Pretty sure that was an open door for a lot of us. My orthodox-seeker mate is interested now in your work because of the intersection of art and sacred traditionalism... but he found you through my link to your talk with Dr. Peterson. Many thanks.

Jung took this from traditional sources. This notion of left and right is important both in Christianity and in Judaism.

@@JonathanPageau psychology is Jung compared to religion.

No. Biological analasys and phenomenology are not the same.

I didn't hear that. But I read from Vladimir Martynov that in case of music what was happening in church (in premodern times I guess) was not what we call music, but ascetic practice. Although I imagine it had some similar external attributes we may find in music. So in a way "art" was inside, although it is more like prayer than art.

Such is a sinners life in joyful hope?

Pageau believes in the literal meaning of many parts of the Bible, like the resurrection. He also believes that the Bible is the message of the most powerful being in any universe, who is completely beyond human understanding. It is entirely possible that there is more than literal meaning in such a book, don't you think? Many of Pageau's ideas are not new and are teachings from Saint Maximus the Confessor, Saint Gregory of Nyssa, etc. This is not some modern heresy. This is knowledge that most people are never exposed to that goes back to the very beginning of the church. But hey it's been 4 years. I hope you have studied some of the church fathers yourself, in the meantime.

but in that sense this christ winking is full of meaning, following your logic (if my understanding is correct) art represents a hidden meaning, when one person looks at art he's filled with all that simbolism encapsulated in the work that represent something true in our deep unknow and in this case the condensation of our meaning it's the jesus that walk with whores and turned water into wine. It's not hollow or shallow and it is modern art (i belive) even if he's a fool. Mr peterson says in his video that jesus is a metahuman, so our metahuman today is an idiot. But that doesn't mean that modern art is meaningless like the case you make on the video, most of it is bullshit because reasons, but the way you present seems to indicate that this idiot jesus comes from the same place you extract your inspiration afterall the guy who did it touch it on something true on a deep level, i'll speculate that the autor didn't had acess to this knowledge you have about the eyes so he had some kind of comunion with this idea via otherway, it sends a message, apart of that your work is cooler because you seems to put a lot more effort on techique. Just trying to extrapolate your teachings and see where it leads, thanks for your time!

hahaaa! is sarcasm a sin? (who know's, you guys keep moving the goal posts). like i said, you're good at what you do - a simple observation. I'm not in the business of convincing/converting/indoctrinating, i find it bad for society in general to put what supports your ideology above what supports the needy

maybe when your balls drop you'll realise when you're communicating with an adult you gullible little boy

lol okay dude...

He's right though, you have that obnoxious combo of flippantly rude and smug that some teenage atheists never grow out of. The fact you think society's main goal should be to financially support the needy is also the sign of an immature mind. Are you sure this isn't a case of arrested development?

Maybe you want to read what i actually said instead of telling me what i think, i never suggested that financially supporting the needy should be society's main goal, although common decency should involve helping the needy. I pointed out that the church cares more for it's self promotion/preservation than the welfare of the people it claims to help.