I’m glad he never stopped doing them it sets his content apart from all the others 😂

the skit was fucking cringe

literally comparable to the golden era smosh skits

@@bennaambo2716 i think you have bad fucking taste

@@Jorda5s i agree

Should use it like a TV at least. Could be watching this right now on it if you hook it up. Get a soundbar and you got a nice little setup

@@ghost-user559 That wouldn't make any sense. I have a TV already and the iMac Pro is so power hungry I don't want to run it even on idle unless there is a specific need once in a blue moon. But I look at it every day, without the cables and it's the best way to enjoy it for me

Beats having cats I suppose........

@@randomcomentator What does it take on idle? I didn’t realize the processor made that much of an impact. I use the older Thunderbolt Display, which is a similar sized screen and its not outrageous on lower brightness. What is the average draw?

Your life must suck

It’s called the Studio Display and a Studio Max or Ultra. Way more powerful than the IMac Pro ever was, and you get to keep the screen when you upgrade later on.

Historically,the iMac has never really been aimed at Pro users.There was only ever the one Pro model released in 2017 (which is featured in this video) and that was just a stop gap whilst they was developing the 2019 Mac Pro which replaced the trash can Mac Pro.The iMac is more of a family computer.It’s still a very good machine though and I have the M3 which is plenty powerful for my use.

@@davidjacobs6244 i don't have enough money for the imac pro

My 14 pro has 84% health and I installed the beta. Funny enough battery life is better than the iOS 17.4.1 I left. It’s a good version since before that I was on 16.6 due to jail breaking

honestly, I wish I had bought one back then instead of buying the 5K iMac that came before. I've heard nothing but great things! I really wish I had bought one. I have an Mac Pro 2013, but I'm sure it's nowhere near as strong and powerful as the iMac Pro.

Nothing cause HomePod can’t run it

yeah

The fruit had to do it differently to avoid Windows bs patents. So the windows don’t snap you snap the windows to the outer grid lol

It’s bummer my 14 pro isn’t getting it. But I’ll be getting 16 pro in fall

And people keep MacBooks longer than apple watches so Sequoia should support MacBooks much older than the ones that aren't supported by WatchOS 11.

Yeah but the 2019 doesn’t have the neural engines for ai. That started with M1. So this is a very rare example of actual hardware differences instead of just a forced obsolescence.

@@ghost-user559 But the 2017 iMac Pro doesn't have that either and still gets Sequoia, just without the apple intelligence features. This is how the 2019 MacBook Air should've been treated.

@@ZaneMouakket Yeah I do agree that it could run it, and anyone can with Open Core. But it wouldn’t have the processing capability to make it “snappy”. It’s got too much bloat to run smoothly without a dedicated Gpu. The IMac Pro is a beast, it has plenty of Ram and it has a gpu. The intel Airs have always been the weakest system in the entire lineup prior to the Apple Silicon Airs.

@@ghost-user559 I agree, but I think most people would prefer their computer still get updated and be a little less snappy, compared to their computer not getting updated anymore. It's much easier to reinstall Sonoma if Sequoia isn't snappy enough or not update to it in the first place if you think it won't be snappy enough compared to installing OCLP to upgrade to Sequoia when your MacBook isn't supported. Also I agree with you that it might make sense for Apple to prevent people from upgrading their OS to the latest one if your computer is old. But only if your computer is 10+ years old, not 5 years old. Even the iPhone XR (launched in 2018) is getting iOS 18 and people replace their phones way sooner than they replace their laptops. Laptops should be supported for at least 50% longer than phones.

Why are you here then? Apple is never going back to Nvidia, they don’t even support Nvidia GPUs in the Mac Pro Intel as they stopped supporting Nvidia GPUs in general through software. And with Apple silicon Macs you can’t even do AMD GPUs (which are supported on Intel Macs officially) so you’re not getting E-GPUs anytime soon. Maybe someday you can use an external AMD card over thunderbolt but as of right now you’re gonna be SOL. But also the M3 and up has hardware Ray tracing support baked into the SOC so you may get outperformed soon.

@@ChromiumProtogen42 Because I still use the entire Apple ecosystem overal, laptop included. However, my desktop is the PC tower and I am not going to return to iMac or Mac Studio anytime soon. Perhaps never. I require at leasat 12 USB-A devices connected, and a few more USB-Cs. I tried 3 high end hubs and none of them can sustain it, each one overheats or breaks. Mac Pro is ridiculosly expensive for what you get and I'm not spending 3x my top tier PC to get some PCI slots for the additional USB ports, especially when that Mac Pro is no good for anything requiring true GPU - AI inference and gaming. I like the idea I am not limited by anything on Windows, everything works, even software from 20 years ago. I still have Macbook Pro and use it when I need a laptop, but it wasn't suitable in the long run for regular work in clamshell mode.

Atleast they have the power of i99👍🏻🫢

@@happygofishing yea so that's why i edit my videos on it in very professional ways.

He like other KZfaqrs want touch screen MacBook. Like run macOS on iPad and that’s what you got. It won’t be iPad anymore. So they really just want MacBook with touch screen

@@sly2792004 yea it just makes no sense.

@@happygofishingmen don’t watch Netflix with their iPad?

Because they want a touch screen macOS. But that’s impossible because macOS isn’t designed for touchscreen They want a round hole to fit into a square peg like Microsoft 10S 😂😂