Welcome aboard!

Glad it was helpful!

Well those tests are really useful for people who shoot brick walls or directly into light sources all the time. :)

Wow, thanks!

You should! It's a great lens

get both! :D

Thanks for your suggestion and you're right, next time we should focus a bit more on side by side comparison.

I liked the format of video 🎉

Hi, We made a comparison of 3 wireless microphones which includes the Godox too. In a nutshell: it's a great mike just don't use the noise cancel feature as it sometimes "cancels" human voice too. Also it lacks the internal recording feature or the safety channel, but the charging case is awesome and the built in magnetic feature is also good. Having a screen on the transmitter is a really great feature and the pricing here in the UK is just right.

@@holdmylenscap7241 thanks u so mucm Mam for ur honest Response

@@holdmylenscap7241 What were the other two wireless mics? I use fully wireless Sony ECM-W2BT bluetooth mic, and it's fantastic. It has a 200 metre range, in full stereo, and it has a 9 hour battery life (USB rechargeable) which is two hours longer than the RODE Wireless Go. There is a separate mic on the receiver which can be switched on on off and when switched on it mixes the audio from near the camera with the audio from the transmitter, great for "environmental audio" video footage whilst have a clear talk over from a distant presenter. The transmitter also has a mic in socket so you can plug a Lavalier mic into it, and Sony make a unique optional stereo Lavalier mic specifically for it (The ECM-LV1). The ECM-W2BT is only around £160 too, which is much cheaper than the competition, despite offering better audio quality.

I don't know why On1 recognising Samyang lenses incorrectly... :'( Exposure X6 did recognise them properly

On1 is mostly for cataloging and "mass" editing, but when I edit I use Affinity as it has more options

strange, I find the 85mm's background very pleasing, but sure it's not as creamy as the 135's

Hi, It won't be the same as the 135mm. The biggest difference would be that your depth of field would be less shallow (f2.7 equivalent) which is one of the key strengths of the 135mm

@@holdmylenscap7241 Once i was comparing my oldie samyang 85 1.4 on canon apsc to 135 f2 on FF canon 5d mark3. Results in terms FOV and DOF were virtualy the same On my canon (1.6crop) it was equivalent of 136, f2.24 . I think DOF will be around F2 equivalent 1.4x1.5 gives F2.1 so not so far from 1.8 on 135.

@@SzymonPytel For a given focal length, aperture, and distance to subject, a larger sensor will always give a shallower DOF than a smaller one, and the larger the sensor, the shallower the DOF. This is why tiny mobile phone sensors have a virtually infinite DOF and why it is almost impossible to blur anything in the background with one, unless a software based effect is used either built into the phone or in post. APS-C sensors have a deeper DOF than full frame sensors, and that's makes the full frame much better for portrait work but if you want the best quality portraits you really need medium format sensor, which has an even shallower DOF than full frame. Medium format lenses are often not be as sharp as full frame lenses though, so using medium format is always a compromise.

Affinity Photo. Affordable and powerful.

Glad it was helpful! Unfortunately as of now Canon won't allow 3rd Party lenses...

Fear not, Canon have now released their own 135mm f1.8 for RF...It's almost as sharp as the Samyang right across the frame, but it has to be stopped down to f4 to get good close up image quality at it's minimum focus distance (MFD), whereas the Samyang has perfect image quality at it's MFD even when wide open. The Samyang also stays sharp down to f16 whereas the Canon is soft due to diffraction at f16. However, like the Sony GM, the Canon also suffers from noticeable LoCA (Longitudal Chromatic Aberration), whereas the Samyang has virtually none. But it's the best your going to get for RF. Only us Sony shooters are blessed by having access to the stellar Samyang, so maybe consider swapping to Sony...

Thanks

It's Affinity Photo

Switch to Full Frame then :) Both are great for Bokeh, but the 135mm is slightly better, but it would be huge for your A6400.

@@holdmylenscap7241 thank you ma'am i will switch to Full frame .

Thank you! We always try to give honest and impartial opinions and focus more on the actual usage than the boring stats :)

pinoy :)

This was not focusing on the lenses but more on the focal lengths, but thanks for the comment, we will include the SOOC images too in the future!

@@holdmylenscap7241 Thanks :)

thank you for your kind comment! We work hard on getting there :)

First of all I would like to take the opportunity and let you know that we are really appreciating that you took the time and effort to create such a great comment. We are taking every comment into consideration and yours is definitely one what we are appreciate a lot as it is shredding light to some concerns some of our viewers might have. Sometimes we are getting caught up in the heat of communication and you could be right about the amount of words used to get our message through might be a little bit over the necessary amount, but it is really hard to decide what part of the information we should exclude to avoid unnecessarily long stream of information by going over and above with the amount of linguistical forms of communication. But considering your very detailed and informative comment hereby we promise to you that in the future we will aim to reduce the words used in our videos to a more healthy level. Also we will take it into consideration that the same methodology will be used in our communications here in KZfaq comments, starting immediately, including this comment as well.