please make a video about Tippu Sultan

Why you didn’t mention that Chechens entered to Belgorad territory?

Ll

@@extremegrindingwithjesus7887 hahahah you are funny! russia FOR THE FIRST TIME SINCE SECOND WORLD WAR announced mobilization, why do you think they did that? just for fun?

@@extremegrindingwithjesus7887 bla bla, don’t cry 😂

@@Better_Clean_Than_GreenI was just playing that yesterday XD

The strategy games didn't lie did they

Where did you get that? Are any Russians surrendering or asking the US for help? lol

It reminds THE LEGENDARY BATTLE OF STALINGRAD 💀

@@gdiwolverinemale4thWW2 history for a start

It's the consequences for Russia down the road. Their overall population is far and away not a healthy one, especially at the rate it is aging. Despite their noticeable adaptations, having to trade thousands of personnel and hundreds of pieces of equipment for each city with pre war populations of 70,000 or less and barely a few km of ground will have serious ramifications for their future warfighting capability.

Ukraine has a much worse problem. Not only their population is ageing, too many people left and are still leaving Ukraine

@@johnrr8854 except Ukraine hasn't been the one marketing themselves as a preeminent superpower. We are seeing a military apparatus that was vaunted as the 2nd most powerful on earth if not on parity with NATO struggling to get past the first hurdle, the conventional war before occupation, this is the easy part and it's now going on year 3 with Russian casualty figured that have far exceeded all post ww2 conflicts they have been involved in until the 2022 invasion.

@@johnrr8854 Ukranian Demographics wont recover in our lifetimes.

@@cynthiaherbst3909 you, like the experts, do not understand the Russian economy of the war in Ukraine 🥱

Their training and practice is vastly inferior still desipite experience. As well as tactics and strategy.

@Diego_TeixeiraI see what you mean, However Thats Completely Different. That was an unconventional war where The enemy used Guerilla warfare very successfully and in a Jungle Environment, which must made the effects of Guerilla warfare 10 times as effective. This can also be seen in Afghanistan, where Guerilla warfare combined with Geography delivers incredible resistance and success against a Regular Conventional armed forces. Russia would fight as they always have, they would lose the airwar in a matter of hours maybe days, and would be crushed at sea within weeks. It would be a slaughter they would have to surrender to avoid mass deaths.

@Diego_Teixeirayou have a fundamental misunderstanding of both conflicts

@Diego_Teixeira well at least you’re right about Russia.

​@Diego_Teixeira the americans never suffered a defeat in battle. They "lost" and or just quit as there was no winning in the traditional sense. You can't destroy a guerrilla force outright especially if it's main force isn't in the same country of the fighting. In a standup traditional fight the US won each time, however the cost of playing world police is expensive so they chose to leave and force each country to handle it themselves.

Oh boy, 5 mins to pass out 😂

Ivka is like burg or polis, just something to specify that it's a settlement.

So Ukraine is the reason oil prices increased. Got it

A shot of Vodka.

@@MkEpicness Middle East: ARE WE A GODDAMN JOKE TO YOU?!!? Don't answer that.

Not the ideal way to count the casualties, but can work as an indicator.

@@NachttiSchlampE65 according to Mediazona, they are only able to find around 50-60% of all obituaries, so again, even their method is not perfect.

Europe and NATO won't let that happen because they will be next

@@TrojaFojaRugsNah. Russia’s struggle in Ukraine has proved to them that Russia cannot conventionally threaten them if they go on the offense. If NATO giving weapons to a third world country with a large mass can hold them still. Russia pushing to even the Vistula in Poland is impossible

@@TrojaFojaRugs No they won't, because any move on any NATO member would mean direct US involvement and considering the US has produced more F-35s than the russian air force had aircraft in total pre-war I think they understand why that would be a horrendous blunder. Also note that russian production numbers are heavily padded as they are counting refurbished old equipment as "newly produced" to make it sound like they aren't so desperate for kit even their "elite" tank brigades are being handed tanks that have been out of production for more than 50 years.

​@@kyleb7974if they conquer Ukraine they will completely destabilize all Europe and will conquer it without a gunfight.

Yup. Without foreign aid the war will finally end

🙄 Slava reality

steiners emu division

Mein Fuhrer...

I love Perun. He gives such good insight into the numbers involved.

@@JG-xi4tu he's been consistently.... wrong

everything hinges on the 2024 presidential election. Ukraine really needs to hold out until then. If Biden wins - (and congress turns blue) - Ukraine will get what they need to go on the offensive again. If Trump wins, the Ukraine will probably need to sue for peace and hope that American Democracy somehow survives. If it doesn't . . . the world has a much bigger problem.

From what is being said from people who are on the frontlines is they need ammunition not people

​@@QualityBuddyexcuse me? That's exactly what they say. Because most are simply dead. Zelenskys 31000 casualties my a s😂

@m.j.9318 OK so I know you find this hard to believe, ukraine doesn't do Human wave assaults that is a soviet union strategy that russia seems to follow. So no ukraine doesn't have nowhere near how much deaths that russia has now I do agree its nowhere near 30k probaly higher but let's uses the syria civil war for a example, over 100k goverment forces have died over a 6+ year progress you would think that after everything it would be more but it's not because only russia sends large groups of people across a mine battlefield.

@@QualityBuddy do you have one verifiable proof Video of a "human wave attack", in this best documented war of all time? Why do you believe ukrainian Propaganda?? Not even the ukrainians believe it anymore. They know they get slaughteted. That's why they dont want to go. Zelensky cant fool them. They are not that dumb.

yeah. 🙁

Elections in short. No funny business this year.

Issue is that higher petrol prices mean more votes for republicans and so likely to get Trump elected... which would mean no aid for Ukraine.

Nah, use your brain. The election is coming up. If gas prices rise the current president loses votes. If Biden loses votes the Republicans win, and aid to Ukraine stops.

It’s not that simple, you troglodyte. If Russia goes into a economic free fall, that instability is how nukes get lost. I already have a hard time believing that the Russians can accurately count their nuclear arsenal. I would much rather have Ukraine in cinders that nuclear weapons in the wind.

Every French president is unpopular in France its part of French culture. He won twice

But a later poll showed that many young french men are willing to fight in Ukraine for the interests of France. More than half of French youth ready to enlist and fight in Ukraine. A new survey published by Le Parisien finds that over half of French young people would be ready to enlist and fight against Russia in Ukraine if it were needed to defend France's interests Not to mention this isnt about just the person of Macron - but general french interests, regardless of who is the president.

@@cz1589 Yeah, as a french I can assure you these polls aren't really reliable...

According to the same study, half of young people are interested in the military world through films and video games. Most have probably never held a weapon, or never fired with a machine gun (thank you Chirac for abolishing conscription). They are soldiers from Facebook, who think that war is a video game. The French army is struggling to recruit, (as in all Western countries), it lacking 2000 men in 2023. This is the first time this has happened in French history. We are simply not ready, neither mentally (people don't want to go to war), nor socially (the popularity rating of leaders is lower), nor industrially (our economy is based on services, we do not have the industrial capacity we had during the Cold War). We have disarmed and deindustrialized this country for decades, it will take decades to coming back and when you see the "elites" who rules France (and it is the same in all Western countries), I am not sure we're taking the path.

@@David-we1sd all young men that want to join the military in al lhuman history were naive about it. so its not new.

How so?

@@mariuss1590 Ukraine running out of air defense and morale drain, the Western country diminishing aid, and the upcoming Russian Summer Offensive could be the reason. As long as the West keep sending half-assed support to the Ukraine, the Russian will slowly gain the upper hand

@@mariuss1590 The battle lines will move further to the West

listen to captain nostradamus off lol ... how in the name of god would you know that just asking ? i mean your saying something with so many variables the people on the front couldnt say what you just said .. omg

@@colinobrien3806 there are no variables here, it's just the current status quo so if nothing changes Russia has the perfect opportunity to make it's advance it's as simple as that and Ukraine sending more men to the front without ammo, anti air or arty shells the defense will end in a bloodbath for the defenders

It depends. There were a lot of boys who left at the start of the war under a draft age but turned draftable during the war. But I don't know to which group you count those.

No, not so many. Firstly in Ukraine closed borders for man 18-60 years. Secondly, new mobilization law was applied and must to mobilize mans from 25 to 60 years. By this law, increases salary for fighters, updates mobilizing process etc. Ukraine don't has a lack of manpower, we need more amunition and thats all

@@Danti1229 "increases salary" you're funny bro

They are only lowering the draft age to 25. While necessary, it's not desperate.

@@thefarter6462 What? My English not good. Increasing really huge. If u in frontline, your salary was 130k hryvnias( 3 286 USD(huge for Ukraine) and now +70k hryvnias(+1769 usd) and will be 200.000 hryvnias(5050usd). It's really amazing, with average 18000 hryvnias(455usd) in Ukraine and low prices **compare to our EU partners or US**

Literally everyone talks about heavy losses on both sides.

@@taiwi Yes, even according to Z-telegrams I am subscribed to Russia has heavy losses. They talk about it constantly, it's only news to the English-speaking audience I guess.

@@ImpreccablePony no they aren't stop lying. Most Z channels dont talk about losses.

Everyone? Russians are dropping like flies.

@@litrpg101yeah, losing men like crazy, losing ships like crazy, planes, tanks and so on. Im listening about this since russia invaded but here we are, still going strong. Truth is always somewhere in the middle.

Power Point Man is love, Power Point Man is life, Power Point Man is peace.

@@KingsandGenerals Verily is it said, brother! And Power Point Man looked upon it and said that it was good.

@@KingsandGeneralspower point man keeps the people blind about the usas role in the middle east, he works for the establishment.

The man from Emutopia shall bring peace to all of military economics.

@@MattMajcan you know what his day job was before he took less time on it to work on his channel right? He literally did work for them LOL. He has openly stated why he can't talk about Australian arms procurement for a reason LOL

You forget that the washing machines became a meme because the Russian soldiers were looting them. They think like their oligarchic masters at home - they steal stuff and invade countries that belong to other people, then they put the label 'Russian' on it.

Facts

Yeahhhh.... That's pretty much standard throughout literally all of human history, and probably most of prehistory. Nothing new about the poor being the ones who have to fight.

@@evananderson1455nope. In ancient and medieval history, the rich fought alongside the poor, and often went in first. They served as the elite forces since they could afford training and good equipment. One of the most famous examples is knights. The gun changed that forever, as any ape with a gun could kill you no matter how rich. Although the rich still normally had patriotism for their country and fought as officers in the army. It wasn’t until modern history that they betray their countries more commonly. They even do so when they’re at peace. Look at all the wealthy/educated people around the world fleeing their countries to go live in the wealthier countries, leaving their countries for dead

This is early access for KZfaq members. Will go live for everyone at 9 am EST.

Hahaha wtf rekax dude​@Bogdansmh

@@KingsandGeneralsgotcha, cheers

​@KingsandGenerals was a lil worried myself there lol, ur one of the most thorough and fair channels detailing the war

Exactly. You don't do military exercises and wargames with countries who are not your allies. Russia-China-Iran are the new axis. There should be no doubt at this point.

Also that Iran simultaneously launched a half-hearted drone attack on Israel that did little damage but made a lot of noise

@@kongming66 supposedly cost the U.S. 1Billion to deter massive loss of life

How so?

@@georgekim933 there appears to be a division between the Western and Eastern hemispheres of the globe. The East self-proclaimed as the 'Global South' under the oppressive nature of the West. That being said, media has been depicting the divisiveness fairly often and this military cooperation helps to further that narrative between the two sides. With Russia-Ukraine, China-Taiwan, and Iran-Israel; I'd prefer to see each of these pairings reach resolutions instead of further isolation and eventual desolation.

Sure, that's why they mobilised almost a million aince the beginning of the war, and their army only increased by 15% in size.

Both things can be true simultaneously. Did you even watch the video? Where they spent literally half the episode talking about Russias manufacturing capability? Its true that Russia likely lost over half of its originally military capacity that it had prior to the invasion. But its also been three years since then, and in three years they managed to build a shit ton more equipment and conscript a shit ton more people. So its possible for both them to have lost half of their prewar stock and ALSO for them to have replaced all of it in three years....

things change over 2 years bonehead. at the time, russia was embarrassing itself. now its evolved past that in a lot of critical ways, others not so much. it's also benefiting from Ukraine's lack of aid now moreso than before. if u dont like the channels info, why are u here? the channels been very fair and balanced regarding facts despite its evident support for ukraine, as all sane people right now. u sound like a russian bot or something.

Perun breaks it down better than i could ever explain. Their arms industry hasn't declined but it is on a very very very sloooow upturn. The sanctions are in some way working but we are looking at some marginal differences as they work around those sanctions. If for example Russian industry was at like 7.0 out of 10 before in 2020. Right now it is 6.8 out of 10.

Of course there's going to be propaganda in the western media, there's propaganda everywhere... But it's been a long 2 week special military operation.

this war ends this summer my dear

@@Marijan510 They said that when they ASSURED us they'd be in Kyiv in 2 weeks.

Probably at least another 2 years, yeah. Russia doesn't seem capable of breaching Ukrainian defenses so far and with every month they fail the long term prospects for a total victory become more dire. This is because Ukraine adopted the Russia defensive tactics shown to the south to stop their attack, and so are now just like them just building line and line of defenses. Obviously if those are given to much time going anywhere quickly in Ukraine will become a complete hell. Especially considering so far Ukrainian defenses inflict incredibly lopsided losses on Russia forces. Russia could easily lose their bid to take over all of Ukraine in such a case, being forced to have to leave the larger part outside their control. It's even conceivable Russia could have an internal coup in such an outcome, as one imagines the armed forces and elites would be very much not amused at such a defeat and the immense economic losses.

@@samwill7259only the west said that you can’t capture a city of millions with 40k troops the Russians were just there to apply pressure.

@@Quickshot0 I would add the demographic crisis as well. With their fertility rate being 1.4, they won't recover the amount of people lost on this war, on the contrary, their population will decline steadly year after year. The population decrease over the next decades won't be limited to countries like Japan and South Korea.

First according to who it is (fact) and second i am here in Ukraine and i am telling NO WAY that was going to pass! Ukrainians were never ever going to surrender to putler!

Thanks!

Ukraine has enough troops, they need more weapons.

@@Chad-xs2dethey don’t have enough troops ether. They want to mobilize 500.000 thousand troops

@@JahNgomba-ir2zi 500k is possible but Ukraine will be going straight into a demographic collapse in the oncoming decades because of how much young, healthy, able-bodied men are disabled or killed in combat. It would be a disaster for Ukraine's economy. What's left are women and old people to take up the slack...

well zelensky is a foreign jew and hes party got into power through a coop rather than votes.

Maybe because peole don't want to die for Blackrock interests and corrupt elites? Or just don't want to die in general.

Where did you get that source from?

from his butt. 😂

You need to understand a different between make a promise and make the delivery to Ukraine Please check how many percent of that AID actually delivered to Ukraine) Right now EU is growing in military perspective when Ukrainians are fighting. So you can spend less than 1% of your budget and save your country & your soldiers or waiting when the war will come to your country

It sounds like a lot, but as a percent of gdp or total defense spending, it's tiny. When you consider that all of western Europe 's militaries exist I protect from Russia, then you don't need to keep very much in your own defense of you win in Ukraine.

Well Poland has sent so much stuff we barely have anything left for ourselves. So if push comes to shove we can fight with sticks xD Plus EU has pretty much trashed its economy with fuel and electricty prices going through the roof in the last two years. Small businesses are closing because they cannot afford to pay electricity bills.......and now our amazing leadership wants to give a percentage of our GDP to Ukraine so........rip us xD

​@@Raguel1984 you are full of 💩

It's probably helped US/EU militaries immensely. Most of the weapons and equipment we (the US) have pledged were equipment and arms that were going to be decommissioned/destroyed anyway, and I'm sure it's been the same for most of the EU. For that aid and no risk to our own troops, we learn Russian military capabilities in a wartime scenario, the effectiveness of our weapons against Russian armor/aircraft, and we get to learn from both the Russian and Ukrainian mistakes/victories and the viable/enviable tactics/strategies being used. This has also highlighted the strengths and weaknesses of the Russian military, from how they use their equipment (they seem to be very bad at combined arms fighting/integration) to how they produce it (seeing how quickly they need to turn to "allies" to shore up their own weaknesses) and has financially left Russia in a much more weakened state even if the war was to end today. The information we (US & EU) have gotten from this war exponentially dwarfs the monetary value of our aid.

Can I have free money please?

Ikr, sadly all we can do is hope for the best..

If you're American, don't vote Republican. It's that simple.

Sigh, do you really think it doesn't get delivered? Is that your conspiracy theory?

@@Chad-xs2de there are so many things to factor in, and it has already happened that some things were not delivered.

MGT, Gaetz and Tucker Goebbels took it. They call MJ traitor now.

Call him his real name; Moscow Mike

It looks like a stalemate to you. The actions on the battlefield and Zelensky's messages to the West tell a very different story

@@gdiwolverinemale4th but no ones wining.

@@gdiwolverinemale4th The frontline hasn't changed for 1.5 years, it is absolutely a stalemate / attritional war right now Doesn't mean things won't change, western front WW1 was a stalemate / attritional war... until it wasn't.

@@HistoryHaty Look up Zeno's paradox. It looks logical does it not? Particularly if the side you support is a turtle

@@jatie9 The battle line is changing every minute. Did you know it is 1000 miles long? Look up how many towns/villages have been captured in the past several months

What treaty that Putin signed was not respected?

you are brainwashed, any treaty that was signed by putin was respected which we can not say for ukrain and its western partners

@@karmakiss6610 Why sign treaties when you can invade countries on your border instead? It's not like Yeltsin signed any treaties... Oh wait.

@@jovanfirma01 Putin signing treaties? LOL.

​@@jovanfirma01 2008 Georgian occupation. He broke the UN charter that Russia signed. The new START treaty of 2023. INF treaty, etc.

And this isn't biased? Weird

he uses facts taken from propaganda sources

@@Lancetdrone He used fact taken from the source you deemed propaganda

Sorry, there is no facts, just pure speculations.

I wouldn’t trust either sources from Ukraine or Russia. Ukraine wants more money so they’ll say “look what we did America!” My Ukrainian friend said Americans are the only ones who will gain from this war and Ukraine is a pawn. They have resources American companies like Blackrock want first dibs on IF they win.

It is not fair to say. We have hardware numbers and they are extremely lopsided. There is no reason to think personnel numbers are different.

Isn't that Channel some far left pro Russian rag that is now running Pro Hamas propoganda or am i mixed up with another channel starting with P

@@dopaminedreams1122you're definitely mixing it up with someone else, perun is a coward that only covers ukraine and doesnt even acknowledge anything is happening in the middle east. if he ever talked about the middle east his "war data" would show how evil the west is

You put a lot of stock on a guy who has been wrong

And at the same time they’re saying that it possesses risk to the international oil trade and calling oil infrastructure a “civil” one.

Seriously? So why did they say anything? Does the Russian ambassador have the means to pressure Kirby to say something he does not want to?

@@oleksii000 ye , i call us bs on that one if they the increasingly blatantly corp dynasties and fundamentalist kingdom style us wants to pretend it not tryess to bully smaller nations it cant double speak like that after all it could fork out resources in advance along with some hardware to render the tsars armour and airforce advantage null , since considering the last decades it looks like the only way to use the bloated us army long term is by arming locals already fighting , aka small nations like ukrane get hardware and monetary support without debts , or one just ends up with afghanistan or iraq situations agen

The US and other countries refused to provide certain long range weapons for the sole reason of not wanting Ukraine to attack Russian infrastructure. You don't know what you're talking about

American citizens do care. Unless Ukraine wants less support: we arent interested in paying more at the pump. Furthermore, Ukraine has on multiple occasions violated US terms of using our weapons inside of Russian territory.

We are releasing videos all the time.

The war could end tomorrow if Russia would stop the invasion.

Thanks to Putler! he NEVER EVERED stopped having a war here or there! you do know how much his friends earn from these wars?

Fortunately Europe is still upping its contributions then, so I'm doubtful they don't have strong enough leaders as such. Plenty seem to be willing to provide more aid as they are able. Though of course that is also the problem, Europe was in a pretty deep peace economy, so cycling up their military production takes a fair while. Still two years later there are definitely quite a bit more of them now running and being built.

dude russia has been waning ukaine for years not to join nato why do u think they annexed crimea and initiated the separtists movement in donbas? they wont listen and forced putin to invade as there's no other option as if they join nato then its gonna be a alliance made against Russia super close to Moscow and a large border with them which is something that has occurred in the past with invading forces trying to invade Russia

@@what5772Ukraine had an official neutral position before the Russian invasion and had no intention of joining NATO at all. This position change only occurred after Russia invaded and forced Ukraine to reconsider its military situation. It's just Russia's excuse that such a thing would happen. And even if it for some reason had been a thing Ukraine actually wanted to do, it's not really Russia's business to tell sovereign nations what they can and can not do. Truthfully though, it is Russia that had reneged on its treaty obligations. After all they had guaranteed Ukraine's borders as well as its full economic freedom for them giving up their nukes. Yet a decade later they were meddling in Ukrainian politics via economic means. And then a decade later violated Ukrainian borders as well. Beyond that, the closest border to Moscow is the Baltic nations, which are already in NATO. And the war itself caused Finland to join NATO as well, which now has put Russia's second city St Petersburg extremely close to NATO borders now, as well as the supply and support routes for two of their most important naval bases. So the entire thing about distance to the border is a pretty fictitious thing, just an excuse made up by Russia that was never under any real threat because NATO for one can only be activated defensively and secondly has absolutely zero interest in getting involved in a nuclear war, something the Russian invasion of Ukraine only further proved. The developed nations have far to much to lose to go for such utterly imbecilic gambles that gain them basically near nothing even if it went well. Thus Russia was under no threat, it never was under threat, it wouldn't have ever come under threat. In the end Russia's elite were just far to arrogant to listen to anyone else and just acted out their desires and greed with not a care of what the actual peoples wanted.

@@what5772too bad. you dont get to bully your neighbors because you dont like them. if you dont like it, move somewhere else. if russia is worried about its capital maybe it shouldnt put it so close to the border.

Is it the west aka EU and NATO that is at war, or is it Ukraine that is at war? How comes Ukraine can't supply their own forces themself?

How do u know Ukraine is on the right side?

@@azman73681 wasn't Argentina one of the countries the Nazis in WWII escaped to?

one way you could help mind your own but coming from Argentina after WW11 I believe some Germans fled to there I see where your coming from

@@azman73681 Uh, who started the attack? Russia. Who's a dictator in all but name? Putin. Whatever issues Ukraine had before, that Russia is invading to conquer and annex another country is wrong.

@@Quicks1lvr A few, yes. Enough of the politicians back then were closer to fascism, something I criticize these days. They also brought enough scientists so we could build a nuclear power plant. Dunno how to feel about that.

Source: Zelensky told me LOL

You must be really stupid if you think major countries lose 1000 men per day in a war.

Pretty sure the Russia is to blame here, comrade.

@@jorgeluis2247 What's the address of Russia? I would like to ask him/her some questions. There is no Russia, Ukraine, USA etc. These are imaginations invented for people to be bamboozled so they don't see the manipulations of this internationally active force that does not know any borders.

​@@walterdewald267 - in short, you know that ain't the case.

@@pmayo7894 In short we will know very soon as the time of hiding is over.

@@walterdewald267 - dude, don't play dumb. You know that.

Because Israel is not fighting a country with thousands of nukes

@@ball3677 so if a country has nukes, nobody will try to stop them? Is that the logic here?

Israel has massive influence in the US to the point it can direct its foreign policy, Ukraine does not and it is simply an expendable pawn that the US threw at Russia

​@@ball3677Iran does have a nuclear arsenal though

@@friedrichjaeger367 They do not.

Africa is a large continent, which part? Which country? I think they already covered Egypt which is one of the most interesting countries of Africa, long history too!

Carthage too. Awesome history there, Hannibal was the pride of Africa back in the bc era. Cleopatra not forgotten either.

@@Trump-jv8xf Africa is vast, any part is gladly love to see. We typically always hear about Egypt because of how rich in history it is, it’d just be nice to hear about other countries in the continent.

100% correct.

Pro-Ukraine as can be, yet I'm starting to feel this way too. If the West is gonna not be there for Ukraine, they need to think about terms. Why grind out these battles with the same result at the end? Ofc I want them to retake lands, but if it doesn't seem possible idk..

Its Western intervention that is scuppering peace talks, not Russia.

@@TheBucketSkillit is possible if means are given to Ukraine. “It is impossible therefore let us stop giving aid” is a self-fulfilling prophecy

@@pomperidus Nah I never want the aid to stop, I never said that. In fact today great news regarding aid has come! I was just pondering from Zelenskys perspective I guess.