Literally, he had set points on his own serve in the first 2 sets and he couldn't take one. 🤦‍♀

He was too young....@@anniechan9922

​​@@anniechan9922So? He had no experience at this level. He was playing an 11-time Slam winner. It's pretty excusable. He did very well.

Djokovic lost a lot in the 2000's

Roger was lucky that Djokovic was inexperienced here. I think Federer was on cruise control in this match and could have lost.

Thanks !

Fed Fan coping😂

Unusually fast court in this match- (and both played with Wilson racquets, which added more speed to the ball as well). Complete opposite of the old French Open matches- (Roland-Garros), on soft clay.

For sure

Then Federer got him back in 2009 semifinal that too in a straight sets.

@@healthylifehub8089 then Djoker got him back in 2010 and 2011 two choke jobs on Federer not to mention 2019 Wimby 😬 ouch

can u guys just shut up and appreciate both of them, jeez

@@KunnuITF Djoker sure but I hate Federer and his cult 👍🏻 so I’ll just leave it at that

@@kevinreilly7924 Well each to their own but no need to spread unnecessary negativity here

versus baby Novak

@@user-specific-6985I can mention old Federer if you want to use Young Djokovic and Nadal and old Agassi as excuse

@@dewman7477 Well, that has always been an excuse for Roger having inferior total H2H vs Rafa and Novak so it's not new. By the way baby Roger (

@@user-specific-6985 but stamina in younger players beats stamina in older players in the mid to late 30s too

@@dewman7477 Absolutely, after the younger ones get out of their baby shell, their stamina starts to prevail. That's why after turned 22, Roger had superior H2H vs Andre after he turned 33 and Novak after turned 21 had better H2H vs Roger after turned 27.