Add Princess Dusk and Anastacia from "Dark Souls" O_O

Stalker alert 😂

Sherlock.

except when it comes to writing Dr Who and Sherlock, then hes just predicatble and tedious.

Stephen Hicks clearly you haven’t seen chris chibnall work yet

@@stephenhicks9902 early Moffat was great on DW. The best was RTD, no question....

@@stephenhicks9902 irony

@@stephenhicks9902 I think his writing for Dr. Who and Sherlock are sensational. The boy who waited 2000 years.

One of my favorite parts of the show, (and Jeff's anxieties). Before we had Michael Scott, an American studio tried creating a version of Coupling, and fell flat on their faces. It's just something that the cast and crew couldn't quite replicate. Honestly, when you said "misinterpretation and double entendre", the first places that my mind went were the "shadayim" story and when Jane told her friends that her bf was a plastic surgeon and not a butcher.

cbak12sg I know this is 6 years old comment but just wanted to say, I agree. But most of BBC’s comedy sitcoms back then we’re done in front of an audience... it’s so much better than the canned laughter nonsense you get these days. Mind you, I was surprised at just how many sitcoms are still recorded this way. There’s an awful lot you would never expect to have an audience.

@@markotik2I know your comment is three years old, but…(sorry, couldn’t resist). There were often scenes when filming where they had to edit out minutes of laughter, in one scene (the Spider-Man dance), they had to stop as the audience were laughing so much

@@LiveDonkeyDeadLion Keep in mind though that live audience laughter was often augmented by recorded laughter, particularly in scenes in which the laughter level increased over a series of character exchanges.

@@hd-xc2lz not according to the DVD commentary by Stephen Moffat. They only used the studio recording, but would use the original laugh at the joke, then reset to film it again once the audience had calmed down and the actors could keep a more natural flow to the performance

@@LiveDonkeyDeadLionI know this comment is three weeks old, but sorry, just wanted to point out that out

efcpl Pure genius comedy.

For my part, I find Sally annoying and sometimes unexpectedly shallow and even pathetic, just as Jane put it using the "snake of truth". Jane herself had moments of self obsession, but also self-insight: One can interpret it her character as not fully consistent, or the one with the most progress in character development.

🐍

WRONG

@@yawnhiccup what is this episode

Wilma was great.

TuberOnTheLoose Sally is a Goddess !!

Nicole Song Indeed 😉

TristanandIsolt Yeah, I’ve never understood that... Susan is a little bundle of innocence and never found Jane as attractive as Susan because I think, she’s been in sooo many other things around this time, she was nothing new. Sally on the other hand was just perfect. And very, very hot !!

@@markotik2 Thanks for the reply. I still definitely prefer Crazy Wacky Jane and Susan the Happy Trotting Elf.

I find Sally to be my favorite too. We might be rare but we exist. Jane is too crazy and Susan too grounded. Sally is just right. My favorites episodes tend to be those with a heavy focus on the Sally and Patric dynamic.

I liked that there was a bit of a reversal, where Jeff and Jane are painted as the weirdest, and Sally and Patrick as supposedly normal, and then as the show goes on you see more of Sally and Patrick being very weird... I forgot about this scene, and how well it was done! Kudos to both actresses and the writing, etc. It's funny but also quite endearing

I know where the full episode is.

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/jLt1acaryr-cd4k.html one year later...here you go

They both are.

Dibs on Sally afterward

Wow. To not think any of them are pretty is something.