For that single cell to form itself in the first place is the real miracle.

Single cell to multi has been reconstructed. male-female is the biggest problem for creationists: 1 why did it survive 2 what is the essential new feature

There are more videos that explain that

@@letstacobout Really? Where?

There have been 3 to 4000 humans found from the flood, but you have to remember that humans are smarter than animals and would would avoid drowning a lot longer than they would. They would most likely end up drowned and fliating on the top of the water where they would decay and when the waters receded they would be pulled out into the ocean and be picked apart. Plus there was way way more animals than there was humans. There were probably billions of animals and less than a billion people. Do the math. Answers in Genesis has a lot of good videos on this and other subjects.

Yep. Better to cut than boost.👍

Why at the mic? Doesn't the sound board have crossover frequency adjustments?

keep faith out of everything..faith is worthless

@@markcongleton9533 We all know that. But I was trying to be nice.

Observational science vs historical science. Evolution is a belief about the past which is not supported by observational science. If there was a global, year-long catastrophic flood then what observational scientific evidence would we expect to find? The very same observational scientific evidence we find. Rapidly buried and preserved fossils in water-deposited layers of rocks (sedimentary rocks).

Your “Science” teacher may be “slightly” biased if he/she showed you parts of this video as factual information. This speaker was more theologian than scientist as well.

@@MrBugPop So it's not bias just to teach the secular assertion only? What a hypocrite.

@@Flagrum3 No you can believe what you want, but teaching something as science when it is religious mythology is a little sketchy wouldn’t you say? Science is not secular by the way. That is a weird way to describe the process.

@@MrBugPop Really? Well what if I told you your secular evolution is also a religious mythology? Everything mentioned in this video can be backed with science. Problem is you have been indoctrinated so bad you won't even investigate any opposition to your precious evolutionary stories. And yes science is run by secularists right now, the establishment I mean, who give grants and dismiss those who will speak against their dogma.

@@Flagrum3 🤣🤣

If any scientists dares question any aspect of common descent evolution as being wrong, including the age of things, their reputation is smeared, their funding attacked, and sometimes they are even fired. That's the behavior of cultists, not scientists. That's fact, not a conspiracy. I would search on it.

@@ForumLight I actually agree with you regarding how they treat the topic of evolution (evolution dealing with life) .... it is VERY "cult-like". However, when it comes to the age of the Earth, that is a different story. People believe the Earth is old because there is real evidence for this. In any case, it's only small groups of "fundamentalist Christians" that believe the Earth is only 6000-10,000 years old. Most Christians are fine with the Earth being old... most are fine with the Big Bang theory (seems in line with Scripture anyway).

@@amark350 Their "dating" methods of various kinds have been exposed to be an outright farce. Fossils 'dated' up to 100 MILLION years old are now more often being exposed as having the remains of soft tissue and red blood cells on them, which proves they can only be in the thousands of years old. Rocks created under 100 years ago were sent to secular labs to be 'dated' as to when it was created - they come back with 'dates' up to a MILLION years old. It shows their 'dates' are not just wrong, but an absolute farce.

​@@amark350 Here's more proof the Earth cannot possibly be as old as evolutionists need it to be. #1 Very Little Sediment on the Seafloor #2 Bent Rock Layers #3 Soft Tissue in Fossils #4 Faint Sun Paradox #5 Rapidly Decaying Magnetic Field #6 Helium in Radioactive Rocks #7 Carbon-14 in Fossils, Coal, and Diamonds #8 Short-Lived Comets #9 Very Little Salt in the Sea #10 DNA in “Ancient” Bacteria 1) Net gain of 19 billion tons of sediment per year. At this rate, 1,300 feet of sediment would only need a few million years, not billions of years. 2) Rock doesn't bend, it cracks and breaks. Yet rock layers of the same thickness, thousands of feet thick, that evolutionists claim each layer took millions of years to be deposited are BENT, not cracked or broken. 3) It's scientific fact that red blood cells cannot survive more than a few thousand years. Yet they find them in bones mistakenly claimed to be up to a hundred million years old, proving those bones are merely thousands of years old. 4) The sun is getting hotter, meaning it was much cooler in the past, too cool at the ages evolutionists claim for life to have been possible on earth. 5) The strength of the magnetic field has been decaying overall - the earliest records are only 1820's or so. As some put it "Such a rapid decay could not have been going on continuously for millions of years, because the field would have to have been impossibly strong in the past in order for it to still exist today." This alone puts the age of the earth at best to be 20,000 years. 6) Helium defuses so rapidly there would be no helium after, at most, 100,000 years, more so in hot areas where it defuses even faster. The deepest and therefore the hottest zircons (387 degrees F) contained far more helium than expected. All measurements are in agreement that all the helium should have leaked out long before now in the claimed age of the universe. 7) The Earth was not supposedly formed when the imagined big bang happened. After a few hundred thousands of years, with a half life of 5,730 years, there should be none left, yet it’s found in abundance in “ancient” fossils. 8) Comets burn up merely being anywhere near a sun, not just entering in an atmosphere. Scientists know comets cannot last millions of years, so they invent “oort clouds” as one “rescue device” where these imagined clouds make new comets. 9) Again an imagined “the land became sea and vice versa” as a rescue-device, realizing the salt accumulation in the oceans would mean we could now walk across the oceans because the salt would be so thick. 10) DNA breaks down quickly even in ideal conditions. Even evolutionists agree it should not last more than a million years. Yet we find it in bacteria dated at 250 MILLION years. (A false dating of at LEAST 250 times the true date). What’s so interesting is every single time evidence refutes evolutionists beliefs about the age of the universe, they make it clear they have no intentions of ever abandoning their made up claims of the age of the universe as proven by them never even being willing to consider if they are wrong, but instead assume the evidence must be wrong and hence they fabricate rescue devices over and over and over again.

@@ForumLight : Your response reminds me of a friend of mine that tried so hard to convince me that 911 was "an inside job"... he would go point by point and state tons of facts from "supposed experts". But nothing he said came close to changing my mind. Why? Because I did not believe the premise i.e. (George Bush and friends attacked America for whatever reason). The same is true for any conspiracy theory ... think of talking to a person that believes in UFOs... they will send you all sorts of "evidence"... but in the end, if you reject the premise (space people are flying around Earth and crashing their ships), then the evidence means very little. With the age of the Earth, the VAST majority of scientists believe the Earth is old... and every point you made can be rebutted and explained by real experts. Historians, archeologists, physicists, cosmologists, etc. nearly ALL unanimously agree that the Earth is old. These are the people that study these things and their opinion has more baring on me than a very small group of fundamentalist's Christians that are trying desperately to paint a picture of Young Earth (based off a literal interpretation of the Bible). You do realize that the majority of Christian denominations do NOT teach young earth (or at least leave it open to interpretation). In short, I would tell you the same thing that I would tell a "flat earther" ... - wake up and smell the coffee and stop trying to prove something that has already been settled by the people that study it. All that said, I do keep an open mind... but it would take a consensus vote from the scientific community to change my mind on this one. Not point by point facts from a fundamentalists.

Are you willing to talk to me about it?

@@flysoup3607 one verse disproves the entire dinosaur theory. God told Noah to bring 2 of EACH KIND onto the ark. when you see every living animal that made in onto the ark still alive today besides "the most ferocious beast to walk the earth", then you have a problem.

Says a grown man who plays fantasy video games 😊 nice one Einstein

@@markford4127 Pro 14:6 A scoffer seeks wisdom and does not find it, But knowledge is easy to him who understands. Pro 24:9 The devising of foolishness is sin, And the scoffer is an abomination to men. making fun of people you’ve never met does no good. I live for Christ, not the things of this world.

The deception is Ken Hamms invention. He has them on his Ark roadside attraction and some how believes they boarded two by two along with the rest of the animals prior to the “flood” 🤣🤣

Yous really believe in alot of purpose considering you preach chance and natural detection

I mean both extinct and modern.

@@dencollins7801trilobites still exist today and we see them in the fossil record. There are plenty of animals that we still have, like squids and crustaceans who are also found in the rock layers.

The lower layers, like the crustaceans on the bottom of the ocean, were covered by sediment first. Then came along the upper layers with land-dwelling animals who were covered in different sediments.

@@skueky8181 How about some fossils of dogs, cats, lions, sheep, goats, ducks, crows, sparrows, robins, cows, and horses?

Mostly a result of the British Kennel Club during the past 300 years. All the dogs of today trace back to an archetypical wolf of some kind.

@Joe dirty71 Someone told me to create Human by chance...is the same chance of a foot ball stadium filled with penny's dropped from a helicopter and all land on heads.

@Joe dirty71 can water cover the earth? who knows. But the amount of things that have to happen to design/make..end up with a human......there may be less stars in the sky than things that have to go right to create life. And I think that penny anology....is actually only to build the human eye, not even a whole person.

@Joe dirty71 lol I bet you didn't even watch the whole video. I may be picking the wrong animal...but humans have the same vertebrae as a whale...did we evolve from whales? Or did whales come from us? lol theres no half whale half human...theres no mid transition fossil. If whale bones /fossil can get to the top of andies mountain....we can flood a mountain...but somehow we can't flood the whole earth? Im indoctronated...you probably think theres multiple genders...lol

Life! From the simplest form. Water or just moisture with bacteria growing mold mildew and God knows what else. Depending on the size and if you had a picture of it that I could enlarge I would tell you exactly what it was how you familiar with water bears? Look it up on the internet.

" I had a flood in my basement and had many lines on the walls and strange things growing in the water that looked like fish with legs. " They are called rat's and are pretty common

This video is a bunch of lies peddled by self serving morons. How a geologist can spout this bullsh1t is beyond me. Please don’t allow these terrible generalisations to influence you. These AIG videos are embarrassing. Notice how this guy refers to random support from authorities backing his story up. I’m shocked that a grown up man could spout this drivel to an adult audience.

@Joe dirty71 that is your opinion… same can be said about macro evolution.. nothing about it is factual or true.. look up the second law of thermodynamics

@Joe dirty71 cope

@Joe dirty71 Please provide specifics as to what he said that is not true or perhaps what you have stated is not true.

Excellent series...a must watch for those seeking scientific evidence that bolsters the Biblical narrative.

Are you excluding the possibility that the bones would be more strong than now?

"Unlike in mammals and birds, the trabecular bone does not increase in thickness as the body size of dinosaurs increases." “Instead it increases in density of the occurrence of spongy bone. Without this weight-saving adaptation, the skeletal structure needed to support the duck-billed, plant-eating hadrosaurs would be so heavy, the dinosaurs would have had great difficulty moving.”

Wait until Jesus come back. Then evolution will be bronze age.

Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful - Seneca

Christianity is one of the base core values that shaped the world to what we have today, it always lead to the first scientists of modern science. Also there's evidence for God useing mathematics (it's one of the 4 branches of science) there is a good argument with evidence I can use to prove God exist. There are Physicist that have done math to show the likely hood of our universe happening "by chance" and they counted every variable for it. One stated that for life to come from nothing (which violates the biological law that life can only come from other life), nothing being molecules accidently arranged them selves to make the first DNA to mindless form into the first living cell is comparable to a tornado going into a scrap metal yard and building a passenger airplane by chance. The math showed there is a 10^40,000 in 1 Chance of that happening though natural process. To put that into perspective, if you could speak 32 Zeros in 6 seconds it would take you 4 hours to say that whole number. And it would take about 38 pieces of paper to write out the full number as well. I can't believe something that has that small of a number behind it. It would be illogical for me to believe that the universe "accidentally" was created from a huge unorganized explosion (Big bang theory, nothing created everything) made laws of physics that line up for life to exist in the first place. (Protons neutrons and electrons having the ability to even combine together to make Anything in the universe including life forms, and there's no logic or thought behind something so complect and complicated happended by a mere 10^40'000 in one chance. So by the creation of the universe it's self, and seeing how wonderful and good it was created, It would be more illogical to Believe nothing caused it. In a way, believing something like that is it own fairy tail. It's just more intellectual.

And even if Christianity weren't true, look at society when most were either Christian, or atleast respected it as opposed to now. Drug addiction is out of control, suicide is rampant, violence is off the charts, children born out of wedlock is sky high. Yeah this age of enlightenment from science has done wonders for us hasn't it. I wonder if people even know why they don't like Christianity or is it because they just heard someone else say they don't like it and they just follow instead of finding out for themselves. Only a fool doesn't find out about their eternity on their own.

Yeah, the entire contiguous states were once covered in shallow tropical waters….hence sea organism fossils. Sorry, but everyone can find those in their backyard. Mountains form where two continental plates collide rock is pushed towards the sky. Over time these plates continue to collide, mountains will get taller and taller. So “In the beginning…” seems to rival science. In my opinion the Bible is a pov collection of stories and we all know perception is the driver for stories. Some stories weren’t included not due to facts or lies but that the men in charge of deciding what books and narratives went into the official cannon. So just like politicians today…if you aren’t in the “it” crowd you aren’t viewed as knowledgeable or correct.

Good, you've found evidence of plate tectonics and mountain range folding.

@@ilonahaun that's your theory? Good luck with that!

@@eliteknowledge7298 And your theory is to claim that 6.5 million different species fit in a 300! feet long wooden boat, built by 8 members of a family 3000 years ago, whose boss is 600 years old, to save himself from a flood whose water volume corresponds to several times the volume of the world's oceans?

Same found same on the top of a high desert mesa in Central AZ!

What happens is that agnotological campaigns purposely misrepresented the findings in a way that would fool the science-challenged. In this case, the term “soft tissue” in real life, refers to tissues that are not bone. Your liver, or marrow, or brain, or tendon, etc… are soft tissue. Misinformation sources, pretend that it meant the tissues found were STILL SOFT, as in, like meat you could chew, etc… instead of what the real articles and papers referenced. In the case of the recent Misinformation examples, the parts in question were rock hard, and preserved due to the involved chemistry. That made it possible to resolibulize the crystals, etc, and analyze the remaining proteins, etc. So, yes, some ancient remains from around 66 or so million years ago or more, were able to be analyzed in this way. No, there was no soft flesh, etc, involved, and no rational thought about why it was still soft and moist after millions of years… as it was as hard as a rock and luckily preserved in that state. You should ALWAYS ask yourself the following; If such a find would really turn the entire scientific world upside down .... Why didn't it? Science isn'one big conspiracy as it's open for anyone who wants to be a part of it.

It was elastic you can see it being stretched under the microscope there's blood the samples had cells still on it there's no misinformation about it bro

Tissues preserved in clay last a long time.

Why? Many dinosaurs were quite quick, yet they're always found under large slow mammals. Why do birds show up before mammals?

You have the ability to USE multi sylabic words and some technical terms, but I will dish dash away from your mish mash word salad of poppycock and be better off! Number 3 is a fact, but doesn't mean a thing.

​@@lizd2943 I thought so before, but there are claims that the fossil layers do not follow a sequence that is based on slow gradual stratification. In my understanding the living creatures must have been buried very quickly under mud masses to be able to become fossilized before getting eaten away. Slow fossilization under soil layers would be of course impossible, because animal corpses do not stay untouched on earth's surface waiting to be buried by 2mm/100 years of stratification. Animal corpses are practically always eaten away in couple of days.

@@jounisuninen Why assume the only thing that can bury organisms quickly is a worldwide flood?

@@jounisuninen the fossil layers do show us the sequence of evolution. They always follow that. Yes fossilization is usually from a quick burial, as you pointed out, but the rock layers and the actual fossilization process take millions of years.

More like taking us back to the dark ages before the enlightenment.

Evil?🤣🤣

First, let's look at what evening and morning are not. They are not actual evening and mornings, as this requires a sunrise and sunset. According to young earth theory, the Sun was not created until Day Four, thus there could be no sunrise or sunset for the first three days of creation. However, God uses the terms evening and morning for those first three days. Therefore, they cannot be actual evenings and mornings. We are left with only one option. The words for Evening and Morning can only represent the beginning and ending of the creative period, and not actual sunrise and sunsets. Scripture itself sets this pattern for us.

Aliens.....siphoned it off to use on other planets.....

Scientific research change the story as they learn new theories. They don't really have it figured out without a doubt. I still believe in science.

Maybe you have noticed that there is still a lot of water on earth. The water ran of into the ocean basins.

@@crisjones7923 if the water covered mountains that's a whole lot of water Where is it now.

@@crisjones7923 and that water is useless as it is. It provides more water vapor which is a very good thing......

Well, 'they' own The Smithsonian, and every other world organization, including all forms of media and "news" outlets, world "governments" and their "military" ("legal" terrorist forces). The Smithsonian has been hiding and getting rid of evidence of The Most High and His-story for at least a couple centuries already.

How would we know if we have found fossils of humans from the flood? How would we know if they were from the flood and they didn’t just die of old age? We know this about animals because there are billions of animal fossils in one place, and that wouldn’t happen without a catastrophic event. For the humans, you could just say there was a bad disease or there was a war. There would be no way to tell if they were from the flood.

@@Gospeldefenseagancy Yes there would - by the same standard we gauge the animals by. If human fossils were present in the same "stratum" preserved in the last position they were in, such as while eating, giving birth, etc, and there were masses of them, you could reason the same thing.

@@corndog9482 How could you tell the difference between human fossils from a flood and a war? This kind of stuff doesn’t happen for animals. There have been many wars over the years. We don’t have many fossils from even wars where bodies weren’t picked up. We haven’t found many human fossils, anyway.

@@Gospeldefenseagancy "How could you tell the difference between human fossils from a flood and a war?" Look around the human remains. Do you see masses of other animal fossils around the human fossils in the same "stratum"? If so, I would say that would make 'war' less likely in that scenario. Vice versa; if there were only a bunch of human fossils, I'd be more inclined to assume a war, ritual/genocide/mass burial of some kind.

You mean God cannot have a human voice come out of an animals to make one statement? You do realize that common descent evolutionists claim some populations of fish, frogs, reptiles, and more could learn to speak, read and write English and all other human languages, play baseball, pass laws, have marriage ceremonies, design and program computers and more if you just "give it enough time"? That should mean you reject it. Do you?

Animals communicate with other animals. The story in the Bible explains that the human understood what the donkey was thinking. God can do thar, don't you think?

@@TRUTHandLIGHT4809 No, no, no. The donkey really talked in human language. It says so right in the Bible. Don't you believe the Word of God? In these times when they fake moon landings and election results it's important to keep believing in truth and revelations.

@@douglascutler1037 My point remains the same--The donkeys thoughts and words were know. Easy for God to do. All life forms has thoughts.

@@TRUTHandLIGHT4809 You can't be a cafeteria Christian, only choosing what you think the Bible means. The Bible literally says the donkey talked, spoke, communicated with intelligible human speech. "Then the Lord opened the donkey’s mouth, and it said to Balaam, “What have I done to you to make you beat me these three times?” 29 Balaam answered the donkey, “You have made a fool of me! If only I had a sword in my hand, I would kill you right now.” 30 The donkey said to Balaam, “Am I not your own donkey, which you have always ridden, to this day? Have I been in the habit of doing this to you?”

Unfortunately, there is no Nobel Prize in pseudoscience.

Creationist scientists use the same scientific methods as atheists. They just get results that atheists do not always accept for ideological reasons. So there is in fact many creationist Nobel Prize winners i.e. people believing in God.

@@jounisuninen You got confused. Creationism is not science. Atheism is also not science. And what are the ideological reasons? Name these Nobel Prize winners because I can't find them

@@jounisuninen You are 100% wrong. The scientific method always includes the possibility of being wrong. The holy books do not. There has never been a Nobel prize awarded for confirming anything in the Bible or any other religious text. You are confusing a pilot who is religious with saying that means god is flying the plane. Totally false conclusion.

@@at1970 The scientific method always includes the possibility of being wrong and as I said, creationist scientists use exactly same scientific methods as the atheist scientists. Creationist scientists never use "holy books" as evidence. Instead, they prove scientifically that Bible contains the truth. We can see it e.g. in this video.

I’ve seen people do the math on the energy all of that would take and basically it would vaporize the planet. Also, there isn’t enough water to cover the earth.

Man made story.

What? Older than 5782 years? No humans at all?

What proof for 40 000 years?

@@jounisuninen "...Molecular clock estimates, genetic studies and archaeological data all suggest the initial colonisation of Sahul and Australia by modern humans occurred around 48,000-50,000 years ago....The oldest human fossil remains found in Australia date to around 40,000 years ago - 20,000 years after the earliest archaeological evidence of human occupation. Nothing is known about the physical appearance of the first humans that entered the continent about 50,000 years ago. What is clear is that Aboriginal people living in Australia between 40,000 and 10,000 years ago had much larger bodies and more robust skeletons than they do today and showed a wide range of physical variation." The Australian Museum.

@@meganwilliams2962 Your faith is strong in the fable of evolution

Go on.... It's floated into space..🤪💨💨💨

According to Walter Brown some of it splashed down on the moon (and any other celestial body with a craters)

It's still here, in the oceans and under the earth.

the oil and they discovered 3 times the amount of water on top of earth 400 miles beneath the earth

it was water in two very large bodies, Grand Lake (past Grand Junction and into the western Rockies) and Hopi Lake farther south, more water than Lake Superior, water which breached a southwest natural dam and poured out all at once, in a period of a few weeks. It carried off thousands of cubic miles of dirt and cut the Grand Canyon in a short period of time. The Kaibab Plateau is an area where the earth's crust ROSE, floating on magma, because so much weight was removed from the crust by the outflow of water cutting the canyon.

@@daveperk tks!! I always suspected this!!

@@bradthompson5383 give me ur theory, and stop being a jerk about other theories and yes if u have info on non conforming areas of this giant washout or crack in the crust, I would like to hear it. I'm just suggesting alternative ideas from which we're taught. Tks

@@bradthompson5383 ok explain to me yhe difference between jagged earth crust rock and round edge rocks which can only be rounded on both sides by tumbling or under water erosion. Just because your college told u so does not make it so. Think logical not what someone told u to be true. Open minds are amazing. U should try it.

@@bradthompson5383 I welcome your ideas. Explain your theory of the canyon gape. I'm not narrow minded, just inquisitive.

" I have found seashells on the tops of 14k foot mountains. " I beat the mountain was of sedimentary layers, you know, you never find seashells on old volcano mountains.

Indeed. *"For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold [suppress] the truth in unrighteousness;"* Romans 1:18

Good catch! "500 million years" LOL!

It can't be understood because it doesn't make any sense.

Your talking about every species on earth, like insects, bacteria, fish Viruses... Ect. The ark is only land animals. So your 6.5 million species number is wrong and does not make since to use, leading to it making no since

​@@jr8260he used 6.5 million different kinds including insects, viruses, bacteria, fish... Ect. Because he used the wrong measurement here his comment made no since interpreting the ark

I hope this helps… There are roughly 8.7 million species of life in the world. The ocean alone contains an estimated 2.2 million of that, and this is just in Ocean plants and animals. This doesn't count for bacteria species that live in the Ocean and on land. The ocean’s species count during the flood, except for the animals who did not survive because of the extreme conditions, was largely untouched. So, a lot of the big number of species you see were in the ocean, which did not come from the original roughly 8,000 on the ark. The 8.7 million is reduced. Bacteria, viruses, and other microbes make up a whole lot of that 8.7 million also, and since there are trillions of microbes living in the gut of a single animal, we know that lots of microbes survived the flood. Plants are also a huge amount too, so they subtract more from the 8.7. After all the subtraction, we are left with the number 2 million for species of land animals. Only 2 million compared the 8.7 million. And it's actually thought of to be just a little less than 2 million. Insects take up a lot of that 2 million, and since they reproduce at rapid rates, they speciate quicker. The other land animals have adapted to their varying environments which creates more species. God created animals with the ability to adapt and change to different environments, anticipating the sin of man and the following curse in creation. This is why we see so much diversity in animals, microbes, and even plants.

Who said only 8,000 kind were on the ark ? How is it even possible that one living organsim with a known set of DNA can produce 6.2 million different living organisms, many with DNA that aren't even close to each other, which of the two is more plausible ?

They actually date them by how old they think the rocks are that they found them in it’s all theory never 100% truth

They don't actually have a scientific way of knowing how old a fossil is. It is merely an assumption to say evolution exists. But if evolution was real we wouldn't have dinosaurs "6.5 billion years later". They would have evolved into a different species. They say monkeys became humans but somehow we still have monkeys. Doesn't make sense.

You know what else proves there was a flood, 3 quarters of the earth is water. If our planet was 6.5 billion years old we would have less water, not more.

They try to date the rock layer it’s in or one above or below. So if they find a layer of, say volcanic debris, they can date that pretty accurately. Then if the fossil is above that layer, they know it’s younger. If it’s below that layer, they know it’s older. Sometimes they find them between known layers so they can give a range. Sometimes they have species that they have repeatedly confirmed with such processes. These species can then be used to give soft estimates for the age of things found in the same layer. Such estimates are never considered definitive.

@@jayess9752 When mnt saint Helens erupted scientists knew exactly when the rocks were formed. But when they used carbon dating it showed the rocks were formed millions of years ago. do you not see the problem with that?

Pappy: There are plenty of fossils of large and small dinosaurs (and other ancient animals). Just go to your local museum.

Will you stop talking?

There simply is not enough water on earth to cause a global flood, though I trust you to excersize some incredible mental gymnastics to work arround that problem. Its a story, a myth, that you so much want to be true, you're willing to reject any evidence to the contrary.

Definitely not explained by the flood if it was there would be reams and reams of papers ( scientific studies, peer reviewed) produced about this. Name one genuine studie or paper connecting the flood and that mass extinction!

You aren't convincing anyone. Some of us already know deep time, others believe the world is 6000 years old. Both groups already have their minds made up.

I see you have some squiggly lines as your identifier, they remind me of alien markings. So, how is the 'Predator', what planet are you on? Here on Earth we have a system called education, it trains people to think, to investigate physical phenomenon and categorize the findings into reports and papers that are reviewed by others who are educated as well. I notice you are a nobody, a pretender, a wannabe with no identity and no peer reviewed papers just like the other dopes at AiG, and yet you write long fanciful stories about geological systems that are eloquent but have no scientific basis. What is your deal?

What? Older than 5782 years? No humans at all?

They very likely lived in the same area or they would have long since decayed , one or the other, and not fossilized together. That alone minus' out several billion years.

We can be absolutely certain they didn’t necessarily live together? How is a possibility absolutely certain of anything? You really aren’t making sense. We can be absolutely certain that it might rain tomorrow, or it might not.

We?

Maybe the footprint was neanderthal or cro-magnon man.

Nuts 😅

Rather large evolution

What? Older than 5782 years? No humans at all?

"Gods evolve according to the whims of society." In fact, there is no evidence for that.

@@jounisuninen really? Look a societies and look at their gods.

@@jounisuninen I'm guessing you're a Christian...have you ever thought of the evolution of your own Abrahamic God? With the Judaism to Catholicism to branching off into the many sects of Christianity and Islam....it evolves with the different prophets speaking in their *time.* It's still evolving, just like language and culture.

@@jayess9752 I know. Just look at the development of the Greek Gods pantheon changing into the Roman Gods.....blatant.

It is easy to make a living in geology, oil companies and mining corporations are always looking for good geologists... if he is not fully employed, maybe Dr. Snelling is not really that good at it

@@kenjiwebb1509 everybody knows the Bible shows the exact location of all mineral deposits … it’s in the back on foldout maps ….

Have you ever been to one of the coasts? It's right there for you to see with your own eyes and touch with your own hands. In fact 71% of the earth's surface is covered with it. Interestingly, ocean trenches and valleys are so massive and deep that if all the continents were levelled off and the trenches and valleys filled in, the entire planet would be covered with water over a kilometre deep.

The Black Sea is not close to Israel, so the idea that it is the source of the Flood account in the Bible is not a reasonable hypothesis. This is why your comment quite rightly said “many think,” because it is speculation, it does not even have sufficient grounds to be considered a hypothesis.

Earthly flood happened. All rock formations are proof

@@bradthompson5383 not a valid response. Be specific on one point, don't just throw out names hoping to sound smart. I made a solid no apologizes statement. Name 1 thing very specifically that you think refutes that statement.

What? Older than 5782 years? No humans at all?

The description of Noah's Ark and the Flood is found in many cultures, even in China (with different names), so it obviously was not just a local catastrophe.

🐑

NASA are only qualified to pump out cartoons and entertain people who love CGI

As a consequence of the floods caused by the eruption of Mount Saint Helens a solid rock canyon was carved in less than a year. Geologist at the time said we would have assumed it took hundreds if not thousands of years for this rock can you do for him if we didn’t have eyewitnesses to the contrary. This indeed calls the idea of the Grand Canyon checking eons to form into question. But the sheep of evolution don’t ask questions.

@@unkelfukkenskot7447 your response is appropriate: in articulate and without reasoning. You have added nothing to the conversation.

@@denvan3143 I wasn't trying to add anything to the conversation. I just wanted a reaction. Thank you.

Or where are the modern day mammal in the same layer with dinosaurs, for that matter? Or a dinosaur buried next to an elephant?

@@Michiel_de_Jong all live forms are at various levels. There are no specific levels indicating a certain millennium. All the layers we placed within days of each other

@@TRUTHandLIGHT4809 | That line of thinking was possible till the mid 19th century. By that time the observations and the closer inspection of those layers made this hypothesis untenable. Fossils in those consecutive layers were very different; plants as well as animals and you never find modern day mammals in the same layer with dinosaurs, or vise versa. Moreover, the layers were formed under different conditions; as a bottom of a shallow sea, as a dry desert, as a lush forest, as a lava deposit, etc. Moreover, the orientation of the crystals in the rocks of those respective layers are in different directions, showing that the earth magnetic field direction was different during the formation of those respective layers. Moreover, the Lead content in the Zirconium crystals differs between those layer, related to the amount of Uranium that has been decayed to Lead during the time that has passed since the formation of those Zirconium crystals/layers. Etc, etc. Believe what you want, but don't send your kids with this 6-days-creation-narrative to college/universities... You will be responsible for the fact that they start the game with a 0-1 deficit, in the discussions they will have.

@@Michiel_de_Jong YOU SAID--}"| That line of thinking was possible till the mid 19th century. By that time the observations and the closer inspection of those layers made this hypothesis untenable. " (nothing has changed. We still know that the layers were laid down at the same time (within days)) YOU SAID--"Fossils in those consecutive layers were very different; plants as well as animals and you never find modern day mammals in the same layer with dinosaurs, or vise versa. (faulty logic. Absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence--NORMAL JUVENILE mistake you make there) YOU SAID--}Moreover, the layers were formed under different conditions; as a bottom of a shallow sea, as a dry desert, as a lush forest, as a lava deposit, etc. Moreover, the orientation of the crystals in the rocks of those respective layers are in different directions, showing that the earth magnetic field direction was different during the formation of those respective layers. Moreover, the Lead content in the Zirconium crystals differs between those layer, related to the amount of Uranium that has been decayed to Lead during the time that has passed since the formation of those Zirconium crystals/layers. Etc, etc." " (you are conflating the sediment laid down by the flood with tectonic movement and geologic activity after the flood) YOU SAID-- }Believe what you want, but don't send your kids with this 6-days-creation-narrative to college/universities... You will be responsible for the fact that they start the game with a 0-1 deficit, in the discussions they will have." (appeal to fear, and authority. Starting off with a BELEIF is worse than accepting what we all already know. There was a flood and all life was buried alive. There are many dozen dinosaur graves where they were fleeing and got trapped and made a mass grave The evidence for a flood is off the charts if you want to discuss)

@@TRUTHandLIGHT4809 | As I said, it doesn't concern me when you believe what you believe about creation, but be aware about your responsibility for your possible choice to send children ill-equipped with your creation opinions, based on wrong hermeneutic concepts with regard to Genesis 1 and 2, into a battle against well established facts.

Cannibalism is when you eat someone's flesh - usually they are dead - and the amount of flesh to eat is lessened the more you eat. Jesus is a living sacrifice, so that's the first main difference from cannibalism. And the quantity isn't diminished the more you take communion, unlike the eating of flesh.

What? Older than 5782 years? No humans at all?

My thoughts exactly

Holy crap, what a load of nonsense! 😞 Why don't you talk to an actual geologist??They love talking about this stuff! They will actually educate you so that you don't walk around in ignorance

@@donnyh3497 its interesting that the most converted scientist group from atheism to creationism are geologists.

@@davidbilliter5619 Where did you get that info from??? I’d love to see

👍👍 no worldwide flood. No cores I have even taken had absolutely no evidence of a worldwide flood. By rock or ice. Fresh water lakes are not salty, mammals haven't died not on an ark(out of abundance of fresh water), and our diversity as humans Noah's family didn't spawn. A,worldwide flood is the one of the most false stories ever!! 🤣😂😂🤣 Many religions have many false stories. Science is a collective of peoven observation, It is rarely incorrect. But we will correct any wrong information. As discovery.

@Danny from Charleston, SC. Where did you study your Geology? Must have been a goon institution, for you make a statement like a goon. Am scratching my head about what you are trying to convey.

@@iaam8141Well, sir, do you consider an ice age, as a planetary flood? By geology and cores I have done. No worldwide flood ever. I worked at a test lab. On cores. No evidence of a worldwide flood.

​@@donaldgoodnight7853. Global flood was in 3298 BC, + 2022 AD = 5,320 yrs ago. Duration of flood was 300 days. Noah was in ark for 377 days. What yr was the ice age? Duration? Was it planetwise? Provide hard dates n data. If cannot, it'll be mere you 'shooting mouth off like a mad man.' Like a lot of fancy talkers on this video thread.

Floods are not planetwise, except the Great Flood of Noah's time.

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 sadly there are folks with PhD degrees in some discipline ir another and yet they believe in ghost and other things that run counter to true knowledge. Superstition and Miracles are deeply ingrained in the human psychic. If you remove them from the Bible then you are still left with a good book. However, becuase man is man's worse enemy it is best to grin and bear it. But in my opinion, a doctorate means absolutely nothing if one is not a critical thinker.

Men inspired by God. Evolution was though out by men. There is a big difference.

... under God's guidance, right.

How the seventh day, a day of rest was actually started, 445,000 yrs ago, a flesh and blood alien race of immortal beings landed on earth. Built domains and created man. On their first seventh day of work, I quote, " By eve time, complete was the encampment! For the night therein the heroes gathered. Ea and Alalu and Anzu the doings considered; all that was done indeed was good! And it was evening and it was morning, the sixth day. On the seventh day, the heroes in the encampment were assembled, To them Ea spoke these words: A hazardous journey we have undertaken, from Nibiru to the seventh planet a dangerous way we traversed. At Earth we with success arrived, much good we attained, an encampment we established. Let this day be a day of rest; the seventh day hereafter a day of resting always to BE. Now these were the gods of earth, Who and when they wrote the scriptures, made man believe a different story, why to keep man to continue serving and worshipping them, till they return to earth their second time!

7th day Adventist?

Grand enlightening. God loves man so, I cannot comprehend how or why anyone would reject his Grace. But, as written, "Wide is the path that leads to destruction (i.e., eternity in Hell) narrow is the path that leads to salvation (eternity with Jesus) and few find it". It is painfully sad to see how many, today, willingly choose the wide path of life.

So that's Saturday then.

@@adriel2919 If God loves man so much why do children get raped, murdered and go hungry?

Why would the creation layer need to be 1,000 feet below the surface or 700 feet above it. What do you mean? This is absolutely not necessary. Much of the water that killed everyone and everything sank into the ground, so why would you expect it to be above or below the water?

We don't need layers of ground to proof That God Created everything it's there for you who need the physical to believe and yet you don't... I pray for you

@@judaspriestcod-m6259 You are correct. I do need proof on a story over 2,000 years old written by men. I’m more on the agnostic side. I am an average person with plenty of faults, but my measuring stick is how I treat the people I know and love. I would never inflict them with illness, disease, financial hardship etc. to “test their love” for me. So basically you can accept, possibly have a horrible life physically, mentally and financially with a promise for a better life, but no proof. Or you might be a horrible person that lives a spectacular life here on Earth with no problems whatsoever and we are all supposed to believe payback comes later in terms of eternal damnation. Or perhaps you lived in a society that did not allow religion and never heard of God, but you get eternal damnation anyway. Sounds pretty messed up or perhaps people that have been in control over the ages create these systems to keep people in line. Did all the people that worship sun gods prior to Moses automatically go to Hades because they didn’t know any better. So many rabbit holes.

How exactly does dinosaur fossils prove an old earth and evolution? You do realize dinosaurs still exist so if evolution was real there would not be any dinosaurs left because aren't they 6.5 billion years old? How exactly are dinosaurs not people by now?

"dinosaurs" (behemoths) were created on the 6th day by God. Job 40:15 Behold now behemoth, which I made with thee; he eateth grass as an ox. Job 40:16 Lo now, his strength is in his loins, and his force is in the navel of his belly. Job 40:17 He moveth his tail like a cedar: the sinews of his stones are wrapped together. Job 40:18 His bones are as strong pieces of brass; his bones are like bars of iron. Job 40:19 He is the chief of the ways of God: he that made him can make his sword to approach unto him. Job 40:20 Surely the mountains bring him forth food, where all the beasts of the field play. Job 40:21 He lieth under the shady trees, in the covert of the reed, and fens. Job 40:22 The shady trees cover him with their shadow; the willows of the brook compass him about. Job 40:23 Behold, he drinketh up a river, and hasteth not: he trusteth that he can draw up Jordan into his mouth. Job 40:24 He taketh it with his eyes: his nose pierceth through snares.

Oil is from trees that have been flooded buried on earth(( fossil fuel))

If a dinosaur life-span was millions of years, you would have something.

@@billtierney2201 Soft tissues, blood cells and DNA have recently been found in dinosaur bones. So most dinosaurs died about 4400 years ago in Noah's flood. Some died after the flood. Don't believe the lies written in text books.

It is a mile deep in places .

Because a basic understanding in science will tell you that it's not physically possible for the world to be only 2000 years old, nor is there evidence for God hence why it's called "faith".

Math mostly

Yet on the other hand it's supposed to make perfect sense that apparently god sprang forth from nothingness. If all things have to come from something then where did he come from? So claiming that god made the universe doesn't solve the riddle of where all this came from either.

Have you read god’s cure for leprosy? Leviticus 14 The creator of the universe and this is the best he can do? This is clear evidence that god does not exist and that the bible is NOT a book of science

Well that's a Theory just like Majority of science - us flying planes and using rockets to get to space was also a theory to start with and science made it happen then its a fact, its very hard to go back into time and prove anything, just like its impossible to prove god. you just refer to a book and not as a theory but fact when ignoring any other religious book or god as your blinded by your faith - which makes you biased to it, meaning there is no logical conversation to be had.

@@toddbradford4700 God didn’t spring forth from nothingness. He always was, and is. He has no beginning or end. Doesn’t it make more sense for an infinite being to have created everything rather than matter creating itself from nothing that eventually produced intelligent life?

@@jalatham86 No. It doesn't make ANY more sense. If all the matter of the universe had to come from something then so would a god. And the mystery of where this god came from would therefore be just as baffling as where all the matter of the universe came from. So that "Claim" doesn't explain how everything started either. Quite frankly it's frustrating to even try to talk to people whose minds seem incapable of seeing the double standard they are engaging in. Perhaps the universe is cyclic in nature and it's always existed. That's a rather incredible thought I know but no more incredible than a being that has always existed. What's the difference? The question of the origin of the universe is perhaps unanswerable but I'm not going to just make up a fairytale to explain it like some clearly do.

evaporate into clouds

@@Mr.Robert1 It would take years for all that water to evaporate and it hasnt dissapeared so it would fall as rain again

A study was recently published where scientists say they have discovered a 6th ocean underneath the surface of the earth. At first I was like what no way and then I googled earth’s 6th ocean and a ton of articles came up. Simply put the flood waters receded back into the fountains of the deep.

@@Sunshineonmymind714 somebody who does research, good work..

What? Older than 5782 years? No humans at all?

The more science is finding, the closer it comes to the Biblical description of creation.

@Alex Perez I suggest that you start examining this fact.

@NESHMETAL Actually that's not what Genesis says.

What? Older than 5782 years? No humans at all?

The animals Noah collected did indeed "evolve" (adapted) into the animals we now have, but innumerable animal species have gone extinct after the Great Flood.

@@jounisuninen I thought no evolution existed that a dog was a dog and a cat was a cat. how do you get so many different species of today from a few hundred on the ark.

what about the kangaroos, after the ark they hopped only to Australia (across seas) and did not leave any traces along the way?

Or maybe like me they came to conclusions from evidence, then found the truth against the assumption presented by 'Atheists' in all media that there are millions of years. I suggest the bombardment in the media of Evolution, without the reasoning of this video, may raise even your suspicions a out their motives.

@@simonskinner1450 the theories in this video seems full of holes to me. He provided very little physical evidence and then just started telling us what the Bible says and it left me more confused then before. He really didn’t make much sense when he talked about the fossils, and then he threw the Bible into it as if it would help explain his fossil evidence but It still didn’t make sense. That’s what I took away from it.

@@monteclark1115 So you did not get the worldwide dynamic that was given to you, that fact of chalk beds, or sandstone beds, or limestone beds stretching around the world overlaying each other, describing how each animal type would be collected in the Flood as it progressed. He confronted you with very idea that animals or trees can die and yet be preserved in the air waiting for dust to cover them, instead of a catastrophic flood event scouring the rock and gathering life or plants into beds to be fossilised. I have been there, where you are and this may be new to you, but seriously how could you imagine fosslilization without a flood? The phenomenon you need to know about is the mechanics of how sediments layer themselves in a flow allowing different density sediments with varying grade size to sort using the speed of the flow. This cannot be seen in action, but only when the flow stops and the water above it cuts through to leave canyons. However I sense it is all the talk of the Holy Bible being used as history and fact that puts you off. Remember it is followers of Darwin that put the emphasis on the Flood for truth, as Darwin proposed it would be false if his theory was true based on uniformatarianism, so without proof for his theory only gaps in it, the biblical version must be considered. Exciting times.

@@simonskinner1450 floods and mud slides and volcanic activity happens all over the world , they just don’t happen everywhere at the same time And he failed to convince me of that. He also did a lot of preaching from the Bible about it but left out the parts that are ridiculous like the firmament and the rainbow. But the idea that Mount Everest didn’t exist yet, I found that to be outlandish.

If God exists, why is He not able to give us His Word, and then why is He not able to preserve it? If we believe in God, it's illogical to claim He is too weak to give us His Word and/or too weak to preserve it.

And there weren't any fossils from all the millions of cows, horses, lions, sheep, goats, dogs, cats, geese, ducks, crows, robins, sparrows, hawks, and more which perished in the flood either. Just the primitive creatures found in the geological strata which are traditionally dated millions, tens of millions, and hundreds of millions of years ago.

and how did he fit over 33,000 species of animals (not including insects) on a boat smaller than an aircraft carrier? What did the carnivores eat? Who cleaned up all the poop, without everyone dying from methane poisoning in less than a week? How did any fish survive, since the oceans would have mixed with the fresh water, killing all marine life? So, if it rained 40 days and 40 nights, it rained 17.3 feet of water per hour, in order to cover Mt. Ararat? Category 5 hurricanes rarely exceed 5 inches per hour... How did more rain fall in 40 days than water that existed on earth beforehand, since rainclouds come from water evaporated from the ground? How did animals repopulate from two of each kind, without going extinct from excessive inbreeding? Yeah, there are a few holes in the science of Noah! Shall I go on? I can...

@@christopherheim5247 I think we're saying the same thing..... You must be typing on a keyboard and not a phone, like I am????

@@francus7227 Yes, I type on an actual keyboard, since I am blind. Smart phones give me too much trouble trying to get the touchscreen to work. But yeah, I was just adding to your comment.

@@christopherheim5247 And adding WELL ! This guy can't believe what he says. It's got to be a money maker. I only watched it because I needed something to put me to sleep for a nap after seeing The Rolling Stones in Brussels last night. It worked perfectly. I made it 3 minutes in..... Hee hee hee. p.s. They still GOT IT ! ! !

@@francus7227 When has religion ever NOT been a money-maker?! If in doubt, read the book of Numbers, and note how much gold these Hebrew slaves had to give god and "His" priests! ...and where did the Hebrews find all this gold while wandering as exiles in the desert? and how could they afford to sacrifice so many animals both to god, and for the benefit of the priests? Well, the priests were sure making bank! Just like televangelists today.

That me me chukle, your not Australian by the way are you?

@@haroldwilson8081 ha ha close, Kiwi

Not was. Is.

@@jesusislord461 So where are the human fossils?

There are plenty

And I'm agnostic I believe in the fossil record

Which part of the Bible? They are actually uncovering evidence everyday in so many dig sites ongoing right now. I would love to see what parts you are thinking of they have uncovered a ton of evidence to back the stories in the Bible up. They found evidence that god did cause the Egyptians to give the Israelites fine clothing and jewelry when Ramses let Moses take them to the promise land. Evidence of world wide flood. Burial sites of people from the Bible...so there it is.

@@jesusislord461 What evidence that God "did cause the Egyptians to ..".

@@jasminehomes4615 they uncovered some of those treasures and they were clearly from pharaoh aka Ramses.

@@jesusislord461 Seems reasonable. After all there were 11 Ramses. Although in the Hebrew Bible Ramses is referred to as a city not a person. It was only in the creation of the King James Bible published in 1600 when the bible made reference to Ramses as a person. But how does the existence of the treasure or that Egyptian slaves escaping from bondage prove God.