Feynman gets stopped by a cop. Cop : why were you speeding ? Feynman : what do you mean why ? Half hour later Cop : please just leave me alone
@RODWALLBANGER4 жыл бұрын
Freedom Works many people will respond with a simple Lol. I actually laughed hard at your post. Excellent. Thank you for the laugh. Kudos
@mmv91554 жыл бұрын
lolol
@akihitonarihisago42764 жыл бұрын
I died🤣🤣 Maybe because read your comment exactly at the time when feynman asked such a question
@juliorodriguez16344 жыл бұрын
Freedom Works I laughed so hard when I read your comment. Thank you!
@RobertoDonatoFS4 жыл бұрын
😂🤣🤣
@matthewsawczyn65922 жыл бұрын
If this man ever talks to toddlers, the conversation will be infinite
@TheMennoXD2 жыл бұрын
Lol because they always ask why
@TheMennoXD2 жыл бұрын
I still do
@BradKwfc2 жыл бұрын
Why will it be infinite? Richard goes straight into an infinite loop discussing the infinite.
@thisismonitor40992 жыл бұрын
He actually did. He talked to me when I was a toddler at a physics conference in Greece and i remember it well. However, at the time I thought my father (another physicist) was smarter than him:)
@amysteriouspersonintophat14582 жыл бұрын
@@thisismonitor4099 Really? That's really cool! What did you talk to him about? :D
@GAURAV-hm4xd2 жыл бұрын
Even after speaking on so many topics and fields in a single breath, he came back to original topic. That's an art. Many people tend to forget where they started.
@schmetterling44772 жыл бұрын
Yes, he took seven minutes and still didn't answer the question at 0:10. He did talk a lot of nonsense, though. ;-)
@GAURAV-hm4xd2 жыл бұрын
@@schmetterling4477 i think he did answered the questions in last few seconds. Iron atoms spinning in same direction magnifying the force which u generally dont feel in other materials.
@schmetterling44772 жыл бұрын
@@GAURAV-hm4xd No, he didn't. The question at 0:10 was not about magnets. It was about the nature of the magnetic field. Do you know why he was being asked that? Because he wasn't a solid state physicist but a quantum field theorist. He got the Physics Nobel for developing the correct theory of the quantized electromagnetic field. He really didn't know much about magnetism and you can clearly tell by his struggling attempt to explain what he hadn't been asked to begin with.
@GAURAV-hm4xd2 жыл бұрын
@@schmetterling4477 oh. U may be right. Thanks for telling me this.
@vigilante8374 Жыл бұрын
@@schmetterling4477 He answered the question at 0:10 at 0:32. The interviewer asked "why" at 0:37.
@Rbx98Cp2 жыл бұрын
Richard actually forgot why magnets repulse, so he came up with the most elaborate distraction of an explanation to make you forget that you'd even asked.
@stefanmenzel2632 жыл бұрын
😉😅😀😃😃😄😆😆😅😅😅🤣🤣🤣
@tyrannde63922 жыл бұрын
@@SkepticMaestro he did answered though
@hillaryclinton13142 жыл бұрын
Actually, explaining repulsion is easy ..explaining attraction..like gravity.. is very very hard
@johndabate6442 жыл бұрын
He should have been a politician.
@deviklovecraft38352 жыл бұрын
Hah 🤣
@AbhishekSharma-zq5qk4 жыл бұрын
'Some husbands arent interested in their wives' - Richard Feynman explaining magnetism.
@athleticaesthetixfitness69374 жыл бұрын
Opposites attract on the macro scale just as frequently as on the micro and quantum scale
@funcentral24394 жыл бұрын
If feels like he is projecting raw that. He is a thought train conductor
@firozosman4 жыл бұрын
Good catch Abhishek! 👏
@DavidPellerinmaison4 жыл бұрын
In fact the dude was apparently very attracted and interested to his wife... therefore, its elsewhere he lacked...
@dontinjectdisinfectant99194 жыл бұрын
😆
@coolz94794 жыл бұрын
interviewer: "so why is aunt minnie in the hospital?" feynman: "ok so magnets..."
@jayeshunde14814 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂
@Nikolapoleon4 жыл бұрын
"Why is Aunt Minnie in the hospital?" "Because water expands when it freezes, and because of gravity, which involves the planets and everything else. Frankly, it's impossible to really understand why she's there." "You are a bad cousin, Richard."
@matthewnewton88124 жыл бұрын
Yes. Yessss.....is this being clever? That’s exactly what he’s saying. Aunt Minnie is in the hospital because of electromagnetic forces holding molecules together in Aunt Minnie-shaped clumps, and gravitational forces attracting those clumps to larger clumps like planets. So, yes. You’re restating what he said. Is there a joke I’m missing? (AND BEFORE I CATCH ANY FLACK- yes I know smaller masses also tug on larger ones; but because electromagnetism is so vastly stronger, it takes a much larger body for gravity to overcome it and be noticed)
@musicfan16954 жыл бұрын
that's incredibly funny hahaha
@ASLUHLUHCE3 жыл бұрын
Brilliant
@lucasm53345 ай бұрын
Feynman's wife: why is there lipstick on you neck? Feynman:
@nateo2003 ай бұрын
Ahahaha
@Iruleyouforafee5 ай бұрын
This is the greatest version of: "I can explain it, but I'm not sure how much of it you would understand" that anyone has ever said.
@schmetterling44775 ай бұрын
The sad thing is that he would have been able to explain the answer to the actual question quite well. He just didn't hear it. Watch the video carefully. You will notice that he was very tired. His eyes were glazing over when the interviewer asked the actual question at the ten second mark. He didn't get it and he misunderstood what he was being asked to explain. The whole thing went down from there because what he thought he was being asked is not a physics question that can be answered in anything less than a whole semester course called "Magnetism", which is so awful that I hope that you will never be required to take it. I was. ;-)
@johnjordan603215 күн бұрын
Not really, it’s more of a “we don’t f*ckn know so what do you want me to tell you?”
@Iruleyouforafee13 күн бұрын
@@johnjordan6032 he clearly knows. He just explained it quite clearly.
@dianevandenhaak4682 күн бұрын
That is exactly it! A very long polite way to say" You wouldn't understand" Beautiful!
@thatsalex52983 жыл бұрын
Interviewer: Why do magnets repel each other? Feynman: You wouldn‘t get it...
@baedenmckell50433 жыл бұрын
perfect paraphrase
@ImHeadshotSniper3 жыл бұрын
the very moment when Feynman says "when you explain a why, you have to be in a framework where you allow something to be true, otherwise you're perpetually asking why", i believe it makes it very clear that his soul purpose in life is to EDUCATE in the form of changing peoples viewpoints to always consider the "Scientific Method", even if you're a simple person such as this interviewer who Feynman likely knows very well will have no interest in actually studying magnets to actually understand them. i believe he is basically saying, unless you really take the effort the understand the fundamentals of literally every single aspect of the question you're asking via experiment or experimental data, then your knowledge of that question is entirely based on what you read/see/ or are told. this may be because i just finished watching his Scientific Method video as well, but to me it seems he basically found it very reasonable to apply the Scientific Method to any aspect of life as lets you take into account all possible biases in the situation which can be incredibly helpful for solving problems, and literally every single thing you do in life could be considered a problem you can solve.
@Jayhhardy3 жыл бұрын
Simple answer
@rishabhroy17743 жыл бұрын
@@ImHeadshotSniper May I have the link for the Scientific Method video please.
@rishabhroy17743 жыл бұрын
@@ImHeadshotSniper Thanks!
@yorkerold4 жыл бұрын
This is how you give your job interviewer an existential crisis.
@waldwassermann4 жыл бұрын
I actually suggest anyone having an existential crisis to watch these videos. Perhaps that's how we all got here.
@joshuarohantitchener73954 жыл бұрын
That is the intended effect
@KibyNykraft3 жыл бұрын
You're joking. He barely gave a high school teacher answer of BASICS, and mostly just avoids the question.
@AppleOfThineEye3 жыл бұрын
@@KibyNykraft Splish splash your opinion is trash
@djoakeydoakey10763 жыл бұрын
@@AppleOfThineEye Why did I find your comment funny?
@charleshirst62202 жыл бұрын
I have watched this so many times over te years that I almost know it off by heart; and yet, when I bump into it again I cannot resist istening to it yet again.
@schmetterling44772 жыл бұрын
Yes, there is something magic about Feynman making a fool of himself, isn't it?
@ronniechilds2002 Жыл бұрын
Same here. I've also watched his famous lecture series several times. Never fails to draw me in.
@anthonymusto3537 Жыл бұрын
Why?
@alexanderviolinist Жыл бұрын
Bacause you do not understand why.
@animalbird9436 Жыл бұрын
@@alexanderviolinist comes after x and b4 z. Lol
@etherealstars5766 Жыл бұрын
This is why I LOVE the "Explained In 5 Levels" Series on KZfaq, covering all sorts of different subjects. You get to see the cut off in your own understanding, and the deepening of the explanations as they get more technical, but also the beauty in how complex things arise from simple concepts in a progression of stacking and intertwining knowledge.
@pierre-yvesmachavoine4983 Жыл бұрын
well worded
@AdelaideBen1 Жыл бұрын
That's true - but the point is, you can start with the simple... and become more complex/nuanced. This video is the example of someone saying, it's ok you don't understand, you are dumb and don't need to. Learning should be focused (and this is a modern view) on the rising-lifts-all-boats. We need to encourage that the answers are easy, but the understanding is hard. If we can get more people past the first hurdle, the later ones become incrementally easier.
@hitchslap825410 ай бұрын
Thanks. Just looked it up!
@TheArrowedKnee8 ай бұрын
Exactly what i thought of when he started talking about the different kind of levels of his hospital analogy
@Atombender5 жыл бұрын
Interviewer: "Magnets? How do they work?" Feynman: "Listen...hospitals..."
@logicalapple_32744 жыл бұрын
deserves more likes
@aldrinb.e42974 жыл бұрын
Lol
@elietheprof56784 жыл бұрын
Real juggalos don't wanna talk to a scientist...
@gregoryjclark814 жыл бұрын
@@elietheprof5678 Real scientists prefer zero association with Juggalos, real or fake, let alone conversation...
@SolaceInHD4 жыл бұрын
Ya I'm a scientist and I don't want anything to do with juggalos
@danielisenberg23602 жыл бұрын
I just had an epiphany. This is why young kids ask "why?" over and over. They don't have the framework with which to understand the answer that those with more experience understand intuitively.
@schmetterling44772 жыл бұрын
That's cool, but just like every other little kid in this comment section you missed the question at 0:10. :-)
@hugobraat21042 жыл бұрын
Epiphany? You mean you used to think they asked why to annoy you?
@MovementLiquid2 жыл бұрын
@@schmetterling4477 I think you missed the rest of the video between 0:00 and 7:32 :-)
@schmetterling44772 жыл бұрын
@@MovementLiquid When Feynman has a meltdown because, like you, he didn't listen carefully at 0:10? No, I didn't miss that, but that's Feynman's shame and yours. :-)
@nielsendc12 жыл бұрын
I have a 3 year old asking why all the time and i actually just had the exact same thought. I think there is definitely some truth in that.
@brianthesnail38152 жыл бұрын
I did my undergraduate science degree at Oxford the unique system there is based on weekly tutorials with your tutor and a relatively few lectures and laboratory practical. Every week you are asked to write an essay on a topic you have not studied before and the tutor marks it and you discuss for an hour. I say 'discuss but your tutor is quite possibly someone like Richard Feynman and after three or four years of being exposed to that EVERY week all I can say is what doesn't kill you makes you stronger. Academic people like Richard Feynman can go from asking the most annoyingly and intensely frustratingly simple question to blowing your mind in 3 minutes. Ask a question so simple a mere mortal (or undergraduate) can't understand why its even being asked and then suddenly reveal to them that everything they thought they understood has been torn apart along with their essay. Its a level of intelligence and thinking which is extraordinary as this clip shows.
@schmetterling44772 жыл бұрын
Well, they certainly didn't teach you how to write essays. ;-)
@paulgilbert2506 Жыл бұрын
Sadly, not many people grasp this as evidenced by many of the comments.
@user-nz6rz9bb9o6 ай бұрын
Hi, I’m in my first year, and I would like to get a better understanding of what you were talking about, would it be possible to somehow give an example of the essay you wrote about?
@brianthesnail38156 ай бұрын
@@user-nz6rz9bb9o Typically you will just be given an essay title to write about. Mostly you will never have had a lecture on it. Then you will be expected to go away, research the topic by reading original academic research and authoritative books. Your tutor will probably give you a reading list of papers to get you started but you will be expected to read more than that. Then you write your essay. Then you hand it in. Then you go to your tutorial (usually with a few other students) and discuss your essay. Its that simple. During the tutorial you will be asked to defend and discuss and consider everything you have written or ever thought about the topic. Your tutor is trying to teach you to think. The tutor is there to train you be an academic thinker. Your tutor doesn't teach you facts but will correct any obvious errors in your essay with written comments. I was a biochemist - so an essay title might be 'Ribosomes and their role in protein synthesis: what we know and don't know'. 1500 words
@NeonKnightXDАй бұрын
I bet at first the interviewer felt ashamed for asking the question, but after few minutes of Feynman giving this EPIC speech, he couldn't have felt any better about asking it :D
@AlanCanon222223 күн бұрын
That would be Christopher Sykes, who, when asked once what he did for a living, replied, "I make films about Richard Feynman".
@schmetterling447720 күн бұрын
The interviewer had nothing to feel ashamed about. It is Feynman who doesn't hear one of the finest science questions that one can possibly ask. Neither is Feynman in a good situation here because in an interview the man with the camera always has the upper hand. If he decides to show one of your weakest performances as a human being, then you are toast. And, yes, that is what the interviewer did here.
@automotive47417 күн бұрын
A good interviewer.
@513morris4 жыл бұрын
If he had only asked him why ice is slippery, he might have found out more about how magnets work.
@kamuelalee4 жыл бұрын
Makes sense
@orangecanary26884 жыл бұрын
You must be all doing this for your exams and you are just expecting to get quick answers:))
@jamilaaissi70934 жыл бұрын
Loooooooool
@saulsavelis5754 жыл бұрын
but he explained why ice is slippery
@ardeleanion44354 жыл бұрын
LOL
@Saturn-uz6jc4 жыл бұрын
Interviewer: Why? Feynman: I'm boutta end this whole man's career
@PartiallyAgonized4 жыл бұрын
No, you were bout to leave the most original comment on KZfaq.
@stef25ify4 жыл бұрын
I made is this far down the comments before pretty much pissing my pants with laughter
@squamish42444 жыл бұрын
And his sanity.
@MovieAnalystTelugu4 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much brother. This one made my day
@thelaurels133 жыл бұрын
Nobody ever says that bone head! Such an unoriginal cretinous comment.
@esoteric404 Жыл бұрын
i could literally listen to this guy speak for hours and never get bored.
@deanthemachine96 Жыл бұрын
I don’t think he would either
@AdelaideBen1 Жыл бұрын
@@deanthemachine96 The funniest comment I've read so far. Spot on.
@zlcoolboy2 жыл бұрын
I've heard of him, but I had no idea I would be such huge fan of him from one video. The title of the video is perfect.
@Ixions3 жыл бұрын
"Sir, this is a McDonald's drive-thru...."
@Jayhhardy3 жыл бұрын
What do you mean by would I "like" fries with that? What do think it means to like? Let me explain weather we are even able to like in the way you think you like things. We can't. Do I want fries? Yes please.
@adamtibbo73063 жыл бұрын
You win
@mickeymcnaughton25553 жыл бұрын
@@Jayhhardy But why does he (or she) ask the question; What do you mean by would I "like" fries with that? Probably because the McDonald's drive through assistant DIDN'T ask; DO you WANT fries with that?, Because he (or she) has probably been instructed to use the word, "like" when a customer orders, because it is a positive sales reinforcement technique.
@painstruck013 жыл бұрын
he'd make an excellent McDonald's manager. "sir, why are my fries cold?"
@attiylanen3 жыл бұрын
LOL 🤣
@billpaxton75254 жыл бұрын
Imagine him at a job interview.
@riku48614 жыл бұрын
Bill Paxton lmao
@droptak4 жыл бұрын
Why do you want this job?
@cetinakkaya46074 жыл бұрын
Bill paxton Boss : 'Why' should we hire you? Feynman : listen , because the ice slippery and so...
@bencorrigan27024 жыл бұрын
Great comment!
@wick94624 жыл бұрын
This was the funniest comment
@brandenharding88642 жыл бұрын
This man just verbally described every experience I've ever had with wikipedia over the last 15 years.
@schmetterling44772 жыл бұрын
Wikipedia does not replace the science library. People who already know the subject and can tell the quality from the bullshit articles can get something out of it, but if you think that it will do you any good as a naive user, think again.
@ValleysOfRain8 ай бұрын
@@schmetterling4477 Wikipedia is a good starting point and general summary. You should always check the cited sources (that's why Wikipedia puts up big red banners warning of articles which have insufficient or low quality citations), but Wikipedia is a useful resource. A scientific library is more powerful _but more specialized_ , and requires an existing working understanding of the topic to be of use. Most papers on mathematics are impenetrable for anyone without a university level education.
@KostasAlbanidis2 жыл бұрын
He *actually answered* the question ( electrical forces ) but he stated "I can not answer your question..." because in a truly genius way he limited the scope of the answer to the understanding capacity of the receiver. There is nothing bad here. He is not meaning the receiver can not understand, it is the old paradigm of the kid that is trying to fill up the hole in the beach with the ocean. No matter how many buckets of sea water the ocean will be in his position and the hole empty... Still the kid will keep trying and truly remarkable teachers like Feynman will point out *why* the whole is still empty...
@vigilante8374 Жыл бұрын
Actually, if you look closely he half-answered the question: he answered about repulsive forces but then he said he couldn't answer about attractive, because there was nothing else he could compare it to.
@KostasAlbanidis Жыл бұрын
@@vigilante8374 "The best teachers are those who show you where to look, but don't tell you what to see." [ Alexandra K. Trenfor ] 🙂
@vigilante8374 Жыл бұрын
@@KostasAlbanidis Oh it wasn't a criticism. I think this was brilliant; it's just interesting how there's a wide diversity of ways of summarizing what Feynman was and was not saying. It's almost like "The Dress".
@KostasAlbanidis Жыл бұрын
@@vigilante8374 "The Dress" is a lie. There is no color. Color is a human construct. ;-)
@vigilante8374 Жыл бұрын
@@KostasAlbanidis Math, optics and the Standard Model are human constructs to make sense of qualia, including but not limited to color. Ego, perceived color is more fundamental (less of a construct) than any rigorous method one has of describing it.
@stefanserofuggsgiven29813 жыл бұрын
Teacher: Why did you forget homework!? Me: See, when you ask why something happens....
@IanDoesMagic3 жыл бұрын
You are the real genius here. Thank you.
@IanDoesMagic3 жыл бұрын
@vladimir putin is andrei panin jfk is jimmy carter How do you know that you're not hallucinating right now and just responding to things you've imagined? Ultimately we can be certain of very little, but if something has been verified by enough other people, it's worth trusting them. If we try to verify every detail of every piece of information in our life we won't have time for stuff like ice cream or youtube.
@qnm77043 жыл бұрын
😂🤣
@user-fc5wq3sb4f3 жыл бұрын
Thats an excellent question.
@shashwatprakash85163 жыл бұрын
You are a fing genius you
@IronCandyNotes4 жыл бұрын
Your mind doesn't have the packages installed required to run this explanation.
@gilbert6914 жыл бұрын
Hahahah
@crawfordking36574 жыл бұрын
npm i -g physics
@joinmeki4 жыл бұрын
Hahahaha
@SunnyBhattacharjeeAboutME4 жыл бұрын
Hahaha 😂
@4inaftermath4544 жыл бұрын
smh what???
@SimonGeraedts Жыл бұрын
I could listen to this man for hours. The way he sees and describes the world is just so incredibly unique. I guess this is how a super intelligent alien would have answered that question. Never take anything for granted, always stay curious. 😊
@jianhushi21510 ай бұрын
An ordinary man is eager to tell you what he knows. An extraordinary man goes to great lengths to tell you what he doesn't know. By the time he is done, you know 10x more than what you asked for.
@schmetterling447710 ай бұрын
But you didn't get your question answered, though. You just got bullshit about rubber. ;-)
@santiagoo.89589 ай бұрын
@@schmetterling4477how would you answer that question?
@psychicbink44923 жыл бұрын
2 lessons I perceive: 1. Asking "why" allows to start on the journey of discovery 2. Discovery ends only when the observer decides that they are done searching
@peacock14263 жыл бұрын
Genius!
@bushcraftadventure52153 жыл бұрын
or invokes a God was responsible.
@pinjaannoying19423 жыл бұрын
@@bushcraftadventure5215 or your fucking ass keeps picking on religious people
@blablabla555553 жыл бұрын
Or when they die
@bushcraftadventure52153 жыл бұрын
@@pinjaannoying1942 triggered
@maksimkuzmin52463 жыл бұрын
Imagine him answering the question: "Why do you want to work for our company?"
@ThexXxXxOLOxXxXx3 жыл бұрын
Recruiter: He talks a lot of stuff i dont understand.. HIERED!
@martinchitembo18833 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂this comment is underestimated.
@jamesdoolan80403 жыл бұрын
'I don't want to work for you. I just need the money'
@ThexXxXxOLOxXxXx3 жыл бұрын
@@jamesdoolan8040 This answer always gets you the job guaranteed.
@Yus14093 жыл бұрын
😂🤣😂
@ShoeibShargo Жыл бұрын
"No Aunt Minnie were harmed in the making of this video."
@jasontyler21852 жыл бұрын
At 6:35 he gets so excited about his own epiphany connecting restorative force and electric attraction. This man never really prepared in advance exactly what he was going to say he just rolled it out in his own ad lib ingenious way. Beautiful.
@schmetterling44772 жыл бұрын
Also completely false on every possible level. ;-)
@thomazmartins8621 Жыл бұрын
@@schmetterling4477 How so?
@schmetterling4477 Жыл бұрын
@@thomazmartins8621 It's bullshit. ;-)
@thomazmartins8621 Жыл бұрын
@@schmetterling4477 Restoring forces in rubber bands are absolutely caused by electrical forces, how's that bullshit?
@schmetterling4477 Жыл бұрын
@@thomazmartins8621 Nobody asked anything about rubber. :-)
@Euquila4 жыл бұрын
come here to learn about magnets. left with an anxiety attack and an existential crisis.
@CaptApril1234 жыл бұрын
That's why there's a certain advantage in being dumb.
@Declan_Lyons4 жыл бұрын
How does an existential crises feel?
@Yorkie-UK4 жыл бұрын
@@Declan_Lyons I would say it feels with the force of rubber bands but I would be cheating...
@gilbert6914 жыл бұрын
I WONT take all day to explain to you "why" you made me laugh. Just accept that it was fucking funny.
@ALPalmos4 жыл бұрын
This particular thread has made my day. Cackling. Thank-you!
@TheRealGuywithoutaMustache2 жыл бұрын
"Why" HIm: "And I took that personally."
@user-iu5pe7xz2j2 жыл бұрын
u dont understand
@crissssseee2 жыл бұрын
u don't understand
@Numidium_2 жыл бұрын
You won’t reply to me 😭 but how are you doing 😊
@Adhithya20032 жыл бұрын
u don't understand
@pavithranloganathan20072 жыл бұрын
u dont understand
@GeorgeZoto Жыл бұрын
Excellent answer with so many beautiful analogies ♥️
@russellbrown3526 Жыл бұрын
I wasn't "feeling so good", but this put a big smile on my face. :)
@albus235 Жыл бұрын
Mine too ✨🌸
@albus235 Жыл бұрын
After watching full interview of 1 hr 6 minutes
@vikasbiliye5023 Жыл бұрын
Why?
@saltstillwaters75062 жыл бұрын
Interviewer: So why did Aunt Minnie go to the hospital? Feynman: Ok so magnets...
@majorpeg85342 жыл бұрын
Underrated
@kryrins2 жыл бұрын
why?
@XENOS10102 жыл бұрын
Billy Herrington: Ok maggots...
@leon320gb2 жыл бұрын
genius
@varma1012 жыл бұрын
@Berta Maria Mota It's a joke, chill
@marthinus_28055 жыл бұрын
Me: Hey Richard, what day is it? Him: Well, first you have to understand what a day is.
@entrancemperium55064 жыл бұрын
Here is a better analogy: Why today is Monday?
@robjohnson5914 жыл бұрын
no. you ask him "what is today" Feynman: "Well, first you have to know what day it is NOT. Me: "Just answer the damn question! What is the truth!?" Feyman: You can't handle the truth!
@Robbo19669 ай бұрын
This is brilliant, I keep coming back to this one to, most people seem not interested or devote the time to understanding the deeper meaning to fundamental questions, rather want quick answer to satisfy limited understanding.
@ImKat46 Жыл бұрын
I absolutely adore Richard Feynman. I've read his autobiographies of the time he was at Los Alamos, the death of his first wife, Brazil learning to play bongos and drums, Professor at Cal Tech, to discovering how an O Ring was responsible for the 1986 Challenger's mid air explosion, and his passing. I know simple mathematics, that's it. Quantum Physics is a foreign language. However because of Richard teaching and sharing stories, I understand it on a non verbal level... If that makes any sense. Love him. 💖
@schmetterling4477 Жыл бұрын
If you understand it the way he explained it, then you don't understand it. I used to tell people to read his layman's book about QED. I don't do that any longer. I think his explanation makes it actually harder to understand quantum mechanics, not easier. It is not completely wrong, of course, but it has some serious flaws.
@irtheLeGiOn11 ай бұрын
@@schmetterling4477 That is literally what he is saying towards the end of this interview.
@schmetterling447711 ай бұрын
@@irtheLeGiOn He simply realized that he messed up and feels bad. That has nothing to do with the correct explanation for quantum mechanics.
@wasiurrahmanXstudieswork11 ай бұрын
@@schmetterling4477 your just a hater spreading your bs opinions around the comment section about the most charming intellect of his time. seriously nobody cares about your sh!t opinions (or should i say stupidity), nobody has the time to care about a lifeless person. actually why dont you try get a job that might give your meaningless existence some depth of life in it.
@johnwallace762910 ай бұрын
Did you also learn how he seduced students to have sex with him?
@david-barna3 жыл бұрын
"Your aunt Minnie is in the hospital." - Feynman on magnetism
@jlonzoy3 жыл бұрын
Why? - Aunt Minnie on broke hip
@curtisa1882 жыл бұрын
this is the most relevant summary
@curtisa1882 жыл бұрын
•aunt minnie is in the hospital •ice is slippery •some husband aren't interested in their wife's welfare and are drunks •grease is wet and slimy •ordinary people don't know anything •if you put your hand on the chair it pushes you back •i can't explain it revise for test
@ayushmishra12292 жыл бұрын
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@Carfeu2 жыл бұрын
If you know why she slipped it’s because of quantum gravity
@nvsabhishek73563 жыл бұрын
His last question to himself: "WHY did I ask him this?!!"
@Cognitoman3 жыл бұрын
Lol
@aparnaiyer78883 жыл бұрын
🤣🤣🤣
@ptzfingerstyle97003 жыл бұрын
lol underrated
@maksimkuzmin52463 жыл бұрын
You see when you ask why you did something...
@imarchello3 жыл бұрын
goes insane
@jhsdfjhgjh2 жыл бұрын
Now I know why my toddler has so many WHY questions as the resulting answer helps him understand much more about the world around him.. Many of these facts are fascinating to him while grownups are so used to it, they really don't care..
@phj2239 ай бұрын
In the recent movie Oppenheimer, this guy was played by Hughie from The Boys.
@professormburatto71724 жыл бұрын
Imagine a world with more teachers like this man. I wish I had teachers like him.
@leefithian37044 жыл бұрын
Yes , he expands your methods of thinking about anything , it makes you more analytical about everything and gives you wisdom in dealing with the world around you at a safer level than just the simple mthd of not exploring he “why” deeper , it’s a survival skill multiplier , so to speak , if you choose to use the informationsafely
@joshuarohantitchener73954 жыл бұрын
He exists across dimensions and space you will meet him again when you finally confront your own suffering on your terms
@sgigi48394 жыл бұрын
that would be awful. they're all boring now.
@Oscar_Armstrong4 жыл бұрын
This man is an amazing philosopher but would make a horrendous teacher. A teacher teaches, they don't question why, they teach you why.
@martinch.62574 жыл бұрын
@@Oscar_Armstrong you do realize that he did, in fact, teach, and produce some of the best known lectures on physics?
@aubreyscott60585 жыл бұрын
It's so neat how he detected the interviewer getting defensive and calmed him by saying "No, it's an excellent question!"
@MarsLonsen5 жыл бұрын
How? It's very human to detect the feelings of other humans and other living beings.
@vikitheviki5 жыл бұрын
@@MarsLonsen Watch the clip again LOL
@MarsLonsen5 жыл бұрын
@@vikitheviki eh no LOL
@MarsLonsen5 жыл бұрын
@@vikitheviki tell me why its neat or stop wasting my time.
@Izkapts5 жыл бұрын
@@MarsLonsen Well, first you ask how did he detect it and I might tell you that he perceived it with his senses, but then you might ask how do senses tell us things. Then I might say that our sensory system consists of sensory organs that perceive outside stimuli and deliver it through a neural network to our brains. Then you might ask ''how come we have such sensory organs'' and so on... That's interesting.
@user-oi3yb7mm7h Жыл бұрын
Blessings come from a generous heart. Those who give are the most blessed.
@valevisa842911 ай бұрын
My father was the same.He would start with a subject,jump from that to a second one ,third one,forth one etc.,and finally after 15 minutes he will come back and explain the first one.Drove me crazy.
@CyclonicTuna0233 жыл бұрын
Interviewer: Why... Feynman: First of all, that's incorrect.
@stephandalton23902 жыл бұрын
Hollering LOL!!!!!! comment of the year
@neithere2 жыл бұрын
This... is... not at all what happened.....
@fujihita25004 жыл бұрын
Interviewer: "Why must you give a long lecture on why?" Feynman: "So you have chosen death."
@devanshsingh33694 жыл бұрын
I would've liked this comment, but it was on 69 likes and i didn't wanted to be that guy who stops another person from smiling.
@odyseuszkoskiniotis62663 жыл бұрын
The question was indeed stupid, and he has foreseen it and he replied in a way that would completely psychologically surprise interviewer
@razormilkyway84443 жыл бұрын
@@odyseuszkoskiniotis6266 what? No. I will ask the same thing.
@STyl8883 жыл бұрын
AHAHAHAHAAHAHAAHAHAAHAHA
@labsanta Жыл бұрын
My learnings The importance of curiosity: Richard Feynman emphasizes the value of curiosity and questioning the world around us. He believes that asking why is essential to understanding how things work. The need for a framework: Feynman suggests that to explain why something happens, we need to have a framework that allows us to accept certain things as true. Without this framework, we can fall into an infinite loop of questioning. Understanding complexity: Feynman acknowledges that the world is a complex place, and explaining why something happens is not always straightforward. It may require digging deeper and exploring various directions. Question everything: Don't accept things at face value. Always ask questions and seek to understand how things work. Have a framework: To explain why something happens, develop a framework that allows you to accept certain things as true. Go deeper: When you get an answer to a why question, don't stop there. Ask why again, and keep digging deeper to gain a more profound understanding. Imagine yourself as an explorer in a vast jungle. You come across a beautiful waterfall and wonder how it was created. To understand the waterfall's origin, you must first develop a framework that allows you to accept certain things as true. You understand that water flows downhill, and it takes a long time for a river to erode rock and create a waterfall. You then start asking why questions. Why does water flow downhill? Why does it take a long time for a river to erode rock? As you delve deeper, you begin to discover the complexity of the natural world. You learn about gravity, erosion, and the forces that shape our planet. start by cultivating your curiosity. Ask questions and seek to understand how things work. Develop a framework that allows you to accept certain things as true. When you get an answer to a why question, don't stop there. Keep digging deeper to gain a more profound understanding. For example, if you're learning about a new subject, don't just memorize facts. Try to understand why things work the way they do. Ask questions and explore different angles. By doing so, you'll gain a deeper understanding and be able to apply that knowledge in new and creative ways. Everything in the universe is governed by fundamental forces, including electrical, magnetic, and gravitational forces. These forces are intertwined and intimately related to each other. The behavior of these forces can be explained and predicted using scientific principles and laws. Tactics: Study and understand the principles and laws governing the forces. Observe and experiment to test and validate these principles and laws. Apply the principles and laws to solve real-world problems and create new technologies. Metaphoric Map: Think of the principles and laws governing the forces as a map that guides us through the complexities of the universe. Just as a map helps us navigate and understand a physical landscape, the principles and laws help us navigate and understand the invisible forces that govern the behavior of matter and energy. Learn the basic principles and laws governing the forces through studying physics and other related fields. Practice observing and experimenting to test and validate these principles and laws. Apply these principles and laws to solve real-world problems, such as developing new technologies that use magnetic or electrical forces, or designing structures that can withstand gravitational forces.
@Bernhardseckm10 ай бұрын
Now you can publish a book
@ShubhamSharma-hm3sb4 ай бұрын
Great 👍
@automotive47417 күн бұрын
And yet he goes "WHADDYA MEAN WHY?" lol
@johnarmstrong68672 жыл бұрын
This is a WONDERFUL insight into Feynman's integrity and thought
@edithbannerman47 ай бұрын
@Hello there, how are you doing this blessed day?
@Luisp0t3 жыл бұрын
I can’t explain that magnetic attraction in terms of anything that’s familiar to you
@CarlosGomes-yc3nm3 жыл бұрын
That's a good one.
@Cometer3 жыл бұрын
And with that thousands decided to study physics.
@aristotle_45323 жыл бұрын
At any level besides a gross practically useful one.
@ahnaffarhan80283 жыл бұрын
because I don't understand in terms of anything else that's you are more familiar with.
@MPHOSADIKI-vu8rx3 жыл бұрын
Man I love your content.
@GreenEnvy.3 жыл бұрын
*Gives Richard a snicker bar* Feynman: "I see, it turns out I was just hungry."
@user-uy4jc3zz5p3 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂
@beatles77983 жыл бұрын
I laughed hard
@ksg78823 жыл бұрын
best comment LOL XDDDDDDDDD
@ozzylepunknown5513 жыл бұрын
But why?
@enblanchard54923 жыл бұрын
God. A fire comment
@anthonydecarvalho652 Жыл бұрын
Marvelous! What an extraordinary man he was.
@tarikb.949711 ай бұрын
This is a concentrate, illustrated and elaborate course of scientific methodology. I just love it 💕💕😍🤩💓🤩😍💕💕
@amityadav854 жыл бұрын
me : why didn't you recommend this video sooner!? youtube: ok, so semiconductors.. . .
@shashank_srivastava4 жыл бұрын
😂😂👌👌
@chandramouli31064 жыл бұрын
Why semiconductor?
@amityadav854 жыл бұрын
@@chandramouli3106 err.. Semiconductor materials are at the core of a computer processor.. Feynman is sure to go into that level of detail! 🤣
@kairostimeYT4 жыл бұрын
Why are they used in computer core?
@amityadav854 жыл бұрын
@@kairostimeYT what do you mean why are they used in the computer core? 😂
@NorroTaku2 жыл бұрын
this is exactly the kind of depth I wanted to hear as a kid ^^
@filippetersen13042 жыл бұрын
yes, yes! I totally agree! And as a father of a 7 year old child I hope that every time I tend to be anoyed by the billion questions a day I will remember this clip and very calmy explain the things, just the way they are and how "I"! understand them to my boy - in HIS language :-)
@David-ku6dm2 жыл бұрын
Well said
@mik9napkin5982 жыл бұрын
Just means you (and all of us) need to learn enough to provide this level of knowledge and intrigue for kids today.
@orthopraxis2352 жыл бұрын
What this shows is that you are capable of many levels of understanding as a kid. The educational system in public and some private schools today wants to keep your stupid, so they provide stupid answers, the same stupid answers that Feyman is unwilling to use. Kids want to and understand the need to get it completely right. Adults don't want to take the time to indulge them.
@nickwilton68222 жыл бұрын
Why?
@SK-vg3xh Жыл бұрын
Thats just beautiful ❤️
@avral41488 ай бұрын
He was an artist in explaining very basic things ❤
@mrfashionguy18 ай бұрын
Nothing he explained was basic, he made it simple to understand though
@schmetterling44778 ай бұрын
@@mrfashionguy1 He didn't explain anything and he definitely didn't answer the question. Oh, wait, you don't know what the question was, either. ;-)
@sharptongue29724 жыл бұрын
I agree. When most people answer "why" questions, they are actually answering "how" at a superficial level.
@GrammeStudio4 жыл бұрын
i don't think Feynman draws the difference here. I don't think he thinks the interviewers was mistaking motive or an agency behind natural phenomena. I think he sees the interviewers curiosity to ask such an interesting question about physics to be the start of an inquiry that if the interviewers is being scientific, would lead to a series of questions that would eventually bring him to the most fundamental question--a question about the fundamental forces. and so he's answering the question that would be asked in the future and pointing out that at the end of the would-be series of inquiry, the questioner would have to be contend with not knowing further because that's as far as one could explain. this fundamental premise is known as axiom. a valid axiom can be demonstrated by its alignment with reality--and hence verified with the senses.
@garysutherland70044 жыл бұрын
@@GrammeStudio Well, there is also no known answer for why magnets work. I think he could have answered honestly, but had the wherewithal to explain his reasoning. The answer is that no one knows why.
@subhadeepmanna71064 жыл бұрын
How?
@shrawan123214 жыл бұрын
@clayfame I used to think the same. But if I carefully analyze answers that I am satisfied with, they are merely descriptions as well. More importantly, we can differentiate actual descriptions from false ones by being able to correctly predict outcomes of yet unknown scenarios. Then i ask why am i satisfied with some descriptions while a few others leave a bad taste (or a certain kind of uneasiness in accepting). The only answer I can come up with is randomness of my mental state of acceptance.. Given an alternate universe, I might have been satisfied and dissatisfied with completely different sets of descriptions.
@edek31593 жыл бұрын
@@garysutherland7004 That's simply not true. There are varying levels to what 'understanding' is. As eloquently explained by Feynman in this video, there are varying depths of understanding how magnets work, that varies among different people. Eg. a university student will know more about how magnets work than say a child. Sure, we may not know how magnets work to the deepest level of quantum physics, but just because we do not, does not mean the answer is "no one knows".
@LazerC46 жыл бұрын
Nevermind bro, I will just google it
@1996Pinocchio5 жыл бұрын
LazerC4 So, tell me when you have found a satisfying answer using google.
@liveinshyam5 жыл бұрын
Legend says LazerC4 is still searching for an answer on google could not find a satisfying one except one of the results which is this video itself
@lawrencejohnson32595 жыл бұрын
Dheeraj V.S. LOL
@darthvader-ey4xw5 жыл бұрын
Snowflake
@JeanMarcGarin5 жыл бұрын
He's not really a "bro", you know...
@daibonehead2 жыл бұрын
A simple question that results in such an elaborate series of other questions. Simple in its own genius to elicit a shockwave of analysis from a recognised genius.
@erhanfindik254 Жыл бұрын
At the end of the video i was like "May the force be with you master." Great man, Feynman is !
@SnootchieBootchies272 жыл бұрын
This is why children get stuck in the "why" loop. It's the question that can't be answered.
@wavydavy98162 жыл бұрын
If you actually keep answering their questions they soon lose interest (normally when you mention doing some research) 🙄 hopefully well before you're completely out of your depth.
@midnattsol62072 жыл бұрын
@@wavydavy9816 it's very healthy for children to learn that their parents knowledge has limits and to present them these limits
@wavydavy98162 жыл бұрын
@@midnattsol6207 Yes. This is also true. But with small chlidren, when they get stuck in the why loop, they're rarely listening to what you're actually saying, they're playing a game. You play the game by answering the questions, but you're just playing the part of the person delivering a set-up line for the child. You can tell when a child is genuinely inerested in obtaining information to answer questions, and I think the best way to help educate children these days is to demonstrate to them that they can educate themselves using the resources directly at hand. I tried to explain how lightening worked to my nephew when he was about 5 and quickly realized I _didn't know_ how lightening worked and we spent a good 20 minutes learning about it together on the computer. Job done! 👍
@midnattsol62072 жыл бұрын
@@wavydavy9816 Yeah, that's true also. Well done! :)
@timangar97712 жыл бұрын
@@wavydavy9816 noooo, when I was a kid I would ask my das questions for HOURS, and I was lucky enough to have a dad who was well educated and could answer a lot of them. But it always bugged me when we reached the "that's just how the universe works" point.
@NagCamagoni3 жыл бұрын
My mom : Why are you home this late? I can't explain why in any terms familiar to you. *shoe thrown at me*
@irshviralvideo3 жыл бұрын
rolf !!!
@christy39712 жыл бұрын
The last thing I remember was a shoe flying towards me 😂
@DickiMonster2 жыл бұрын
Primitive mom
@francisofthefilth88292 жыл бұрын
@@irshviralvideo Rolling on the laughing floor. My floor also laughs at me sometimes. I stopped rolling on it since that time it tried swallowing me though. Don't piss off your floor. It's friendlier when it's laughing. Much friendlier. Oh god.. so much friendlier...
@Fb-gj5rn Жыл бұрын
Yeah that’s really a good way to look at things. Once one questioned is answered, what other questions arise after it to truly understand the full picture. I try to do this constantly with things I talk to myself about
@conscience580 Жыл бұрын
This is the best answer to a 'why' question i have ever seen. His final answer at the end is humbling - "I really can't do a good job, any job, in terms of explaining it in terms of something else that you are more familiar with, because i don't understand it in terms of anything else you are more familiar with"
@schmetterling4477 Жыл бұрын
There was no why in the question at 0:10. You simply didn't listen to it. ;-) Here is how you answer why questions in science: Why is the sky blue? Because of Rayleigh scattering. Don't make a fool of yourself, my friend. It's bad enough that Feynman did that, already.
@Gigasimo456 Жыл бұрын
@@schmetterling4477 Learn english then rewatch the video, i guess. The first two questions did not make sense. My thoughts: "what's the feeling" - you're feeling the force, like any other thing you can feel with your body... was that really the question you wanted to ask? "there's something there" - there's nothing between them, it's obvious - that can't be what you actually want to know - you surely won't be satisfied by that. "what's going on" - for me it's already equivalent to asking "why", but Feynman took it literally. "why" - the question. And about your example ("why is the sky blue")... So if someone who does not know anything about Physics asks you that question, do you think that saying "it's Rayleigh Scattering" mean anything to him? Short answer is no, it's just a name - so congratulations, you did not answer his question. Be prepared for the following "what is Rayleigh Scattering" and then "why does it happen". Which is the whole point Feynman is making in this video. Again, learn english and then rewatch the video.
@schmetterling4477 Жыл бұрын
@@Gigasimo456 Yes, that was a huge pile of bullshit. I understood the actual question at 0:10 just fine. I can also answer it nicely. It's one of the deepest questions that one can ask and it has one of the most profound answers. If you don't understand that, then you simply don't know anything about modern physics. Which you don't. ;-) Why does what happen? Rayleigh scattering? Because you are not superman and you don't have x-ray vision, kid. Your eyes can only see wavelengths of visible light that are much longer than the size of air molecules. ;-) See how easy it is to make a fool of yourself. Next time... don't. ;-)
@barneymiller5488 Жыл бұрын
@@schmetterling4477 Feynman DID answer the question! It's YOU who won't answer the question "Do you love me?" Why do you torture me like this Ling! I can't take it!!!
@conscience580 Жыл бұрын
@@schmetterling4477 Well, making the same mistake as Feynman can't be that bad :) Although in this case, there was no mistake: the 'why' actually came at 0:38
@222ableVelo2 жыл бұрын
Wife to Husband: "Does this dress make me look fat?" Richard Feynman: "Don't worry I got this bro."
@freddiebauer58432 жыл бұрын
Know when you say "make"...
@JohnCena-yu4mj2 жыл бұрын
"it's not the dress that makes you look fat."
@everlastingideas86252 жыл бұрын
If we consider the wife to have a negative charge. The charge of the husband closely depends on his answer.
@kindnessfirst96702 жыл бұрын
He was too smart to answer with anything but a "no".
@notablediscomfort2 жыл бұрын
"Do try to understand that I haven't called you fat at any point leading up to this interaction. I clearly haven't shown that I think you're fat. I might notice it if I really look. But at this point I know I don't care. So to me, I have to say no, not at first glance. But now that you've put me in the mindset that you might be fat, I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say yes, it does. Not necessarily the dress alone, unfortunately. It definitely exasperates some visual features that people see more in someone they would call fat. I'm not calling you fat. But someone else might. So if someone else seeing you as fat is the issue you care about, then yes, the dress absolutely makes you look fat. I would go as far as to say some people would call you a heckin chonker. But that's not me. I didn't want to be here in the first place. I just wanna touch your butt and watch south park with you."
@BeSmarterFaster2 жыл бұрын
Feynman's ability to instantly delve deeply into the topic of "Why' with so many examples that are immediately relatable is really quite remarkable. He takes what seems to be on the surface a simple question and expounds on it to an extraordinarly deep level. He really was quite a fascinating person to listen to.
@walter41802 жыл бұрын
Sure but the dude just wanted an answer to how magnets work.
@voicetube2 жыл бұрын
@@walter4180 I'm with you Walter; in a sense, Feyman sort of gives a good reason as to why he didn't need to go into any of that. It's called "reading the room." It's pretty obvious to most people watching this video (or that film) that the dude asking wanted to know some of the inner workings of the physical universe that aren't so apparent on the surface as regards magnetism. If you go to my channel and watch my recent Vlog on magnetism, you will get a much clearer understanding of this magical force (that was a joke - I generally make an ass of myself - purposely :-) In any event, the basic principles of magnetism and why it seems like magic but the explanation of why it isn't maybe given in about one or two minutes would have sufficed.
@schmetterling44772 жыл бұрын
@@voicetube That's complete nonsense. Feynman simply messed up here. There was no need to start a rant about why questions. The initial question was "What is that feeling (force) between two magnets?". That is a perfectly fine physics question that has a straight forward answer. Why Feynman couldn't give it is a mystery to me.
@danielrelva2 жыл бұрын
@@schmetterling4477 because almost every question of magnetism doesn't have simple answers. He tried to say that on the beginning but the man wasnt satisfied. So Feynman just explained how his question will turn in another ten questions and will take hours to explain
@johncoops68972 жыл бұрын
@@schmetterling4477 - It's simply because he is such a smart-arse dickhead that he didn't know HOW to answer it. So smug and arrogant in his own self-righteousness, yet totally unable to answer the most simple question. There are various technical terms, including "fuckwit", "knob-jockey", "bell-end" and "tool".... mostly related to penises, however it's notable that a penis is a useful object.
@williemuonio164010 ай бұрын
“If you can’t explain it to a 6 year old you don’t understand it yourself” - Albert Einstein
@Parasmunt8 ай бұрын
This kind of gives the lie to Einstein's comment. Try explaining why ice is slippery and why ice expands etc going deeper as he did to a six year old.
@calitreesweet6 күн бұрын
i recently had to help a cousin of mine with his 6th grade project on magnets i was writing an introduction to how magnets work and it was super difficult to explain without talking about electron spins and orbitals and domains of a material... i resonate with what he said alot especially when he talked about cheating the answer with an anology. rip richard
@Undead84 жыл бұрын
When my daughter was about 2 years old, she went through a phase of asking "why" constantly. I would answer each question as best as I could, then she would ask another "why?", often to statements that were self-evident for me and everyone else. Seeing that video helped understand that she has a totally different framework than mine - she knows nothing about the world so everything needs to be explained to the most basic level. It would go on until she would have an answer that she understands in her framework or until she would not understand the words I was saying: "The car is white" - why? "hmm Because someone painted it white" - why? "Because I asked them to paint it white when I bought it" - why? "Because I like the color white, just like you like purple!" -oh... ok...
@PartiallyAgonized4 жыл бұрын
Umm yeah? I don't even have children and I knew this... this is something everyone already knows, you didn't need to spend the effort writing a whole novel about it.
@Jide-bq9yf4 жыл бұрын
Eric Yoon absolutely ; piss off @ Cousin Kyle .👎🏾
@smolytchannel50624 жыл бұрын
Lol I have a cousin who, when she says the why word, people just reply z and she just doesn't know how to come back from that
@Blubbha4 жыл бұрын
Best advice to keep trying to answer the whys. She will stop asking about the specifics after she feels to understand the deepest basics of it. Its something like the natural "first priciple".
@tonmoydeka73194 жыл бұрын
@@PartiallyAgonized how old are you?your words looks so childish
@Mussi932 жыл бұрын
Finally someone who gets straight to the point!
@goodisnipr Жыл бұрын
Pelosi could learn so much...
@21.parthjoshi20 Жыл бұрын
The whole point of the video is he didn't go straight to the point
@Thanos-hp1mw Жыл бұрын
@@21.parthjoshi20 he DID go straight to the point by saying "magnets repel each other" however he predicted the interviewer would ask 'why' again and had to tell him that he could not explain anything deeper than this. It seems like very few people listened to him speak.
@trollme.trollmehard.9524 Жыл бұрын
This was quite clear to me.
@Ligierthegreensun Жыл бұрын
@@goodisnipr Touch grass.
@jimw5299 Жыл бұрын
Humble Honest. A true genius of our time. R. I. P
@john123wayne9 ай бұрын
i have waited my entire life for this video. thank you.
@lewisburton18524 жыл бұрын
Imagine being his son and asking him where do babies come from.
@deidara_85984 жыл бұрын
He'll have you sit there for hours while he explains the entire history of life on earth and the details of child birth on a cellular level.
@dionlindsay24 жыл бұрын
@@deidara_8598 I bet he won't if the son stops asking why.
@Exosfear134 жыл бұрын
why are babies made.
@robertdale0014 жыл бұрын
hilarious!
@markgigiel27224 жыл бұрын
@@Exosfear13 Hormones and stupidity.
@WeSaveWe5 жыл бұрын
Brilliant. I will use this approach to answer my 5 year-old nephews' 'why' questions going forward.
@Pallum135 жыл бұрын
Why?
@m_c_frank5 жыл бұрын
try asking your nephew about his own opinion to the "why" question. That worked for me.
@lordgaulo65205 жыл бұрын
I use this method with my children they are the hyper active type and they naturally don't think much but they enjoy the mental aerobics of these types of questions I think your nephew will also enjoy this type of game
@DDanV4 жыл бұрын
You should rather listen to your 5 yo nephew's questions and wonder why yourself. That's actually the point Feynman makes: if you're curious enough you'll end up questioning why until you find the fundamental "why" that actually gives you fundamental and true understanding. We took more than 2 thousand years do find the "atom", that literally means uncuttable or indivisible, just to find out it wasn't the fundamental, smallest constituent unit of ordinary matter that the philosophers of old thought it was... so we asked "why" until we were satisfied just to discover 2 millenia after we didn't fully comprehend reality, we had an incomplete answer to our "why", and yet again we were asking "why", a new "why". I started out in Physics... I'll be asking why till the day I die. Your nephew is trying to understand the world, it's good that his curiosity still wasn't hampered and he still digs deeper on those why's, for as long as he does his understanding will deepen more than of those who stopped asking it earlier.
@crazydavec38614 жыл бұрын
When you're done with so many "Why's" go "What's the next to last letter of the alphabet?" ... "Why"... "Correct, well done!" :)
@memedaddies8 ай бұрын
I met a guy years ago who refused to answer “why” questions. It was one of my favorite things I ever learned from someone.
@UnknownMFe5 ай бұрын
He didn't just answer the raw question. He expanded my knowledge any provided me with entertainment. This is a great man
@schmetterling44775 ай бұрын
So what was the question the interviewer wanted to get answered? ;-)
@UnknownMFe5 ай бұрын
@@schmetterling4477The interviewer asked why the magnets repel eachother
@schmetterling44775 ай бұрын
@@UnknownMFe Listen to the question at the ten second mark, again: "What is the feeling between the two magnets?". It's not a why question but a what question. It doesn't ask about the mechanism inside the magnets that causes the magnetic field but it asks directly about the nature of the magnetic field itself. Why would the interviewer ask such a question? Because Feynman had received the Nobel Prize in physics for illuminating the mathematical structure of the theory of the field. Feynman didn't spend a waking second in his life on the question of how permanent magnetism works, as far as I know. That's a completely different and unrelated question to which no easy answer exists. What the field is, however, that much more fundamental question can be answered easily and it was Feynman's field of work.
@studio48nl4 жыл бұрын
Sagan: There are no stupid questions. Feynman: Why?
@johnjonjhonjonathanjohnson35594 жыл бұрын
stupid question: why is the earth flat
@studio48nl4 жыл бұрын
@@johnjonjhonjonathanjohnson3559 I do understand what you mean, but maybe the person is, not the question. According to Sagan, questions are not stupid because it's a 'method' to get information. If you tell the person (a child maybe), 'Earth is a sphere because of (proof)' and he/she goes 'ok', then it was not very stupid...
@johnjonjhonjonathanjohnson35594 жыл бұрын
but that doesnt answer the question, why is earth flat? an incorrect fact has been forced into the question thats why its stupid.
@Ometecuhtli4 жыл бұрын
Why is not a stupid question, and when Feynman says it is a good question he isn't patronizing, he's genuine in his response that it is difficult for him to answer it in a way that can be considered satisfactory to the interviewer. I'd have to transcribe what he says because I don't have a better way to explain it, it all depends on the reason for asking it is, whether your trying to understand forces, the way materials behave under certain circunstances, if you're interested in metallurgy, applications, curious about science, and so on. Sagan was talking about how as we grow up we start to take into account how we are perceived by our classmates, so the more pressure we feel the more we try to avoid questions that are considered 'stupid', and social animals that we are, we tend to ask 'safely', to supress the questions that would reveal our ignorance even if it's a perfectly good question and, as seems to be happening in the video, ask a question that we don't know if it's good or not, and not be really prepared for its answer.
@amellirizarry95034 жыл бұрын
in my opinion Feynman is way more badass than Sagan👌
@leftyfourguns3 жыл бұрын
Basically what he's saying is that he can't answer "why" magnets repel each other because giving you a definitive answer would not be truthful. There are so many things you need to understand and theories you need to accept as true to understand "why" magnets repel each other. And that's literally what scientists spend their whole lives doing. So unless you want to be a scientist and study physics, you just need to accept the known nature of magnetism. And this is why I love this guy so much. He purposely went on all those tangents and drew out the "answer" so long to demonstrate the fact that such a simple question only begets more and more questions, some of which we can't answer truthfully yet. It's not meant to insult the interviewer or anyone else, but only to illustrate how amazing science is and how much more we still have to learn. People who are fascinated by everything he said here may be encouraged to further their study of science. Everyone else will just go, "oh...okay..." and quickly accept that magnets repel each other because it's cool and sciency.
@AppleOfThineEye3 жыл бұрын
@Hearing.Chanting Remembering.Krsna Go fuck yourself.
@successfulatpeace3 жыл бұрын
Beautifully said.
@AppleOfThineEye3 жыл бұрын
@Hearing.Chanting Remembering.Krsna Again, go fuck yourself.
@leftyfourguns3 жыл бұрын
@TomG Gabin If you don't want to learn the science yourself (which takes a lot longer than a 10 minute KZfaq video can accomplish) then yes, you just need to trust the people who've dedicated their entire lives to it. If you chose to be both ignorant and skeptical, then that's on you and no one is under any obligation to cater to you.
@InternetUsername3 жыл бұрын
@Hearing.Chanting Remembering.Krsna: Are you just schizo-posting or something? You remind me of me when I'd experience great bi-polar mania. From your vantage, it all seems so substantial, so meaningful. To others (and even yourself a few hours later), you realize to the degree for which you've bastardized your own presentation of thought; tangentially and arbitrarily connecting dots doesn't automatically paint a picture of truth just because it feels interesting. Correlation =/= causation, etc. You've presented nothing that isn't in-of-itself a fallacy. You've only blasted an academic-buzzword confusion ray at everyone. Are you an only child? I only ask because having an older brother frequently saved me from the depraved hall-of-mirrors mindmaze that I'd frequently get lost in; familial, deeply personal self-scrutiny lending to a more effective self-awareness, providing points of reference. Such is often the case with sheltered, only child, _neurotypical_ children; they aren't periodically bullied back into reality and, in turn, believe that they're smarter, superior, and more intellectually unique when compared to their peers. If this is the case, you're looking forward to a decade of burned bridges and unrivalled bitterness. I can only imagine the hell I'd be living in if I didn't have a rope ladder to help me ascend from the pits on my own psychosis.
@John-ci8yk Жыл бұрын
With 12,000 comments I'm sure whatever I had to say was already said. So I'm just going to go with thank you for the time and effort you put into this video, thumbs up.
@thekinarbo8 ай бұрын
This non explanation reminds me of that quote that goes something like 'if you can't explain something simply you don't understand it very well.'
@4jonah4 жыл бұрын
3rd grade Teacher to Feynman on an English test: "What color was the balloon?" "What do you mean by what color? Color is a refractive index of light. Color is an illusion. You might as well ask me why sugar is sweet and salt is salty. That's a great question, let me explain. But first, tell you where taste actually comes from. It's an electro-neurological stimulus...." *5 pages later* "Anyway, I can't tell you what color it was because you don't know anything."
@drkarimalsalihi87854 жыл бұрын
Probably the best comment in this whole comment section
@oleole36084 жыл бұрын
Brilliant, rofl.
@cristianmartinez90914 жыл бұрын
This is why scientists need to be truly educated, meaning actually having the ability to think. And again, meaning that they become well versed in philosophy or at least epistemology. The nihilistic and amateurish conclusion that we know nothing is laughable at best.
@potusumanbibingka4 жыл бұрын
indead. 😂
@alexanderb62784 жыл бұрын
@@cristianmartinez9091 You're spouting sweet nothings. You claim that every scientist needs a background in philosophy because of... What? A physicist's long-winded response to an inane question? The fact he hurt your feelings by saying that you know nothing? Feynman wasn't perfect, but he was definitely not an ivory tower academic.
@kanatsizkanatli9 жыл бұрын
Wow! I mean, it's not just his explanation that is impressive, it's his ability to understand a question better than the person asking the question. He sees the inner workings of the mind of the interviewer, understands his motivation, notices a flaw or weakness in that mind and then sets out to repair or awaken that mind in that very precise and almost ruthless way of his!
@TheKwod9 жыл бұрын
Lol, he's a professional bullshitter.
@joedt19 жыл бұрын
TheKwod IS that what he won the Nobel for?
@TheKwod9 жыл бұрын
I suspect so, the committee does like to award prolific bullshitters at times.
@joedt19 жыл бұрын
TheKwod it was not the peace prize :) It was quantum physics :P
@TheKwod9 жыл бұрын
Not everyone believes in some of the mumbo jumbo of quantum physics.
@kurtmcfc16298 ай бұрын
nice of him to explain every conversation with my niece.. Why is the most fundemental question we humans have.
@AmikaofMan2 жыл бұрын
This has gotten me in trouble my ENTIRE LIFE. Asking a question can and becomes SO LOADED with so many intricacies that NO QUESTION is an EASY OR SIMPLE QUESTION
@schmetterling44772 жыл бұрын
Why did your keyboard break, though? :-)
@morbikdon52454 жыл бұрын
"You have to be in some framework that you allow something to be true. Otherwise you're perpetually asking why". What a great great neuron connections.
@joshuarohantitchener73954 жыл бұрын
morbikdon nothing is true everything is permitted as self imposed limits dictate and as ones own internal harmony harmonizes with the harmony of others or dis harmony so to speak Mr Anderson
@chrismcquaide2263 жыл бұрын
The beauty of mathematics encapsulated in a single sentence
@Sahilbc-wj8qk3 жыл бұрын
@@joshuarohantitchener7395 Nothing is true? Then mobile phones must not work. Or anything.
@fakeemail40052 жыл бұрын
@@joshuarohantitchener7395 If nothing is true then the statement "nothing is true" is also false, so it shall be disregarded
@onemanenclave5 жыл бұрын
"I can't explain that attraction in terms of anything else that's familiar to you." That sums it up well.
@fidziek5 жыл бұрын
Well, except how did Feynman know what exactly is familiar to that person asking questions. So he himself made some /pretty unjustified/ presumption about someone's knowledge or mental abilities... And he implied that he doesn't like that question, actually insulting his interlocutor.
@margaritasytcheva27305 жыл бұрын
@@fidziek The thing is, Electromagnetism is notoriously for being a very difficult topic to most people in the STEM disciplines and requires substantial prerequisite knowledge. If you go further than that (to describe the nature of forces within particles), you would be tackling Quantum Mechanics, which kills all. So, unless Feynam happened to know that the interviewer had a background in engineering or physics, I think it's pretty fair that Feynman can make that claim.
@studiousboy6444 жыл бұрын
@@fidziek It's not about knowledge. The fact that he asked that question should make it clear that electromagnetism cannot be explained in terms of anything that interviewer knows. Otherwise he wouldn't have asked the question.
@fidziek4 жыл бұрын
@@studiousboy644 only he's not asking for his own benefits, but on behalf of the viewers/listeners, and I pressume he's not one of Feynmann apprentices/students... i.m.H.o.
@fidziek4 жыл бұрын
@@philipfry9436 it's not about someone's feelings, but so called personal culture (including empathy, EQ, IQ) of Great Master Feynmann - he should not humiliate anyone, simple as that.
@azurlake5 ай бұрын
I regularly come here for my peace of mind.
@isaacrhoads8205 Жыл бұрын
Great Video! Love it!
@shortcutDJ7 жыл бұрын
He truly was a fine man.
@superroydude6 жыл бұрын
Shortcut I feel like I'm the only one that sees what you did there. LMAO
@clivemakongo6 жыл бұрын
We have a winner
@user-ec6kt2fg7m6 жыл бұрын
Shortcut poke poke smart joke.
@rickymort1356 жыл бұрын
gayyyy!!
@moustafamohsen5 жыл бұрын
that pun was a given
@tannerallen5972 жыл бұрын
This is actually an incredibly useful exercise in limiting the scope of a question. "How" and "why" questions have answers that are entirely defined by the expected knowledge of the *questioner,* just as much as that of the answerer. Notice how Feynman _did_ answer the question to various levels of satisfaction as a component of his overall criticism of asking unbounded questions.
@schmetterling44772 жыл бұрын
Ah, there is the kid who didn't pay attention to the question at 0:10. :-)
@jloost-gamer2 жыл бұрын
Schmetter Ling is right. The point is not that one has to limit the scope of a question, but that every question contains numerous, almost infinite implications and frameworks. Communication between two people always depends on these implications and frameworks, and part of Prof. Feynman's pleasure is that he WANTS you to ask deeper, deeper, deeper until you go with him to truly understand the marvels of the universe.
@schmetterling44772 жыл бұрын
@@jloost-gamer Ah, more bullshit. ;-)
@dhawkins12342 жыл бұрын
@@schmetterling4477 do you really think the interviewer would have been satisfied with, "the magnetic force" in response to a question about what is it that he's feeling when he feels two magnets repel? The interviewer already knows that the magnetic force exists, but he's not clear about what is going on-he doesn't even have a framework to articulate why it seems mysterious to him that magnets repel each other. He wants a deeper answer than just, "they do" and yet ultimately, as Feynman points out, there is no deeper answer. It's a feature of the universe. You're the kid who is so convinced he's smarter than everyone else that he doesn't even need to listen to the full video before setting himself up as superior to Feynman. We get it, you think you're a genius, and so insecure you have to point out flaws in people with reputations for being brilliant. Christopher Sykes was the interviewer, and had immense respect for Feynman. Maybe you should consider that he got a lot more out of the answer than you think he did.
@schmetterling44772 жыл бұрын
@@dhawkins1234 I mostly think that you just wrote a large amount of bullshit. ;-)
@E.h.a.n10 ай бұрын
Man gave the most honest answer. "Basically its just a property of reality. And if I try explaining beyond that, you won't understand because I can't really compare it to anything at hand"
@schmetterling447710 ай бұрын
Wrong answer. ;-)
@maalikserebryakov10 ай бұрын
@@schmetterling4477thanks.
@maalikserebryakov10 ай бұрын
@@schmetterling4477keep it up We need you
@schmetterling447710 ай бұрын
@@maalikserebryakov More than you. :-)
@scottchappel19073 жыл бұрын
The interviewer is feeling how I felt as a kid when I asked the teacher, "can I go to the bathroom"....
@raisin44063 жыл бұрын
I don't know, CAN you?
@Asdayasman2 жыл бұрын
@@raisin4406 Fuck you that's EXACTLY what I wanted to comment.
@Vatsek6 жыл бұрын
It would be a very bad idea to ask him what day is today.
@RogerBarraud6 жыл бұрын
+Vatsek. True. Necromancy is a Bad Idea.
@strategen91245 жыл бұрын
Vatsek why? You will get knowledge from a intellectual man
@davidsiatatgaming5 жыл бұрын
it would actually be a very good idea :)
@mattzx0035 жыл бұрын
The singularly most important reason as to why it would be a poor choice to ask Richard Feynman what day it is today is because the guy is fucking dead. Resultantly, it would be extraordinarily difficult for him to respond to you, let alone provide you with an accurate answer. Retrospectively, it would have been just as easy (or perhaps significantly easier) to have conveyed that exact same message with just 5 words rather than 50
@Schmidtelpunkt5 жыл бұрын
"Resultantly, it would be extraordinarily difficult for him to respond to you, let alone provide you with an accurate answer." And yet would there be an answer, it would last four minutes and make you feel like an idiot for not wording the question better.
@bbok16169 күн бұрын
It’s always so nice to listen to a clear mind
@Dan-rd8dr Жыл бұрын
that's just brillian - I'll be sending this video to everybody who asks me complex stuff that I cannot explain in simple words
@schmetterling4477 Жыл бұрын
And most of them will notice that you are a low EQ person who didn't notice just how tired Feynman was. ;-)
@billwilson36654 жыл бұрын
He's telling the interviewer "I could explain it but you wouldn't understand"
@bethetoven28414 жыл бұрын
Bill Wilson Because Feynman was a narcissistic know-it-all.
@alfredwilson17954 жыл бұрын
No? He literally explains how he CANNOT explain it in terms of anything the guy is more familiar with because he doesn’t understand the electromagnetic force in any way that is familiar to the interviewer. There might not even be a way to explain the electromagnetic force in terms of something else like gravity, it could just be a completely fundamental force of nature.
@triton626744 жыл бұрын
He's probably right tho.
@varunshenoy19064 жыл бұрын
Not really. He's saying the why question can't be answered at any level of depth, either to a layman or a scientist. Even if he explains magnetism at the deepest level possible, there is always scope for another follow-up 'why' question. Always. And that's because science is only observational. It observes the existing universe and the laws that govern it, but can't explain why the laws exist, no matter how deep you go. There is no end to the 'why' question. You might as well ask why anything exists. And the answer would be, it just does. Science might one fine day explain all the phenomena with one unified law, but you will still be able to ask why that law exists. Never ending.
@scottjones99734 жыл бұрын
But Richard Feynman is also saying that HE doesn't understand either.