An atheist bumped into the wrong Muslim! Mohammed Hijab And Atheist Speakers Corner Sam Dawah

Рет қаралды 17,244

Жыл бұрын

Пікірлер: 126

@uthman2281 Жыл бұрын

Don't these so-called atheists realize how futile their approach is? If you're an atheist you come up with the idea that life has no meaning everything is worthless and meaningless how on earth do you come up with the idea of arguing about it when ultimately everything is worthless and meaningless in your worldview? What is behind your intention, dear atheist?

@Ace-rn5vb Жыл бұрын

Hijab was murdered 😂😂🤡🤡

@uthman2281 Жыл бұрын

@@Ace-rn5vb I know it hurts to remind you your life is ultimately worthless and meaningless.

@Ace-rn5vb Жыл бұрын

@@uthman2281 prove it!! 😂😂😂🤡

@Ace-rn5vb Жыл бұрын

@@uthman2281 I know it hurts to know Allah isn’t real 😂😂😂 you mug!! Little puxxy!!! Looo

@Ace-rn5vb Жыл бұрын

@@uthman2281 there is no afterlife with Muhammad’s alter ego Allah 😂😂🤡. And I’m sure my life on this earth is 100 times better and more meaningful than yours 😂

@Itsadamen Жыл бұрын

Sorry but these types of arguments go nowhere, proving God is much simpler.

@Era-lk1lo Жыл бұрын

Proving god is impossible, if you could it wouldn't require faith.

@Itsadamen Жыл бұрын

@@Era-lk1lo Faith requires reasons to believe, we don't blindly believe God's existence. We can easily believe it though, due to the miraculous beings that we are, and the insanely calculated universe we live in. + There are 0 atheists on a failing plane, because it's innate to believe in God.

@Era-lk1lo Жыл бұрын

@@Itsadamen Words have meanings and I suggest you look at the definitions rather than making your own faith /feɪθ/ noun Similar: trust belief confidence conviction credence hopefulness hope 2. strong belief in the doctrines of a religion, based on spiritual conviction rather than proof. "bereaved people who have shown supreme faith"

@IKETalk Жыл бұрын

It doesn’t

@iiddrrii6051 8 ай бұрын

@@Itsadamen You may have your own personal reasons, but those reasons are not universally accepted. For example, astrophysicists are experts in the calculations of the cosmos but do not conclude an "insanely calculated" universe. Biologists are experts in life, but also do not conclude life as "miraculous". It's much more likely your beliefs are derived from your upbringing. The beliefs of your family and environment are the highest predictors of belief.

@EzziiG Жыл бұрын

This is why philosophy is complete bollocks 😂 what a pointless conversation.

@ruddin93 Жыл бұрын

LOOOOL so true.

@guccisayian2512 10 ай бұрын

Whole bunch of waffle

@_Mo-Ham_ 6 ай бұрын

I tend to agree. IMO, phiosophy is great for asking questions... not so great at answering them.

@FromNothingComesNothing 2 ай бұрын

Why is it pointless? It clearly showed at the end a very important point in which they are all agree, that there cannot be a state that only contingent things exist, therefore there needs to be a necessary existence that is independent (not depended on any other thing) that gives rise to all dependent things.

@musaimaan Жыл бұрын

May Allah SWT bless brother Hijab for his patience. AMEEN. Really wish people would allow a person to speak, then answer an answer, then speak lol. 😅. May Allah SWT make that easier for us all. AMEEN.

@Era-lk1lo Жыл бұрын

They were both respectful, why do I see this on all Mohammad Hijab videos when Hijab himself is an incredibly bad faith debater?

@musaimaan Жыл бұрын

@@Era-lk1lo Why would you continue to watch his videos if you deem him as a bad faith speaker?

@Era-lk1lo Жыл бұрын

@@musaimaan I'm agnostic but I enjoy debates, probably one of my biggest past time is just watching all kinds of debates, it's nothing person with Hijab he is just bad faith when he argues, but he's often against people who are also bad faith.

@King-kw1mo 11 ай бұрын

Al-Qadr is the belief in predestination. This means that Allah already knows everything that will happen, and nothing happens unless it is Allah's will and command…However, this does not mean that the choices people make are not free choices. Instead, it means that Allah knows what people will chose to do. Allah is an eternal being and one day he decided that He will create other eternal being who He already knows will sin, He already knows He will punish them for eternity (he creates eternal being so he can punish them for eternity)… He already knows before He creates these souls that He will burn their skin off and grow it back just so He can burn their skin again, He will feed them poisonous foods and crush their skulls, the only drink He will give them is boiling water because He already knows they won’t obey his commands even before creating them… He will put this eternal soul in a finite body called a human… He will put the human through tests and if it fails the test (which he already knows they’ll fail) they have to face eternal punishment… So now that the soul failed the test Allah will punish the soul for an eternity… As long as Allah exist (which is forever) he will make sure every second of his own creation is spent in the most horrible, embarrassing and degrading way…

@1kWithoutContent Жыл бұрын

The argument postulation was consistent, and the counter argument of modal collapse was never going to hold because it had theistic presuppositions to it, honestly the young man was pushing it as it's main event but it was obvious all along because there is no way of disproving a dependency or contingency argument, the young man was trying to dodge it that's all.

@drive-2786 10 ай бұрын

the young fool, trying to cause curruption in the land u mean , but young man .smh

@abuhanifa1 Жыл бұрын

Elhamdulillah for Islam...i don't need any of this to believe without any doubts, ..after watching everything the conclusion is that sophistry derails discussion even though they say the same thing...the christian guy didn't want to accept bro Hijabs arguments because the trinity becomes obsolete and the atheist guy is a contrarian and maybe an undercover christian (they are allowed to use deception according to Paul)

@uponsunnah6986 10 ай бұрын

8:00 "CAN THEY DIFFER!?!" has entered the discussion. IF YOU KNOW, YOU KNOW! LOL

@hakawatis 2 ай бұрын

he used some of the same talking points as the atheists as well very funny

@mountain102 Жыл бұрын

When a teacher speaks to his students who have bad behaviour. They keep interrupting all the time and haven‘t even read the important books.

@19furkan96 2 ай бұрын

What are the books they're speaking of?

@tajolariffin6021 Жыл бұрын

they acted like they are smart but everytime they repeat the postulate the got it wrong..what is wrong with these guys

@blademetalblade3053 Жыл бұрын

I don't understand why this siig is talking in a speed of 200 miles an hour

@DarkPacmanC Жыл бұрын

Allaahul musta3aan... Basic Summary (according to 26:35 when the man says "God is His Attributes", which is a deviant, kufri, Jahmi lie, and Hijab immediately says "this is exactly my position" but then a few seconds after realizing what he just said corrects himself and says "but not in that sense", which shows he's confused about what "exactly is his position"): Mohammed Hijab can't properly refute a Christian because Mohammed Hijab can't properly refute a Jahmi. Christianity inherited the Greek Philosophy of Negative Theology (i.e. "Divine Simplicity") which forces Christians to negate the Attributes of Allaah. The Jahmiyyah did the exact same thing, and the Salaf called them kuffaar. Mohammed Hijab doesn't understand how to refute this because he's more interested in philosophy than the aqeedah of the Salaf, which affirms Allaah's Attributes as real, true attributes but without kayfiyyah (howness). Ahl as-Sunnah believes "ليس كمثله شيء وهو السميع البصير" (there is nothing like unto Him (Allaah) and He is the All-Hearing, All-Seeing). Jahmis/Mutazilah/Asharis/Maaturidis *and* knowledgable Christians and Hellenized Jews *stop* at "ليس كمثله شيء" (there is nothing like unto Him) so they negate the Attributes of Allaah like Speech and Actions because their sick hearts are telling them that affirmation = kayfiyyah (howness). Mohammed Hijab's struggle is that he either refuses to study or has yet to understand properly the aqeedah of the Salaf. His obsession with Ibn Sina and al-Ghazaali (deviant philosophers) has him stuck in a corner where he "defends" Islaam by implicitly denying the Attributes of Allaah. He hasn't said that out loud yet, but every time he talks to a Jahmi, or a knowledgeable Christian, or a philosopher, he gives them either exactly what they want (refusal to affirm Allaah's Attributes) or he waffles and acts like he doesn't understand what they're saying. The Jahmis, philosophers, knowledgeable Christians and Hellenized Jews are braver than him: they negate Allaah's Attributes outright. They're wrong, they're kuffaar, but they don't hide it. Hijab loves to debate them and study Islaam from their false Greek principles, but he pretends to be "Athari" and fails to defend the aqeedah of the Salaf literally *all the time* . This is why he hates the Salafis who teach that "Allaah has Hands", even though he claims to believe that Allaah has Hands! He doesn't like *affirming* Attributes out-loud because if he does, the philosophers and Jahmis he respects who negate Attributes will make takfeer of him. Mohammed Hijab cannot refute a Christian, because Sufis and Christians have the same usool of aqeedah: Greek Philosophy, Negative Theology, Aql over Naql. Baatil.

@DarkPacmanC Жыл бұрын

Also, at 28:35, Hijab translates "God is just existence itself" as "waajib al-wujood". This is blatanty incorrect, and because of his history of attacking Salafia and defending Jahmis/using their arguments, I can't tell if he misspoke or if he genuinely tried to mislead people away from the true translation which is "wahdat al-wujood", which is the deviant creed of his friends and scholars, the Jahmis/Ash'aris/Maaturidis (Allaah is the only existence, Unity of Existence, Allaah is everything).

@DubSalvation Жыл бұрын

Bloody hell mate sounds like you should have been there debating them instead

@DarkPacmanC Жыл бұрын

@DubSalvation the Salaf were against debates, unless forced or absolutely necessary to dispel doubts. Better and safer to study the deen from authentic sources and clarify the deviant beliefs of the kuffaar and the deviant sects. Once Allaah grants you understanding of these principles, you can easily catch and clarify nonsense like this being presented as "da'wah".

@DubSalvation Жыл бұрын

@@DarkPacmanC yeah makes sense

@youssefmo Жыл бұрын

He obviously was avoiding going into Islamic theology in this debate. I think because he thought his argument holds weight without going into it.

@josephomboto-pp4oo Жыл бұрын

Greek philosophers! Ha ha ha ha Hijab cries !".....say it again..."

@HuhuHuhu-cf4mu Жыл бұрын

We are supposed to know god through the fitra (intuion, translated approximately). All of these philosophical arguments go no where.

@osamak123 Жыл бұрын

This is why philosophy is nonsense. All three were arguing with each other but didn't know why although they were basically arguing the same thing lol. Is this dawah?

@mustafa-cc7cg Жыл бұрын

Not every discussion he does will be to be with dawah , he just wants to have philosophical discussions which is completely fine.

@IKETalk Жыл бұрын

Idk even know is they are arguing about God or just havin an argument 😂

@TazBo-wd2ig Жыл бұрын

Guys anywhere decent in London to hang out for at 9pm onwards for tourists. Bunch of guys just want to chill but in a halal environment. Apart from the mosque

@mhm_fateh5747 2 ай бұрын

Croydon is a pretty chill place

@mpaturkey8027 Жыл бұрын

Dear Christian give the other cheek but don't give your mind to a atheist 😂

@mpaturkey8027 Жыл бұрын

I am talking about that boy who agreeing an atheist 😅

@mohammadsaim4515 7 ай бұрын

Now this atheist comes like a Christian in the park🤣🤣😂

@ahmedkarim6927 4 ай бұрын

Alhamdulillah for wahi and nubuwah

@JamesBrown-it1hf 8 ай бұрын

the full video is online watch the whole thing.... mohammed flawed big time

@King-kw1mo 11 ай бұрын

@iiddrrii6051 8 ай бұрын

This God of yours sounds like real piece of work

@yassineamell9311 11 ай бұрын

Pointless discussion 😴

@dunloplego 7 ай бұрын

What?

@metaphysichien 6 ай бұрын

Il se fait arracher un peu

@thegreatest1176 Жыл бұрын

first

@unapologeticallychristian. Жыл бұрын

Hijab got so utterly obliterated he ended up taking a position which one wasn’t originally his 2 out of desperation and 3 that doesn’t he doesn’t even agree with because he’s unaware of the subject matter. Embarrassing.

@yourfavoritedrawer7680 Жыл бұрын

Ive listened to the entire video. where did he even remotely get defeated, if anything the converastion is just a derailment of the first 5 minutes

@unapologeticallychristian. Жыл бұрын

@@yourfavoritedrawer7680 well the full debate is 2 hours long so u don’t have a full understanding and u also probably don’t understand the topic either so that doesn’t help

@yourfavoritedrawer7680 Жыл бұрын

@@unapologeticallychristian. Can you link me the 2 hour debate than? I'd gladly watch it. I also don't understand what you'd think is so unfathomably difficult to understand most of what theyre saying is easily Googleable.

@aqeelkirmani7391 Жыл бұрын

Read some books on Modality, 🤦‍♂️ What a lame emotional comment

@elite7329 Жыл бұрын

Hijab literally stated (as he has in the past) that he agrees with Ibn Sina's version of the contingency argument which Aquinas has shamelessly plagiarized as his Third Way. In what universe did he agree to a different position in this debate? You clearly struggle with tracking the conversation.