Russell on Denoting

Рет қаралды 32,463

Daniel Bonevac

7 жыл бұрын

Bertrand Russell, "On Denoting," The Analytic Tradition, Spring 2017

Пікірлер: 31

@feritbaris9508 2 жыл бұрын

thank you so much profesor from the ones like me who dont have to chance to go to your university and your country. i am watching you from China, i am grateful to you for your lectures you share in KZfaq.

@user-pi9pi3gy8h 2 ай бұрын

Truly impressive how you were able to give a lecture on this essay and somehow make it as simple as the beginning of his publication “the Phil of logical atomism.” Amazing!

@hereticmorte666 4 жыл бұрын

Thank you posting these lectures on youtube for free, good sire.

@SAM-Asura Жыл бұрын

Listening to these lectures helped me understand a lot of connections in Semantics and Pragmatics. Thanks a lot professor!

@intrograted792 6 жыл бұрын

I just watched you're first attempt at this and felt for you. I'm so pleased you had another crack at it. Thank-you.

@MrAlanfalk73 7 жыл бұрын

You are an awesome teacher 😆 (and a nice human being too) . Thanks for all your lectures 😎

@romeoharold2183 2 жыл бұрын

i know Im randomly asking but does someone know a method to log back into an instagram account..? I stupidly lost the account password. I would appreciate any assistance you can offer me!

@jacksoncayson9242 2 жыл бұрын

@Romeo Harold Instablaster =)

@romeoharold2183 2 жыл бұрын

@Jackson Cayson Thanks so much for your reply. I got to the site through google and im in the hacking process atm. Looks like it's gonna take a while so I will get back to you later with my results.

@romeoharold2183 2 жыл бұрын

@Jackson Cayson it did the trick and I finally got access to my account again. I am so happy! Thank you so much you saved my ass !

@jacksoncayson9242 2 жыл бұрын

@Romeo Harold happy to help xD

@1987Isabella 5 жыл бұрын

Very engaging and easy to follow. Thank you for sharing!

@vincentmutale4562 6 жыл бұрын

I salute u professor. u are a great professor

@Eitankahane 4 жыл бұрын

Great teacher! Thanks for the video

@lola0u 4 жыл бұрын

This is an amazing lecture! I want to study more philosophy now😀

@krzysztofciuba271 2 жыл бұрын

At 35:52 -"I am confused" and yes, he really messed it up contra original B. Russell's intention in the article!

@NousProductions 6 жыл бұрын

I'm glad he finally erased that partial A on the chalkboard at 33:00 into the lecture.

@sebastianuys425 3 жыл бұрын

At minute 44, is there not in some sense an analogical relationship between "always" and "everything"

@repubblesmcglonky8990 2 жыл бұрын

It's the case that every time he says "everything is awesome" is that everything is awesome

@user-pi9pi3gy8h 2 ай бұрын

Stop playing the metaphysician. Wanna see my theorem?

@pengefikseret 2 жыл бұрын

That 'its not unnecessary' joke was pretty spot on! Or better: It is not the case that the 'its not unnecessary' joke was not spot on

@ThePeaceableKingdom 7 жыл бұрын

Enjoying your lectures. This is no. 4, I presume?...

@MrFranganito 7 жыл бұрын

I think this is the fifth, there's another one on Frege ( "Frege on Thought") uploaded the same day as this one.

@hemalatayaddanapudi7564 Жыл бұрын

Audio is having lor of background noise and disturbance, voice is also not clear

@renehernandeza.7309 3 жыл бұрын

Nice! I red the paper, but I missed some stuff.

@robertstevens1287 4 жыл бұрын

I've grown acquainted to your face... Your well denoted English face... lol

@markuslepisto7824 2 жыл бұрын

How can you see the king out of a man?

@forty2888 2 жыл бұрын

22 s29

@m_monemy 4 жыл бұрын

well i think C(nothing) means: "(∀x)¬(x is awesome)"; the student has turned you in a totally wrong way of giving a description of the quantifier: "(∀x)¬¬(x is awesome)" is completely another thing and it's equivalent to the first assertion.

@clockfixer5049 4 жыл бұрын

Here's the thing, the prof. had to lay down a proposition 'Nothing is not awesome', not 'C(nothing)' by itself which would be exactly what you wrote. In Russel's terminology " 'C(nothing)'means " 'C(nothing) is always false' is always true". And if we abstract from defining 'nothing' by itself, we merely use the language of logic which will even out two negations into one positive proposition. Hope I was clear. محمد صدرا منعمی نودهی