Even science says everything is energy and energy cannot die. Soon we'll all realise the brain is essentially a wireless computer. It has memory but is connected wirelessly to consciousness, which is universal (the universe itself!).

16 years later people are still obsessed with the matrix

I LOVE ❤️ these guys!!! Now I know why I went into science, being religious... it was in order to WAKE UP!! Now, I’m spiritual yet also scientific and they come together perfectly!!! Thanks 🙏

I don't think we'll be able to simulate consciousness in 30 years or even 60, but it's hard for me to argue that in 100 years or 500, if humanity hasn't destroyed itself, that computers won't have the capacity to run a complete and total simulation consciousness or even of the entire universe.

Terrille’s idea of a simulated universe created by our own human descendants from the future or by another advanced beings is a fascinating one. Standing on the existing scientific discoveries, this may be the only plausible explanation one can come up with.

Its nice to know that I am on a PS30 system running a quantum drive with atomic media, and displayed on a holographic 11 dimensional system with 3 visible dimensions and 7 compacted dimensions, and one time dimension. So when I die I can replay the great times I had for some heavenly fun.

Fantastic,go Rich

Every time u turn on your TV or Computer you have a Big Bang !

The ending is brilliant.

Life is not mathematical. And its limited to perception. Mathematics is a human interpretative device, with the potential of being closely accurate or vastly inaccurate to reality varying from person to person and time to time. Mathematics is an interpretation of life. A language like any language, developing and limited to human consciousness. Science is study and observation, the statement that “Science is the discovery of the mathematical framework which explains your observations." is Paradoxal in reality. And many scientists and philosophers do not come from this particular school of assumption. For example the first assumption is that possibilities and what we've developed as laws of physics are universal across the cosmos, wheres the evidence for that...

that one thing that is everything resides in the only thing we will never understand, in the absence of everything (absolute vacuum or singularity). from there and within itself (since there is no other place to be or go) it does its magic, in absence of time and space it can be anywhere and everywhere in the eternal moment of now (call it the "Prime Radiant" if you like), thus simulating the infinite. I like a lot the kaballistic expression "Ain Soph Aur" which translated to french shows its beauty: "Le rien du tout" meaning the nothing of everything. I guess that is the source (code, matrix or algorithm) in which we (everithing) float(s) and are able to create our own realitie(s). Of course I left out the detail about the HOW!! :)

Imagine a couple of kids in the distant future having a wager and initiating a computer simulation. Team 1 is "Good " and Team 2 is " Evil " Does this sound like anywhere you know?

Q: How many ads can we pack into one lecture? A: 69

If the Universe is a simulation, why was that simulation written/compiled/initialized, is this the first iteration or were their others previously (IMHO we are not the first, because there was some "diddling" of the physical 'constants' with widely varying values until "good enough" was arrived at.) and when may whatever be "solved" and everything 'turned off'?

Religion and science are like relativity and quantum mechanics...

The logical fallacies of this man are astounding.

Haven't we now (2019) drilled down to smaller particles? I am a conceptual thinker and I don't recall the names, but I believe that currently it appears that the "math" is infinite? Anyone know what I'm referencing?

This whole time, I've been getting around thinking the universe was a bunch of infinitely nested windmills- don't I feel like a dolt! This makes way more sense.

Well, simulation yes , but what kind? There you have it wrong: our simulation is probability based, it’s made BY consciousness, consciousness IS the computer.

You are free to explore the Grid, Programs. :)

Who ever created this simulation really fucked up with the settings 😂😂

What I've always wondered about: Why does light have a set speed? And why does speed affect time? To me that has similarities to how a computer works. A program can not run faster than the information given by it's processor. Ever played a computer game in the past that your graphics card couldn't quite handle? What happens? Everything stops. Light itself does not experience time. It traverses the universe instantly from it's perspective, because it's running at the processing speed of the universe. - But why do I never see scientists take on this subject or explain why? From what I see they only accept that light moves at a certain speed and that it affects time, but I almost never see them question why? Because my understanding of reality, which means reality with no layers above, then there should be no rules limiting speed or time. Rules are counter-productive for chaos. And the universe isn't chaotic. From human perspective yes, but from scientific perspective no. It follows set rules. And rules do not appear out of random. I'd love to just lay in bed an be lazy all day or sleep through my entire life...But my body tells me "I need food" "I need water" "I need stimuly". Energy or a giant gas cloud also would love to sleep all day. But someone kicked them out of bed. We humans misunderstand randomness. We think that everything that can happen will happen because of randomness. Randomness is also a rule. Randomness does not work unless it has something to work with. I'm no genius, but I do know that nothing can come out of nothing. Imo you can never understand the universe just by observing it's rules (science and math). That is the same as accepting the world as it is and not questioning reality at all. Exactly the same as a computer generated character. It follows the rules given to it and never breaks out of those set rules. We humans have a certain ability to look beyond those rules. Our consciousness and imagination. Those are tools to look beyond this reality, even if they can not perceive the truth. But if the universe is created, then is must be based on some values / traits / patterns of said creator. Just like each of us have different skills and personalities.

Sorry to hear he lost his religion. Science and Catholicism work together just beautifully. He lost me early when he said the geocentric devise was right, but geocentrism is wrong; and that everything is numbers. No, principles are not numeric. Hopefully he comes back.

Good content..too many ads.

Those demons 😈 aka demigods thats Ruling, Controlling and Manipulating humams Daily reality n lives wont allowed that to happen.

When/if we are able to program consciousness and put in the Sims, we will essentially be gods of our own universes of people. Whether or not they know of us will be up to us to decide. We will, however, make them suffer. All you have to do is look at the violence of our current entertainment. Who hasn't laughed when their Sims die? We'll still do it when they have AI consciousness. It's kind of sad, but inevitable. We will be ambivalently cruel and merciful gods, depending on how we feel that day. Kinda sounds old testament, doesn't it? Maybe we'll want to start a new game, so wipe out our current one in a flood or fire. -shrug- Start New Game. Some people, of course, will love their conscious Sims and let them evolve and evolve and discover math and question their existence and develop computing...

What is his definition of "Simulation" secondly we don't know that life is finite obviously theirs no scientific method currently available that can measure the universe - www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Space_Science/Is_the_Universe_finite_or_infinite_An_interview_with_Joseph_Silk This man is just extrapolating. And everyone else jumping on the simulation bandwagon. There's no way to prove that it's a simulation, so as if yet its just a philosophy not science.

Here we have a scientist failing in the same spot that everyone else does when considering a "simulation theory". They want to accept the idea that this is a virtual reality, but they are not ready to accept the logical consequences of that idea. He gets to a certain point, then he starts talking about the "meat and bones" and how consciousness is produced by the brain. However, that concept and the concept of a VR are mutually exclusive. Consciousness does not come from within a virtual reality. There is no meat and bones in a virtual reality. Only data. Only virtual meat and bones. Consciousness is real, not virtual. Therefore virtual brains cannot logically produce consciousness. If this is a VR, the ultimate logical consequence is that our consciousness is not produced inside the VR. It exists outside the VR, and the purpose of this VR (like any other computer game) is for our nonphysical consciousness to experience a highly constrained interactive multiplayer reality. This is the major hurdle that must be overcome by materialsitic dogmatic science/scientists if the true theory of reality (VR theory) is to be explored fullly.

If we are simulated this life is just unfair. We are running on a Xbox for sure.

Ponganlo en español porfavor 😲😲

You don't have to believe in anything.

It's a good lecture, but I'm going to say we perceive and INTERPRET the Universe as "mathematical"... it isn't necessarily so...

Simulation or God, we still suffer and die.

Consciousness cannot be explained by science. But indian vedas can help people to understand better

So you do believe in a creator you are just calling him/her a programmer. That's what makes me laugh about Atheism. You can talk about the big bang all day but something still had to create those rocks that collided. All the way back to .."Yeah there is a creator".

So the discovery of order, math, structure, design within our universe, doesn't need a creator? how can people be soo bright, yet soo flawed in their basic reasoning? "Claiming to be wise, they became fools," - Romans 1:22

What if the purpose of the game is to free oneself of the game? The source of all suffering is the misinterpretation of the physical realm as fundamental reality. Really. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maya_(illusion) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sa%E1%B9%83s%C4%81ra

Perpetum Mobile? The consequences of what you are saying, is an infinite loop... we live in a simulation, eventually build a simulation.... and so on and on and on :-)

Just because you create it doesn't mean you are God or can control it.

Definitely more interesting than any religious story! The truth is!

Hey ideacity, I'll never click on another video when I see your name on it. Want to know why? How about 4 commercials in the first 16 minutes of this video. You're obviously trying to be greedy and I hope it backfires. Get lost dude.

I AM THE ONLY ONE REAL...,

What science fails to see is that the human eye and brain is only able to observe certain elements of our reality....there is a lot of worlds within our world and universe that our eyes and brain aren't equip to see so the fact is we will NEVER know the whole true of reality with science....you need to start getting into spirituality if you want more answers.

IF this is TRUE, probably the "system" try to perform any action to "STOP" this thesis... probably considered a danger from system...

If you don’t believe in faith, you don’t believe in quantum mechanics

Way to many ads. Couldn't even watch it all. Somebody is alittle greedy. Definitely not subscribing or "trying" to watch any more content. 👎

NO ME INTERESA

There's nothing greater than a miracle. This man is more lost than he is intelligent -- poor guy.

Doesn't really make sense.

DMT

TOO MANY COMMERCIALS!!! 😵

Let's just make this simple and debunk the stupidity of this argument at the forefront of his argument. It starts ironically at about 4:20 when he says that "our universe is mathematical, it is based on mathematics and it runs on mathematics." Even though the previous sentence he mentioned that science was the art of using mathematics to increase our comprehension of the natural world. So here we find this huge gap, like an enormous gap. He was right the first time, about science being an art of applying cognitive models to improve comprehension and communicability of 'knowledge' about the world of things and stuff. But then started speaking like Donald Trump telling you how amazing it is, instead of having to back up his argument for basic things and stuff. He just ignored that the actual world exists and that math measures it, but that it is NOT CONTINGENT UPON MATH NOR IS MATH A NECESSITY OF ITS EXISTENCE! So this, its math so a computer made it forgets that we made math because we have the world, and we made computers because we had math and the world... not the other way around. Just like god didn't make man, history shows us more clearly when thoroughly read that man in fact created the IDEA of god. Go back to metaphysics 101 bruh. Descartes showed that your mind is better than a computer so get out of your moms basement and get out of your technological fantasy shit because it totally laughs in the face of the existence that doesn't need you thinking about it for it to exist. This guy is not a scientist, he is a hack.

This simulation is much too over simplified to legitimately describe a Universe and all the systems and interactions it rests on. Is the simulation capable beyond the visible band, does it account for photosynthesis, bacteria, cellular interaction, every water molecule in all the oceans? The elaborations go on. Of course the foundation of the possibility benefits from an open ended computational ability, but then Life isn't static. Where you really get into trouble is with the question, How did the simulator come into its existence? The unmoved mover. The answer, as in religion and atheism is no answer at all, that question is off limits or its always been here, which puts us right back to the mystery square we started from. Indra Net, Multi Verses, Nested Turtles or Russian Dolls aren't any answer at all. The Cosmic Freedom of Information Act has that chapter redacted. God, figuratively used, seems to have set limits to our imaginations equal to our inability to traverse the stars. That light hasn't reached us yet.

you should keep silent for the rest of your life...maybe things would get then better for you !!!

5000 year ago indian already....prove all is illussion

Rubbish.

No. Your face is a simulation, meet my reality fist!

Lol, there’s no way to know and I mean KNOW that the earth is not the center of the universe. If you kiss NASA’s ass then you will buy everything they sell! But for the rest of us, there no way to be sure of this.