Seriously what I have seen in many videos that they lack indepth explanation. Thanks for the complete explanation
@babandas72814 жыл бұрын
Sir after 30 mins. This lecture became super interesting. I understand that first 25 mins. you took just to clear the basic things.
@kamikaze20214 жыл бұрын
ignore that dislike sir. I am quite certain that the guy hasn't seen this lecture.I have seen and taken a lot of lectures both offline and online and i can bet,there is no faculty out there who can explain these concepts with such ease.🙏🙏🙏🙏 glad you are on KZfaq.
@RohitChowdhury_sajaysaini4 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your kind words. I wish you achieve all the success and happiness you deserve in life.
@beautyofbangladesh3751 Жыл бұрын
understanding level ...out of the box
@babandas72814 жыл бұрын
Really one of the best lectures on this topic. Really helpful in gaining entire knowledge.
@robinsherwood48162 жыл бұрын
Sir this video is useful even after 1 year From Sri lanka
@thotasridevi23293 жыл бұрын
Great explanation sir,
@mahmoudzaki625110 ай бұрын
really this is the best explanation I have ever seen , thank u very much
@RohitChowdhury_sajaysaini10 ай бұрын
thanks
@ramnareshchaudhary58823 жыл бұрын
You are very good sir . I love your method to make us understand . Please make all videos of hydraulic machines
@seymourfroggs3 жыл бұрын
Very many thanks. This is so much more helpful than I've found before (because I was never sure what Vr was relative "to") I think it better to say "B1 is angle between rel. vel and the circumferential velocity, U1". Also it takes a moment to see that V1 is where it is: but the key is always U1: Vr1 is determined as its cosine and V1 as a sin. Presumably this gives a 90 deg position. At 40 min 20 sec, the rel vel is what person the blade sees, namely the water shooting out but being left behind. I still can't get my head around Vf2 - which is a function of exit blade angle and outer diameter - **being equal to V1**. I do understand how "Whirl velocity" arrives as the vector value parallel to U2, because along with Vf2, it equals Absolute velocity, itself determined by U2 and Vr2.
@carolmike4546 Жыл бұрын
Great explanation,,,, thanks alot
@shahidurrahmansakib455 Жыл бұрын
Sir, Thank you so much for this video. Lot of confusions have been cleared.
@lightningldrago56372 жыл бұрын
AWESOME YR MAZA AAGYA THX
@cogitateandabet3 жыл бұрын
Best explanation I've ever seen. Thanks a ton!
@sureshkumar-ee6mo3 жыл бұрын
Nice presentation and excellent explanation... it will helps to understand easily
@CalmBirdBath-zt1ooАй бұрын
Best explanation ever
@jayshu35112 жыл бұрын
you are the best one of those to explain the velocity triangle in this subject!! , keep up good job
@mohamedragab98412 жыл бұрын
Thanks sir, Very good explanation.
@aniruddhashetye54913 жыл бұрын
Nicely explained Sir. Thanks.
@jayshu35112 жыл бұрын
you are the best one to explain the triangle in this subject !!!! keep up good job
@aurponahsanapon23992 ай бұрын
best explaination ever
@tfi24524 жыл бұрын
Great job sir. I love your lecture sir
@deepnarayanbharati70793 жыл бұрын
Exlent way of teaching.. thank you sir for elaborated concept
@user-fc1in9rs2v5 ай бұрын
its is awesome lecture 10q
@vignesh92693 жыл бұрын
pure knowledge!
@tanujdatta55174 жыл бұрын
Nice👌👌
@gargichowdhury4352 жыл бұрын
Very nice sir 👍
@mckenziejohnson55792 жыл бұрын
Perfect explanation
@hsbnworld2 жыл бұрын
Amazing approach to teach easily.
@supratimdas23874 жыл бұрын
Nice video..... Sir..
@lufa12722 жыл бұрын
Nice nice 👍🔥🔥
@myatthu26283 жыл бұрын
Excellent Explanation. Thank you sir
@seymourfroggs2 жыл бұрын
Esteemed Sir, You have kindly answered some of my questions. I now wish to make a remark: the analysis, historically, came from Turbine design, for "water wheels," when the one thing known, was Flow. So that becomes a starting point in these examples. But **why should we know Flow in advance** for a pump? I think the analysis can be done without this. You would think that a blade cutting water at a certain velocity would have a predicable flow along its surface, as long as rather small angles (eg 10 - 40 deg) were used. It would mean that at Inlet, Rel Velocity would immediately be known and so Radial velocity could be calculated. All else follows. I cannot see any fallacy here-in. [Imagine the blade cutting the water, the water's movement along the blade will be the same as the tangential velocity of the Inlet circle.]
@dysfonik3 жыл бұрын
this video helped me understand this chapter. thank you sir
@jerinfernandez88784 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much sir
@lumpi80611 ай бұрын
thank you for your patience ! Is ther a video where you explain WHY the absolute inlet velocity ir radial ? Thanks .
@sampathkumarganesan4274 Жыл бұрын
Sir, where did u there till now.... Thanks a lot sir... ❤
@hassanaitsi42602 жыл бұрын
Thank you prof
@seymourfroggs2 жыл бұрын
U is "given" and Vr is line of blade angle. Draw V normal to U first and *then* show you *always* have a parallelogram. Also, rel velocity *must* be > tangential (=rotational) vel, because it is rotational vel + a radial component.
@seymourfroggs2 жыл бұрын
Many thanks for the approval. I still have not got my head around the Two superimposed vectors. I think they are being multiplied, not added; Vw2 and U2. I guess I don't quite know what Vw2 actually means.
@Mkumarcpy4 жыл бұрын
Awesome
@RohitChowdhury_sajaysaini4 жыл бұрын
Thank you, I am quite shocked to see that someone put dislike. It was not expected really after putting this much of effort. Well it's okk., I will look forward for further improvement. But I am quite hopeful that if someone watches the video with patience, definitely he or she will understand how to draw velocity triangle.
@Mkumarcpy4 жыл бұрын
Your lectures is very useful for me. Bcz it clears all my doubts..
@shivangsingh5834 Жыл бұрын
Sir I do not understand one point here how Vr1 and Vr2 are parallel blade surface....... please 🙏 telll
@piravythan934 Жыл бұрын
That is the relative velocity of the fluid. reference is a blade so it should be parallal.
@thoudamnaresh35172 жыл бұрын
Would love to learn the velocity triangle for axial flow compressor from you....
@anupkumar82204 жыл бұрын
Thanks sir
@vaishalitalekar28733 жыл бұрын
Sir is it useful for torque converter
@tomvandenhoudt47592 жыл бұрын
Thank you! Very good explenation. Do you have a patrion or somewhere where I can donate bc this explenation has helped me a lot!
@RohitChowdhury_sajaysaini2 жыл бұрын
Thankyou dear learner for your love and support. I am overwhelmed. However right now I don't need any donation. Don't take it in a negative manner. You are a beautiful soul!
@seymourfroggs2 жыл бұрын
I am still stuck at the outlet! The rel vel (Vr2) is a combination of "you" travelling around, Below the horizon, viewing the water apparently rising outward. So it must be > U2. But if you draw it as such, V2 becomes *same* as a radial flow. But you emphasise otherwise.
@RohitChowdhury_sajaysaini2 жыл бұрын
Dear if you are getting confused from my lecture. You can see other lectures as well or you can study from a standard textbook also. However in the video whatever I had taught is absolutely correct.
@RohitChowdhury_sajaysaini2 жыл бұрын
Vr2 will be in the direction of the blade line at outlet. U2 will be much greater than U1 . Then complete the vector diagram by joining V2 as the resultant. You will see a large Vw2 component . And that is what is desirable in case of pump. Then that Vw2 (velocity head) needs to be converted to pressure head which is been done in the blade passages and in the scroll casing. That's it dear. It is easy .
@seymourfroggs2 жыл бұрын
@@RohitChowdhury_sajaysaini Thank you again. I have looked at books also & I am sure you are right. But, concerning rel vel, I still imagine that it must be greater than U2 because it is "being left behind circumferentially but also moving in some radial direction". So it should always > U2. Perhaps I should ask: when you drew Vr2, how did you know its length? Sorry to be a bother.
@RohitChowdhury_sajaysaini2 жыл бұрын
Whatever I have drawn is not upto the scale. It's just a representation to help you find the magnitudes of different velocities. I can give you one suggestion. Take one numerical problem. Draw a velocity triangle representation. Then find out the values. You will get to know that which one will be larger.
@seymourfroggs2 жыл бұрын
@@RohitChowdhury_sajaysaini Thank you. I will review my drawings. :)
@12345mmmmas Жыл бұрын
What is Vw2?
@tomvandenhoudt47592 жыл бұрын
When you explain the direction of the flow with the water entering hte impaler axially but the vane purely radially, you could maybe reccomend people check out this animation if they dont understand it kzfaq.info/get/bejne/eMd1e7mhsMmRYYU.html, this video has a very nice diagram where they show what you explained there.