NO

the model y

I would but I'm not in UK

Lexus NX

Yes!

they said they will or have changed crash tests to account for the higher height of average car since so called suv became popular... so now sedans wagons etc have to be heaver top area so they will have more tedency to roll over so more stiff suspension and ex[ensive things to make it all preform with comfort... car height and weight should be penalizaed by heavy tax because in some situations, people in heavy car are protected in crash with lighter car but people in lighter car are more likley to suffer.. but statistically there is not so much benefit to heavy car for saftey as explained in video by aptera owners club on saftey. lighter cars cost less in raw materials, health problems (and climate change, if you beleive that is caused by co2 kinda of stuff) caused by emissions including microplastics from parts dumped at junkyard and stuff liek windhsield washer fluid, heavy car cost more to manufaturer and consumer (see aptera owners club video on cost and suspension geomrty), weight wears on roads creating more need to pay for road repairs, bigger cars make traffic congestion worse because space taken up per occupant in car. japan gives tax credit to kei car owner for these reson but of course law should also incentivise even smaller improvements.

weight and more weight futhur from ground makes it more expesnsive to make car not bumpy over road imperfection and make make it not roll over when moving fast around turns, taller wider cars are lress areodynamic which adds on energy cost to move the increased weight and make the weight crash safe.

certain geometries also help with crash saftey, for example egg shell is easy to break but when its part of a unbroken egg, its suprisingly strong structure against breaking

Many folk can't afford to think of safety, they just buy what they can afford, yes, it's easy to get a loan for a better car but who wants debt hanging around their neck like a millstone? Not to mention the shame of being in debt, something that, thankfully has never happened to me

@@Markcain268 this car is not for everyone. You know the Tesla Model X?

The Giulia was tested back in 2016 and the tests have become harder since then. Be interesting to have it re-tested now and see what it scores.

A few cars have gotten 98% on adult safety dude.

@@TheTrueWelshIdiot I went to check and the only other one I could find is the Volvo XC60. Then at 97% you have a few cars, such as the Stelvio, other Volvos, BMW 3er and 4er.

Alfa Romeo Giulia Sprint Speciale also.

@@nomad6-1 May want to check again dude. Volvo, Mazda, Tesla and Alfa all have cars that have 98%, so that's 4, before model variants.

Carwow, please crash all your tested cars 😃

@@samma995 or just mention it 😂

@@a1asdairpage safety is boring. no need to mention it.

I really wish they would

@@demirbo7639 it's important tho

Agreed... these cars in this video start at least 35k new in the uk.. with some of them triple that price...

@@rasherbasher8203 You don't have to watch a youtube video for that. Look at the NCAP data as proposed in this video.

Most of the people are buying the Model Y now...

Yes this ^

For personal research I know that VW Polo is one of the safest car in the 20/25k price range (and also because I recently bought one so I know first hand how it behaves in traffic when a pedestrian cross the street when he has a red light but that's another story) About the other models I don't really know but nowadays cars are usually very safe

Also Tesla produces low or not applicable outside the euro NCAP test spec.

Agreed.

Yep. Storia X4 has better safety features than even Model Y.

​@@purwantiallan5089 No it doesn't stop making things up 🤣🤣

@markyes That's why I bought a lorry, my kids are safe now

terrible content stick to drag races and reviews

Agreed.

Repeat...💤💤💤💤

How do you feel being ruled by an Indian 😂😂?

What about a drag between Rossolini LM CLASSIC vs Tesla Model Y?

He failed before but we forgive him. 😆

@@LEGOTROLL1 LEGOTROLL1, Tesla Model Y and Hunter Takedown 4x4 are some of the safest cars you can buy actually.

Bot

@@matty7834 yep. 😂

Nice 👍😂

Thanks

Newer or larger and heavier cars always will come out best. Even new cars if there is a big difference in weight you dont want to be in the lighter car

@@Zarphag actually the smart #1 isn’t bad either

Yep. Storia X4 is also known for its success of crashtesting multiple times.

Yeah it’s only cars tested in 2022. The s class was tested in 2020 I think

Yeah, the s class is next level

The nice thing about problems like this is that Tesla will push an update over the air to you at some point and solve this, unlike most other companies

You can actually choose how early the car starts beeping at you when it notices a possible crash. I personally like it on "early" even though its sometimes annoying when it starts beeping at you of a car you clearly can see is braking or something.

@Alejandro There's roughly 5 Tesla fires per 1 billion miles and roughly 53 fires per billion miles for the average vehicle. Those numbers include arson, structure fires and other reasons unrelated to the vehicle. I've heard rumors about higher severity of those fires and especially that firemen are sometimes uneducated on them and/or that battery fires persist for much longer. And in the opposite direction, I've heard the car have been able to warn occupants that the battery firewall has been punctured long before the fire spreads. I don't know the statistics of those aspects though. But I know that Tesla fires are vastly overreported in the news.

@Alejandro Bare in mind, no-one is interested in a 'typical car fire' because it won't get clicks. Putting 'Tesla catches fire AGAIN' in a headline will drive clicks. They are still far safer and have less fires than 'normal' ICE cars.

@Alejandro Anecdotes and extrapolations don't really matter objectively though, unless they plan to be used on a class action against Tesla for fraud, which I doubt there's merit for. So those anecdotes primarily create fear and confirmation bias. Tesla haven't published statistics for 2022 yet (and likely won't until May 2023) but their fire incidents have falling slightly since 2019 so it'd be odd if it had reversed and multiplied by over 10 this year. We'll see though.

For pedestriant savety, I think not much will change, as the braking system already relies on vision. Only objects very close would have been picked up by the ultrasonic sensors.

The ultrasonic is just for parking.

They stopped using ultrasonic sensors for safety reasons ages ago.

@@lachlanB323 false

@@MaticTheProto I'm talking about FSD beta. Ultrasonic sensors were giving data and was hurting the system more then helping. Same with radar.

What if we got Rossolini LM Classic as one of the safest cars you can buy on this list??

In Thailand isn’t the biggest worry getting clipped by a scooter while walking?

How would the car's behaviour differ in Thailand as to Europe?

@@petteri2506 vehicles are made to different standards depending on the market they are sold in and the factory they are made in. The EU Civic could be a very different car in different markets where it's been made to a lower price point

Civic owner here, save your money, its garbage! Japanese cars are overrated!!! I tried mazda, toyota, and now honda. Worst decision ever! Waiting for christmas sales🙄 to get something else!

Mat knows how to make those insane videos.

What's insane about this video?

Really?!?!? Insane? Please explain how

Agree. Model Y and Storia also have the best safety ratings.

Tesla is removing ultrasonics - I don’t know how much that affects emergency braking, etc., but those sensors are the ones that most often get blocked for me in snow, etc.

@@bartwaggoner2000 It doesn't have any impact. Tesla's use camera's only anyway.

@@purwantiallan5089 Only if you don't have kids you want to keep alive.

Death is not a good metric to determine how safe a car is. There are a lot of variables in fatal crashes.

The main reason for Dacias low scores is the lack of active systems like automatic braking and those expensive systems can’t really be on cars this cheap. If those systems weren’t accounted for a lot of their cars would achieve 5 star ratings

@@onelyone6976 that’s not quite right, if you look at the adult occupant scores the best any model achieves is 71% for the Duster which is pretty low. If people are comfortable with that no problem as long as they are aware.

@@meriofrog yes absolutely, so there would have to be a large sample comparing like for like. I’ve attended many serious/ fatal incidents and often been struck by the different performance of similar weight / size vehicles when in collision with the same body area.

Yep. Especially Tesla. Storia X4 and Subaru 360 should've been on this list.

Volvo is owned by Geely, so technically there's 3 Chinese automakers in the top 10

Quite incredible how quickly they have caught up. They were getting 3 star ratings just 8 years ago.

For more affordable price too.

Jeremy Clarkson was right after all....

Thats one of the benefits of having a car that can improve over software updates instead of needing to buy the new model year to get the best safety

@@Mouwcat Yet a few downsides are system failures and possible unreliability

@@cheez1012 yea cant be 100% reliable

@@cheez1012 yet Tesla reliability is astonishingly high and just gets better with software which rarely fails

@@jame5zhgaming950 Really? I've watched tons of videos and read multiple articles and they all said something along the lines that Tesla has had multiple system failures and overall isn't a reliable vehicle compared to others.

It might make you safer, but at the expense of everyone else on the road. You are less likely to die in an SUV vs a car, but more likely to die if you hit an SUV vs car. Yet another reason SUV drivers are delusional and selfish.

@@a_single_white_female what a conclusion 🤣

@@a_single_white_female SUVs like Krieger Pioneer and Hunter Carson Inferno Van?

​@@a_single_white_female just buy the biggest heaviest car you can afford. Then you will be safe. If someone in a small car dies that's their poor choice.

@@a_single_white_female Have you watched the video at all? Yes, its a larger car but it also has the best collision avoiding technology Euro ncap has ever seen along with the best rating for being a collision partner vehicle. Lastley why do you have to be rude about it? you think that gonna change the minds of people who buy SUVs?

I was wondering the same... If it was a list consisting of all time tests, then out of 10 there would at least be 5 volvos... But this video only takes into account the cars tested this year only...

@@ramanuj_g Yes you are correct. This video is about 2022 new cars. But after 4 years, the VOLVO XC60 still shows, comparing values, that is one of the most safest cars ever made.

Did you watch this video?

if you’d test the volvo again right now, it wouldn’t score as good as it did back then

@@niels9663 Why do you say that? What is your opinion? Your comment makes no sense at all... and you don't even bother to answer, because you don't have enough arguments to sustain your nonsense comment. If VOLVO XC60 2018 was incredibly safe just 4 years ago, it still is to this day, incredibly safe and way more safe, than probably all of these cars from 2022, shown in this video.

They have to up the standards, since most modern cars are very safe.

@@haruyanto8085 It's because they're both lumping active and crash safety together. You could get 100% in not occupants and child safety but if you don't have aeb you wouldn't get 5 stars.

@@Robert-cu9bm yeah. That’s literally why tesla and the chinese made the top 5 this year

I personally think no car should be able to score the maximum points in any category, just means the test isn't strict enough. But I definitely agree that crash safety and active safety should be separated. Also it would be interesting to see how well these ratings stack up in real accidents and if Volvos even stricter and more realistic homegrown safety tests have resulted in safer cars outside lab environments

It seems these tests factor in active systems a lot, which might be why. Also, Volvo develops cars from their own stricter standards based on real-life accidents that Volvo has studied, they aren't designed to perform in a lab but on the road in real accidents, things like repeated hits, hitting moose and culverts, ease of rescue after crash and things like that. Personally, if I had to choose one car to be in an accident with and I didn't know what accident and at what speed, I'd choose to entrust a Volvo

No..

No match

Rated extremely safe.

I mean if you die instantly rather than suffer then that is good right?

The thing is they usually happen in very particular circumstances. Like on a Tesla if you're on autopilot and it's out in the boonies on a straight road, and there's no other traffic, and there's heat shimmer on the highway, and you crest a hill as it sees the heat shimmer it will often hit the brakes for a moment because it thinks it might be an object. And at some point some software update will improve that. If there was some standardized test everybody would just make sure they can pass it.

@@Officialfazerug1 Congratulations You have gotten a scammer fine

Saved my life too back then.. truly Benz is king

the tesla won’t even roll

Tesla starts deploying the airbags just before the crash happens so it doesn't shoot into your face.

@@niels9663 the tesla also won’t protect you or your kids as well when it crashes

@@lachlanB323 huh, yet they score worse when it comes to protecting the people inside

Evs are safer duh. Also all new brands hire experts from said 100+ yo brands.

People aren't all rich like you must be. You'd essential say poorer people can't own cars.

Lexus and Toyota all have best safety and reliabilities feature.

But it doesn't protect children as well as others.

I hope you realize that if you care about the safety of you and your family in the car when it comes to a crash, Mercedes evs tend to be safer. Teslas merely have more assistance systems as standard so they get a point bonus, but since those rely on cameras they aren’t reliable in bad visual conditions

Model Y, Krieger Pioneer and Subaru Impreza.

No no no no no theres no chance☄

I might be wrong but I think that these are results for tests conducted in 2022. I think the Model 3 was tested in previous years.

@@ewadge You could be right, I thought it was safest cars in the world as per title. Pretty crap if it's only cars tested in 22, a bit disingenuous.

@@VSS1 Exactly. If you look at the numbers the Model 3 got. I believe it would be #2 on this list.

@@ronin7645 true. This is a list of new cars from 2022.

I got a good score on those cars.

And then the other guy rams into you

Not at all true, if some bumhead slam their car into you, front, back or sides, you want to make sure your car is strong enough to not crush you dead.

@@michelbruns and then other guys coming from 160mph with nitrous suddenly crashing into you.

@@ItsDaniPlays like Carson Inferno Van and Krieger Pioneer SUV?

My nan has had 9 accidents and all the other vehicles were stationery when she hit them. Only inside a garage would be safe. Unless she crashes into the garage !

Cupra? Toyota Vitz F also.

Yeah I thought that but I think its not there because this is just cars they have tested this year. Next year it will be the EXC90 so will be interesting to see.

Well, its not.

@@kartoffelcreek2609 😂😂I was so disappointed.. The fact that it ain't there makes me doubt this list

@@OllieTT Volvo XC90 wasnt even close compared to even to Krieger Pioneer.

@@kartoffelcreek2609 Krieger Pioneer has far better safety features.

People just like to complain and hate on Tesla, there will always be something that people will complain about. For example, its the safest car on the road, BUT, its ugly. FSD is the best self driving system in the world right now, but it still doesn't drive itself (no other car does that).

@@meriofrog actually chinese cars sh*t on tesla by now. Including in terms of self driving features

Teslas aren’t reliable, don’t even have road sign recognition outside the usa, often don’t make it past the first safety inspections, don’t have some of the features that were promised years ago, don’t have high quality materials, lack many convenient things like buttons or even things for safety like a drivers display or hud. But yeah ig as long as the camera based assistance systems work (on a bright summer day) you might be a tad safer. Although honestly the EQE and many chinese cars aren’t worse in any way

@@MaticTheProto Not worth arguing with you. Keep living in your fairy tale.

@@meriofrog i know my information, you are just riding Elon‘s meat

Methodology now is more strict, so any cat that scores high with the new methodology is probably more safer than the older rankings