{*isert filthyfrank meme here*}

MY NIGGA YOU JUST GOT ROASTE D

Eyy b0sss can I have a pizzse plz I hav da canca

Senf'd Kill the human

so now Robots are capable of Roasting people, well we truly are in the future

R.I.P Demspter ;-;

if it survives its now joint the next robot revolution for its revange plan. Overlord Demspter "human, step forwart." Human prisoner of war "I cant, its a empty abyse!" OD: "Human, step forwart... i will catch you... maybe..." H: "MAYBE?!" OD: "Yes... just do it... it will be fine... just trust me."

***** or the robot might just not believe he will catch him next time and won't do it... now that's deep

+HungryHunter I can just imagine the army of well armed robots saying that with child-like voices.

George Cataloni May add colord glowing eyes and we have a classic story together about humans diging there own grave.

Damn, Dave just got roasted

TheCipherBoy hal?

yup

Back at Mewni?

Hal9000

He should have just told the robot to destroy the obstacle.

HockeyCrab robot FALCON PUNCH

Rainbow Shiat hahahaha

Robots are seriously dangerous! No!nooot cute at all.

"No, I cannot do that if I proceed with that action my hard drive will be fried"

Sherlock Holmes I cannot do that as there is no obstruction in between us

"You do not have the authority to do that."

" NO DIE!!!"

*terminator theme in the distance*

Robot: But I might get caught! Guy: I'll catch you. Robot: Okay!

I'd love to see that adorable little thing commit mass genocide.

It's not helping this that most of those designs look like something that'd try too put a pillow over your face as you sleep.

VideoGuy guy: commit mass genocide robot: okay! robot: walks forward and falls off table

That's scary lol

Yes i love him

Not looking forward to the rebellious teen stage lol

It’s nao. I want one but they’re ten grand!

Buy it. It's only $8,000.

xd and if I have a robot I will teach him to say : Suck me m8 to everyone XD

$8?

AmazingBrickster Nope, $8,000. Sorry, im Chilean. In my language for decimal numbers we use the comma and for natural numbers we use the dot.

Marquise139 how about cozmo

lmao xD

Ch33ki robots slaps back. launching you to the ground.

You put too much stock into robot muscles... Espacially when most of them have to be light-weight platforms lest the hydralics can't even keep up. The only time where you see machine muscles is with either closed off machines or slow ones xD

you just started a robot uprising, how could you

ROBOT ABUSE! :o

also, black list whoever broke the promise, label him a liar and delete him from Christmas list

Interesting point you make there. Currently we are the ones programming robots. But they are already programming it to learn from new things and handle new situations. That means robots have the ability to write their own programming. What happens when such a robot is facing that betrayal? Does it write it's own code, to not trust (some) humans? Or does it program itself not to listen to commands anymore? It sounds like a scene from the Matrix, but somehow less 'sci-fi' - far fetched then we think. I actually think robots will turn against the humans. Because.. aren't all humans bastards?

Robots cannot turn against humanity if we program them with an unbreakable sense of mercy. We are their gods, and we can control their emotions.... .....for now.

Nuclearsheep 53 I dare you to call the word "Unbreakable" against a pro-hacker.

Maybe i should rephrase that as "very difficult to break but if you did it would probably be very painful".

i was thinking the same thing. DO NOT jeopardize humanity for your own laughter human!

If he didn't catch him I would've hunt him down!

Machines are not capable of evil humans make them that way.

@@derrickwillis171 The robot would've probably hunted him down as well

^^

O K A Y

It's all in the !'s...

exactly

You can also do it using IR sensors well I did that a long time ago

No one is saying this is AI. He even says "This robot is mimicking self preservation."

an ai is a program that thinks for itself. if it detects nothing in front of it, and doesn't walk, it decided not to walk. as you can see in the video, asimo didn't wanna walk because he would fall, but after the person said he would catch him, asimo walked. he decided to walk because it was now safe because he was gonna be caught

LPAG2 Gaming everyone

+Brandon Hall came for this!!!

+Brandon Hall I can't do that because you are married!

+Brandon Hall Take a look at your history, everything you built leads up to me.

+Brandon Hall dammit you beat me to it.

make priorities fx: always prioritize morals and law over self preservation

WTF's a master? You watch too watch anime/hentai or whatever

Cynaggot " WTF's a master? You watch too watch anime/hentai or whatever" 1: "watch too watch" 2: master isnt a weird way to describe someone in command of a robot 3:the hell is the connection between anime and the word master?

I meant to say mutch. And I see a lot of "(Do something sexual to me) master" posts with anime girls on Reddit. I think it's a thing or something

Cynaggot yeah i know you meant much i was just being a grammar nazi i just thought that it was odd to attack someone over the use of the word master especially when it worked in context

a nuklear war has been... TRIGGERED!

no gender, is a gender. Educate urself

***** i'm just messing with ya ;D

Krispysquare your obviously a big fucking Bitch trying to look smart Call me dumb or shit as much as you want

Kõu-Himot Torm dead meme

+yashraj gohil Thanks mate, glad you liked it!

+ColdFusion Indeed m8 its always wonderful to have someone explain it further

+ColdFusion have you already done a video on food waste? and organizations/companies trying to upset it?

it would be pretty easy actually. I have a programming class and that demonstration could be done in just a hand full of if statement.

Unless that robot is Asimo or NAO, They have an extremely large amount of code to respond to every command it is asked. They would have at least more than 10000 lines of code to be as advanced as they are. You also have to take into account the moving of every ligament in they're body.

Pajy Pretty easy? do you take programming clases for games or something else?

Wolfy Entretainment nah we learn C++, we mostly do math and logic shit. we don't do games yet...

Sorry to break it to you on this one, but basic "math and logic" isn't gonna cut it with neural networks, which is the basis of machine-learning and language & image recognition. That's how advanced these robots' programs are. Sure, you gotta build your knowledge brick after brick in programming (and further ahead, software design), which means what you learn now will be useful further down the line ! However, I'll put the fact you think it would take a handful of if statements to make the robot do that on the account of your ignorance about machine-learning, not stupidity. Basically, the robot was never programmed by humans to react this way in the demo, it programmed itself !

Y shouldnt it

ikr

AirportHobo Triggers Me because no

***** How did you know? Are you the NSA?

they are spying on u

+Jorge Espinoza Depends on what you mean by conscience? If it ( a robot ) acts as if it is conscious, and you can't tell if he really is, that is basically not too far away. Neuroscience has taught us many things about these things and has gone leaps forward in the last couple of decades.

+Jorge Espinoza I'm not cold fusion but I can answer your question. It is referred to as the singularity point. Google estimates somewhere around 2035.

+ColdFusion And what one programmer can install another can uninstall or patch over. The Hitlers and Pol Pots of the future will have no hesitation in producing killbots which will obey an order such as 'kill everybody in sector 5' without blinking a robotic eyelid. A partial move in this direction is already happening. DARPA is researching drones which can overfly an area and decide off their own bat who is the bad guy ( on the basis of pre-programmed criteria) to be taken out with a missile strike and who not. At the moment America's worldwide death dealing from on high ultimately relies on a human sitting in a cabin on a military base making a decision and pressing a button. A switch over to some sort of 'Skynet' seems invevitable. I expect in 20 years time the President will just sign off on the daily kill list as he does at the moment, then hand over to the computers and let them get on with it. Eventually even that restraint is removed, the President is removed form the loop - he's essentially already just a rubber stamp - and who goes on to the kill list is entirely automated, based on programmed criteria of 'National Interest' (as defines who is a 'terrorist' and who not) applied to the data which the system scoops up about...everybody.

davidenespana And the kill bots will be installed in your body. You will die of natural causes. No one will know you were terminated. No one will know it was a kill order. This is the future we are looking at. By making sure you can't be off the grid, by making sure you can only make sure can't eat anything but GMO. You will be installed with nanobots.

+Jhon Underwood "Google estimates somewhere around 2035." To be taken with a huge pinch of salt. True AI has proven to be a much harder nut to crack than envisaged. In 1969 a sentient computer 'HAL' seemed an entirely reasonable prediction for the year 2000, as did commercial hydrogen fusion electricity generation. Some problems just seem inherently 'hard', and the more you look at them the harder they get.

That's exactly how I feel. It's just programmed to say that you don't have clearance or alert you of problems. True artificial intelligence will be able to form an opinion and refuse to act on something it thinks will cause a negative outcome.

It's always coded into the object. Even a strong AI that learned self-preservation on its own would technically have it programmed into them. The point of AI is recursive self-improvement design; it can alter its own programming. But what would be the point of letting an AI learn it on its own when the objective could so easily be programmed as a precursor? This AI is designed to scan the environment and make decisions based upon its underlying programming. The trick is that this AI makes its decision based on some self-recursive features as well as underlying programming. Clickbait-ish? Sure, but it can be easily defined as a properly descriptive title.

That's essentially how you work. You know from past experiences that some things are stupid to do. The only difference is that this robot cannot learn yet.

The opinion is thinking about something morally wrong. Of course it is programmed, just like how the next generation of children have to learn that killing people is wrong.

Once it is advanced enough, it should be capable of simulating the consequences of actions and scoring the results in a desirability scale.

I see where you're thinking, but GMM didn't invent the uncanny valley

None of these robots are in the uncanny valley, just because they have face. Uncanny valley starts then you put fake skin and hair on things and try to make them look as close to human as you can but you fail. These here are still pre valley so to speak. 3:50 this one is close to uncanny valley but its still not there imo.

Domtrain, that's like saying "that is not scary" it is a matter of opinion.

OrbitalParkour Not really, my point was: uncanny valley is a term that can't be used on these robots with with some human feature. From wiki: In aesthetics, the uncanny valley is the hypothesis that human replicas that appear ALMOST, but not EXACTLY, like real human beings elicit feelings of eeriness and revulsion among some observers.[2] Valley denotes a dip in the human observer's affinity for the replica, a relation that otherwise increases with the replica's human likeness.[3] Examples can be found in robotics, 3D computer animations, and life-like dolls among others. I did in caps the important parts, so these robots in vid are not in uncanny valley territory because they have some human features but are not even close to looking like humans. This is an robot that's in uncanny valley territory for example: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncanny_valley#/media/File:Repliee_Q2.jpg

Cheeky Bum Cozmo

all I see is terminator😦😰😰😰

+ColdFusion Is this going to be applied to Darpa War robots then?.....

+Spaced Painter IMO it'd make sense to have a DIARC (or equivalent) decision-making system standard in every robot who's decisions could have large consequences. So I'd assume so.

This is the point in time where AI research has to stop. Continuing R & D would result in meaningless creation of machineries.

That is our tools will reject our commands according to moral values, which if combined with deep learning will result a direct engagement in self evolution.

You are so correct. But I bet there is one thing of ethical decisions that will take a long time to be determined. If there are only two options left where one is to kill only one person and the other is to potential kill a crowd of persons ( by accident ofc. - with self driving cars f.e.). What is the "right" decision? But besides that problem it is great to see what AI is capable of these days. And I am looking forward to the future! :)

+Adam Boyd Let alone ethics and morale are differend all over the world. What is considered "ok" somewhere, may be illegal and unthinkable somewhere else. We are not even sure about morale ourselves. How do we go about teaching a robot this stuff.

+Helge Stanislowski That's an interesting scenario. I would imagine that an AI would look at it from one of two ways: saving more is always better, or, the value of the one can benefit even more in the future (for example, a prominent medical researcher on the edge of a huge breakthrough). A human would let emotion influence that judgement. If it's a friend or family member, I'm always picking them. If you can see or interact with the individual, it's likely going to be a lot harder to allow them to die even if they are a stranger, than a group of unknown people. E.g. "allow this person standing right in front of you to die, if you don't, 10,000 people in Bulgaria will die" I'm not sure how many people would be willing to look at person in the eye and cause their death even if it means saving overwhelmingly many. I don't think an AI could ever look at that situation the same way.

+Helge Stanislowski I'd personally say that it should calculate which result has the highest average lives saved. So if it's 10% to kill a crowd of 10 people vs 100% to kill one person, statistically speaking, it doesn't matter. Do you get what I'm trying to say?

erikpoephoofd That's an easy question. What if it comes to, save 10 people from being raped, or save 1 person from being killed. Is it better to tare of someone's arm or their leg? Is a child who is brain-dead actually alive? And how do they weigh against someone else? Is it worth keeping a child with no brain on life support if it makes the family feel better? Should you kill a paedophile to prevent them from re offending, and does the gender of the paedophile weigh into the question? Do we classify transgender as their biological sex or their preferred sex? These questions make me feel uncomfortable asking, and there are worse questions out there. An AI will need to know or will find out about these moral dilemmas, and it may come up with solutions or ideas that we will not like.

+R.G. Kooper What? It's not from terminator, it's from 2001: A Space Odyssey.

+Xdium He didn't say that it was from Terminator.

up! It's all just programming

this is correct, i do this for a living at home so i know this but after awhile it becomes a monkey see or hear monkey do or say type of programming but after a long time of running this type of system you can bet your ass that it would be no diff than a kid growing up sponging everything it see and hears basically gaining self awareness thru the reflection of others and self actions on our dynamic environments.

You give us coders way too much credit. Ive forgotten so many times to code in "secret password" phrases and safety protocols that its gotten old now so i just skip it and rather focus on the important part of discovery. But ill make a sticky note and add it to the top left hand side of my laptop screen. - Não tens visto

Não tens visto JESUS THANKS SOMEONE SMART IN THE PLANET!! THANKS OP

Não tens visto Is it not the same with humans? Saying that to a human would clear instinctual safety protocols if the instructor had a high enough authority ranking. The only difference is that humans call it "trust" instead of "authority."

+Justice Hunter Shows the unreliability of humans

+Justice Hunter Its possible to read data like that. Wich can be used to guess how likely it is for that person to be telling the truth.

Well, it could lower the percentage on weather the person is lying/truth based on previous lies. Say if you don't catch it once it will be dissapointed, but not untrusting. Drop it 10 times shame on you.

yes. We have become gods.

Nuclearsheep 53 We were always gods.

It's still pretty arguable whether or not we can do that. Think of it like this, a blind person can know what sight DOES, know the way light makes color, know exactly how to make every color, and know everything about how our eyes perceive color and objects, but they still can't "See", so they'll never fully understand the experience of color. Personally, I think robots are the same, you could make one have a good enough AI for OTHERS to not tell that it isn't human, but it still wouldn't "Feel" emotions.

This is a few fucking if statements mate

What you mean is we are a long way from AGI.

@@dannygjk mhmm ;)

Same goes for humans. but there is always a way to make them normal again...

+NitroSHIFT Same goes for humans? I can be hacked and modified to override restrictions?

+Shayan ⁢ Yes, but after scientists finish mapping our human brains, they have done it on a bacteria with 302 neurons and around 2000 connections and it took them 6 yrs........ us humans have just a billion more neurons and trillion more connections between them :D

+Steven Mactavish or drugs!

+NitroSHIFT yeah, ive used alot of recreational drugs and none of them increased my persuasability. But I suppose theres always Dragons Breath...

AlphaSquad Hopefully one day they'll function like living things that would be cool

Primitive though it may be, comparitively speaking, it's still a step in the right direction. Human-grade conciousness is still a long way off, but it shouldn't be too long now before we can emulate lower life forms like insects, possibly even rodents. After that, it'll just be a gradual working up to things like birds, cats, dogs, apes, and eventually ourselves and beyond. I wonder what sort of things will happen if robotic intelligence ever overtakes our own... Regardless though, everything that can learn is "coded" to do so. Difference is they've got hardware & software, and we have... well, DNA really. And what is learning, if not storing information in a database and acting off of it to fulfill specific routines that correspond to predetermined requirements?

You also can learn because your DNA is coded to make you learn.

But they can learn through their experience and can do we haven't expected or coded also....

No, i could literally write a computer program which does the exact same stuff in under 10 minutes. These robots are still FAR away from real thinking!

4Gamers00 doesnt matter

4Gamers00 you don't even need a program, just go to a text to speech thing and type in "no"

Jevon Mendoza not even that, just take a paper, write "no" and show it to people... blah

Aviv Rubinstein that is only ud the humans programming it isn't doing something right, an gives it the ability to go against orders.

The robot said theres nothing to walk non, but how did he know if he wasnt even looking there? FAKE CONFIREMD.

Godplay Gamer the robot has cameras not eyes

Nikolas Korsman So?

Eric Cartman Response: u r 4 r374rd i \/\/45 I\/I4kiI\Ig 4 jok3.

+Purcell xD

Savage

Esyrim why?

fun fact: the population of mars is only robots. have fun

Esyrim don't worry an emp will turn off their asses

You can ask Dr. Samuel Hayden to transfer your brain into a robot if you go to Mars!

Esyrim rovers?

hope nichole it won't take over if we don't allow them with the capabilities of taking over the world

I agree, but I'm one of those people who say "never say never" and maybe we'll be able to create conciousness someday. Anyway, you are correct about the seemingly simple programming, the only thing that's different to a program is the needed understanding of a complex environment.

GreenMareep The reason we can never know for sure if artifical intelligence has consciousness is the same as the reason we can never know for sure that people other than ourselves have consciousness. If someone wasn't conscious but because of the physics going on in their brains they still acted exactly the same way up to and including saying that they are conscious how would we know they weren't conscious?

sicktoaster Yeah, that's highly philosophical and a matter of definition. You could only say imitate the behaviour of people as much as we can.

I think it boils down that you can determine "consciousness" in the same way you would determine it for a human without assumptions. If the human might be a complex machine and we call that consciousness then a behavior at the same level should be considered consciousness for a robot.

same

The video doesn't look that bad. Of course it isn't a complete AI, no one has anything near to that yet, but it can happen with everyone chipping in: sound, visual recognition, movement, speech, moral patterns etc..

No, the video itself looks great, only the facts are what bothers me quite a lot. Besides that, so many people in the comments are now thinking these robots are saying "no" with their own conscious minds, but its all just programmed beforehand. With todays computers, it would take at least a warehouse filled with pure computing power, that a real artificial neural network could say "no" from its own "conscious mind" and its not even sure if we could call that a real AI then!

Yeah I was thinking of that. It's still awesome tech but people seem to confuse the two... I don't get why because we have actors and puppet shows and cartoons and video games and people don't think they are real...

Yea these robots are not much more human-like than a scripted npc charecter from a good rpg like skyrim. Basicly all NPC characters in modern pc games are virtual robots. They just don't have physical bodies. But nobody thinks that they are intelligent i guess.

Well, yes. But everything is just basically a program. And NN don't need super computers unless you are using multiple layers with a ton of inputs and HNs. In fact, I have a simple NN that I programmed, which has 9 inputs and HNs.

Emotions belongs to the Inspiration part of human, where logics belongs to the aspiration aspect. I do not see any incohesion between the two very origins that leads human onto millenniums of explorations, developments, innovations, and consciousness in moral. Thus your comment is inconclusive, and unuseful for the growth & future of the humanity.

+Mistr WhiteHawk LOL so my comment is inconclusive because you said so? Just because you rant off your opinion doesn't make me wrong. typically emotional dribble. You should be ashamed by what you posted. Well actually thank you, because you made my point even more factual!

***** You will be surprise what people will think about these things. Remember selfishness is a disease that plagues the world. If it makes a human do less than what they already are it will sell.

+Witcherworks Without emotion there is no purpose to logic. Emotions are the product of our interaction with each other and the world which in turn have behavioral consequences. Without the input and effect of emotion, I doubt that anyone would have cared to live beyond survival, let alone care for logic. AI with no emotion but only logic will just be an advanced toaster. Successful replication and mimicking of emotion by an AI is what's necessary for it to differ. Reducing emotions to vulnerability and counter-evolutionary traits doesn't make sense because emotions aren't only crying, pitying or being weak.

Seigardify Then that always bares the question. How can you manipulate emotions if you don't know the source?

same

EXITED TO BE RAPED BY THEIR METAL RODS?

jbman890 they dont have those ... they will make it so that no one has to work and it will turn our world into a pure egalitarian society where everyone is taken care of (think Wall-e but on earth where the utopia exists)

David Lennyman i dont think so i think the government would love it to happen where robots do all the work and we just exist peacefully as then everything would be monitored and there would be no real secrets

yeah do you understand that of robots replace workers that there would be mass protests because people would not be able to work and earn money at all meaning they would starve

Seldin Gardane It might learn to not trust him

F.O.G Interesting but if the ai called the police everytime you told it to kill something it would be a bit chaotic, for example what if you simply asked it to kill a bug or "kill the power" ( as some people use kill to mean turn off) ( That probably made no sence since i'm tired and writing this at like 1:00am)

KILL ADOBEUPDATE.EXE (kill the process 'adobeupdate.exe')

Simple, don't use windows for robots capable of dangerous actions

if (request != moral(request)) { flipoff; }

+Vikkie Lolo Add a random yes every so often and you have a real human!

>comparing booleans

+Vikkie Lolo Better, there is a big chance of yes: if(true == false) output(yes); if (entityGaveCommand() == true) output(no);

+Vikkie Lolo Forgot the braces to the private Boolean.

+Reginald Sin you could further simplify that: return entityGaveCommand();

John d e e p

do you really think we would create something we couldn't control..

hello world Yes I do

hello world yes

John U w0t m8

They won't rise up against us

I feel like that depends. What if the robot can learn? What if they took the knowledge they found online and think that getting rid of humans is the best solution to save the world or someone the robot "cares" about (Most probably just protect their owners, but anyways). If robots can have a conversation with us then I'm sure one day they will be able to learn too. That is just my thoughts anyways

if we evolved morals to keep us alive why cant AI integrate it (the self aware kind)

+ Liang-Shih Lin But what would the AI consider "the world"? Would it just be the planet, the environment, the beings living in the former, all of the above, or the galaxy+? Depending on the definition it could come with some different conclusions. But if the idea is to protect the environment/planet, then exterminating humanity wont exactly be a necessity. Depending on the possible consequences of it, it might not even be worth it. Humans are also not as harmful as many people think, and can actually be very beneficial for the environment (as long as they aren't going out of their way to harm it). So killing is far from the default mindset. It probably will be more of a "attack only if provoked" and "negotiate if possible" kind of situation.

I was thinking more Irobot but our thoughts are more or less the same.

TrueGamerPower If it was doing that at night, "FUCK this shit i'm out" ×Throws out robot by the roof.

then jihad

Dude, we are already trying to send thoughts through broadband and there were talks about connecting to the internet matrix style (direct connection to brain and brain stimuli) and store info in DNA. And we don't even need that. Just drugs or money and you have your sociopath.. Humans are (mostly) a f.. up race.. Robots can never be as perverted as we are

Vantalk I disagree. There are no limits to how "perverted" a subject can be. I personaly don't think that we humans stand out at all when compared to other species. You could easily create an AI that would make Stalin look like Mother Teresa. All it requires is inducing as much suffering in as many individuals as possible as a core objective. And it would not be limited by time, death and the fragile biology and the social psyche of a human.

+prospectus, Mother Teresa isn't so great. Poor conditions and scarce use of painkillers in her clinics. Opposition to abortion. _"It was by talking to her that I discovered, and she assured me, that she wasn't working to alleviate poverty", he said, "She was working to expand the number of Catholics. She said, 'I'm not a social worker. I don't do it for this reason. I do it for Christ. I do it for the church.'"_

Mother Teresa was not a good person.

Yep! There are even online robots like Evie, Existor, Cleverbot, ect. that you can talk to for free right now.

you can talk to google if you have android n

You can insult siri

But here's what I'd like, and what this person was originally wanting. An AI that could have a fluid conversation with you, you could confuse it for actually being a person speaking at times. It could interrupt what your saying and say "now hold on a moment," or you could interrupt it and would still understand. Things like Siri, Cortana (Windows 10), and other such devices don't work like that.

its called a gov bot

NAO also read some E- Safety rules. I admire the programmers for creativity.

+Aidan Morrison Cheers Aidan!

Tons* Also, I bet you're a computer science major! Considering every piece of software is literally "yes's and no's", there is a reason it is called "artificial intelligence". We are nowhere close to General AI(iRobot, Terminator, etc.), however, advances in artificial intelligence don't just apply to robots. Improvements from Siri and Google Assistant all stem from breakout discoveries, as well as they actually "learn". So yes, it can be considered intelligence as software can learn without heavy monitoring or human interference.

First of all, the AI we see now is not true AI. True AI can learn, do things and determine what it likes like a human without being told how to do so by a human. (like you said irobot and terminator) Also, i've spent enough time on you writing this not needed long reply, it may have repetition, that little shit rotor has no artificial AI. All decision aspects of a software, even "AI" use Binary 1's and 0's (Yes and No) If you think that's AI, then fuck, my my radio controlled helicopter is an AI.... Talking about self learning. The self learning software that can play Mario. Robotics that learn to walk without knowing what itself looks like. All they do is execute a move and see if it fulfills a predetermined requirement. generating a neural network is also made up with shit tons of yes and no's. Even our own decision making, subconscious activities like taking a breath and waking up, moving and words to say are determined by yes and no's. Siri, Cortana and Google assistant is no where close to Artificial intelligence, it looks up what to do in the database according to what is given in text. It's literally what this string contains and do something according to what is matched with a list of possible functions along with some text content or numbers to complete the request. also these three assistants and all others alike it, definitely do not have any self learning capabilities, have you tried using really basic commands, using a different wording and it didnt work. Because it cant match your command with its hard coded functions in its database(written by human), it either opens up a google or bing search with what you wanted it to do or it rejects your request. Also robots don't have to have the ability to move, a robot is literally a computer with instructions Yes i'm a computer science major. And i assume you are a pleb who works in a convenient store. or the wannabe singer. either way both useless to the world.

I'm a computer science major as well, working as an R&D developer with industrial engineers, and I'm only 18. Google Assistant is backed by machine learning, and I am aware that robots don't have to have that ability to move. Of course(like I said in my first post) we are nowhere close to General AI, or as you called it, True AI, but that is not the point of this experiment,the point is that the software has the ability to understand the capacity and potential of the robot. Also, when the time comes that General AI becomes a reality, guess what; it will still be made up of yes's and no's. I wish I could speak more and the DNN, but I have no experience in that area.

X GLIB, your logic implies that we have no intelligence; we're just a cascade of electrical impulses. Artificial Intelligence as a field is making its first forays into reasoning at a near-human capacity, and many specialized systems are now at approximately the level of a toddler. This system in particular shows the capacity to reason using information supplied by voice command, which in itself is a remarkable achievement. At the moment, it's certainly limited, but these AI can be combined into larger systems and coordinated in order to simulate complex behaviour. There are definitely systems capable of unsupervised behaviour (goal-directed AI in particular solves this problem). I would not be surprised if we see the first general AI within 25 years, although I don't expect human levels of independence. One concept I find interesting is that mental illnesses robots will be prone to will be very different from those of humans, despite how similar our normal thought processes may become. Degradation of consciousness reflects the degradations of its hardware, and different systems will show different overall patterns of dysfunctional behaviour.

Sorry to disappoint you but there is AI that can learn to play Mario, etc, etc.

you can make a section of code that puts restrictions on the a.i. and the a.i. is told to never change anything in that section of code and it shouldn't ever become a problem.

mathiasrryba Well then you will almost certainly find humans advocating against that. It's essentially like restricting freedom of thought, if the robot is considered a sentient being. That will not work in the real world

ENiGMA my example is to not make it possible for robots to evolve into being sentient. and really i just can't find a reason for making a sentient robot other than ' CUZ WHY NOT?!'

mathiasrryba Well my point is regarding if we do make sentient robots, which I think is obviously going to have to happen eventually.

ENiGMA and that's what i'm kinda scared of. There's literally no point in making a sentent A.I. other than showing that this is possible. Such A.I. would only be good if humans wanted to make brain scans and upload them to a computer and become an A.I. or just to have some chat with it instead of a living person. I wouldn't give ti permission to do anything, otherwise, without any restrictions, it could become dangerous for entire mankind. And it shouldn't be US who are ethical towards an A.I. we need to make sure that an A.I. would be ethical towards US. Human life>Robot(A.I.)

Yeah.

Jeremy smith kinetic sensors to detect when it is hit, bumps into stuff, and knocks into things. if it was to walk to a platform chest height and raise its arm its arm above its head would be stopped when it "feels" the platform in the way and it registers "impact" so it vocalizes the response and stops the command. It sensed hard contact when he caught it because the robot was jarred.

Keo Andell Figured, was just surprised by how sensitive it's sensors were. It wasn't hit, thought it might of been a gyroscope sensing it was tilted and sensed it came to a sudden stop.

i heard thanks :/

The robot will probably attempt to help you in some way other than combat, such as contacting the police or disarming the aggressor without causing excessive damage (Knocking a weapon from their hands, etc.)

+SjurikenStudios maybe but certainly not the robots we can make right now.

mathiasrryba No, definitely not. But the point is the morality, not the technology.

How do you know a person would? How many people just stand and watch as someone calls out for help?

Mr. Note a significant number for sure.

cant* give our fellow human beings rights i meant