The sspx does not follow the Catholic magesterium,get out now

"Orate, fratres: ut meum ac vestrum sacrifícium acceptábile fiat apud Deum Patrem omnipoténtem" is the prayer from the Traditional Missal. In English that is "brethren, pray that my sacrifice and yours may be acceptable before God the Father almighty." The New "offertory" just lifted from the old, in this case. But they removed much of the other sacrificial language, and the language which makes it clear the "sacrifice" in question is a real propitiatory sacrifice.

1. Yes, each sacrament gives the restoration or increase of sanctifying grace, along with a special grace befitting that sacrament (the “sacramental grace”). 2. A person can receive graces from Holy Mass without receiving communion; however, these graces are dependent on his dispositions - in what way and with what spirit he unites himself with the sacrifice going on. When receiving communion worthily, the sacramental graces is given from the very fact of receiving, and in some manner, does not depend on the person’s dispositions. 3. Holy Mass and Holy Communion are not the same with regard to the person who simply attends versus the person who attends and receives communion. The grace of Holy Communion is a sacramental grace of nourishment and union. The graces received from the holy attendance of the Mass are, again, dependent on the dispositions of the one attending. Moreover, merely attending at Mass does not give the special, sacramental grace of Communion. -Fr. Wiseman

#10 www.vatican.va/content/leo-xiii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_l-xiii_enc_25071898_caritatis-studium.html

The excommunication can be lifted after death. The situation around the Econe Consecrations which Archbishop Lefebvre performed doesn't seem enough of a reason for him to not be declared a Saint one day, so far it seems he did that because he thought he was going to be betrayed, which seemed likely due to the situation at the time. And before he did that he repeatedly requested the Holy See for authorization for consecrating the bishops and went to Rome many times, yet the pope didn't summon him for an audience regarding the matter. All in all, Abp. Lefebvre didn't attempt to create a parallel Church, who wasn't in communion with the pope, but instead consecrate auxiliary bishops and potential successors after he died. I wonder if he feared he was going to be martyred as well.

It's already uploaded. Thank you sooooooooo much!!! Learning a lot from this series 🥰

If you read Lefebvre’s books you will se why. V2 stands against Trent and the universal and infallible teachings of the Church and Popes in several points - religious liberty, ecumenism, indifferentism. Also V2 did not teach or define doctrine and did not apply the protection of infallibility. It was repeatedly called a Pastoral Council by the Popes. The problem is it is constantly used as a source of teaching in the Catechsim and elsewhere with no regard to actual doctrine that has been defined before by previous Councils etc. Why is a pastoral council now used as a source of doctrinal authority? Why not Trent and others, which were actually dogmatic? You basically have to stand with 2000 years of Church teaching, or with the last few decades since the reset of V2.

The SSPX is in communion with Rome but has irregular canonical status. The Society has been given jurisdiction to do marriages and hear confessions from the Pope. Bishop Athanasius Schneider discusses this with Taylor Marshall in a podcast.