away from brass into either copper for high flow, tungsten carbide or steels for abrasives, and these insert nozzles are gimmicks at best compared to a solid chunk of TC with greater heat conduction than brass and while not a PCD, we aren’t printing diamonds so we don’t need more than TC. Make a solid PCD nozzle and I’ll shut up. The only brass nozzle worth anything right now is the CHT and that’s specifically also stated to be used at sub 300C temps. They have a hardened variant for that which uses a COPPER outer sleeve.

@@BigfootPrinting that is the maximum they suggest you use their product at there is always a lot of breathing room on the other end of that and they play it safe to limit their liability for when someone does something stupid. This is a consumer product that should be used as such so we are not going to be using it for industrial applications that would cause the brass to be the failing point. You also need to remember the majority of the people they are marketing this to are not going to push it to the limits of it especially in an off the shelf printer. Other materials might have better properties depending on what you want but they also have to be manufactured as well and some of those materials you mentioned are not great to work with on something like this.

@@BigfootPrinting This diamond isn't like the Ruby nozzle, which cracks over any impact, you clearly don't know enough of what you're talking about when it comes to DiamondBack. Yes... You are correct about brass being inferior to copper. But if what you want is a nozzle that can print PLA, ABS, PETG, Nylon and abrasives without ever needing a replacement, then this is it, and as a product it is a superior alternative to obxidian even. So, yes, you are correct about the metals, but you are still horribly wrong about the value proposition of this nozzle. I definitely want that and there's a reason why E3D caved about this one. People have been asking for it since it's clearly a match made in heaven. E3D also has a Revo line coming for high heat and industry. You're just barking at the wrong horse here. And, to be fair, DiamondBack would be amazing in high heat and industrial too, just not with brass.