This Mod is very awesome JJ the Fixed Camera Angles is just like the original Resident Evil 2.

hi 2:16

Do a full playtrough with both scenarios!

I think it's crazy cool🙌🏻👍🏻 if they put me some spiders and crows It's practically the "dream"👌🏻🙌🏻 P.S. Too many shots (some very Rebirth vibes), but it's not important Semi-automatic aiming (but for a fan made mod it's too much) And in general a clean job, with icons in the right places👍🏻🙌🏻👌🏻 And original style inventory congratulations to the creator🙌🏻😉

A step back so giant you kick your own arse. What's next? A mod that brings back lo res textures and warping PS1 rendering?

Should have rewarded u with this if u completed all the scenarios

All the games moving forward for this franchise should give players 1st, 3rd and fixed cameras. That ways there’s something for everyone

​@@MR.__GThat's a LOT more development time.....we should be happy we got 1st/3rd person perspectives in recent games already.

@@BreadCatMarcus how hard can it be just to change camera perspectives ? Modder’s be doing these things for free lol

@@MR.__G It's not difficulty, it's time. And time is money.

Yeah, Leon is like going to slip every step he makes. 😂😂😂 They need to add more friction and momentum shifting on his running animation.

I know what you mean, but it kind of looks like that in Re1 remake too.

@@jonissues1914 Really? It reminds me more of Dark Souls 2.

@@jonissues1914 no it doesn't.

Just gotta make the running animation slower or increases the player movement ​@@AkoSiFrance

Reminds me of Punch Out lol

hell yeah, hair flyin everywhere , got knocked out of frame 😂😂

agreed

Yes!

Nah it's awful. Who tf wants to run straight ahead then the camera angle suddenly point at Leon's crotch. People and their nostalgia.

I wouldnt and its ppl like you who have made gaming pay to play.

Hell yeah!

Nope. The remake would've been trash. Good thing they didn't use this.

​​@@IlDiavolo2515 you couldnt be more wrong. Its like calling re1 remake trash.

@@SrBlue-qp2uxMaybe it would’ve been cool if Capcom made it an option to play RE2R like this, but only this? Hell no.

​@@IlDiavolo2515 The Resident Evil 1 Remake was elected many times as one of THE BEST RE's of this franchise. With THIS camera. So, you don't know nothing about what you saying. Probably a Gen Z fan of Resident Evil 3 🤢😷😷😷

Of course. They're inspired by the original game.

up

word brother!

100% that would be awesome

I agree!

Thats in the base RE2 Remake already. You can switch between them.

​@@CaptainPerfect I'd recall that the og soundtrack is DLC material that has to be bought separately

up

Occasionally i go back to to resident evil 2, 3 for the ps1.

Outbreak file 1 and file 2 does not get enough love.

I would give everything able to play outbreak games on my PS5 with my friends online. The game had the most hardcore mechanics that's why i loved it.

One thing i don't like in the outbreak 1,2 is that they miss the headshot explosions. Simply a resident evil game without the headshot explosions is like something is missing from the game since all resident evil games have this feature exept the outbreak games.

Outbreak File 2 was my first ever RE game. Didn't have Internet hooked up to my PS2 but I enjoyed it nonetheless solo. Outbreak File 3 could work so well now in the era of proper online console gaming.

I get what you're saying with this. It's a valid point. But the main thing here is that when you play with this perspective, it adds another layer of seperation. Games really shouldn't be going for "cinematic". Leave that to films as intended. We play games to be immersed, and the more distance between you and what is actually going on in the game is detrimental, especially when it comes to horror. For horror to truly be at its most effective, and this even extends to cinema (and even the original RE games where you couldn't see something around a corner but could hear it), it's usually the case of the unknown or the unseen that tends to be the most scary. It's certainly the case when playing games like RE7 in VR, where the game was at its most unsettling whenever nothing was really going on and it was quiet apart from the odd rattling of a window somewhere.

@@steve_ire321 "it adds another layer of seperation" Really doesn't, in fact. If that were the case, first person would be the absolute "best" perspective in gaming at all times, wouldn't it? Especially for horror - but on the contrary, a major percentage of the most significant horror games in history... are not first person. Indeed, all the best examples make use of a third person camera - and often a very restricted or shackled one - to significantly heighten the horror elements. And thus far, there has been nothing to actually suggest that they would have been better in another perspective. Arguably, a game's perspective is a far more complicated matter than just "closer is more immersive, more immersive is more betterer" - for example, it's interesting to look at the camera work used in Silent Hill 4: The Room. In the apartment, a first person perspective is forced, to convey the sense of being trapped in a confined space, and heighten the helpless voyeurism of looking out at a world you can't reach. "the more distance between you and what is actually going on in the game is detrimental" Less is more, especially where horror is concerned; the absolute peak horror in any medium spends more time plucking at your imagination than it does at your eyeballs. For example, Soma remains one of the most horrifying games I've ever played; because its first person perspective was often used specifically not to reduce the distance between the player and the game world... but on the contrary, to create more distance between the player and their own character; one of the game's darkest, most unsettling moments is born of being given the opportunity to finally look in a mirror. "For horror to truly be at its most effective, and this even extends to cinema" Again, if this were true, all the "best" horror films would be shot in first person, to fully convey what the individual person was experiencing. The reality is - first person cinematography is often misused, and its primary purpose is in shorter shots establishing what a character can see (and even then, the most effective horror scenes in history... are not from a character's perspective). The best horror isn't about jump scares or realism; the best horror can unsettle and instil dread through the subtlest cues. Indeed, some of the most atmospheric and fear-inducing moments in Resident Evil 2 were not dark scenes, not tight close-ups, but careful distant framing that highlighted the isolation and vulnerability of the protagonist. This is what I mean by cinematic; just as one can apply the same fundamental principles to any still image... games are, regardless of their interactive element, the art of moving pictures. The same rules apply. By cinematic I do not mean "trying superficially to look like films". With an over-the-shoulder camera, what you end up with most of the time is a combination of outright bad cinematography (if the player doesn't look at the right things), or boring cinematography, because the view never really changes. Both of these things represent the artistic antithesis of horror, and certainly do "immersion" no favours.

​@@steve_ire321like movies and books, you could be immersed, be invested and empathize with the characters and story without an specific perspective. Original SH games and Resident Evil games have a great old school fan base because we were invested for several reasons including gameplay. Old things still work but for a mechandise point of view is a risk that the developers don't want to take. And I'm ok with that, re2 and re4 remake are excelent games.

Very well said.

By cinematic you mean security camera... fixed camera looks nothing like cinematic and spoils the immersiveness of over the shoulder

who is he do u have link for his chnal his mod is relly good love it 👍🏻

That can't be saved, you'll need to do it again from scratch

or it could feel like CCTV, like someone is watching you, maybe Wesker ;)

I agree with you.

This is also a problem with RE1 remake. They want to add so much it gets confusing. The first trilogy and Zero have the perfect balance of fixed camera angles in my opinion. The first two Onimusha also have great camera transitions.

​@@viejodelentes6079I don't really remember REmake having that problem. There were some extra ones at times if that makes sense, but not this bad.

They will charge you for this.

@@ofiCHQso what i ll buy it any thing to get the fixed cam back 🔥

Yeah, this bugs me too but it's understandable since we're not supposed to see that. lol

if they tweak the travel distance more fast/slower just to sync movement animation, i think it going to look solid.

That is how Leon walks/runs in the original version, but it wasn't clearly on the shoulder view.

​@@GilberThorSolkio I only played the remake for a few minutes, what's funny is this is how I know resident evil, so hardly noticed anything wrong with his movements.