The more I live with the awareness of not being able to see my face without a mirror it illuminates how the mental function rationalizes everything. We are basically walking around as ghost to ourselves without ever giving any thought to our reality. GLORY!!!! Wonder!!! Amazing!!

This is the interview that helped me to finally understand the nature of self inquiry.

Wow! you must be gods favourite to experience and be as happy as he is

I love feeling the dialogue between Richard and Patrick. As Richard says about the two voices in the one - what fun that is! Creating the new from the unknown one we see we are the one and the many.

It is interesting that his glasses are frameless. I think it is because the frame can obtruse your view an make it a little bit harder to be in the headless mode.

Zo fijn dat je met Richard gesels hebt.

Just started searching more about the headless way, and today this video shows up on YT. Then also, I realize it's the same channel where I saw an interview with Jim Newman. God, this nonduality spins in circles.. :'D

Wonderful! Thank you.

The cultural input/identity and the universal mind is a tool, this teaches you the off button! So we can relax

Wonderful just wonderful

37:20 This is exactly what's happened to me.

Hi

33:55 This idea that merely being the one could be lonely or boring is an entirely anthropomorphic projection and leads me to suspect that the realization of "the one" cannot truly have occurred yet.

fuck yes

Am I Patrick?

Dear Richard Lang, What you say sounds very familiar to me, the way Tony Parsons talks. The difference between you and Tony Parsons seems to me like this: Tony Parsons represents the nothingness in an authentic way, his answers really do come from the nothingness. “What is being said here, certainly does not come out of the thinking mind, it comes from nothingness. There is nobody here, who invents this." Whereas with you, your answers seem as if you have learned them by watching and you try to copy Tony Parsons. In other words, you think the way you think as a ME and you will remain a ME. That means you pretend to have a collapsed ME. Maybe you have not heard Tony Parsons's message, he says, "The giving up of the ME means loss of control and accepting utter helplessness. Me has lost everything apparently." This I cannot see or feel when I watch your videos. Why do you choose to be a copy instead of being your original nature? The boundless energy never produces carbon copies. When I look at your frequencies and your behavior, it seems as if you are very, very far from giving up control or helplessness. I once heard that when a person feels called to pass on a certain teaching that they have thought up, for example the non-duality teaching, sooner or later it falls back on them in the form of apparent energy /real and unreal. In which form, that is the surprise.