Wondering if you have some training program to teach Sanskrit language ?

Can i ask you a simple question? The term OM - a sacred sound considered by many ancient philosophical texts to be the sound of the universe, encompassing all other sounds within it. Where does sanskrit has the letter "O" or "OO"? It is called as Aum 🕉️right? As the world knows tamil is the oldest language on earth and only tamil has the letter O- ஒ and OO- ஓ in it. And only the language thamizh represent OM-ஓம், how can u claim that OM belongs to sanskrit? Ist it not cheap to steal and loot from the original sacred language Thamizh into sanskrit? When sanskrit doesn't even have the letter O! I don't know how people blindly follow these things without doing proper research.

@@thanu-go1ts Can I ask you a simple question which idoit told you that sanskrit doesn't OO it really does not have the short O sound but has OO and Aau sound and the correct pronunciation of it is through the Aau sound and not of how it is transliterated in the latin script. 2) How did the world knows that tamil is the oldest language show me the proofs. 3) Infact in the sanskrit language scripts you can write the OM in 4 different ways 4) Tamizh doesn't use OM, as it is used in the beggining of mantras and everyone other languages have sentences including tamizh and not a systematic way of composing mantras I don't know how people like you blindly follows these things without doing proper research.

@@jatinoham What more proofs do u need to prove tamil as the oldest language? Have u not heard of indus valley,athichanallur,athirapakkam ,keezhadi excavations?...sanskrit has 90% of loan words from tamil , it is proved as well and every sanskirt scholars knows this, just some are not revealing it to the public. But still people like you are not aware of these things,and the country is also under the control of these Aryans / brahmins who want to keep themselves as superior in everything by looting others history and findings. And trying to make a language as superior and god language which doesn't even have its own scripts🤦🏽‍♀️

@@thanu-go1ts HUH! poor man sanskrit doesn't even have a single tamil word as it has it's own word generating system 2) Indus script is not deciphered yet then how can you say that it was tamil 3) Indus script was found in many states of India not just tamil nadu 4) Aryan Invasion/Migration theory was proposed by the britishers to divide the MINDS of we the fellow indians it has been disproven a long time ago please wake up there is no such thing as aryan and dravidian and please understand our culture is greatest of all and who said that sanskrit does have a script of it's own? In that case I will also point out to tamil scriptas it was evolved from the brahmi script in which sanskrit was written 5) Every nothern indian language script (Including southern indian language scripts except tamil script was used to write regional languages and sanskrit simultaneously)was used to write sanskrit initially until regional languages emerged out of sanskrit. PLEASE WAKE UP FRIEND A GET OUT OF THIS FAKE WORLD But, you know why britishers really propogated these theories without any proofs? That's because they thought that usually the natives (As they had seen in africa were black in colour) had black skin and when they visited the northern india they saw people with white(Not every northern indian has white skin including me) skin and without even considering the grographical location of india concluded that we invade India. Please understand all of this propaganda now propogated by the current politicians and news media portals. JAYATU BHARATAM

Can i ask you a simple question? The term OM - a sacred sound considered by many ancient philosophical texts to be the sound of the universe, encompassing all other sounds within it. Where does sanskrit has the letter "O" or "OO"? It is called as Aum 🕉️right? As the world knows tamil is the oldest language on earth and only tamil has the letter O- ஒ and OO- ஓ in it. And only the language thamizh represent OM-ஓம், how can u claim that OM belongs to sanskrit? Ist it not cheap to steal and loot from the original sacred language Thamizh into sanskrit? When sanskrit doesn't even have the letter O! I don't know how people blindly follow these things without doing proper research.

@@thanu-go1ts what do you mean? OM or AUM ...is a pluta svara which has a longer pronunciation than the dirgha svaras like आ ई ऐ औ. It can be considered as a compound svara... Written as ओऽम् ... Remember Sanskrit as a language developed earlier than it's written form, so did Tamil and other languages.

Can i ask you a simple question? The term OM - a sacred sound considered by many ancient philosophical texts to be the sound of the universe, encompassing all other sounds within it. Where does sanskrit has the letter "O" or "OO"? It is called as Aum 🕉️right? As the world knows tamil is the oldest language on earth and only tamil has the letter O- ஒ and OO- ஓ in it. And only the language thamizh represent OM-ஓம், how can u claim that OM belongs to sanskrit? Ist it not cheap to steal and loot from the original sacred language Thamizh into sanskrit? When sanskrit doesn't even have the letter O! I don't know how people blindly follow these things without doing proper research.

@@thanu-go1ts This channel has a video about Om vs Aum. Maybe that can answer your question.

Yes. Logic gates.

Wov! I wish they make it compulsory in all schools in India Praful Lakhani

@@prafullakhani3549 no need

Should I laugh?😭

it will be you shdr@@rajarajan6205

It's not the letters of Sanskrit, sir. These were the letters of Brahmi script. From Brahmi script, Devnagri or Nagari script was devised around 1000-1200 years ago, after the 8th century AD. The whole of Sanskrit books set is found only in Devnagari script. So it is highly doubtful and historically wrong statement to claim that Sanskrit books are very old !! Some more facts are needed to make that claim, but it can be thought of being present in primitive form during the Guptas period, ie. around 500 AD. In fact, the Ri, (ऋ) letter used to name Rigveda, Richa or Rishi is only 1200 years old. Then how it is possible that the Rigved was written in 1500 BC ?? Is there any proof ?? Do you know that the oldest specimen traced for Rigved is from 1464 AD !!! Does anyone have historical proofs of Vedas and other Sanskrit texts being written in the period prior to invention of Devnagari letters ?? Which script did Rishi Vedvyas used to pen down the Rigveda ??

@@B-Raja thanks for the information. I agree there is no written proof yet of the antiquity if Vedas. I am not going that way at all if you rightly read my statement. I am only opining about the scientific arrangement of Devanagari script. So you can call Hindi also. Understand the question first'

@@B-Raja Let me tell you bro, the Sanskrit we use today is modern sanskrit which was made by Sage Panini, he is also sometimes called grandfather of linguistics. He was born somewhat around 7th century BC. It is well documented, I am not gonna spoonfeed you, you can research it yourself. Also the about the Rigveda, even if Rigveda was written by any sage, then it would have been destroyed till now because how old it is. And we do not say Rigveda was written in, we say Rigveda was composed in! Both have different meaning. It is generally said that initially, Rigveda knowledge was transfered orally to one another. Also, for your question that what's the evidence that Rigveda is old, is the use of river named Saraswati. It is used heavily in Rigveda, and it is said as mother of all river or angered river which creates floods and what not! Now until now, Saraswati river was claimed Mythical river, cause it is not present now, but a river bead is found in the Sapt Sindhu region, and you know what's shocking? Yamuna was one of its tributaries, which later of deflected due to tectonic disturbance, and became tributary of River Ganga. Now, it is claimed that this river was at its peak in 7000 BC and dried in around 6500 BC. How can sage who composed Rigveda knew that there was some river in the past which was very large?? So, you got the answer to your question bro?

@@ashish.nagpal One can say that Sanskrit is 10000 or 20000 years old, who is objecting ?? The point is what are the evidences to prove that ?? Sanskrit itself is not a noun and it's an adjective word, that means refined of cultured. There is no historical evidence of Sanskrit before 2nd century AD, and the specimen found of that time is also dubious to be called as Sanskrit. Sanskrit was formed from Pali and Prakrit languages of India in Buddhist universities of ancient India, but it's not older than the Gupta period. The Buddhist literature is older than the Rigveda, and other Hindu Sanskrit holy books. The Hindu Sanskrit text is only 1000-1200 years old because the devnagri script is not older than that. No Sanskrit literature is found in a script that was in vogue prior to invention of Devnagri. The talk of river Saraswati is a bullshit, nothing else. The Rig-Veda itself is a metered text, and metres in literature are not more than 1300 years older.

@@B-Raja if you just wanna claim, and discard others claims as saying them bullshit, then I can't do anything. If you wanna do this only, then play this yourself, I am not free here to see one person just bragging about his claim to make a certain conclusion that you already jumped into. If you reply to this, if it would me meaningful, then only I'll reply, otherwise you can think you are ignored ;)

Yes please

kzfaq.info/love/J2TFVdsEqQaQQs78OS7qPA

@@ravi-gx2qc2qz4r fools

@@user-fq2xg8dg3e What fools?? Who is fool?? Go to link and see.

You can learn with the Google app search it and also you can learn mantras that come with translation or look for youtuve videos of mantras with lyrics !

truly mine too

Sanskrit become famous not because of the language but because of this bird !!! kzfaq.info/get/bejne/o7lyapSbs9eRqYU.htmlstart=60&end=147 Sanskrit has developed words from other languages to make itself better. Sanskrit is an oral language it does not have an attested native script: from around the turn of the 1st-millennium CE, it has been written in various Brahmic scripts, and in the modern era most commonly in Devanagari. The Hathibada Ghosundi Inscriptions the oldest known Sanskrit inscriptions in the Brahmi script, and dated to the 100 BC(2100 years old). en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hathibada_Ghosundi_Inscriptions Tamil Language : In 2019, excavations at the "Keezhadi" unearthed potsherds with graffiti, which were claimed to date back to 580 BC(2600 years old). The graffiti bore numerous similarities to known Harappan symbols and so could be a transitional script between Indus Valley script and the Tamil Brahmi script used during the Sangam Period. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keezhadi en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tamil_inscriptions en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tamil-Brahmi

@@satheeshbabu7724 Incorrect. Vedic Sanskrit is first attested around 1400 BCE, this is confirmed by contemporaneous Mittani Aryan. The earliest Tamil literature is from only 300 BCE. On the other hand, Hittite is attested as early as 1700 BCE, and Mycenaean Greek as early as Vedic Sanskrit. Tamil doesn't even begin to compare in terms of the date of earliest attestation. BTW, do you know The oldest grammar form of Tamil itself has Sanskrit Name and first chairman of Sangam, Agastya too has a Sanskrit name? Even if I take this argument that 90% of Sanskrit words have Tamil origin then will you pl enlighten how despite being non Indian Sanskrit did had such origin for max words. Where the Tamils of those days sending packets of words to Europe with Pegion?

@@naiyayika Mittani languages was not sanskrit. Trow your sanskrit puranas in the trash. Agathiyar was a proud tamil siddhar, he has nothing to do with the sanskrit and it was not present during his time, he never wrote a single line in sanskrit. Agathiyar was born as tamil and lived as tamil but later brahmin incorporated him into their mythology.

@@naiyayika Get to know Sanskrit speakers before knowing about Sanskrit. The Roma gypsies europe's largest indo-aryan ethnic minority group successfully migrated from northwest india 1500 years ago. Roma gypsy speaks indo-aryan language "Romani" a descended from sanskrit and also similar to the marwari and lambadi languages spoken in north parts of india. Roma is a mixed race of north indian and european. The Native sanskrit speakers brahmins are just as nomadic in the past as the modern roma gypsies and both are european mixed race white skinned native indian descendants. As bramins were nomads and therefore the influence of the other dialect on sanskrit. Sanskrit is a mixture of many dialect and it has developed words from other language and dialect to make itself better. The Narikkuravars nomads have been migrating from the state of maharashtra to tamil nadu through western ghats forests for hundreds of years, their dialect has a few marathi, kannada, tamil and other language words so the language of the nomads may not be the best or mother off tamil language.

no, today's modern english language is not same as it was 200 years ago.

Your a demon my g u need to get slapped

This is only due to the fact that Sanksrit is a liturgical language and happens to have a writing system well suited to its phonology. If Sanksrit were still widely spoken today, it would undergo pronunciation changes that would decrease the accuracy of Devanagari at conveying the sounds of this changed version of spoken sanskrit.

The Sanskrit alphabet is also effective as a therapy for countless issues in human life.

Yes brother.. sanskrit is very sutable language for computer.

Sanskrit is so perfect and god’s language, then why is it dead? RIP Sanskrit.

I'm open to positive vibes Love peace light and strengthfrom Holland brother!

Obviously, this Swamiji has heavy, very heavy Indian samskar!

I think this should not be said with pride . Hence its downfall.

If it is then it should have been alive now but is it dead

@@priyakulkarni9583 it's still alive. Official language of India and spoken by 40,000+ across the world.

@@naiyayika, Iyer, take it easy my friend. 40,000 out of 7billion world 🌎 population is : 0.000004% Take it easy. Sanskrit language accept its limitations and let it go. That way you are respecting it without exaggeration

@@priyakulkarni9583 - Some say it never lived for it to die! It created like coded language to steal other peoples languages culture wealth etc! And the Aryans woman and none Aryans were not allowed to learn it, because for example the Veda contains some filth in it...

Mother of North Indian languages

@@tubbie456 correct

@@tubbie456 + European languages + Central asian languages + Russian languages + south asian languages