No video

Risk analysis and evaluation in an FMEA

  Рет қаралды 2,405

Let's Talk Risk!

Let's Talk Risk!

Жыл бұрын

Failure mode effect analysis (FMEA) is routinely used in the medical device industry for risk analysis, However, when it is the only technique utilized for analyzing the risk of harm in the context of ISO 14971, we run into a lot of problems.
The main issue is that the probability of occurrence of an individual failure mode estimated in an FMEA is not the same as the probability of occurrence of a potential harm that may occur due to that failure mode.
Second, the purpose of an FMEA is to identify potential failure modes, their causes and effects on requirements. An FMEA is primarily a tool to support decisions about treatment actions that may be required to alleviate the impact of potential adverse effects.
It is not an appropriate tool for hazard/harm analysis in the context of ISO 14971.
In this video, I describe an approach to linking your FMEA to harm/hazard analysis and to making risk acceptability decisions.
👉Subscribe to the Let's Talk Risk! newsletter naveenagarwalp...
👉Connect on LinkedIn / naveenagarwal

Пікірлер: 3
@ReliaMitch
@ReliaMitch Жыл бұрын
Very nice discussion Dr. Agarwal. Your overview is very instructive for those trying to learn how FMEA fits into a robust Risk Management architecture. One of the key takeways was needing to know the hazard (or hazards) associated with the failure of the system to achieve a function. Doing this can greatly help the engineers conducting the Design Analysis to focus on what they are experts at, how often will the design fail rather than trying to guess how often that failure will result in harm. The variety of outcomes and harm severities frequently trips up engineers trying to assign occurrences in FMEA and can make those meetings much more tedious than necessary. Focus on the occurrence of the failure mode, not the harm. The harm 'math' can be done later in the Risk Analysis.
@AnilKumar-yv4iu
@AnilKumar-yv4iu Жыл бұрын
Does probability of occurrence scoring criteria changes every time we revise FEMA
@NaveenAgarwalPhD
@NaveenAgarwalPhD Жыл бұрын
Hi Anil, good question - you should define your criteria in the risk management plan. Generally, they should not change over time for the same device unless you have a good reason to do so. However, you can use different criteria for different products based on their technological characteristics, maturity level etc.
Common mistakes in risk analysis
9:39
Let's Talk Risk!
Рет қаралды 893
FMEA & FMECA: How to perform failure mode and effects analysis
14:32
ROLLING DOWN
00:20
Natan por Aí
Рет қаралды 9 МЛН
Harley Quinn's revenge plan!!!#Harley Quinn #joker
00:59
Harley Quinn with the Joker
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН
ISSEI & yellow girl 💛
00:33
ISSEI / いっせい
Рет қаралды 16 МЛН
What are the four different types of medical device risk analysis?
25:01
Medical Device Academy
Рет қаралды 5 М.
Interview with Rick Stockton   How to manage your design FMEA
1:07:41
Medical Device Academy
Рет қаралды 975
Application of Risk Management Principles for Medical Devices
24:25
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Рет қаралды 6 М.
How to Interpret Your CGM Data
26:32
Nourished by Science
Рет қаралды 8 М.
What is a FMEA? FMEA Guide + Example
8:16
Adriana Girdler
Рет қаралды 4,5 М.
How to get ISO 13485 certified? (Quality Management System)
25:45
Easy Medical Device
Рет қаралды 11 М.
Risk Management in the medical device industry in the EU
10:39
Profilzentrum Medizintechnik
Рет қаралды 8 М.
ROLLING DOWN
00:20
Natan por Aí
Рет қаралды 9 МЛН