@@utado1 Jesus Christ was electro-magnetic waves led by electro-magnetic waves in Roger’s ethereal soul. Since Fed is his chosen one, favourite! Lol

What you’re not seeing in the highlights is the volume of errors. For every great shot there is a bad one

Thanks for mentioning that..I just corrected myself. Obviously no player goes through a match without making errors.

Hi! I have been following your comments on a few videos now. You're quite insightful generally. I'm curious, what do you think of Roger's 2019 Wimbledon loss?

@@adnanshahriar4435honestly pathetic. Djokovic couldnt break serve to save his life and federer still couldnt bring it out. Didnt want to hit the backhand on the first mp and poor approach on the second

yeah and he could be more aggressive with his backhand in 2017/start of 2018. then it kind of simmered down

Well you're gonna have a very long wait, Stick a fork in him, Roger is done.

Carlos Ike you can write off anyone but Roger Federer

when nadal slows down, roger is still slam contender, after djokovic slow down will be same. I believe 18 will come. Roger plays like 10 yrs younger.

+hililala321 I think people got the impression more with the Tsonga match how he dismantled him. Lets be realistic Murray was working his way back from surgery here not saying he would have won but considering Nadal thrashed him semi final he clearly was not back

+Josh Jones Nadal played nearly his best in that match and Federer used a horrible strategy. If Nadal had played like that in the final, he would've beaten Wawrinka.

For a third best player

@@user-mf5ue6rc5n Murray is not the third best player u imbecile

Matched and beaten by Novak

Murray was coming back from a long term injury

Yeah 😂 acting like he didn’t get beaten in straight sets by Rafa in the next match.

Nadal literally destroyed him in the semi final

@@haajiryabre335its how fedfans cope, just give them a break

well murray doesn't have very good mental. he only didn't get pissed off this match for once because he knew he was gonna lose. but him not complaining actually made him come back some. so he should try that more often you would think. but eh, Federer is way better anyway so who cares

Murray is actually really strong mentally. He's fought from match points down countless times.

Why

Борислав Димитров Why do You need to know?

Nice bro

Youre a lucky person.

Can confirm, I was the ball

@@gnochhuos645 can confirm, i was the net

Just weak player stuff

@@user-mf5ue6rc5n can’t even spell correctly when trying to insult people

@@mapthemultiverse talk to my keyboard, not to me bitch, it assumes that I want to type different word

@@user-mf5ue6rc5n weak player and 20 Grand Slams. Federer with just a bit better mental would have beaten Djokovic and Nadal in the most of their clashes because he has the best technique and natural talent.

@@robakooo96 Yep. If you aggregate the stats throughout Federer and Djokovic's meetings, Federer leads in points and sets won... it quite literally comes down to mental strength in the decisive moments.

nah that was 2013

Blocked him? He played semi in AO, final at Wimbledon and got to the final of WTF even tho he didn't play. Was a great season for him. Maybe you talk about 2013.

NLLeFa he’s talking about Andy.

You're not alone. Just shows how hella biased some of the Fedal/Djokovic/Wawrinka fans are.

Charlie Tong That makes no sense. Why would them being a Fedtard make them hate Murray? Fedtards love Del Potro, so why would Murray be any different. I'll tell you why we don't like Murray. His presence on court is annoying. He's always complaining about everything. Federer can be grumpy, but Murray is way way worse. When off the court Murray is a great guy, but on court I just can't get myself to like him. Then there's the fact that he's British. Tennis is a very British sports and that led to him being pushed alongside the three greats (Federer, Nadal and Djokovic.) Murray is not nearly as good as these guys. These three are the best in history, while Murray wouldn't even make the top 20. yet they're still trying to get him out there as one of the "big four."

Hey, Fed fan here too. Because whenever Murray reaches his personal milestone, out come excuses and degradation from a certain group within the fan base. For example, some complain that he only beat Fed in Olympics because Fed was more tired, even though Murray spent more time on court because he also had to play doubles. Or how he only got to Number 1 because everyone else was injured, even though Fed won RG because he didn't have to beat Nadal who was also injured. Maybe asking you to like him is impossible, but does it hurt to give the guy some respect? If you thought I was only generalizing that only Fed fans insult Murray because other groups also mock him, then I apologize for that and edited my previous comment. First of all, you seem to have a misconception. The Big 4 term was coined by the American press in 2008, when Djokovic still only had 1 slam at the time, refuting your implication that the British press is responsible for the "hype" Murray gets. The term refers to their overall consistency, not their total slam count. Within their era, they've been the most consistently dominant players in terms of ranking and reaching deep into most tournaments. No one ever said Murray was one of the goats; all people have said is that he's the fourth most consistent and best player in this playing period. And on a site note, Murray would actually be in the top 20, not outside. Besides slam total, less than 20 players in the game have ended the year number 1, and his overall masters titles and win percentage put him around Agassi's and Sampras's range.

Charlie Tong I do agree on the note that Murray's 2012 olympics win over Roger wasn't because Roger was tired. Roger didn't have his best match that day, but it was mainly due to Murray playing out of his skin. However, Fed winning Roland Garros and Murray being number one in the world are completely different issues. The Fedal rivalry is explicably one sided, which is the sole reason why it took Roger so long to get a RG title. (Fed has always been a good clay courter, contrary to popular belief.) Murray's number one ranking, was in fact due to a lack of proper challenge. Federer and Nadal were both out, and Nole has been just a shell of what he used to be since RG 2016. It's no coincidence that Murray only became number one in the world *after* Djokovic deflated. Being number one in the world is still an amazing achievement, but his ranking being a result of the field weakening is no myth. Are you sure about the term big four first being publicly used by American press in 2008? A year or two ago I did some research on how this term came to be, and then I learnt about the British press' influence. Then again, I don't have any valid sources on that anymore and can't seem to find any, so I'll assume you're right. My bad then. It makes a lot of sense though. Murray first started challenging the big guys during the American hardcourt swing in 2008, hence the American press catching on. That invalidates my last point, but still leaves the original point standing. *We don't dislike Murray, because we're Fed fans, or fans of any other player for that matter. We dislike Murray, because we dislike Murray.*

Certainly, Fed is a really good court player despite the relative lack of titles. I guess what I was trying to say was both players have certainly been aided by external circumstances, with you implying Murray more so than Fed. I can see that: Fed only had to worry about Nadal while Murray, who even though was still ranked higher than Fedal in 2016, suddenly didn't need to worry about Fedal playing or a consistently in form Novak dominating. As to whether how much things would have changed, we will never know because it's all in the past. And it doesn't matter at this point, because you and I aren't even arguing about that matter at all. Again, if one of my statements wasn't clear, I agree. Nothing wrong with disliking him; just hope that the dislike doesn't go too far to the point of devaluing his achievements.

And 14:12! Everything Murray had to do: from serve - to rally - to redlining his shots - beautiful

+Alex Sander Cause it's impossible lol

From late 2012-2013 Andy plays like this. Every point was contested. Its just not sustainable for more than 1 year. He lack the killer shot to shorten the point.

+Tevez Charlotte yeah he's too defensive sometimes

Murray was coming back from a long term injury

just a classic from the maestro and his wilson wand!

Mischa Riedo it didn't bounce twice you idiot. don't people have eyes. the racquet got the ball before it reaches the ground.

soheil adam no it didn’t

+kid gloves that was definitely a double bounce lol, play it at 0,25 speed

+Bigcrusher55 played at that speed and I honestly dont see a double bounce..the umpire would have probably seen it if it was, it was right in front of the chair..

Stop saying what is not true. Most certainly NOT a double bounce.

@@djpete2009 its definitely a double

pru

in form Murray??? I beg to differ Murray was coming back from surgery.

Gazorpazordfield II i

In form Murray? He was just getting back from the worst season of his career at that time.

@@NLLeFa 2013 was one of Murray's best years, you're confused.

He played against Rafa at his absolute peak in the semi final that's why

+nassim rebbahi He said "yeah well played"

no he didnt

@@Dara-wq3sg I think he probably got it while it bounced, which is already illegal. But it's the officials' job to call it.

I don’t think that was an illegal shot. It is hard to tell since it is very close to the floor but I think Federer got just before it bounced again.

@@sebastiandufau5798 Federer is evil

just watch it at 0.25 speed and spam pause, you will notice the ball hasn't bounced twice

+Pedro Pablo Ackermann RF97 Autograph

+mohannad alghamdi it seems to me he's not using that one in this match

+Pedro Pablo Ackermann it is that one, but without paint. Back then the rf97 didn't exist yet

+Sybren Oerlemans Thanks!

I believe it was a test racquet because he switched to 97" after 2013

you have no class so your words are meaningless

@@zora99ny Not necessarily... Federer's considerably less cantankerous and vulgar on court...

Jajaja me too!

peter Last me too

i did hear a lot of people hate him because of his attitude. But at the same time....they say he's pretty much the ugliest guy in the top 10. lol.... can't disagree with them there...

Agreed. His tennis always causes sleepiness to me

Murray has the worst forehand of all time

Djoko est au tennis ce que Nietchz est à la littérature, ce que Mozart est à la musique. C est cadencé c est précis c est mélodieux c est parfait une symphonie à lui tout seul. Profitez parce que ça n arrivera plus dans ce siècle de voir quelqu'un d aussi complet aussi fort si longtemps.... Le sens du détail de Djoko même dans une chute... Parti pour poser sa main droite au sol, il se reprend et préfère une rotation avec l'aide de sa main gauche pour ne prendre aucun risque.

Because he had a shitty last season and just lost another final 2 weeks prior...

Playing against pushing murray brings it out of him

Djokovic's can be pretty clunky-looking at times, Gasquet's just looks completely wrong, Tomic's is weird (but there is a certain appeal to it), and Gulbis's is utter shit. Personally, I kind of like Isner's. It almost reminds me of James Blake's (when he's moving forward, that is).

Vesciroth God, I've forgotten how much I miss Blake. Great player, just lacking in some areas. But yeah, Gasquet's is weird because he insists on hitting with a flat Eastern grip. It looks ridiculous, and it's unpredictable to boot.

The One™ Blake's backhand was surprisingly good at his best. Such a shame that he had no court sense.

Maybe Fed does, but we don't know because of his bandannas.

John Yancheski That makes no sense.

Uffff

Bryant Luu It was clearly a double bounce, that's why Murray was looking back at the umpire. Can't believe the umpire didn't pick that up. You can see it bounce a second time before Federer picks it up

DaProHobbit Really? I keep watching the slow motion replay and I can't see the 2nd bounce at all, Looks like he just picks it up with the edge of his racket.

It's very close, but you can see the ball hit the ground just before, maybe for just one frame. Besides, you can't really pick it up like that with just a mishit flick, it'd need to be travelling upwards before bouncing off the racket to be a successful lob.

guys it's a joke...just before you hate me... :)

gustavo bedoya perhaps, and perhaps Federer will end with 22.