Sooo what did you choose?

@@timkeepers3325 both returned on Amazon, frustrating experience of use, the raptor is slightly more precise, the most serious thing however is that they are very slow and sensitive, it takes very little to send them into error and cause them to lose tracking, ruining the scans. If I have to use one word to describe them is =Frustrating.

Hello!!! Which one do you recommend?

@@AlexanderV1964 both! for different tasks

laser mode... raptor is better

@@karen170878metall This comparison makes no sense. Anyone with some 3D scanning experience knows that laser scanners naturally perform better than infrared structured light scanners. It's like comparing an adult running against a child - who do you think will win? Don't mislead beginners here. Experienced users in this field will think your video ridiculous.

@@MaxCohen-ic4cn You are mistaken, these scanners are completely different, what one can do, the other cannot.

So I’ve learnt nothing from this video. What were you trying to show in this test. The only thing I’ve learnt is that the raptors have software issue’s from reading the comments. ? I was going to buy a raptor, but now I’m unsure what to do.

Large objects are best scanned with Miraco! Raptor will take a very long time to scan

It works very well for me on the latest firmware and the CR-scan program, (Core-I 9 13900k 64gb ram 1080ti)