I love this version most. Great Roschester and Jane ever. The way Mia show the self-respect, brave and free spirit pf Jane. And I also love Micheal in Roschester, he show his heart, love and pain perfectly.
@zmac868911 ай бұрын
Timothy Dalton was very good as Mr. Rochester.
@juli19075 ай бұрын
yeeep
@nunziawright5957Ай бұрын
@@zmac8689 yes I agree. but this version is my fav
@thehussarsjacobitess854 жыл бұрын
I love that while Fassbender is definitely an example of adaptational attractiveness, they didn't try to make him sexy as was done with Toby Stephen's portrayal. He's really kurt, yet you can see that it's due to internal conflict.
@l.a.3479 Жыл бұрын
*curt*
@rossgalizi20396 жыл бұрын
I love it, this version is the best. Michael and Mia are perfects for this movie. The darkness, the ligthness, It is a master piece. Please put on all.For practice english is very good.
@johnnybowen77143 жыл бұрын
You all prolly dont care but does someone know of a way to get back into an Instagram account?? I stupidly forgot the password. I love any help you can give me!
@hassantate12713 жыл бұрын
@Johnny Bowen instablaster =)
@dj-ux1jr Жыл бұрын
i like Ciaran Hind's dialogue on this event
@avvocatellawhiterose4784 Жыл бұрын
@@dj-ux1jr william hurt e Charlotte...
@feliciakidd9358 Жыл бұрын
I disagree. It's good but it's not the best version.
@christinemason2938 Жыл бұрын
I could have watched more. They’re magical together
@tashu69642 жыл бұрын
I admire Mr Rochester's "stealth horse" technology that allows him to get right behind someone without them noticing
@chooseyourpoison51052 жыл бұрын
The funny thing is, in the book she hears him clattering along on the icy road for ages, so long, in fact, that she has time to withdraw herself into a gap in the hedge so she will not be seen. Of course, that plan goes awry when Rochester goes splat right in front of her
@tashu69642 жыл бұрын
@@chooseyourpoison5105 When the source material is a great book, it doesn't need run of the mill horror elements like jump scares. But the movie makers are rich and making more movies and I am making KZfaq comments so they get the last laugh
@a353622 жыл бұрын
Yeah, he's Batman. In the book of course he gallops past and the horse slips on some ice.
@monicad999 ай бұрын
he borrowed the technique from Euron Greyjoy.
@Mermaid22614 жыл бұрын
Rochester: "were you waiting for your people on that lane? Jane: "I have no people, sir" Rochester: "I mean for the imps and elves, and little green men"
@britjj51262 жыл бұрын
Loool so rude
@rachelnoble55402 жыл бұрын
When I hear that line I can tell that Mr. Rochester is not in the best moods right now.
@amybowen2272 жыл бұрын
haha I get it. He's saying he is her people! She never thought of that!
@musicloverlondon60702 жыл бұрын
There is a constant theme of other-worldliness that runs continually alongside the Christian references in the book such as that of the mythical 'gytrash' (Rochester's dog). When Jane returns after visiting her dying aunt Reed, Rochester wryly refers to her as having come from the abode of the dead. Even near the end, Jane 'hears' Rochester calling her across the miles. Yet Christianity runs parallel with these mystical elements all the way through. Loved reading this book.
@petragrzetic2 жыл бұрын
🤣🤣🤣
@ernestineanderson33236 жыл бұрын
This scene was acted beautfully.
@rosemaryallen2128 Жыл бұрын
It's out of the cinematic dark ages, but no one has ever captured the gothic horror aspects of 'Jane Eyre' better than Orson Welles - or managed to make ugly Mr Rochester so irresistably charismatic.
@yana1955 Жыл бұрын
Agree! If you pay close attention to Rochester's description in the book, Wells is visually and vocally the closest. Only deviation I found is that Wells is tall, not of 'middle height'.
@anne-no2ic Жыл бұрын
1st version I saw was Orson Welles.
@antidoteify Жыл бұрын
Thank you, It's my favourite; very menacing and the thick back and white is perfect. Witha very young Elizabeth Taylor.
@rogerpropes7129Ай бұрын
Not to mention wraith-like little Margaret O'Brien who stole every scene.
@NoeliaJones4 жыл бұрын
I actually don’t like Mia BUT I can accept that she was perfect for this role and she interpreted Jane Eyre beautifully. My respects to her as an actress to interpret such a complex role in such a natural and believable way 👍🏼
@klematiszromanne27284 жыл бұрын
Why don't you like her?
@avian8338 Жыл бұрын
@@klematiszromanne2728 She looks like Greta Thunberg
@l.a.3479 Жыл бұрын
@@avian8338 That's a stupid reason.
@anne-no2ic Жыл бұрын
lol She is my favorite Jane She does not look like G T
@Maxi.Dounut Жыл бұрын
@@l.a.3479 The user seems to be a guy hence in this situation his comment is not worth respecting. Not liking a person solely because if their looks is such a typical comment from a guy towards women whom he only see as an object for men to look at. He’s a failure of a human being please ignore his comment.
@005Amergin2 жыл бұрын
The boss from hell..but she held her own!!
@medusagorgon8432 Жыл бұрын
Such a fabulous movie. She is my favorite Jane.
@sophiakiedrowski587 Жыл бұрын
0:53 and this kids, is how i met your mother
@Mermaid22614 жыл бұрын
The fact that it took her so long(without the incident with Rochester) says much about her mind and what she must have been thinking about just being out alone outside the manor, let alone her encounter with a man on a horse.
@carmen77302 жыл бұрын
Yes. In the book it’s described as her wanting to feel more, to be more alive, so she just wandered through places to places to stay outside a little longer.
@theshillneckedlizard8364 Жыл бұрын
In the book it's described as being a bright sunny day, though very cold, and Jane was looking forward to the walk. So all the fog and eeriness here isn't strictly to the book. Nor did she scare Rochester's horse - it slipped on the ice with Jane nowhere near.
@roshanakmehrazar29923 жыл бұрын
The best Jane Eyre ❤️🌺
@KatrinaLeFey3 жыл бұрын
I agree
@anne-no2ic Жыл бұрын
Absolutly the perfect Jane.
@abnashracd4 ай бұрын
"And I have seen a house finer than this"😂 4:17 Jane Eyre-full of strenght & self-respect 😊
@ildikoivanka5406 Жыл бұрын
I have watched every film adaptation of this classic novel.... Starring Toby Steven is my favorite. No one can surpass these great classical writers. Their teachings are eternal.
@TaxingIsThieving11 ай бұрын
That's one of the worst
@nunziawright5957Ай бұрын
I did not like toby steven.... the english in that veriosn did not call for that period of time. it felt like a modern day conversation. he did not carry the immagine well either
@roshanakmehrazar29923 жыл бұрын
The best Mr Rochester ever 👍🏼👍🏼❤️🌺
@58christiansful Жыл бұрын
Quite a charming scene. The way he teases her, it is obvious Rochester likes Jane.
@user-ds2uf2mu4v5 ай бұрын
Who are the stars
@pinkpastelhearts Жыл бұрын
loved this book and the bronte sisters, by weird coincidence, me and my mom went to a thrift store, and there jane eyre was sitting on a table and she bought it for me as a late birthday present this month, (she's a scorpio my mom is, im a virgo) i also loved wuthering heights by her sister emily
@doomeddodo7 ай бұрын
Ah, Mr. Rochester he is just so grumpy, clinical.
@ildikoivanka5406 Жыл бұрын
The woman who can find Mr. Rochester in her life is the luckiest. And I say this not because of wealth, but because of character.
@czuuleczka72892 жыл бұрын
Pięknie przedstawiona historia moja ulubiona wersja ❤❤👍👍
@soledadgonzalez97397 жыл бұрын
Siempre Excelente! 👍👍👍👍👍👍💝
@elinachin99353 жыл бұрын
I still love 1983 BBC version the best.Timothy Dalton is a great actor and perfect Mr. Rochester.
@kay-ron6253 жыл бұрын
Best by far and most true to Jane and Rochester in the book
@samanthasmith61 Жыл бұрын
@@kay-ron625 of course old people with no taste prefer dusty movie with no artistic value whatsoever.. its the worst by far
@kay-ron625 Жыл бұрын
@@samanthasmith61 I don’t know where you’re getting this assumption that people have to be old to appreciate the 1983 version. It was before I was born. Sometimes more classic versions are better than remakes. Everyone has their own opinion - taste is often subjective. Feel free to have your own without criticising the older population.
@TaxingIsThieving11 ай бұрын
@@samanthasmith61 Absolute cringe. Timothy Dalton is too smarmy and the woman... my God. No emotion whatsoever.
@samanthasmith6111 ай бұрын
@@TaxingIsThieving ew cringe, you don't know what art film is suppose to be.. you have no artistic taste in your bone
@jomurphy165421 күн бұрын
The great and charismatic Mr Fassbender was, imho, under-directed in this film, particularly after the crisis of the false marriage denouement - a shame because he is brilliant. I hope he has another chance to play Rochester, one day, with a more courageous director. In this case, less was, unfortunately, less - more flame needed - more ignition!!
@kay-ron6253 жыл бұрын
This has such a different vibe from the book - so serious and with none of the wit and charm of the original scene. They were obviously going for a more dramatic feel. Such a shame.
@jaredlind28883 жыл бұрын
I think this scene is extremely dark and serious in the book. "‘Let Miss Eyre be seated,’ said he: and there was something in the forced stiff bow, in the impatient yet formal tone, which seemed further to express, ‘What the deuce is it to me whether Miss Eyre be there or not? At this moment I am not disposed to accost her.’ I sat down quite disembarrassed. A reception of finished politeness would probably have confused me: I could not have returned or repaid it by answering grace and elegance on my part; but harsh caprice laid me under no obligation; on the contrary, a decent quiescence, under the freak of manner, gave me the advantage". One of Jane's paintings is of a drowned woman "Sinking below the bird and mast, a drowned corpse glanced through the green water; a fair arm was the only limb clearly visible, whence the bracelet had been washed or torn." In the novel there is a great amount of wit in this scene, but I think they capture much of that in the film. Most of their lines are taken directly from the text.
@kay-ron6253 жыл бұрын
@@jaredlind2888 the delivery of a line sets the tone with acting not just the content. Maybe we viewed this scene in a different way in the novel.
@jpnwtn Жыл бұрын
I think this scene is full of dark humor! Rochester knew who she was from the accident on the road, so he has the advantage of her, but Jane rises to parry a few times. I know I grin like a lunatic while I’m watching it, at least. And I lol every time I hear him ask “that head I see now on your shoulders?” 😆
@l.a.3479 Жыл бұрын
@@jpnwtn 🤣 I wanted her to say, in a sarcastic response, "No, it was a different one."
@anne-no2ic Жыл бұрын
I love this version and her accent and the dialogue is greatly satisfying to me as a writer.
@TaxingIsThieving Жыл бұрын
She doesn't want to be pitied!
@user-uj8gx6pn5b Жыл бұрын
Сколько же фильмов снято. Каждый раз смотрю, каждый раз разные артисты.
@alejandrarodriguezaltamira4679 Жыл бұрын
Best versions ranking for me. 1. 1996 (my birthday) 2. 2011 3. 1997
@user-kx1uj2po9o Жыл бұрын
오래간만에 여고시절에소설을읽었는데너무감동!계속보여줄수없나요
@l.a.3479 Жыл бұрын
No
@monjiaitaly Жыл бұрын
I would love to see Joachim Phoenix play Mr. Rochester.
@ellenmarch3095 Жыл бұрын
This.
@l.a.3479 Жыл бұрын
Not me
@cambrie7946 Жыл бұрын
He'd be great
@debbiebooth7899 Жыл бұрын
So good
@lisalisa6686Ай бұрын
They are so very, very good, are they not?
@christinah7772 жыл бұрын
I just watched the 2011 movie on Netflix and was interested in understanding the character of Mr. Rochester. Is it just me, or does Mr. Rochester come across as a self-centered selfish man who only wants Jane as an escape from his mess? I question, does Mr. Rochester ever love Jane, or does he only love what Jane can provide him? Also, the way he treats his daughter Adele is troubling, since she can’t give him anything worth value in his eyes, he discards her. This comes across as very militant and narcissistic, traits that women need to watch out for. In addition, Mr. Rochester also shows traits of manipulation and deceit, where he lies to Jane, plays with her emotions, and then threatens her with violence when she leaves. I understand Mr. Rochester is deserving of slight sympathy, but should Jane have really returned to him.
@fabulousmyriad2672 жыл бұрын
As you might know, the novel is told from Jane's POV. And she's an intelligent, yet desperately lonely young woman. So we get only her impressions of Mr Rochester, with its overtly romantic overtones. He definitely uses Jane's naivety & vulnerabilities against her, and I feel the "punishment" of losing his sight and arm is small compared to his worryingly obsessive tendencies. As long as we remember that real world people *donot* function as fictional, all will be well.
@theshillneckedlizard8364 Жыл бұрын
To borrow a Facebook phrase - "it's complicated." He does genuinely love Jane, but he puts himself and his own needs first, which leads to him lying to her. Jane only comes back to him once she inherits her uncle's money and has found her family, and Rochester has lost his eye and hand - in other words, when they are finally on an equal footing and the power imbalance that characterised their relationship earlier no longer exists. As for Adele, he didn't discard her, quite the opposite. She was probably not his daughter (she bears no resemblance to him) but when Rochester hears she is destitute after the death of her mother, his former mistress, he "picked her up out of the slime and mud of Paris" and arranged for her to be cared for. Rochester is an interesting character because he's essentially a good man who does bad things, but redeems himself.
@zayinm31 Жыл бұрын
Yep, Rochester is meant to be to a great extent what first appears to be, and turns out to be in the middle, a cold and warped being. Almost his whole life has been an overreaction to realizing his first wife was insane, but perhaps more damningly a complete stranger. I see his narcissistic traits as being fertilized by the hate of himself for his affairs, feeling the essence of love and of healthy relationships slip farther and farther away from him, and knowing he had only himself to blame. Rather than excusing his behavior it simply paints a full view of it, and even Rochester admits all of his faults pretty genuinely once he has the benefit of hindsight. He still fails to execute much self-control or to come clean about ignoring Bertha's existence until the end of the book. So he is pretty squarely deceptive and selfish, but a narcissist is still a person and while that will never entitle them to your mind your heart or your safety, they can still have an arc (preferably while the people in their life watch from a safe distance) and change, like Rochester did. I agree immensely with @TheShillNecked Lizard, that Rochester's a very moldable man, first into depravity then redemption
@nopandakit8051 Жыл бұрын
Read the book if you want to understand. This is one of the worst adaptations.
@gabrielaburcea5734 Жыл бұрын
Exactly. Rochester is narcissistic, even displaying sociopathic behaviour in breaking the law by trying to marry her while being married. He is not at all a dream man, quite the opposite! And it pains me that Jane, who was so abused and never loved, has fallen for him of course... as it is doomed for all who suffered such a childhood as Jane's. Pity.
@jennymack13344 күн бұрын
Keep in mind Rochester wife died in his bed he burning her body place burned down staff still asleep he can't control them the just keep coming back jane interacting with people who died in fire or about to jane keep going into roschester bed while he and wife still in it he kept complaining about burning hair his eyes burning he died in fire too outside bedroom door wearing a dress by time jane had her child some people acknowledge the died in fire start disappearing end roschester book jane was seean acting strangely walking and talking invincible people there was no children nor mr Rochester to be seen anywhere.
@madeleinelefebvrerack2861 Жыл бұрын
Timothy Dalton a été le meilleur Edward Rochester dans Jane Eyer
@gerica824 жыл бұрын
Very good but still I prefer Ruth and Toby
@rosevanguard3 жыл бұрын
Thank you I do too!
@christinawatson16 Жыл бұрын
equally good actors
@l.a.3479 Жыл бұрын
I love Ruth and Toby, but now I'm intrigued seeing this scene. I may have to watch it for comparison.
@sedauyank27872 жыл бұрын
Jane has no afraid although she walks in the forest alone
@amybowen2272 жыл бұрын
her aunty and cousin used to beat her and force her outside. she cant be scared of silly stuff like dark woods ❤
@traditionalfood367 Жыл бұрын
... has no fear as she walks ... ... isn't afraid as she walks ...
@bagoquarks Жыл бұрын
007 would never speak to M that way.
@l.a.3479 Жыл бұрын
A different movie...stay on topic, please.
@sharonpowell19694 жыл бұрын
Great movie however, I think the (2) deleted scenes should have been left in this movie. Additionally, I thought the ending just dropped the audience.
@vonBottorff3 жыл бұрын
The book doesn't really give much more.
@heloisamariani11 ай бұрын
i disagree, the chapter where Jane and Rochester reunite in the book has incredible dialogue. But it is long and for a movie, it does it take up precious time@@vonBottorff
@lady62752 жыл бұрын
🥰🥰❤❤❤
@erikaosipova199 Жыл бұрын
i like the different version 1983, especially I don't love this Rochester
@ZannaZatanna12 жыл бұрын
I want to like this vid, but the higher-pitched audio is sooo annoying. it makes Mia's voice sound like a child's and Matthew's almost tinny.
@arthurmead53412 жыл бұрын
Thats how they sound in the movie
@laquerisma Жыл бұрын
Michael.
@l.a.3479 Жыл бұрын
@@arthurmead5341 Yes, that's the only thing that bothers me about this scene. Mia's a great actress, but she sounds too much like a child here.
@TaxingIsThieving11 ай бұрын
"High-pitched audio" *Is the normal audio*
@silviadetoro8782 Жыл бұрын
Porqué no está doblado al español...pena...
@xaviercrain73362 ай бұрын
Casting off is not a tale of woe…and she is supposed to teach English, perhaps English culture of the stiff upper lip