😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

I've always said if you're going to botch something, botch it well. Fans will believe a failed offensive maneuver if it looks like it missed legitimately

I saw it as a kid too. I too also suspended disbelief but suspending disbelief was not possible when thirty year old men are acting like dogs, snakes, and chickens. I was done with wrestling until ECW came along.

Kornet exposes the business more than anyone lol

​@@bustersales6921 the cat's out of the bag... been out of the bag for decades. Cornette doesn't actually fault anyone for "exposing the business" on podcasts or shoot interviews. If they do it in the ring he often takes issue with it. He's never done that At the time Mansfield did what he did kayfabe was still very much alive

​@@axlbomber thats an excuse people keep making as they continue to expose every little thing that people still werent aware of

​@@bustersales6921 cornette is a hypocrite in so many ways he's just so good at talking he can convice anyone who lacks critical thinking or their own opinions

​@@bustersales6921 Cornette never went on nationwide TV & spoke down about wrestling using the "red makes green" shit

​@abduldinero6363He did 16 times. WOOOOOOOOO

Wrestling has always been suspected to be faked since the 30s. People always thought something was going on but couldnt tell what. Vince McMahon definitely exposed the business but not to the regular people that only watched the shows and werent hardcore fans. But then eddie Mansfield just came out flat and said the whole thing is faked and then there was no doubt about whether the business was a work. At least vince McMahon had some ambiguity about it and didnt flat out say it was fake until after the Mansfield incident. I think the business was always exposed as being not legitimate since the 30s but nobody knew the extent until the mansfield interview. But in the grand scheme of things the business was always going to be exposed because of the Internet but mabey people wouldnt have been so upset about it like they were after they saw Mansfield and maybe we would have a industry thats isnt laughed at and taken as a complete joke. But then again vince McMahon exists

The red rooster had no violence, just vomit inducing clucking around the ring. LOL!

100% agree

So you agree the promoters don't care about them.

He got fired because he tried to attack Mr. T.

I didn't hear anything regarding Mr T but I do know that wwf did settle with Stossell for the injuries he sustained which was put in magazines that lead to Shultz being fired

@@robertmiller8704 neither helped him out

What did he do?

@@barbarahallager5918 he was on that secrets of wrestling revealed

​@@chrischar9428 when was that? What year?

After he beat so many people (according to Flair) for calling it fake 🤦‍♂️

​@@ICHIBAN-cz8ih 1998. Eddy did it in 1984

I’ve never bought the story he tells about how he did it for the boys. He was angry because he’d gotten himself blackballed in the business because every territory he worked in he’d constantly complain about his booking or his pay and often times quit because of it. Terry Funk told him before he went on 20/20 that he’d never get work again. Only after that did he go on 20/20 and suddenly say it was all for the boys. Id love to see how much he was paying his roster when he had his promotion and if he gave them health care. Id bet he didnt. He loves to take credit for making everything better as if people weren’t working 300 days a year for the next 10+ years after his thing anyways. Id have zero problem with the dude being on the show if he’d just own up to why he did it instead of trying to pretend it was all to help the boys.

@@Matt-cr4vv We just disagree then. His issue w/ NWA was more of an Ole Anderson issue. Ole & another guy wanted 20% of his 💰 he said "no" which ended his bookings w/ the NWA. This was also stated by Dr. D. Eddy was still getting bookings in TX before he did 20/20. And it's not like he was wrong, it just didn't work. Ppl just lacked balls. Not to mention John Stossel has a reputation of being dubious. This wouldn't be the first time he interviewed someone for one reason while the interviewee is there for another.

In 1989

@@jims.6393 Might have been 1988. Then again he turned it into a cartoon in 1984.

@@curthennig9448 - it's whenever he appeared on Letterman

@@jims.6393 I thought you were referring to when Vince was looking to avoid paying athletic commission costs and said wrestling is not a sport but entertainment.

@@curthennig9448 - 👍