ROYAL JEWELRY BANS & DRAMA

Рет қаралды 196,295

10 ай бұрын

Was there a ban placed on Meghan Markle wearing any Royal Jewelry? The Queen's Collection aka the Royal Collection of jewelry is beyond priceless and is loaned out to Royals at the Monarch's pleasure. Apparently this was a big factor in Meghan Markle's happiness during her short stint with the Royal Family. Today we are taking a look at what went on when it came to the jewels, who got bent out of shape over it and whether or not it was fair.
Come find me on socials!
Thankyou so much for watching
Have a HAPPY DAY
ILY, BB
Check out our Have a Happy Day merchandise to remind yourself that Beebs Kelley wishes you a Happy Day, Everyday / @beebskelley
If you're interested in any of the makeup products, hair styling products or other things I wore and used in today's video, click the shopping bag icon above or check the products section of the description box for direct links! Anything not linked there, like clothes for example, I will link below if it's still available.

Пікірлер: 1 300

@SuzyQ89 10 ай бұрын

Queen Elizabeth was no one's fool! She smelled the grifter from the start!

@Aida-qy1ts 13 күн бұрын

I❤ the Queen But Why did she let her in ?!?!?!?

@margiewinters6857 9 күн бұрын

Meegain lied repeatedly and demonstrated distrustful behavior repeatedly.

@margiewinters6857 9 күн бұрын

No wonder Meegain seeks to use The Commonwealth as a weapon against the Royals.

@brendasterling3743 19 сағат бұрын

@@Aida-qy1ts😅😅my thoughts exactly. They didn’t know she was so smart. Calling Meghan ANYBODY.

@pamcampbell6991 10 ай бұрын

It's shameful that Harry brought such a classless beast into his family.

@carolhama4156 11 күн бұрын

Well said! You forgot to include "greedy". There was a youtube entry about MeGain rifling through the boot (trunk) of Harry's car while he was on the field playing polo, and she had to be stopped by a security guard! And also an instance while, during a garden party on Palace grounds a security guard caught MeGain wandering through the residential area of the Palace.

@Kate-HR 11 күн бұрын

She is a prostitute … yacht girl

@ellenrobinson9736 11 күн бұрын

Actually Andrew did. She was staying at Andrew’s, he bought her a car, to get around?! She got paid for services, sounds like a “minage a trios”. Then they stuck her on GingerBrat to keep him straight and her quiet! 🆘💰🤐

@alexhayden2303 3 күн бұрын

@@carolhama4156 60 TIMES MEGHAN was told "NO" by the ROYAL FAMILY. *NEW UPDATED VERSION* (YT.)

@montanacrone8984 10 ай бұрын

Seriously, I don’t think many, if any, Americans ever heard of Meghan

@MirandaSinistra 10 ай бұрын

I watched Suits and didn't even know her name. I forgot she was even in it.

@cruzmarin1833 10 ай бұрын

I never heard of her.

@shakazulu2256 10 ай бұрын

@montanacrone8984, lucky you. I've sustained emotional damage from exposure since 2019😅

@honestea1828 10 ай бұрын

Even more telling, I bet many still wish they'd never heard of her.

@montanacrone8984 10 ай бұрын

She’s just vapid. Nothing interesting. Has a good voice but not an interesting speaker.

@CherishEachDay2023 10 ай бұрын

The fact that KC needed to explain humility and not flaunting wealth to a 37 year old, new or not, says everything about her character.

@lenalyles2712 10 ай бұрын

She wasn't 37 she was over 40 and was only after wealth.

@mbd6054 10 ай бұрын

It also clearly displayed her utter lack of education, and ignorance of international affairs.

@georgeedward1226 10 ай бұрын

KC would have had more success trying to teach algebra to a cat.

@deejames1st 10 ай бұрын

She was way too old to have been acting that way. I get second hand embarrassment hearing about her behavior

@rebeccagriner4480 10 ай бұрын

The article fails to mention where the earrings that Meghan wore with the blue dress came from! That turned into a scandal too .

@marysifling279 10 ай бұрын

She was NEVER in Hollywood! Suits was filmed in Canada and was a cable series. Low budget

@hume6900 10 ай бұрын

Marysifling279, have you forgotten that her father was a lighting director or something in Hollywood when she was younger and actually took her to work with him on several occasions. BTW, Suits may have been filmed/taped in Toronto, but, other than set location it was an American production. This happens frequently when the execs want to get more bang for their buck as unfortunately, our dollar is usually worth less than the American. She was also on Deal or No Deal, whether it was produced in L.A. or N. Y. C. I can’t recall. Again she did not last the entire series.

@CptKD-vu3ee 10 ай бұрын

@@hume6900 - She WAS *also* Being *'Written•Out'* of Suits; ✓ & Was in fact, let GO from D•O•N•D! As far as DADDY-M's *"A c c o m p l i s h m e n t s"* [2 EMs/GRAMs; If not mistaken] As for 'Her' ---> *Zero!* Oh! Wait... *'Yachting'* ⛵ To *supplement* her income! At least 'til she 'Married' PRINCE•Pathetic! 🥀 'n The *"Games"* Play ▶️ ON‽ ⚖️x

@annamack5823 10 ай бұрын

@@hume6900 Deal or No Deal is hardly the big time, is it?

@cassandradelvegablanco5299 9 ай бұрын

She wasn't the star either. They also fired her.

@rosemarymonty5399 8 ай бұрын

Meghan was in a Harlequin romance movie too, which are never made in Hollywood.

@enkisdaughter4795 10 ай бұрын

The fact she couldn’t be bothered to learn, about our history or the protocols of our Royal Family says a lot about her.

@jackiesage4430 9 ай бұрын

RIGHT !!! And NONE of it good !!!

@reallyRey2019 9 ай бұрын

I truly believe she understood. There are plenty of her comments on The Royal Family and Princess Diana in particular on the defunct TIG that she wrote about. Meghan just wanted more than she was entitled to and in her mind, that’s simply unforgivable. She didn’t get her way. We were in front row watching a grown woman have a tantrum. Her weapons were not screaming and crying as children do, she used racism and misogyny as her weapon of choice.

@annamack5823 9 ай бұрын

It just says that the RF shouldn't marry trailer trash. I have no time for the woman but too much is expected of her, given her background.

@lisakaz35 8 ай бұрын

I found her confessed ignorance stunning and not credible outside of being deliberate, esp. if she attended Northwestern (my alma mater). Sure, I know British history extremely well but I knew quite a bit about it before I spent a term at UEA my junior year.

@deannestjames5590 7 ай бұрын

Indeed.

@danatate8803 10 ай бұрын

I think sometimes Harry's wife forgets she's an American. The UK, the monarchy, the entirety of British culture is not hers.Nor does Harry have any business at all interfering with American politics.

@georgeedward1226 10 ай бұрын

Neither one of them are great respecters of boundaries.

@larissauchiyama1141 10 ай бұрын

That broad thought she could “modernize” the Monarchy (ie. Crown her Queen with Todger Blue as her Prince Consort). How very arrogant to think she as an outsider and foreigner could change a 1000 yo Institution. But that’s our $meg$!

@Always_Thinking 10 ай бұрын

Not all Americans believe or act as Migraine does. I think most Americans respect the UK, Monarchy & awesome traditions. Decent people understand respectful behavior & protocol unlike MM.

@LibbaB 10 ай бұрын

As an American, I can unequivocally say that if the monarch offered to loan me piece from that historic collection, no matter the event, I would be too over the moon to care what piece someone else got to wear.

@shakazulu2256 10 ай бұрын

Harry wife never got the memo. Harry, well, as his mum would say. He's "thick as a plank". Nuff said

@debranielsen2002 10 ай бұрын

Meghan walked in front of the Queen. 😡 The woman does not understand decency as she is a greedy, common hustler. You are way too nice to her.

@marysifling279 10 ай бұрын

COMMON! Perfect word to describe Meagan. At first, Meagan was described as intelligent. As time moved forward, no sign of intelligence was ever discovered or displayed.

@mistydevillier2197 10 ай бұрын

😂, I was going to say the same thing!!

@gennyolson2257 10 ай бұрын

She has no manners or class.

@WMeier-kd8hz 10 ай бұрын

That is not totally correct. Walking up tp the car, Meghan was ment to enter via the street side door. Her Majesty would never have been asked to do so due to security, rank and because she preferred to sit in behind the driver. Meghan ignoring the security officers hint and protocol didn ´t leave the Queen any other chance than to let her ( Meghan ) enter first. This is worse than walking in front of the Queen, it makes it look like Queen Elizabeth would let have Meghan the lead, when she just outmaneuvered her. By the way, the cameras where on the side M wanted to be too. Watch the clip, you will see it

@enkisdaughter4795 10 ай бұрын

@@marysifling279That’s a bit like saying a reptile is intelligent!

@elinelily4685 10 ай бұрын

The late queen had the eye of an eagle she knew exactly what to do and how to handle every situation with dignit

@MaryannB9203 10 ай бұрын

If ever a person was born to rule, being a strong, unwavering Monarch, QE2 was. A remarkable & irreplaceable woman. ❤️ So sadly missed. 😢

@laurawilliams1090 10 ай бұрын

The weirdest thing is that she wasn’t born to rule at all - she got lumbered with it because her uncle abdicated. Thank goodness!

@gillcawthorn7572 10 ай бұрын

@@laurawilliams1090 But she had very good and loving parents ,whose values she copied . And her father George Vlth ruled as his father had done .

@AgnesC1111 4 ай бұрын

I think I see that same look in Charlottes eye.

@MicheleSayles-nt9vr 14 күн бұрын

Wish the Queen told Harry he could marry her but without her approvel so no state wedding. No millions spent on him and his choice or he would have to wait longer to have the wedding. She would not approve of it then. She did it to Margaret and Charles. Harry would have to wait for the approvel.

@mario-qi3yw 10 ай бұрын

I think Meghan came in expecting to be treated like royalty and learned quickly that she had to earn certain privileges. She didn’t like that one bit. 😂😂😂😂😂

@mbd6054 10 ай бұрын

She was treated like royalty, and had every possible assistance, and courtesy shown to her. When she appreciated nothing, and abused every privilege, the RF became cautious. They quickly understood the nature of what they had in their midst, and started protecting themselves.

@ellevillamor4454 10 ай бұрын

With privileges, comes responsibilities. There is more to being part of the royal family than designer clothes, jewelries, and palaces.

@maureenchallener1529 10 ай бұрын

And now she still have to including USA 😂😂

@ellevillamor4454 10 ай бұрын

@@maureenchallener1529 it amazed me how she pissed off UK and the US

@lyndagears5943 9 ай бұрын

Being an American, you’re right. We had basically no idea who she was. She was a D actress at best, on cable and in Canada. We were like Meghan who? 😂

@angelabrown8458 10 ай бұрын

There was a story about a diamond bracelet that the Queen loaned Meghan that then ‘disappeared’, so it’s not surprising that she wasn’t loaned much else.

@annmcdonald6180 10 ай бұрын

yes, lost allegedly 😢

@annewalden3795 10 ай бұрын

Angela I think it is alleged other things were also lost and may be that is why MM was guarded by 4 footmen when her husband visited his grandmother at Windsor .

@dor4376 9 ай бұрын

😮😮😮😮😮

@kathleenwisialowski4558 7 ай бұрын

I remember that article. She was loaned an expensive diamond and sapphire bracelet from the Queen's personal collection for their engagement photos. We'll it just disappeared. Can't blame the Queen for putting limits on what she could wear.

@mares9393 7 ай бұрын

Think about it? One can count on one hand the times Harry’s first wife wore any royal jewels. The Royal Family were onto her way early. Megan was NEVER worthy of any of it.

@hollisblinn7910 3 ай бұрын

Never loan jewelry to a known thief!

@nadiabasheer. 10 ай бұрын

Literally no one in the world knew Meghan before Harry despite all her claims to Hollywood.

@Msstarrgirl1 10 ай бұрын

I worked in the entertainment industry for 20 years and never heard of Markle until the engagement.

@kathleenwisialowski4558 7 ай бұрын

Her Father's claim to Hollywood. Her husband's claim to Hollywood. She never would have been in any role without her husband. Many casting directors have said she has no talent and no presence. Poor acting abilities She just doesn't have it. As soon as her husband got her on Suits she thought she made it big. Dumped him quickly. She just uses men to get what she wants, then it is over. I'm certain if a billionaire came along, she would be long gone. No Islamics she told a friend. Their rules for women are to strict. Even though none would want her in the first place. My Islamic friend quipped at the time "we wouldn't want a used car either."😂

@gigiray7413 11 күн бұрын

Exactly! No one had ever heard of her in America, until the engagement.

@cruncherblock3834 9 ай бұрын

I wouldn't trust Meghead with my hat, let alone a diamond tiara.

@alanphipps9987 13 күн бұрын

Nor my toilet paper.

@AirsoftOfficial843 12 күн бұрын

She'd probably take that too! Seriously empty head

@myinnermagpie 10 ай бұрын

wearing a tiara in Figi would’ve been vulgar. To wear the blood diamonds instead was really in bad taste.

@SusanPederson 10 ай бұрын

OMG Yes!!!!

@theheartoftexas 10 ай бұрын

Yeah, I was going to say…..!

@anjask8626 10 ай бұрын

Running around at Fiji with a tiara seems quite out of place to me. Did any royal do that at any time?

@kathleenwisialowski4558 7 ай бұрын

We all know she has no taste. Everything is based on what she believes is most expensive.

@carolhama4156 11 күн бұрын

MeGain has N O taste. She is just a vulgar show off!

@rosana847 10 ай бұрын

I remember the day of the wedding, the queen's look at Markle was as if she knew who she was, that she would only bring discord to her beloved family, this woman is only divisive, her behavior is despicable.

@montanacrone8984 10 ай бұрын

Twice married Meghan marched down the aisle in a white bridal gown. It wasn’t proper.

@donnalynnhorniacek4785 10 ай бұрын

The color of the bridal gown is no longer considered an indication of the brides purity. Also women who have been married before can still wear white It is a personal decision. Society no longer cares

@user-nt6cj6nw7w 10 ай бұрын

@@donnalynnhorniacek4785 So true. White wedding dresses only came about due to Queen Victoria. She wore white on her wedding day and then every bride wanted to wear white thereafter. Before then, the bride wore any colour and I fully expect, whatever they could best afford.

@GillNotRelatedToTom 10 ай бұрын

The late Queen told M not to wear white. She had a bigger wedding than was expected due to her demands. It’s should have been much lower key. Her veil was too long. Meghan wanted a red carpet but was refused, she was told she could have blue but refused so there was not a carpet at all. The queens face looking at Catherine’s gown against her looking at Meghan says volumes.

@ashleighhogan941 10 ай бұрын

She should got married in lemon….to match her husband.

@BunnyMomx8 10 ай бұрын

You know another part of this is that Meg wanted to take a large tiara outside of Britain. This takes a massive amount of security. Someone must be responsible for them and Megs wasn’t trustworthy. It really is rare for these items to leave the country.

@elizabethgrogan8553 10 ай бұрын

@marthasmith2622 On Royal tours, one long term employed by the Queen, is in charge of all the jewels. Tiaras, earrings, necklaces and broches are carried together. They ate transported by the designated staffer and Catherine chooses what she will wear before they leave. Expensive items are given back for cleaning after the event. Lots of jewels are given to Catherine to keep at her hime. She is totally trusted. Meghan didn't stay long enough to be trusted.

@mbd6054 10 ай бұрын

@@elizabethgrogan8553 In addition security, and insurance requirements are exacting. MM thought she could pop irreplacable items in her handbag, on demand. Unbelieveable!

@larissauchiyama1141 10 ай бұрын

Sticky Finger $meg$ would have loved that!

@chriscarson7384 10 ай бұрын

There also are far fewer white-tie events now than there were back in the 1980s. Meg would have been the only woman wearing a tiara at a black-tie event in Fiji. As a junior royal, that would be inappropriate. The queen might appear as the only lady with a tiara, but not anyone below that rank.

@ellevillamor4454 10 ай бұрын

I read somewhere that Megnut was banned from borrowing jewelry from the royal treasures since she failed to return several pieces.

@nicolasmalley306 6 ай бұрын

An ex call girl wearing The Queen’s jewels? No thanks!

@alanphipps9987 8 күн бұрын

Now sleeping with a pimp

@EvaHoosen 5 күн бұрын

At least she was not on j Epstein yacht and prince andrew!!!!!!!!

@user-ig6dj9ru8q 5 күн бұрын

Yess it’s a big joke seing an ex call girl wearing the Royal jewels 😅

@user-ox1lw6su7s 3 күн бұрын

That's a good one! Haha😊

@justineheinrichs2798 10 ай бұрын

I believe much of the entire situation was due to Meghan’s demeanor. You don’t marry into a family and walk in demanding things. Or sneaking off when you think no one’s looking to peek at items that you have no permission to be around. Even in our much lower key lives, after your marriage you stood back a little to watch just how the dynamics worked. I think the green eyed monster took over when she saw the jewelry collection. Big mistake.

@ayakasalih4189 10 ай бұрын

It's because she was convinced she was very charming and so popular that any behavior was ok. She thought she could displace Catherine 😅😅😅

@justineheinrichs2798 10 ай бұрын

@@ayakasalih4189 We forgot to add, she’s also very delusional 😂

@user-nm2hw1iu5r 10 ай бұрын

She thought she’d be treated the same as Catherine. KC had to explain to the sock puppet that Catherine would always come first as she was to become the Princess of Wales and a future Queen consort. Where as Meghan would always remain a mere Duchess.

@equality379 10 ай бұрын

Exactly. And a quick Google search would have shown her that the crown jewels have guidelines and aren't worn just as and when wanted. MM was known for taking what she wanted from sets and situation. Princess Catherine of Wales had to be talked into wearing such important, historical pieces.

@Alltheredroses 10 ай бұрын

MM’s 1st mistake was thinking that she was in any way equal to Catherine, her second was thinking that Harry was in any way equal to William and I don’t mean that as measured by the love shown to them by the family because I believe the Queen loved all her grandchildren equally but in stature. William didn’t ask to be born 1st, someone had to be. That was the whole point of Charle’s marriage to Diana and not Camilla. Diana was younger, more beautiful and less knowledgeable of the opposite sex shall we say. MM expected to be treated the same as Catherine, but Catherine had earned her stripes. She knows her place, how to act in public and at important events and how to be a lady. MM does not.

@kimberleyabt-ez3pm 10 ай бұрын

Meghan walked into the family thinking she should be treated the same as Catharine. She forgets that 1 there is a hierarchy and 2 Catharine had been around the family for years and therefore the family knew who she was and what she stood for. Why Meghan thought she was going to walk in there and be treated exactly the same is beyond me.

@gillcawthorn7572 10 ай бұрын

She considered that as Prince Charles had two sons ,the wives of each would be treated the same . She can`t get that idea out of her head, which is why it has been reported that she got her husband to suggest that both sons should share the Prince of Wales title and the future throne . Sorry ,dear ,but years of progeniture don`t get set aside at the whim of an American nobody.

@enkisdaughter4795 10 ай бұрын

One day Catherine, Princess of Wales, will be the Queen Consort and her eldest son will, one day (very far in the future we hope) become King.

@enkisdaughter4795 10 ай бұрын

@@gillcawthorn7572Again, she couldn’t be bothered to learn our history. There has been a Prince of Wales since Plantagenet times; the very first one being Edward of Caernarfon (who to be fair was actually born in Wales), eldest son and heir of King Edward I. He was the first Plantagenet Prince of Wales. Since that date (733 years) the heir apparent to the English, then British throne is given the title. There’s no “sharesy’s” (sorry if I’ve got the spelling wrong). There’s also no “sharing” the Duchy of Cornwall, or the monies it makes - which to be fair the now King Charles III has worked very hard for decades to achieve (I’m saying this and I’m not a Royalist). BTW, I’m English and my fore-bearers were here when the Romans arrived.

@gillcawthorn7572 10 ай бұрын

@@enkisdaughter4795 We people of the UK understand what it means to live in a Democracy that is also a Monarchy.

@jacquelynroe9036 10 ай бұрын

@@gillcawthorn7572exactly. It boggles the mind. It’s like she’s got this block up and *refuses* to see how she and Catherine are in different situations. I’m American and it’s really not that complicated.

@naomidonovan-perry2667 10 ай бұрын

I understood the Queens Grand daughter asked for the use of the Tiara Meghan requested. The Queen had already granted that request to her Grand daughter first.

@amandamcauley 10 ай бұрын

Yes I believe that's true. Eugenie had to put her wedding off because Harry being senior had precedence. I think Meghan only wanted that particular tiara to wield her new found power and to stick it to Eugenie (a princess in her own right)again. I'm glad our beloved late Queen stuck to her guns.

@stargo2931 10 ай бұрын

@@amandamcauleyYou could be right seeing that Meg just had to announce that pregnancy at Eugenie's wedding.

@beverleyevans3262 10 ай бұрын

I agree, this I the understanding I had . Eugenie was given permission to wear the emerald tiara at her wedding ; she had to move the date of her wedding to accommodate Harry and Meghan and I understood that info4med the Queen’s decision . Tiaras and extravagant jewellery is not worn as a matter of course to anything other than major state occasions .

@mariagibson2722 10 ай бұрын

From what I have read, it’s not the emerald tiara Eugenie wore at her wedding. The tiara mm wanted was the huge tiara QUEEN ELIZABETH wore to special events that had hanging emerald rondels all around or an emerald tiara that was of unspecified origin.

@stargo2931 10 ай бұрын

@@mariagibson2722 Yes. It was bought at a bargain basement price by Queen Mary from one of the Russian Romanovs. She took advantage of the Revolution. Queen Elizabeth took great care when and where that headpiece was worn, she didn't like to offend any foreign dignitaries.

@lindaelia2616 8 күн бұрын

Wasn’t ever racism…it was about lack of character! The Queen saw through MegaLiar’s evil ways.

@mary-annebarnett654 10 ай бұрын

This is common knowledge here in the UK. One of the many reasons she is so disliked. As we say here ‘totally up herself’. She is also as common as muck. Rumour has it that because our Queen knew what she was, her wedding tiara was a copy which was all she could be trusted with. Markle hasn’t been invited to a State 9:03 Dinner as she couldn’t be trusted to behave well. She remains an embarrassment to all to this day unfortunately.

@l7846 10 ай бұрын

8 3023 I am embarrassed of this fellow citizen. Here in the South, she plainly would be spoken in private, of course, as "trash." As such, she not only had no breeding or decency, of herself, much less the history she managed to get around her finger, she had, and continues to hav no desire to develop same. Her Majesty was perfectly intuitive, and I am so happy to hear the tiera was a replica! I have also read the engagement ring stones were replaced before they left for Canada. That would be nice to have confirmed.

@sandybruce9092 10 ай бұрын

The Witchmdidnr wear a tiara at her wedding - it was a bandeau - still very beautiful!!!😊

@mary-annebarnett654 9 ай бұрын

@@sandybruce9092 still a copy and not the original

@nubiablack8125 9 ай бұрын

Well said

@kathleenwisialowski4558 7 ай бұрын

@@mary-annebarnett654 diamonds do not sparkle like that. It was most certainly a paste copy. They are still very expensive but not diamonds at all. After she lost the Queen's bracelet during their engagement photos, what else could the Queen do. All of the tiaras had sentimental value to the Queen. I'm certains She was hurt over the loss of the bracelet as it was a gift from her sister Princess Margaret. I would be mortified if I lost any of the Queen's jewelry. They both had the attitude like it was no big loss. Heartless, the two are heartless.

@mbd6054 10 ай бұрын

MM was a junior Duchess. She was in no way comparable to the then Duchess of Cambridge, who was a long standing senior working royal, and of a superior rank to MM. W&C's work was also at a senior international level. It was ridiculous to compare the two. It was like comparing the CEO, with the office junior, hired last week.

@larissauchiyama1141 10 ай бұрын

$meg$ thought she was entitled to the company car with a driver and a corner office as soon as she said “I do”. She thinks she is better than everyone and so above them.

@mistydevillier2197 10 ай бұрын

I was going to say "don't you mean janitor?" But then I remembered that janitors actually contribute to society so, nevermind!

@mbd6054 10 ай бұрын

@@mistydevillier2197 👍🎯

@xhogun8578 10 ай бұрын

@@mistydevillier2197that made me laugh.

@annamack5823 10 ай бұрын

What's most ridiculous is that the ginger retard didn't know (or accept) his place.

@gerrimcfadden2204 10 ай бұрын

MEgain brought the ghetto to the palace😂😂😂😂😂

@JennyTolios 10 ай бұрын

The fact that she thought she could come into the Royal Family (a thousand year old institution!) and play dress up with priceless Royal jewels tells you everything about her unbelievable level of entitlement and delusion! 😠

@alanphipps9987 13 күн бұрын

She is a call girl.

@sparkypete3417 13 күн бұрын

And tell everyone what to do..cause I'm a 'Douchess'!!!. Power went to her head!. Silly 🧙‍♀️!!

@itsonlyatail 10 ай бұрын

God bless the Queen! And we now know Megs lies and steals…

@judywright4241 10 ай бұрын

The first thing MM did was ‘accidentally lose’ a 100K Diamond bracelet that she was loaned. Why would you loan her anything again? It’s hilarious to find out how the Queen had a duplicate of the tiara MM wore, because she feared it would also ‘get lost’--it did. Think of MM’s face when she found out it was a glass tiara😆😅😂🤣

@NChant101 10 ай бұрын

Wait… the duplicate tiara was “lost ?”

@NJ-Cathie 10 ай бұрын

@@NChant101no - a bracelet worth over $100k.

@mariagibson2722 10 ай бұрын

⁠⁠@@NJ-CathieOh my dear. There ARE bracelets worth that amount and more. Dependent of so many factors. The Queen’s bracelet must have had historical value in addition to it’s material worth. What a bloody shame. What a bloody shame. That woman’s behavior is beyond words… I CANNOT imagine “losing” any Royal jewelry…

@dorikeppley8421 10 ай бұрын

I suspect the bracelet wasn’t lost but in a safe somewhere IMO!

@CptKD-vu3ee 10 ай бұрын

@@mariagibson2722 - I hear you! ✓ I'd have been a *broken* human being Returning to "Tell" the Queen (Of ALL People; THAT's *worse* than Mom) [ God BLESS 'n *'Rest'* BOTH Their Souls ✝️] That I'd LOST a *'Piece'* that SHE *Permit* ME To *'Borrow'* - Of SUCH Value‽ My goodness . . . I feel BAD just *'Thinking'* about IT! I'd have NEVER Been able To 'Lift' *my* head, again! 🙇x

@jackieellenbarnes1268 10 ай бұрын

I never heard of Meghan until She got with Harry.

@christinebernazzoli9981 8 ай бұрын

MM doesn't even deserve to wear Princess Diana's jewelry! Markle has caused nothing but trouble for the royal family. 🤢🤢🤮

@stephaniebarrett6193 13 күн бұрын

Tots agree

@Kirsty19957 10 ай бұрын

I doubt Harry's wife would have returned the tiara, had it been loaned!

@user-bu4xm3rr8s 10 ай бұрын

Don't let Megan ever go to England again.

@katsnow9256 10 ай бұрын

And now Meghan's idea ( and Harry), is to take the name *Spencer*! Thankfully Princess Diana's brother, the Earl squashed all that down!!

@CK-wc8ow 10 ай бұрын

What entitled Megan to the Queens jewels? Diana got to wear many priceless pieces that Sarah, Sophie had no access to, this is because she was wife of the heir. Similarly Megan was never going to have any access as she wasn't the future queen

@honestea1828 10 ай бұрын

The were the Crown jewels,.not the Queen's personally..QEll, Camilla and Catherine got to wear some notable pieces given their role and good relation to QEll but Sophie has as well as she too was in QEll's esteem and an attendant at State dinners. Not so with Meghan.

@enkisdaughter4795 10 ай бұрын

@@honestea1828The now Duchess of Edinburgh was close to HMTQ and they become even closer after the Duchess’s mother died in 2005. In fact, the Duchess of Edinburgh used to call her Mama.

@melindawilson1367 10 ай бұрын

Her Majesty did not want the crown jewels stolen.

@sparkypete3417 13 күн бұрын

Or copied?

@nuranar 10 ай бұрын

The most interesting point of this story to me, was that Her Majesty felt the need at all to say something. In an ordinary situation, it wouldn't even come up. The Royal Collection is under the control of the monarch; no one, including the Prince of Wales, can just go in and borrow whatever he or she pleases. And they all know that. What this tells me is that there were so many demands from Meghan and Harry that she had to issue a "ban" in order to stop it. Beebs, you go into terrific detail on all the reasons why it's only logical. All of these things that everyone else knew but Meghan chose to ignore or regard as "racism." We'll never know for sure, but I suspect that Catherine almost had to be urged to borrow and wear some of the pieces she has been seen to wear. The Nizam necklace, for example. She wore it once a few years after her marriage and looked very self-conscious and rather uncomfortable in it. Her demeanor as she has matured in age and in her role has changed, and when she last wore it she looked at-ease instead. Meghan's (alleged) expectation that she could wear anything in the vault when she pleased was the complete opposite. It really seems she thought that anyone "royal" could just use everything "royal." She never seemed to get that personal property still exists! And that the monarch makes all the rules. Moreover, a lot of the items were the late Queen's own, not just belonging to the nation/Crown. Queen Mary left her jewelry to Elizabeth personally, including that tiara that Catherine has worn so much. It's the height of presumption to swan into your husband's grandmother's room and paw through her jewelry box, but that seems to be exactly what Meghan assumed she could do.

@ABC1701A 6 ай бұрын

Apparently Queen Camilla is urging her to branch out and wear items she hasn't worn before now that she is older and William is 1st in line to the throne. Camilla and Catherine have both been seen wearing items not seen in decades, I think I've read somewhere that even Sophie has worn a few new items as well. Jewels need to be worn and Camilla seems to be trying to ensure they get regular outings at suitable occasions. Personally I think this is a great idea, even the most minor of brooches and necklaces need to be worn even if they are only suitable for a visit to an afternoon tea party or luncheon rather than a state occasion.

@magicskyway 5 ай бұрын

I'd bet money you're right about people having to urge Catherine to borrow more jewels, and greater ones. She's totally respectful of the rules and doesn't require an overabundance of attention.

@magicskyway 5 ай бұрын

@@ABC1701A Good for Camilla! She seems super-thoughtful.

@decodolly1535 4 ай бұрын

@@ABC1701A That's a fabulous idea and also extremely sensible. Queen Camilla is different in colouring & build to the late Queen, just as Catherine is totally different from Diana. It makes perfect sense that different jewels might suit them better.

@Canuck13 10 ай бұрын

Meghan having itchy fingers is putting it politely.

@celiacrockett9954 10 ай бұрын

The best bit is MM’s tiara was “fake “ because they already did not trust her. That’s why it sparkled more than any other,crystals do that 😂. I just disliked the way she treated Charlotte it was disgusting and childish. The poor little girl was only three!!!😢

@kathleenwisialowski4558 7 ай бұрын

A blackened heart treats a toddler so poorly.

@manuelajager8517 10 ай бұрын

The RF is lucky she left.

@nancymoore1240 11 күн бұрын

And very lucky that she took Haznoballs with her.

@hattyburrow716 10 ай бұрын

She was too demanding right from the start.

@sparkypete3417 10 ай бұрын

Exactly like when She was asked not t o wear the blood diamond earrings!. Of course she did!. I'm not sure if they were the ones she wore in Fiji with that blue dress?????😧

@kakacoco5 10 ай бұрын

Meghan was allowed to things as a girlfriend that Catherine couldn’t do until she married into the family.

@mademsoisellerhapsody 10 ай бұрын

Multiple times

@honestea1828 10 ай бұрын

No jewel though. Those don't come into play until outsiders become Royal brides.

@marivg8948 10 ай бұрын

This was the Queen's big mistake. Harry was her favorite grandchild, but she shouldn't have made concessions to The Meg. It took HMTQ awhile to realize her big mistake. Her adoration for Harry blinded her.

@susanspencer4075 10 ай бұрын

Megan was caught by royal protection officers assigned to Prince William searching the boot of Williams car at a polo match and caught red handed with Williams phone in her hand, much to William and Catherine horror.

@nancymoore1240 11 күн бұрын

I've always wondered why she wasnt detained or arrested. Bec she was hawwys girlfriend? But she was rummaging through his brother's car. The future, future king. She was shooed away TWICE by security. TWICE!! If someone was seen rummaging through..say..the Vice President of the US's car, they would have immediately been arrested and investigated. The car would have been examined for bombs, etc. I sure dont think much of " royal security". I hope now, after all their nasty statements, " royal security" is being much more professional.

@MCP920 10 ай бұрын

It’s embarrassing to think she would think otherwise. You simply observe and graciously accept what is offered in her situation. Honestly, Royal family or not, some things you should just know.

@ddjr6673 10 ай бұрын

I mean, being offered *anything* is a privilege, honestly the lack of gratitude is astounding

@itcouldbeanyone 8 ай бұрын

I don’t think watching Disney movies was quite enough research into how to be royal.

@christinechandler5690 10 ай бұрын

Megs wanted to wear the emerald tiara, HMQ refused as it had already been promised to Eugenie. Meg got her revenge by announcing her pregnancy at Eugenie's wedding. That showed us her character. Even the PoW has limited access to the jewellery vault, as Queen, Camilla will always have first dibs 😅

@honestea1828 10 ай бұрын

QEll.and QC were/are not stingy about sharing with worthy people, so Catherine is set.

@gaylehunter7744 9 ай бұрын

I love how Queen Camilla has shown deference to the late Queen in her careful selection of jewelry since her death

@honestea1828 9 ай бұрын

@@gaylehunter7744Indeed thoughtful, touching and frequent tributes to QEll as well as occasional hat tips to Queens Elizabeth TQM, Mary and Victoria.

@user-vh7kw4rs8c Ай бұрын

すさ

@sheilastahl633 10 ай бұрын

The Queen had all the answers before Harry married her. She knew that is the reason for those looks and she didn't like being made a fool of. So the Queen made sure she would not take advantage of what she worked so hard to build and her reputation was another fact the Queen guarded and it worked for her. Then this snippet comes along and thinks she is going to tell the Queen what to do and when. MM will go down in history worse than Wallis Simpson. And we have heard from many other people about jewels and jewelry taken by MM. Oh yes Harry sure did a great job of picking a person to settle down with knowing who she was. His todger was talking and made all the decisions for him. God Save the King.

@sballantine8127 10 ай бұрын

The Lovers Knort tiara was NOT a wedding gift to Princess Diana. Diana had the exclusive use of it whilst Princess of Wales. The tiara was then and still is part of the collection of royal jewels belonging to the reigning queen.

@msullivan3531 9 ай бұрын

She’s a train wreck and I wouldn’t be surprised if they get divorced at some point.

@mendocinogirl 10 ай бұрын

The Queen was one sharp lady!❤

@kate2create738 10 ай бұрын

Given how on her Australian tour, her first international tour, she wore blood diamonds that became more memorable demonstrates she is irresponsible when it comes to jewelry and public events.

@carolineyoungs5878 9 ай бұрын

Those have also conveniently disappeared.

@kathleenwisialowski4558 7 ай бұрын

What makes it a blood diamond? I've never looked into it. Did they use slave labor?

@kathleenwisialowski4558 7 ай бұрын

@@carolineyoungs5878 seems many things in her care just disappeared.

@JenMalyon-im3nu 10 ай бұрын

Megan has "lost" jewellery that the Queen loaned her and some of Katherine's jewelry dissappeared while Megan was caught sneaking around palaces at odd hours of the night , even photographing private areas and the sleeping children to merchandise.

@deeannaschutz4049 10 ай бұрын

I'd really like a full story on this!

@lindamorris4542 10 ай бұрын

Catherine with a C not a K.

@lindamorris4542 10 ай бұрын

@@buffys3477 Catherine

@SweetOne. 10 ай бұрын

@@buffys3477 Meghan was caught in the Palace apartment of Prince William by the children's Nanny, she stopped Meghan, who was already taking pictures of a napping Princess Charlotte. She had also been seen in off limit areas by security and escorted out of them. Even the Royal family does not have carte blanche access to the entire palace unless it is Balmoral - the only privately owned Palace. All the other Palaces belong to the English Trust. The Royals are assigned offices and apartments within them. Meghan disregarded the restrictions and thus was assigned a personal Chaperone to ensure her compliance (that she didn't accidentally enter where she should not). The British Nannies are trained to kill to protect their wards and have been cleared by international protection agencies for their credentials. Not one has ever spoken about the children they served over the past 900 years. Who would you believe, Meghan or the Nanny?

@monicacollins8289 10 ай бұрын

@@buffys3477 ⚠️ ATTENTION EVERYBODY: we have a Meghan fan and apologist among us! ⚠️

@tracysmith3076 10 ай бұрын

Let's face it. Catherine is humble, and full of class and grace. Megs is none of those.

@MaryannB9203 10 ай бұрын

QE2 was a person who was born for greatness in her lifetime. She was unwavering in her love & dedication for the betterment of her country, a hard worker, unselfish and born for her position to rule. She was a strong, unwavering Monarch, who lived what she preached. A remarkable & irreplaceable woman. Loved & respected by all. So sadly missed. 💔😢

@kathleenwisialowski4558 7 ай бұрын

The world was blessed with Queen Elizabeth II.

@deannestjames5590 7 ай бұрын

Well said, Indeed!

@GinaSeay-kn7xr 10 ай бұрын

So interesting to see side by side photos of royal women of different generations wearing the same piece of jewellery. A very enjoyable video, thanks.

@cocojo2356 10 ай бұрын

Apparently there was an 'issue' about a missing bracelet that was loaned to Meghan and is still missing to this day. Could that also have a bearing on why she was restricted regarding the Queen's jewellery???

@edennis8578 10 ай бұрын

Meghan wasn't a Hollywood actress, she was an actress on a Canadian cable television show, where the production budget is around $1million per episode, not mega-millions per episode. It's like saying that you're the same as a Rolls-Royce when you're really a Volkswagen.

@dawnelder9046 10 ай бұрын

As a Canadian I never heard of the show until she was engaged to Harry. It was not known as a good show.

@gaylehunter7744 9 ай бұрын

Omg I love this

@AndysandPennysmom 12 күн бұрын

Previously used, twice.

@lisalambrecht6676 12 күн бұрын

I’m Canadian and I saw the adds on cable tv for the show “suits “ I wasn’t interested in watching.

@annvong1579 12 күн бұрын

In her dream.

@susanmaxwell6033 10 ай бұрын

Greetings from the UK. I think loaning her anything would be a bad idea, be it a lip gloss or a pair of shoes let's face it the likelihood of getting it back is low. Getting a tiara back; zero! Just my opinion.

@larissauchiyama1141 10 ай бұрын

Yeah, no way on the lipgloss unless you’re wanting to have some sort of herpetic lesion on your lips!

@janrogers8352 10 ай бұрын

Some of the pieces MM might have wanted to wear would not have been appropriate in Fiji, but she doesn't get it. The evidence that MM can't read the room is there in her trip to the school in New York. The cost of her expensive designer clothes and jewellery, could have fed those children for a year. You don't flaunt wealth in those circumstances and the fact that it had to be explained to her, shows her lack of understanding for how things are done.

@sahdogwrangler5594 10 ай бұрын

It was such an unattractive outfit as well. She didn't need to impress anyone with her looks, I think kindness & authenticity would have been much more impressive. I heard she brought a box of vegetables that weren't in great condition.

@gilledwards4724 10 ай бұрын

She did it again when "helping" at a shelter in LA

@Katherine-vz6ov 10 ай бұрын

It is actually about the message it sends to the former colony...that the Queen of UK still believes that she can send her grandsons wife of 5 minutes to Lord over them and shove it in their faces. This is not done anymore and not tolerated by many former colonies that are now commonwealth countries. The commonwealth like the monarchy hangs by a thread and is dependent on goodwill. The ginger brats wifey does not foster goodwill, had no understanding of the commonwealth, behaved like an entitled diva in Fiji and Australia and refused to show due respect to the Native Queen and King of Tonga. The Polynesian Pacific islands have their own royalty. The 5 minute slut chess from America who probably couldn't find Fiji on a map does not get to behave like the Queen. The ginger winger is the Prince and given the trimmings but she is a nobody who was in the picture for 5 minutes.

@kerryalfaro9437 10 ай бұрын

Mega Marco's Crown, her tiara for her wedding was a replica. It wasn't real, it was definitely replica. They did not trust Megan with Crown jewels at all. So she got her a replica to wear!!!

@heidimeigs5192 10 ай бұрын

That’s what I’ve read for years.

@addieleo6382 10 ай бұрын

The 4-strand pearl necklace suits the late queen and Catherine better than it did Diana.

@kvpx 10 ай бұрын

Her late Majesty Queen Elizabeth II was always a very smart lady. She soon had Megan's measure..... probably much sooner than the rest of us.

@sandrasmith2465 10 ай бұрын

@kvpx I don’t doubt it and I bet the Queen had her measure from day one as did Prince Philip and Prince William and I expect Princess Anne too,no flies on that lady! I liked Harry so even though I didn’t know who she was I was happy for him until the engagement interview when I saw straight thru her! ‘I didn’t know who Herry was just is he nice?’What? Oh please 🙄

@wg8859 Ай бұрын

Don’t forget the Queen also the services of MI5.

@cosmicdreamer1387 10 ай бұрын

Both Princess Diana and Princess Cathrine were, are the wife of the future King and the Mothers of the future King -- Harry hasn’t been even the spare for the last ten years

@deecee9548 10 ай бұрын

Excellent point!

@honestea1828 10 ай бұрын

QEll was very generous with the jewelry with Camilla. Even Sophia has worn an occasional piece. She simply didn't trust or like Meghan with due cause.

@decodolly1535 4 ай бұрын

He is no longer 'spare'. He is now definitely 'surplus'.

@patriot1952-os6mh 4 ай бұрын

❤ WITHOUT MEGHAN'S PLASTIC SURGERY SHE WAS 9NLY AVERAGE LOOKING! ❤

@soniallanos3385 10 ай бұрын

They are grown adults and understood fully why it was not allowed. For people to say she was use to getting what she wants because she was from Hollywood. She was on 1 series...does not make her an A-List actress!! She likes to elevate herself like she was top notch...she was not!! MM has shown her true personality to the world and its not great!! Can't imagine how she behaved behind the scenes with the RF. Horrendous, I'm sure!! She's Harry problem now!!

@gillianking3080 10 ай бұрын

To your point about being new, in regular jobs, there is a probabtionary period which can be up to 6 months with an option to extend if there are questions about performance or an understanding of work culture. Civil servants, even low level Admin Assistants undergo rigorous security checks and long probabtionary periods before they enjoy the prestige of such a position. She failed to understand that her job was really just a somewhat overdressed civil servant🙄. ❤🇬🇧

@hl6876 10 ай бұрын

Beebs I am not surprised at this after some of her demands, such as her wedding tiara be available when her hairdresser was. Catherine practised her hair with a cheap plastic tiara before her wedding - bad manners...

@st69854 10 ай бұрын

And what a fantastic job that hairdresser did at the wedding, eh? 😂😂😂

@larissauchiyama1141 10 ай бұрын

She look she had been dragged through a bush backwards!

@LynetteMcGrath 10 ай бұрын

When you are showing pictures of the different tiaras and the women who have worn them, it struck me that Catherine's wedding tiara was much smaller than MM's. I'm sure she (C) didn't throw a tantrum over that. Also regarding tiaras, this was one of the points of contention with Angela Kelly when MM rocked up to the palace demanding the tiara for her 'hairdressing rehersal'. She honestly thought she could just take the tiara and waltz off to the hairdresser!

@catpatrick3838 10 ай бұрын

Catherine seems to be a very humble person. I imagine she chose the most low profile tiara of the ones she was told she could choose from, which happened to be the Halo scroll tiara and, in my opinion, suited her perfectly. Catherine has always seemed to understand that with great privilege comes great responsibility. She married William knowing she was signing up for a lifetime of service and duty to Great Britain and the Commonwealth nations. When their time comes they will be a fantastic King and Queen.

@qhluvr77 10 ай бұрын

Catherine bought a £9 plastic tiara for her hairdresser to practice with. Quite the difference in attitudes!

@lynnnad5268 10 ай бұрын

@@qhluvr77I did not read/ hear this before! So practical.

@samanthafordyce5795 8 ай бұрын

A rehearsal with her hairdresser wouldn't have done any good. The messy bun she wore for her wedding could not have been improved by the tiara no matter how you figure it. Me-again always looks like an unmade bed and did so on her wedding day as well. She gives the impression that Americans are slobs. We aren't! only she is.

@kathleenwisialowski4558 7 ай бұрын

Could have fooled me. She had a hair dresser and it came out looking like that? Wow!

@Melshed 10 ай бұрын

The slide with all the queens wearing the Lovers Knot tiara was stunning!

@jcd5211 10 ай бұрын

The truly ironic thing here is that I get the sense that Kate doesn’t absolutely love wearing the various Crown Jewels including the tiaras. They all just look really really heavy.

@Dizfan 10 ай бұрын

Good For The Late Queen! That's one thing I admire about The British Royal Family they gave Meghan a chance(they knew she was trouble was from the start)..but gave a go. 5 years later the Truth has Finally come out (regardless what others may think). That's why I will ALWAYS TEAM KING CHARLES III & THE REST OF THE BRITISH ROYAL FAMILIY!!

@Modro811 10 ай бұрын

I don’t understand why you don’t have 100k subscribers, your videos are always so informative and gently entertaining. This one like your others was fabulous! Thank you!

@larissauchiyama1141 10 ай бұрын

KZfaq does this weird crap! It’s infuriating. Beebs, you are the best! ❤️

@kathleenwisialowski4558 7 ай бұрын

This was a great video. So informative. I'd love to see more like this.

@jo6731 10 ай бұрын

The crazy thing is that at first Cate didn't want to wear a tiara but had to be talked into it by Camilla and was given three to choose from, and she chose the smallest one. If that is true, that tells you a lot about Catherine. My favorite is the sapphire bandeau which hasn't been seen in decades.

@lynettefinnigan9540 10 ай бұрын

With her sticky fingers, its no wonder the Queen restricted MMs access to the jewellery!! Its centeries old and historically significant, strangely disappearing would be embarrassing!!

@Reallifeintheblue 6 ай бұрын

Huge difference when a D league “tv star” comes in and complains to the queen.

@angeliquehammond2996 10 ай бұрын

I’ve seen a video that has compared pictures of Diana wearing her jewelry against pictures of Meghan wearing the same items. They look different. They also rumored that after Tiara gate the Queen had a replica of Meghan’s wedding day tiara made. The replica showed rainbows reflecting in the stones which is not a mark of true diamonds. It looked pretty compelling.

@stacey8420 10 ай бұрын

She's a legend in her own mind and thinks she's all that.....hello, not!!!

@allieb4132 10 ай бұрын

Meghan never attended a function that rose to the level of borrowing jewelry. Princess Catherine wasn’t seen wearing something borrowed from QE2 until 2014, 3 years after the wedding (it was the Nizam of Hyderabad necklace). I’m sure the privilege was earned. We know Meghan thought she was above that, and I’m SURE it chapped her ass that her sister in law had access and she didn’t. Meghan hadn’t, and never, paid her dues. Even then, I’m NOT sure Her Majesty would have been as generous as she was with Diana and Catherine for obvious reasons.

@d.h.a.2700 10 ай бұрын

Catherine did not have immediate access to the lover's knot tiara, she worked up to it. I think her first state dinner she wore lotus blossom. HMTQ knew that anything loaned out to TW would probably be "lost". Not trustworthy.

@honestea1828 10 ай бұрын

She may have even if she didn't wear it immediately. Camilla was immediately given a lifetime loan of the Greville and Boucheron tiaras so associated with Queen Elizabeth TQM, so I don't think temporary access to a tiara similarly associated with William's mother would have been a stretch even early on.

@LoriManning 10 ай бұрын

The Queen knew Meghan couldn't be trusted.

@firecracker187 10 ай бұрын

Meghan would totally never give them back

@maureenchallener1529 10 ай бұрын

Did they get it back?

@sabsmcdabs7139 10 ай бұрын

I'm looking forward to Angela Kelly's book about these events if she decides to spill...

@ElvisRose_ 10 ай бұрын

Good for the Queen if this is true. Although, I must say my favorite Meghan and the royal jewelry collection is the story behind Diana's most iconic piece of jewelry, that sapphire engagement which was actually handed down to Prince Harry for his future wife but he gave it to William for Kate out of a love for her, and a desire to see that ring on the future queen. Given Meg's creepy Diana obsession, you know she was eyeing that ring every time she was in Kate's presence!

@westzed23 10 ай бұрын

The last that I heard, was that the ring was for Prince William.

@ThegirlfromU.N.C.L.E 10 ай бұрын

I think William chose Diana's gold Cartier watch and Harry her engagement ring. They swapped so William could propose with Diana's ring.

@fichinisophie1854 10 ай бұрын

@@westzed23 According to Vanity Fair in september 2021, the two brother made an exchange. William had the Cartier Tank Française Watch and Harry the Saphire ring. But because William got married first and because Harry like very much Kate, he offer the ring in exchange for the watch.

@lynettefinnigan9540 10 ай бұрын

The boys were allowed to choose from Diana's jewellery, Harry picked the ring..later he swapped it for the watch, as he thought a lot of Catherine (back before his mind was poisoned by MM) and thought William should propose to her with it. Back in the good days when they all got on, brothers were family and MM wasn't poisoning everyone!!!

@larissauchiyama1141 10 ай бұрын

And you could tell in that engagement interview with the BBC, she despised it! And it took her no time at all to change it! That should have been a HUGE wake up call to Hazmat. But because he’s such a Thicko, he didn’t give it any thought.

@chriscarson7384 10 ай бұрын

Great video! I feel a lot of people don't understand the "rules" for royal jewels, and this was very helpful. In my estimation, the queen was much freer when it came to sharing jewels with Diana and Sarah Ferguson than she is now. After the Wales and York divorces, the queen was more cautious. It seemed like it took forever for Sophie to be allowed to borrow some of the really nice pieces. The queen came to adore Sophie, and it really showed in the final years of the queen's life. Sophie got to borrow some fabulous pieces. But I think there were few outright gifts. As future queen, Catherine was offered the chance to wear more jewels early on, but I think she wasn't comfortable with too much. Still, the queen's intentions were clear. Consider the Chinese state banquet in 2015. Catherine wore a tiara, earrings and two bracelets. No huge necklace or brooch. BUT, one of the bracelets was Philip's wedding present to the queen. I don't think she ever let anyone else wear it, but Catherine has now worn it several times. As Beeb's noted, Meghan has worn some pieces that LOOK like Diana's personal property, but there is a question as to whether they are copies. The butterfly earrings M has worn are not the same shape as Diana's. And in some photos, the shape and color of her aquamarine ring look different as well. Perhaps Charles or the queen had near-copies made? 🤔🤔🤔🤔

@mary-annebarnett654 10 ай бұрын

More than likely considering

@enkisdaughter4795 10 ай бұрын

I’ve read elsewhere that it was Her Majesty, after there was supposedly an earring “lost”.

@elizabethsheffield6609 10 ай бұрын

.....wasn't Sophie a "favorite of HMTQ?" Of course she was ALSO P. Edward's wife (Edward being her most "favored" son - allegedly of course).

@kathleenwisialowski4558 7 ай бұрын

I would think they have had paste jewels made of several pieces. Just for security alone.

@kathleenwisialowski4558 7 ай бұрын

@@enkisdaughter4795 it seemed anytime Meghan was around things went missing. First the bracelet, then an earring. Can't blame the Queen for not lending to her.

@cjpaeropaint 10 ай бұрын

The Emerald Tiara is valued higher than the diamond one. That's why she wanted it. I don't think she understands that she doesn't own them just cause wears them.

@LynetteMcGrath 10 ай бұрын

You are right. She thought wearing denoted ownership. There was also the story that she wanted one of the large stones from the emerald tiara made into a ring, and also the story about the diamond bracelet that got 'lost'. She was not to be trusted with any of the Royal jewels.

@karinbinnie1862 10 ай бұрын

I heard at the time that mm was planning to use emerald green as her signature color - several of her outfits at the time were deep green like the one on the cover of Finding Freebies. She may also have wanted the very formal crown with all the emeralds that is only worn by the queen on very formal state occasions.

@cjpaeropaint 10 ай бұрын

@@LynetteMcGrath I forgot about the ring, I do remember that.

@WBCRO 10 ай бұрын

The article repeated details about M wearing some of Diana’s jewelry. I’ve watched highly credible videos that showed that both the butterfly earring/necklace set and the gold Cartier tennis bracelet were not the ones owned by Diana. The Cartier bracelet was M’s. She had bought it for herself as a gift for, I believe, landing the role on Suits. The butterfly pieces were compared in close up to photos of Diana wearing her butterfly set. There are slight, but significant, differences between the two versions. I sense that William clamped down on M wearing his mother’s jewels.

@pamspurgers3578 10 ай бұрын

I've seen several videos about the jewels. Some of them had comments that helped understand repairs and duplicates made. Moissanite was used in the duplicates. It looks like diamonds. I think the most informative video I saw was by Celt. Also, it was alleged M took a diamond bracelet William had given to Catherine.

@WBCRO 10 ай бұрын

@@pamspurgers3578 Wow! Thanks for those tidbits. I hadn’t heard about the diamond bracelet but it rings true.

@MW27-v8g 10 ай бұрын

The only crown nutmeg might ever get or deserve is the one from burger king or from her dentist

@stargirlofantares9053 10 ай бұрын

Everything in your video was so clear and concise. It absolutely makes sense that Meghan wouldn’t have been allowed to wear these jewels at first. She may have got to if she stayed more than 2 minutes and was a bit more humble and gracious at what she WAS given to wear! I’d be ecstatic to wear the tiara she wore to her wedding. I actually like it more than the tiny one Princess Catherine got to wear for her wedding. The photo collections you put together in this episode must have taken some serious time. I really enjoyed some of those tiaras I’d never really seen before! Bravo!! ♥️Jessica

@carolray9156 8 ай бұрын

Meg's tiara was fake maybe it was bigger than Catherine 's but Catherine 's was DIAMONDS and Meg's was GLASS!!🎉

@stargirlofantares9053 8 ай бұрын

@@carolray9156 So true!! The Royals didn’t trust Meghan for a second. Allegedly, as I’m not an expert, you can tell Meghan’s is fake as it throws rainbow sparkles, where really diamonds throw clear or white sparkles.

@Neiri-qg2wk 10 ай бұрын

I heard that she also wanted the Vladimir Tiara for her wedding which is a large, elaborate tiara truly fit for a queen. If Meghan had an ounce of sense, she would wouldn’t have even thought to ask for it. The wedding was overall inappropriate. Meghan already had her white wedding. She could’ve worn off white as HM requested. A £35M pound wedding and granny who’s footing the bill wants you to wear slightly off-white, so what? Just wear it. Even King Charles had a humble wedding at a small church and Camilla wore no wedding gown. If Meghan had more sense she would’ve taken her cue from Camilla and Charles and had a toned down wedding at a smaller church and worn off white . Her veil was ridiculously long and looked terrible dragging on the bare ground because she was too stubborn to use the blue carpet. We’ll not mention the giant church for only a handful of friend and family guests. She ran up a £35M bill just to entertain celebrities. Just an altogether tacky woman.

@dawnbeaird5183 10 ай бұрын

I'm sure it burns Meghan's hinny to watch Catherine wear Diana's jewelry, seeing she thinks of herself as so like Diana ❣️

@honestea1828 10 ай бұрын

Catherine has some.of Diana's personal pieces, but the pieces loaned from the Queen belonged to the Crown and were not Diana's even if she might have worn them on occasion.

@honestea1828 10 ай бұрын

Any pieces on loan from the Queen were property of the Crown, not Diana's, but I'm sure it still sticks in her craw.

@elisaseverns2543 10 ай бұрын

Thank you for showing all these beautiful jewels on these beautiful women. Historic photos are so interesting and enjoyable to see.

@PaulDonnam-xs4kg 10 ай бұрын

There are allegations that jewellery had gone missing, not sure veracity, but this is possible.

@lkuffer 10 ай бұрын

Great finds of royal jewels worn throughout BRF history! Very interesting photo comparisons.

@judiththirlwell417 10 ай бұрын

Since allegedly M has refused to return items as she claimed they were now hers and had "lost" at least one diamond bracelet that was loaned to her, it is understandable that only certain items would be available as well as the internal ranking and the type of event attending. IMO

@donnajarvis9542 10 ай бұрын

Queen Elizabeth II knew who and what Meghan was all about!

@slytherinsteph 10 ай бұрын

I’m sure MM would have made this point about race, if not for the fact that people would not have believed that. As you said, people would have heard this story & thought it made perfect sense that MM wasn’t given full access to the Royal Collection, as she was very new to the family. You are so right about these pieces having meaning and history, relevance, and there must be appropriateness when they are worn. Sadly, I think MM only sees monetary value; the other things don’t matter to her. And I bet this absolutely has a role in MMs resentment of Catherine, who not only likely had to wait to have full access but she also had to wait YEARS for her engagement to William. MM was engaged to Harry in like 13 months.

@user-nt6cj6nw7w 10 ай бұрын

A narcissist always hits the fast forward button. I have no doubt she will have said "if you want children we had better hurry up." Then pulling the depression card, along with the yawn fest race card to get him away from his family. Despicable woman.

@riverblue9400 10 ай бұрын

Girl ain’t no Disney princess.. She’s every Disney villain! (cue purple lightning, waves tearing down the cliffs, bird nests being cast to the forest floor, maniacal laughter….)

@MC-yi3zp 10 ай бұрын

It didnt help that Rachael borrowed a pair of earrings from the Royal Collection and said she (conveniently) lost one of the earrings.

@Always_Thinking 10 ай бұрын

I'm pretty sure, on Suits, she spent the most amount of time with the least amount of clothes on😊

@xhogun8578 10 ай бұрын

I might be wrong but I think Catherine wore the lovers knot tiara for the first time in 2015. That's 4 years into her marriage. Everyone forgets that Catherine didn't have carte blanche access to the collection and seems to have respected that. Catherine wore a tiara other than her wedding day for the first time in 2013 for a state dinner. At the end of the day tiaras are only worn at white tie events in the UK. Hence the reason they are not always worn, I notice Harry was wearing a black tie to the event in Fiji (however i don't know ehat the protocol is for Fiji).