When ever I watched That 70s Show, I only saw Clarence Boddicker 😂

1000% right!!! Classic always sir

You took the words right out of my mouth 😆but yes it makes me sad. This men are pioneers, the forerunners .

Compare to this, Transformers look like street hip hop.

I'll buy that for a dollar.

They upgraded, they were limited to the technology of their time. Don't think that the people who handle the vfx just slack off. They really put their backs into it to make it as realistic as possible

"Dead or alive you're cumming with me", classic.

You’re goddamn right it is

my exact thought

and the face

I don't know, an arm-span is meant to be approximately equal to height. If you take a measurement of the mold shown in this clip, and rotate it, it comes to about 2 feet longer than the puppet. Maybe they wanted the arms bent a little and never actually did it in the final composite? Since I first saw this film I always thought the arms were too damn long!

Even when they fucked up the old special effects they still looked a thousand times better and more entertaining than bland CGI bullshit.

lens camera perspectives are not easy

Tweekend27 Technically every creative movie does. Especially star wars. This movie was,a million bucks. Today it would just be a mindless cgi flick with lousy actors if done by typical hollywood today, or JJ Abrams.

This is the product of a village of creative geniuses. Amazing.

Tce Haus so true my friend 👍🏻

OMG same. My coworkers think I’m an idiot for how much i talk about this film. It’s just SUCH a masterpiece

Agree! My favorite movie growing up In the 80s. (B. 81) My uncle had the uncensored Vhs version/bootleg copy in his basement... W the extra long gory ED-209 malfunction scene... Totally traumatized me. So ultraviolet. The Murphy death scene too was like whoa when I saw it 'Not on tv'

Agreed it terrified me when I was younger especially the sounds it made.

@@alexhetherington8028 used frighten me loool, the bit where it murders the executive was probably the scariest thing I'd ever seen at that time

@@alexhetherington8028 The pig squeel broke the illusion for my part, having grown up on a farm where we had pigs.

Don't forget TARS and CASE from Interstellar. Christopher Nolan's take on sentient robots was as good as the others above.

@@alexhetherington8028 robocain was better imo

+xenomorphelv426 * tips fedora *

+Aouzy Schaf what?

I love Cgi but I agree, the man made effects are waaaay better

these older guys where engineers, problems solvers. CGI is a guy in front of a computer, I respect them too.

cgi still requires skill. It ain't gonna turn shit if you don't know how to use it

And it was.

You foretold future exactly.

It was horrible.

Doctor Professor 3000 The original robocop series was great until the one with black suit and stuff, that was a bad one

@Cyberdemon Mike Сhaplin forgotten? are you mad? everyone knows who he is. even little kids

I'm a filmmaker and I stand on what you say, not using CGI they achieved a really very impressive movie to its time. And It is stll the reference for Sci-fi. I use these techniques (phtoshop) to make some backgrounds.

CGI looks like shit when used very much at all. Whenever I can tell a scene is almost entirely done on computer it instantly kills all of the entertainment value for me. When the T-1000 walks through the fire as liquid metal in Terminator 2 it is absolutely amazing. Why? Because the semi-truck was real, it really crashed with the roof cut off and was aflame with real fire in a real water canal in southern California. Close to 98% of the area of the screen is done with 100% real elements put there by people out in the real world doing real hard work. Doesn't matter how simple it may seem. Doesn't matter if the CGI "looks bad by today's standards" or whatever other bullshit excuse is used. When I see a fighting sequence in an Avengers movie and know for a fact that 98% of the stuff on screen was done by somebody sitting in front of a computer on a desk in a comfortable office area, not moving any lights or props, not setting off any real sparks or fire, and not doing any sort of work that is physically or mechanically difficult in any way, then it always looks like shit. The truth is very simple yet very hard to accept. It honestly doesn't matter what it looks like. Movies are judged by the audience solely on how much work seems to have been put into it. How difficult were the emotions expressed by the actors and how well were the conveyed through body and facial expressions? How much time did it take to build the sets or scout the locations? Were any of the shots hard to frame or light properly? Did the stunt actors do anything truly risky and daring? Were the conditions or costumes on set hot, uncomfortable, or grueling for any of the cast or crew?

I was looking to see if anyone else noticed :D You made my day.

He's always seemed quite grumpy whenever I've seen him interviewed.

Yeah man half of the magic were the sound effects when he was simply powered up.

The dinosaur supervisor from Jurassic Park? People were dying on his watch. He had one job.

Huh... All original star trek movies and star wars... Star Trek TOS, original battlestar galactica...

Salvador Dali and Picasso are laughable too. Plus, long hands are for aerodynamics. It was an Art by any means.

Maybe they can clean it a bit in the future. Remaster ?

they did it with die hard.....

Would have worked better having the actor on wires with a blue screen and camera above then shrinking the shot down in frame... would have looked more realistic with a live actor that way.

@@welty69 not really as that was Alan Rickman falling backwards, Ronny Cox wasnt a young man and not everyone wants do a stunt like that

And their way actually looks better than most cgi

@@supernerdgamer7959 you don't see most CGI, meaning most CG effects are completely invisible, people only notice when they look bad. but with most practical effects its always a fight to try to get a realistic look. typically most movies have a LOT of subtle CGI the viewer doesn't notice at all.

@@dixie_rekd9601 be quiet and dont tell me what i see and dont see you racist

@@supernerdgamer7959 LOL racist?

@@dixie_rekd9601 yeah you are attacking me because of my race how dare you?!

Your comment makes me feel old.

SaviourV im not even that old and i knew about matte painting? maybe im just more into movies?

SaviourV Use all over Star Trek Next Generation as well but some of those you can actually tell, but still look good.

Steven Whiting Yeah matte paintings were pretty much the go-to effect for environment/architecture for a good 60 years until CGI finally became viable.

Actually, even Boardwalk Empire show has intensive use of (digital) Matte Painting. It's a technique that's almost unavoidable even in movies or shows that seem realistic.

I totally know which scene you're talking about on nightmare on elm treet lmao!

@@alamaru1 the f*cks a treet

Only the ones that you notice. And i tell you, you notice only 20% of cgi in modern films. Rest of it is so well made that you don't even have an idea.

@@sampokemppainen3041 The exact reason CGI has this bad Image. You don't notice it until it's not well done.

@@sampokemppainen3041 I notice it 100% of the time. You must be young to not see through that digital cartoon shit.

@@Obese_Pterodactyl please, go and see a "cgi breakdown". 😉

Was hoping someone else had commented. I thought it was super funny.

It looks much more unsettling and creepy

It’s an actual object. And your brain knows the difference.

true. although i have to say the stop motion in the movie could be better but thats a matter of time and money.

dharkbizkit just think though, in those days you couldn’t step back a frame and re shoot if it didn’t look right. All you had was a video assist camera above the film camera to give you an idea of what it would look like for framing. No real idea if it worked until you’d finished the sequence and had the film developed. You have to hold the sequence in your head so you know exactly what’s coming next.

Yeah the arms where way to long but still it was a great movie.

@Train Magic Rioters and looters would not have a chance.