Mike, aren’t there a few songs that were recorded by artists that are not the Beatles, that are credited to Lennon & McCartney? Should we add those songs to the ridiculous # of songs that Lennon & McCartney supposedly wrote for the Beatles?

Yes. i thought I mentioned the songs they "gave away" when I was counting up the 189+ songs from from 1956 through 1966.

Yes, that's how the process works. The lads were dancing around their songwriting method during the interview telling us it's a process and can take weeks to write one song and then stating they wrote in great big batches and didn't write between albums. Two diametrically opposed approaches. Which is it?

You are either aware of the programming or the programming worked. Most people's ability to critically think is gone. Pass the beer nuts.

Your students are smart. They would laugh at the notion that the Beatles didn't write or play on the records because there's proof. Demos, outtakes, witnesses, and even video of them writing and playing their songs.

@michaelharrington75 Actually, the students are *brainwashed* like you. And like them, you have no clue you have been programmed to recite a story that has been drilled into your head for 60 years. And, you have no idea how the world really works. The problem with the world is that it is full of individuals like you who lack the ability to critically think. Here is a video (with links) to help you wake up: The Beatles Conspiracy 101 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/Z6qUmbadmLKzZYU.htmlsi=J0zk5YgJs6Z51KRJ But if it scares you to be presented with an alternative narrative, hang out here: www.youtube.com/@TheBeatles

@@MikeWilliamsPaulIsDeadChannel You have nothing to say about the demos of them creating songs, outtakes, witnesses to them writing songs, or the videos of them writing songs and playing their instruments in the studio? Instead you reply with a bunch of ad hominem? Each of the Beatles had a certain style of songwriting. A style that continued throughout their whole careers. They also had their own individual playing style, which also continued throughout their whole careers. The same playing style they had on stage is on those records they made in the studio. If different songwriters were writing their songs, and studio musicians were playing on the albums those individual styles wouldn't be recognizable, and you wouldn't hear them on the recordings. But they individual styles are present on the albums. People have analyzed the Beatles under a microscope for over 60 years, and 60 years later some guy suddenly decides to say "They didn't play on their albums." Come on Mike, you know the PID stuff is all BS, but you're making money off it. Gullible people eat this stuff up.

@michaelharrington75 Try not to be a dullard, Michael. I left links to my presentation that answer all of your questions. If your only mode is to recite the official narrative like a parrot then hang out here: www.youtube.com/@TheBeatles I have no time for people who waste my time. If you want to attempt to break the programming, I recommend checking out the links mentioned in this short video.: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/Z6qUmbadmLKzZYU.html

At the time, it seemed to me that even though they were under immence pressure with composing, recording albums and singles, making films, photo shoots, far flung tours, and hounded by fans, they mostly seemed calm, chilled and humorous in interviews, and in fact made everything look easy. All the different styles of music, all the startling new sounds. All hits in a very competitive market place. So easy; they appeared to hardly break a sweat with no casualties.. It was unprecedented and for a young boy very inspirational.. The fact it was Lennon/McCartney credits all the way through the 7 years without any arguements or breakups (like other bands) made me think they must have been great mates.

@@SuperNevile you do realize paul was killed, right?

@@brianjacob8728 Whatever; the point I was making was that a (very lucrative) fairytale was being spun, that in hindsight was, in many respects, quite implausible.

Yeah! They looked super cool. Doing drugs and living the life. Bunch of punks!

@@brianjacob8728 killed? Why?

By the way, I like the research. I made similar arguments, but only by my recollection of a little bit of this and a little bit of that. I would not have made the effort to research everything and put together a presentation like this.

I can't overestimate what an emotional issue this was for kids at the time. When I suggested that maybe the Beatles didn't play their own instruments either, it outraged him, and I couldn't understand why it should be a big deal.

I went on enjoying the Monkees and the Beatles, but it depended on my mood. The Beatles were darker, and more British, crumbling empire. The Monkees were brighter and more optimistic and American.

I'd be interested to hear about that website (I don't think you can put a full link on KZfaq without the comment disappearing though) and the complex musical structures they used. I've always wondered to what extent The Monkees were devised to distract from The Beatles.

​@@kimchi_b, Interesting theory. I had the same thought. Dave McGowan talks about how close the Monkeys were to other rock bands in Laurel Canyon. But then he comments that they all used the same session artists. The Monkeys were faked in the same way that the Beatles were.

I posted a meme on the community tab: 'You are either aware of the programming or the programming worked.'

It is such a buzz kill when you find out that the Beatles were a Tavistock reality TV show. I still think it’s great music, I just enjoy it in a different way now.

​@@subrosa4792Agree. What else is there to do? Ignoring this music is not an option.

Exactly. Everything they touched turned to gold.

Well said!

That's possible. If we listen to their debut album, Please Please Me, I have wondered if we are hearing studio singers doing the harmonies.

I agree. If they had studio musicians performing the music, it’s not a leap to think that some of the vocals were also trained professionals.

There's just no way. It's a ridiculous premise.

I've seen it too. If they were smart, they would do nothing. The percentage of people who are aware of the conspiracy is small when compared to the fan club. Even when you expose them to the evidence, most fans want to ignore the truth and continue worshiping.

@@MikeWilliamsPaulIsDeadChannel the cognitive dissonance is staggering. I’m still trying to figure out what if/when I’m going to break it to my former bandmates.

Believe me, I know! 😎

Yes, it is that interview (the link is in the description box). It could also be revelation of the method. It's similar to Billy saying he took his shoes off at the Abbey Road photoshoot because it was so hot outside and walked across hot pavement in bare feet. It makes no sense. Paul's statement that they wrote in large batches makes no sense either, especially after he explained the challenges of songwriting. They put the truth out there and if people cannot apply common sense and connect the dots, then they're off the hook. Another example is kids believing Santa can squeeze down a chimney pipe to deliver toys. Except kids accept the truth about Santa much better than adults accept the truth about the lads.

@@MikeWilliamsPaulIsDeadChannel True, that makes sense. I've just never figured out how they chose between the two, if they both engaged in the Faustian Bargain, and if it was a sacrifice.

Thanks for the clarification. And yes, I thought the BBC interviewer was scratching his head.

Either would mean he's saying they didn't play on it, but yes the extra meaning in 'to show oneself up' (in Britain at least) would be to let yourself down in front of others. Unbelievable he said that!

Yes agree - here in the UK the phrase 'show oneself up' doesn't mean to be present but to embarrass oneself - here by displaying the lack of musical prowess

@@MikeWilliamsPaulIsDeadChannel Mike we are agreeing with you given the rest of the quote about Paul saying he didn't play on Yesterday. What we are all trying to explain is that there is a FURTHER level to it (be it a Freudian slip, Paul deliberately spilling the beans, etc) that is clear as day as to anyone British - it is a very very clear phrase to use and sticks out like a sore thumb, it only has one meaning in Britain, there is no debate.

@kimchi_b OK, got it. Thanks for clarifying 👍

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ZqyeibKF0rHToYk.html

Because they weren’t capable of performing anything more complicated than that dumb song.

Also your vid got me hearing Faul’s lazy facile songwriting skills like Coming up- like a flower.. and with a little luck, we can work it out - send it rocketing skywards.. Smile away, smile away , brother I can smell your feet a mile away(did he just rhyme away with away?!?No, actually it was”I was walking down the street the other day” ..but that’s still not genius stuff. I had more Wings albums than actual Beatles albums so I could go on and on about the iffy lyrics he just throws out there that show very rudimentary rhymes and shallow emotional depth. He was much better Yesterday if you know what I mean.He knows “ catchy” that’s about it. Not even that now.

They'd have to know, "McCartney" has been knighted twice. They are all part of the same elite club.

@newsbender Billy was knighted 1x. He also received the Companion of Honor Award (another high level award from the Queen) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_the_Companions_of_Honour

@@MikeWilliamsPaulIsDeadChannel Good point, thanks for the correction! Interesting that YT has hidden my comment anyway, I wonder why?

In truth, King Charles is the antichrist and this whole thing was orchestrated by Satan himself to reign in the last full generation before the return of Messiah. It has been a psyop from day one for us boomers. I guarantee you that KC is the AC.

I agree. The creative process is so intimate, so challenging that it leaves a deep mark when you make an important transition in consciousness. To say, as John does, "I don't remember" realizing they were songwriters and not just part of a boyband gives grounds for the hypothesis presented, that they were _not_ the brilliant, prolific composers that one LP after another climbing to the top of the charts led us to believe they were.

ITS CALLED MODESTY.

@kingyfloyd 🙄 sigh... I knew someone was going to come up with that lame excuse. How about JPM was telling us the truth?

Paul is a puppet.

I got one for you. It's possible that people in the music biz have figured this out. I was back stage hanging out with Los Lobos, telling my friends about my new music project, doing covers from the mid sixties. I told them I was playing Stones, Brian Jones era, and Beatles pre car crash. They giggled, because they got the joke right away.

Thank you so much 😀

Thanks for the clarification.

@@MikeWilliamsPaulIsDeadChannel listened again and you are absolutely right, as usual. I misunderstood what you were saying. Sorry about that. Fantastic video btw!

I suggest watching the *entire* presentation. Not very good or even adequate musicians did *not* pull of Rubber Soul in 30 days. I cover this in the presentation.

Thank you. The channel has a large number of musicians, songwriters, studio technicians, engineers, and producers who subscribe and would agree with your sentiments.

Glad to help!

Glad to help!

I did the presentation for the new subscribers (hundreds over the last 6 months) and for anyone that did not understand why Rubber Soul is a problem for the official narrative.

Thanks Mike, excellent presentation 👍

We are told the Beatles were brilliant songwriters/composers and their music is some of the best (if not the best) in the annals of music. Adequate musicians do not generate that type of resume. I think it comes down to revelation of the method.

Especially when he talks about going to the crossroads and making a deal with the chief commander. Says he can’t write like that anymore.

All Beatles, all the time!

The next few decades are going to be fascinating as the second generation who grew up with The Beatles legend dwindle. If the truth doesn't come out in the next ten/fifteen years or so I do wonder if it would make make many waves at all!

@@MikeWilliamsPaulIsDeadChannel Mike you mentioned Donovan in your presentation. In Beatle Stories, which was aired on UK tv tonight, Justin Haywood of the Moody Blues, related a story when he was invited to Donovan’s house one night. George was there. The three of them played their guitars. Justin said, you know George, I like ‘I’m Only Sleeping.’ Let’s play that. George said he didn’t know the chords! Justin ended up showing him how to play it! Imagine that!? They explained it away in the documentary later by saying oh he didn’t know the chords because it was John’s song !

They come up with absurd excuses when a simple search reveals the following: George Harrison - acoustic guitar, backwards lead guitars, harmony vocals en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I%27m_Only_Sleeping

@@MikeWilliamsPaulIsDeadChannel in the same programme, Beatle Stories, Norman ‘Hurricane’ Smith, the sound engineer at EMI, said he ended up playing the bongos on Hard Days Night because Ringo couldn’t get it! The more they drop out, the more your research is proved right!

My British listeners explained “we didn’t have to show ourselves up” means not to embarrass ourselves. In the US, it would be interpreted as being absent. So, either way, Paul is stating he and his mates were not on the recording of Yesterday.

Yes either way they didn't do the work they are credited for. Its a shame really when you come to realise that most things from music, history to the sciences have been faked and twisted for their agendas... @@MikeWilliamsPaulIsDeadChannel

I don't know. Do you think Don is in the club? 😅

So incredibly creepy!

@@MikeWilliamsPaulIsDeadChannel Let's not get carried away, maybe "the photographer tricked him into doing it" lol

So many people cannot connect the dots even after you do a "see Spot run" presentation for them. It speaks volumes about how clogged up most people's minds are.

I was born in 1962. Here's what happened, take it or leave it, I don't care. You are correct to indicate how implausible it was, because it was a miracle: a divine intervention into human history by God for the salvation of all the world. I am not speaking metaphorically; I am referring to a actual decision made by the Monad to act in the earth plane. The lads from Liverpool were just the Monad's inspired mediums. They were taken over, possessed, at various times by the Monad and implanted at an unconscious level with musical phrases; these musical phrases rose up into the surface consciousness of the lads from Liverpool, who transcribed them into the singing of songs. I can remember that during the 1960s there was something in earth orbit from a parallel universe in the quantum universe transmiting Goodness from God into our souls through an etheric opening the back of our skulls.

@jamesmullaney5841 The Beatles and the Occult kzfaq.info/get/bejne/Z6uIl8x1nd-ZcX0.html

It's an occult phenomenon. On the human side it was connected with the space program and the research by the Army to build an anti-ballistic missile to counter the German V2 rocket. Wehrner Von Braun, LSD, MKULTRA. The Beatles means The Baetyls. Beatles-Stones means Baetyl stones. You dig? Omphalos stones, Benben stones, Stonehenge, Pre-Christian Ireland, Ancient Greece, Mesopotamia, Egypt, and Rome. The Quest of the Holy Grail, King Arthur, the Knights of the Round Table, Chivalry, and Courtly Love. These are the things the Germans were looking for; at the end of WW II, Himmler surrendered to the Brits and was incorporporated into the Tavistock project. The CIA did the same thing in Laurel Canyon and Montauk Point. I'm telling you these things because I like you, Mike. ✌😎

Woodstock was held in Bethel, NY at the height of the Beatles-Stones [Baetyl stones] era. The word Bethel is cognate with the Hebrew word Bet-el, or Beit-el: House of God, or God Is In This Place. When Jacob in the Old Testament beheld the ladder of angels in his dream ascending and descending between heaven and earth, his head was resting on a large rock. The rock was a Baetyl stone [Beatles-Stones]. So Jacob named the place Bethel. The word Baetyl is cognate with Bet-el, Beit-el, and Bethel. Another way of describing Jacob's Ladder or a Ladder of Angels is a Stairway To Heaven [Led Zeppelin] Also: There is a Woodstock in York, England. Is there a Masonic connection? Yes, of course: because the Quest of the Holy Grail dates back to the Knights Templar and Camelot. The Beatles songs, especially the love songs, are Troubadour songs. The Trouadours are from the 11th century, Eleanor of Aquitaine was called The Queen of the Troubadours. This was the era of chivalric romance literature: Lancelot, Galahad, Gawain, Perceval, Guinivere, Arthur, and Merlin the Magician. [Magical Mystery Tour.] The purpose of all this is to assist humanity, not to hurt humanity. What came after the Medieval period? The Age of Reason. Oh, everything has a RATIONAL explanation! We were so childish to believe in enchantment and fairy land. Now we can discard all that and have The Industrial Revolution. We can build factories, mass produce commodities, work 12 hours a day, create blighted ghettos like the ones in London that Charles Dickens wrote about in Oliver Twist.

Glad you enjoy it!

Yes and that's why I'm sure they couldn't have all been allowed to live through the musical plans for the 80s (huge charity events like Band Aid). The pressure on them to perform would have been massive, and the world would have expected them to put any issues aside. They would have distracted from everything else and that's when the legend was consolidated. The thing that annoyed me was Julian because iirc he said he didn't want to ride on the coattails of his father, while releasing tracks like Saltwater. And just listen to his recent version of Imagine! But, if the other three were not up to playing together (even less so after so long apart) the whole reason he kept a great distance makes sense.

I will have to look at the timeline, but recently saw a few movies, including a John Lennon quote about Andy Warhol putting his name on his factory of art workers. Parallel worlds.

Other urban legends abound of John Lennon writing a book that would spill the beans about all this stuff and more, but coincidentally he died before this book could be released.

@@jpalberthoward9 Now we know why they killed John.

Yes. I posted the link to my community tab. Sounds like another "story".

Wondering if this will turn out to be very symbolic...

I want to know who that songwriter was, too.

My British listeners explained it means not to embarrass yourself. In the US it means not showing up some place (i.e., absent). Either way it's not good for the official story. He's telling us he didn't play on the recording of Yesterday 😉

@@MikeWilliamsPaulIsDeadChannel Right. Even more damning. Their playing was not up to studio standards.

@@damianrf6309their solo albums weren’t up to Beatles standards, either. They either regressed as musicians, or they had help writing and recording the Beatles songs.

Watching the Wheels is a great song.

I think the Monkeys were like revelation of the method. They were telling us that the Beatles were fake.

Thank you for your insightful comment.

@@MikeWilliamsPaulIsDeadChannel still watching! thank you for your work

Thank you for your kind words. I think my videos will have to suffice 😉

Between 1962 and 1966, they did not write music or play on their recorded tracks. They wrote more of their own material between 1967 and 1970, but even during this period (and their solo careers) outside songwriters and session players were still employed. The story of them writing songs constantly is a work of fiction. The Beatles were actors and performers. An illusion that was sold to the public. If you go back and listen to what Donovan said, 'while they were out gallivanting, a genius songwriter was writing the songs'. It's likely Don was referring to Theodor Adorno in cahoots with George Martin. As Lennon sang in the song God, the dream is over. I don't believe in the Beatles. People have to stop making excuses and rationalizing about the lads and come to grips with reality.

There are two camps. There are those who are paid to support an official narrative and those who truly believe it and build upon it. I don't get into who I think is in which camp. I let the listener make the decision.

@@MikeWilliamsPaulIsDeadChannelthanks for your perspective, Mike! Keep up the great work, buddy!

Scott does a nice job of presenting.

Of course they stick to the official narrative. Either they're as conditioned as most other Fab fans or they're aware and afraid of losing their subscriber base, so they go along to get along. kzfaq.infoB15eReAoJAE

@@MikeWilliamsPaulIsDeadChannel well, still they are right abouth do not use a stratocaster there, use a rickenbacker bass there use a vox conqueror distortion channel etc. You see, my self i consider the gear almost as important as the player, without vox, the sound would have being way different.And by the way, I don't know if you realise it , but your whole channel makes Brian Wilson of the beach boys the winner.He admited using studio musicians and having the boys only singing the songs (apart from some lead guitar by Carl wilson), but he still composed all this.

Glad you enjoyed it

The wigs are so obvious.

The fake beards too. The photo of them standing in a wheat field, with beards down to their waists. They not only wrote perfect pop songs, they grew perfect beards, in almost no time at all!

They did *not* do it. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ZqyeibKF0rHToYk.html and The GET BACK Discussions - FULL COMPILATION kzfaq.info/get/bejne/pqhhq7WI09Otg2Q.html

Yes. Dr. Henry Truby, who was a professor at the University of Miami and an expert in linguistics and voiceprints (sonograms) did an analysis back in 1968 where he compared Yesterday (bio Paul) to Hey Jude and Penny Lane (if I recall correctly on Penny Lane) and concluded the vocalist on the latter two songs was not the same person singing Yesterday. Comparisons using autotune where a note is sung a little flat or a little sharp (and then corrected) is not a voiceprint analysis. It only shows when a note(s) are off pitch. I bring this up because a music channel on YT tried to pawn this approach off as a legit voice analysis. It is not. The person claimed that since the pitch was off on the same note on Yesterday when comparing Paul to Billy (his version of Yesterday) that "proved" it's the same person. That's a very flawed analysis/conclusion. If I bring 50 people into the "test" and 5 of them sing a particular note a little sharp or flat on Yesterday does that mean those 5 people are all Paul McCartney? Setting aside voices, what is interesting is how people do not or cannot discern the differences between Paul and Billy by scrutinizing their physical characteristics.

See the description box.

There was a lot gaming. I concluded the alternate takes (outtakes) were staged. There are three scenarios: 1) The Beatles was being taught the songs to possibly take out on the road and the practice sessions were recorded by George Martin. In this scenario we would hear them playing on the outtake recording. Martin would record these sessions for two reasons a) so the lads could listen to the playback to hear how they sound, and b) to create an *audio* "historical record" to document them in the studio. 2) The Beatles were singing (practicing) to alternate takes recorded by the studio musicians. This would have been done by George Martin to also create an *audio* "historical record". 3) George Martin fabricated "outtakes" by editing and mixing together recorded instrumentals variations with vocal variations. Again, to create an *audio* "historical record". Martin knew he had to create a backlog of *audio* "outtakes" that would eventually make their way onto bootlegs, Anthology, KZfaq, etc. None of the audio outtakes people like to point to prove that the lads are playing on the actual recorded (released) tracks. After they released Revolver on August 5, 1966, not one track from the album was played during their post Revolver tour. So, they released a brand new album and not one song made it to the set list. The Achilles heal is it's all AUDIO "documentation" and audio can easily be manipulated. What we do *not* have is genuine, authentic film footage of the band writing and recording in the studio until the Get Back (Let It Be) sessions (more on LIB in a moment). Film crews followed and documented the Beatles doing everything *except* writing and recording in the studio. Why were Lennon and McCartney's songwriting talents not documented on film? Wouldn't historians want actual film footage/archive of a brilliant songwriting team practicing their craft? It's not like they were declared geniuses later in history. They were labeled as 'geniuses' during their tenure as a band. People will point to still photos of them in the studio, but images are not proof of anything. These are staged photo opportunities, especially during the period from 1962 to 1966: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mJeEeZubtK7XYX0.html Circling back to the Get Back sessions, my theory is Billy "Paul McCartney" knew the historical record did not have film footage of the band writing and recording in the studio. He knew this was a significant gap in the official narrative so he convened the Get Back sessions to try and plug the hole. Except, the Get Back sessions were unsuccessful. The original plan was to write, learn, rehearse and record 14 new songs in a little over two weeks. Then do two live shows that will culminate in a TV special. The two weeks became a month and resulted in the band playing five songs on a rooftop to an audience of no one. Many fans don't know that the songs for Let It Be were recorded on and off throughout 1969 and into early 1970. It extended beyond just the 30 days in January 1969. Here's Billy giving us the truth about the Get Back sessions and therefore, for Rubber Soul as well: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ZqyeibKF0rHToYk.html

@@MikeWilliamsPaulIsDeadChannel Thanks for your reply, Mike! All the 3 scenarios make sense... Why don't we see any VIDEOS of the geniuses in the studio, only staged photos? Significant gap, totally agree... So, they had to learn to sing ALL the Beatles songs to make the records, but they did not learn all of the songs to perform with instruments live... only a FEW to make the shows, right? I think they played mostly live at concerts (sometimes they used some backing tracks too), they were able to play the songs - as many Beatles tribute bands can. But they obviously didn't write songs of such a high standard, and they didn't record them, especially not in such a quantity in such a short time. So they did not learned the Revolver songs, they knew that a new era is coming, with replaced members, no live shows etc. I'm glad that it is possible to awake from this hypnotic dream, no longer under the deceptive spell. The Beatles' story is supernatural and very dark in my opinion. The truth sets you free! Thank you for sharing your research, thanks for your reply!

Correct. To record vocals for album tracks and singles, they had to learn them in large batches. For the live gigs they only had to learn ~25 songs through August 1966. Their concerts were 30 minutes and the set list was typically 11 songs which included 1-2 covers. They did use backing tracks for some of the concerts. Here's a video I uploaded where George and John miss their cue at the beginning of Day Tripper: Protecting The Beatles' Official Story (Budakon footage): urlzs.com/Vpz1K For televised shows like Ed Sullivan they played to a backing track. There was no way EMI/Tavistock was going to take any chances with their American debut ("conquering America"). Here's a clip of the Dave Clark 5 where the backing track failed: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/g7qBmZVn2MDcias.html With Revolver they either did not have time to learn to play the songs or George Martin decided it was not worth teaching them since the next phase (1967-1970) was going to be dedicated to studio work only (no live gigs). Their audiences started to diminish by the time they reached '66.

@@MikeWilliamsPaulIsDeadChannel Thanks for your replies!

@@MikeWilliamsPaulIsDeadChannel Maybe I'm wrong, but it is fitting in. :D "Don't do it while we singing." "Don't do it while we playing." kzfaq.info/get/bejne/bJuXptZ3xtamlKM.html At 0:20

When they covered it was always nuanced. When they announced the songs during their concerts, many times they couldn't remember which album the song was from or if it was a single. But I will give Paul credit for dropping the bombs during the BBC interview. Perhaps his final words.

It's possible. The German connection into the Beatles is all around them (Tavistocks's playground). Within the deep state, there are many influential players who are relatively unknown in public.

I think Donovan was referring to Adorno.

Glad it was helpful!

If you want to understand the point, then I recommend watching the presentation. It's obvious from your comment that you did not. You're simply playing back the official programmed talking points. Other presentations on the topic: Did The Beatles Write All Their Own Music? Part 1: tinyurl.com/bde8t475 and Part 2: tinyurl.com/2w58w9hv

Paul blew it wide open.

...and the offer for a McCartney solo album from Capitol? 😃@@MikeWilliamsPaulIsDeadChannel

Ha! Or... write the score for Mark Lane's movie 😏

😀👍

I suggest you actually watch the presentation. It will answer "how many does that leave?" As for "he and Paul were in a hotel, Paul was humming the start of Michelle and John added the I love you bit". It's fictional storytelling for the worshipping fans. Additional presentations: The Beatles Conspiracy 101 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/Z6qUmbadmLKzZYU.htmlsi=J0zk5YgJs6Z51KRJ

No , you see some people like rock and roll and even 50's music !! To you we are squares -- but I don't care . I like quite a lot of my parents records . Danceable & enjoyable for me .

My British listeners explained “we didn’t have to show ourselves up” means not to embarrass ourselves. In the US, it would be interpreted as being absent. So, either way, Paul is stating he and his mates were not on the recording of Yesterday.

Many historic events are documented lies. Questioning The Beatles’ Official Narrative kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mJeEeZubtK7XYX0.html Also, If you had watched the entire presentation you would have known I covered the RS entry in Mark's book (I have it).

Ok, you can have Eisenhower then; I'll keep The Beatles.

I put a meme up a few days ago. It said "You are either aware of the programming or the programming worked". Humanity's outlook is precarious because of how dumb many people are. Most cannot see that the agenda has rolled up onto their doorstep.

Same model.