Well done on pointing out that digital pianos don’t need to emulate acoustic pianos: they should instead be improving upon them. It’s a common myth that digital pianos must emulate acoustics, warts and all!

Nice review. Nice looking and sounding piano. I was in the market for something like this, of this size, a few months ago. Roland didn't have a size fitting option at the time. Ended up going with the Yamaha CVP 809, which is great and I don't think can be beat. But this by far looks like a great and more affordable option.

El sonido que sale es directamente de los auriculares?

How about some staccato? If it thumps, I imagine it would then show.

Looks like a very nice instrument, aesthetically. I'd probably prefer to keep the lid down though. Price-wise is going straight against the Fantom 8, which has more features, but as all something-for-everyone type of things, the Fantom 8 is not that great aesthetically. The GP-3 is an everything-for-someone type of thing, which could be the ticket for those who don't want the hip-hip pads or EDM knobs staring at them at all times. The best option, would obviously to get both of the instruments, the GP-3 and Fantom 8, which still comes down to less money combined, than say a certain offering from Moog Music, which is not even fit for much keyboard oriented music in the first place. Roland really offers great things at reasonable cost. I have to check out this GP-3 at a store once they come in, and then see what the experience is. Fantom 8 experience has been good so far.

Buenas HOY probé el piano. Tengo que decir que hay que tratarlo en la app el sonido. Una vez echo el piano es una maravilla. La resonancia me ha sorprendido parece que tiene más cola. La pulsación muy buena y el sonido fantástico. El lunes lo compro sin dudar

despues de 6 meses con el nuevo rolnad gp3 , puedo decir que una vez tratado en piano designer , es una maravilla ,el sonido es magnifico y el tacto muy bueno ,notiene nada que envidiar a pianos de 5000 o 6000 euros , ademas no tiene porque estar pegado a la pared, los que dicen que es un lx con mueble no saben lo que dicen , tampoco tiene nada que ver con los pianos virtuales , como native etc....... la presencia es muy diferente , pero bueno ellos sabran

la gente habla sin probar las cosas , se creen que saben mas que nadie y no saben nada . para hablar con propiedad p`rimero tendras que probar si no mas vale que no critiquen cosas que ni siquieran lo han visto. muchos listos

este piano suena igual que el phamton 8 ? no tenéis ni idea . y la pulsación igual ? menos idea todavía . menos criticar cosas que ni habéis visto

"Let me charge you 3.000 dollars for a RD-88 with speakers and make it not portable".

Bla bla bla ⌚️

The whole lifted lid shtick looks cheesy to me.

This is a Life Style (piece of furniture) instrument. FP-30X is probably better than this thing (for a fraction of the price). How could anyone say that 'This is as good action as any other Roland digital piano"? This is laughable.

Looks and sounds awful. The classical pianist was nowhere near professional-sounding. Really didn't do well to showcase the sound or the dynamic range. Chopin's minute waltz should not be played that loud, he was missing notes, seemed unable to properly play some parts at all, let alone worry about the dynamics. I don't know if that was due to his incompetence or because of the piano, but either way, it was just a sloppy mess of a review; this makes me want to stay as far away as possible from this. At this price, you're far better off going for a Yamaha CLP785 or a Kawai CA901. Hell, even the CA99 or one of the lower end Yamaha digital piano series seems better than this pile of crap. I had a Yamaha YDP-164 and the dynamic range was fantastic, felt great and sounded lovely, for less of the quarter of the price. No thanks.