Scary Techniques US Aircraft Carrier Uses To Defend Itself When Under Attack

  Рет қаралды 524,239

Fluctus

Fluctus

Жыл бұрын

Welcome back to the Fluctus Channel for a feature about how military maritime aircraft carriers handle attacks from missiles, torpedos, small boats, and more on the seven seas.
Fluctus is a website and KZfaq channel dedicated to sea geeks. Whenever you are curious or an incorrigible lover of this mysterious world, our videos are made for you !
We publish 3 videos a week on our KZfaq channel and many more articles on our website.
Feel free to subscribe to not miss any of our updates and visit our website to discover additional content.
Don’t forget to follow us on twitter:
/ fluctusofficial
Please keep the comments section respectful. Any spam, insults or troll will be deleted.
To contact us, make sure to use our email in the about section of this channel.

Пікірлер: 165
@Judgeabove501
@Judgeabove501 Жыл бұрын
Our Lord is our greatest defender and protector but we have to do our part .
@randypiedmonte7381
@randypiedmonte7381 3 ай бұрын
Amen!
@akseakayaker
@akseakayaker Жыл бұрын
The real defense of an aircraft carrier is not the weapons onboard the carrier itself but rather the escort vessels that always accompany the carrier when underway and this often includes submerged fast attack submarines
@robandcheryls
@robandcheryls Жыл бұрын
A dozen CO’s with some brains, really helps 😉. 🇨🇦 Veteran
@chriswong9158
@chriswong9158 Жыл бұрын
Old tech from WWII, Korean & Vietnam time. Proof: Falkland Islands War of 1982, today we have space GPS missiles
@akseakayaker
@akseakayaker Жыл бұрын
@@chriswong9158 there are no spaced based missiles. The US Navy has over the horizon weapons systems. These surface to air/surface/sub surface weapons fired from modern warships are much more advanced then the French weapons Argentina used against the British in 1982. The Aircraft Carrier travels with its escort vessels because these vessels are equipped with these weapons and are prepared to engage any regional threat against the carrier. It would be most difficult to even get a shot at a Carrier and if you tried you surly would not survive more then a few minutes. I served in the US Navy and I would never want to pick a fight with any of our warships because you will get your ass kicked royal.
@giorgiomarchesini7812
@giorgiomarchesini7812 Жыл бұрын
🎉
@franciscalingasan6035
@franciscalingasan6035 Жыл бұрын
Aircraft carrier is the symbol of the power of a nation and the united states of america is the nation that was symbolize the word of power
@chriswong9158
@chriswong9158 Жыл бұрын
Like the history of Japanese battleship Yamato during WWII. Yamato was symbol of Japan and no more in the end. Aircraft Carrier purpose ended from Falkland Islands War of 1982. British Aircraft Carrier had to run away.
@dethray1000
@dethray1000 Жыл бұрын
one nuke in the area and these ships are floating ash--russia considers all boats,things that fly,roll nothing more than targets---russia with 100k high end missiles,20,000 tact nukes are going to get the chance to prove it...
@TSUTENKAKU007
@TSUTENKAKU007 Жыл бұрын
When you start speaking of nuclear conflict, it will be devastating to all floating vessels.
@RobertRAbell
@RobertRAbell Жыл бұрын
Way to prep that War Machine and War Birds 🦅. God’s speed Lady’s and Gentlemen. Move out the way we have a Country to Save. Giddy up little Doggie way to drive that Mule. All day long Yahoo 😅
@user-zu4vx5cx8c
@user-zu4vx5cx8c Жыл бұрын
GREAT AMERICA
@omarionbayley9721
@omarionbayley9721 Жыл бұрын
These defence tactics was insane tbh because to know that thing is like a floating island, and all of those little tricks up there sleeves was nice to see.
@chriswong9158
@chriswong9158 Жыл бұрын
Falkland Islands War of 1982 was proof end of the carrier fleets. Today, China & Russia have better toys.
@stanmans
@stanmans Жыл бұрын
What are you trying to say? I suggest you reRead your comments before posting so they make sense
@Evil.Totoro
@Evil.Totoro Жыл бұрын
I don’t think any aircraft carrier needs to worry about pirates….
@LUVUTV
@LUVUTV Жыл бұрын
so terrible. it's great to watch videos like this. thanks camara
@KRK5133
@KRK5133 4 ай бұрын
Things have definitely changed alot from my time. As part of the original ...first crew of USS Nimitz we totally relied upon the escort ships and our aircraft for carrier defenses.
@motocaza8963
@motocaza8963 Жыл бұрын
Great video, I learned a lot, thanks !
@chriswong9158
@chriswong9158 Жыл бұрын
So did Russia, Iran, etc...
@usbc3121
@usbc3121 11 ай бұрын
今から準備してもらって嬉しいね。必ずこれが役に立つ時が来る。準備することが重要なんだ。
@ioanbota9397
@ioanbota9397 Жыл бұрын
I like this powerful aircraft
@joemoore4027
@joemoore4027 Жыл бұрын
I was on the carrier USS Constellation in the 1970's and went through two RIMPAC's and they were both impressive in a show of firepower by the worlds navies and airforces in the pacific. Back then it was possible to breach the defenses put up by an aircraft carrier. We were attacked by one JSDF F-4 Phantom ( Japanese Air Force ) and were considered "sunk" during one exercise. As you have shown in your video it's a lot different now, thank god.
@chriswong9158
@chriswong9158 Жыл бұрын
Surface ship crews of today "just don't look up" for today USA, Britain, France, China, Russia has build the solution to the carriers without a single pilot.
@smaho27
@smaho27 Жыл бұрын
@@chriswong9158 good luck with that. If China had a real solution they wouldn’t be racing to field 6+.
@virginccyy7645
@virginccyy7645 Жыл бұрын
​@@chriswong9158 the solution of destroying one out at sea is incredibly hard, especially if you have 240 plus anti missile weapons and 60 aircraft patrolling! I doubt China could penetrate this of its 900 km from land.
@leilaniecui6935
@leilaniecui6935 Жыл бұрын
​@@smaho27 1 see Dr
@oscopin74
@oscopin74 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for your service, Sir.
@mitchgingras3899
@mitchgingras3899 Ай бұрын
Nothing will save it from a Poseidon in the middle of it's strike-group.
@chrisnadres494
@chrisnadres494 Жыл бұрын
Watching from Brampton, Ontario, Canada ❤😮😮😮❤
@user-kb3hp2qu8k
@user-kb3hp2qu8k Жыл бұрын
Thanks.
@mhdchannelguys7566
@mhdchannelguys7566 Жыл бұрын
Jos mantap guys👍💪
@psallen5099
@psallen5099 Жыл бұрын
Great video
@TheAmbientUniverse
@TheAmbientUniverse Жыл бұрын
"The P Trap System" here in civilian life we call that a catheter.
@MaryMary-sh5ge
@MaryMary-sh5ge Жыл бұрын
Incredibile!
@bang-bang8782
@bang-bang8782 Жыл бұрын
Thes is real defence beautiful
@chriswong9158
@chriswong9158 Жыл бұрын
One had said: "Those who forget history are condemned to repeat it", Argentina & the United Kingdom did not forget 1982. Today, China is like BASF, may not had build it, but has build a better solution. The night of 11-12 November 1940, Battle of Taranto was the end of Battleship and other surface war ship. Today USA, Britain, France, China, Russia has build the solution to the carriers.
@samshepperrd
@samshepperrd Жыл бұрын
Like pirates in a skiff are going to try and harass any Navy ship Best anti pirate measure - 50 caliber BMG.
@JohnGPagani
@JohnGPagani Жыл бұрын
Best weapon system for pirates would be a CCLAWS. Close Combat Laser Assault Weapon Systems. CCLAWS are designed to blind personal. However, international treaties ban CCLAWS. CCLAWS can also be used to blind pilots AND other equipment operators, such as tank and truck drivers.
@bullballsallday
@bullballsallday Жыл бұрын
Turn them into shark food with firepower. Phuck using hoses. Send a clear message.
@winzaw1860
@winzaw1860 Жыл бұрын
Can this carrier float against Mocha storm?
@postergmail6202
@postergmail6202 Жыл бұрын
Empty shells scatter at their boot clad feet. Now that’s some reporting. This sounds like it was made for an elementary school class.
@billotto602
@billotto602 Жыл бұрын
That's what I was thinking 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@joblo341
@joblo341 Жыл бұрын
I'm sorry, squirt guns are NOT the appropriate response to pirates who hold ships for millions of dollars. The solution is 50 cals's, topedoes and ManPads.
@VAMobMember
@VAMobMember Жыл бұрын
ASSUME that the USA has or develops an air to air missile for use against hypersonic missiles How good would the following aircraft be as a launch platform? F-35 F/A-18 F-14 (I know not currently in service).
@nswanberg
@nswanberg Жыл бұрын
You don't have to sink a carrier. All you have to do is disable the flight deck.
@eq1373
@eq1373 Жыл бұрын
Which would be the equivalent of hitting a bumblebee in a canyon. You have to find it first.
@chriswong9158
@chriswong9158 Жыл бұрын
No Good, for not only is the carrier for air craft but more a floating military base island. Carrier still a weapon as support of other water crafts, communication, supplies, etc... Japan lost of the four carriers in The Battle of Midway changes Admirals Isoroku Yamamoto plan to a defense's battle for Japan. Refer: Falkland Islands War of 1982
@chriswong9158
@chriswong9158 Жыл бұрын
@@eq1373 You mean aircraft I hope, for a US Carrier even now they are track by GPS by fold, can be target in 10min
@stevea2909
@stevea2909 Жыл бұрын
Gee wiz it's Sea-wiz!
@billotto602
@billotto602 Жыл бұрын
.50 cal belt fed weapons work best for dealing with pirates ! And if you're squeamish, just shoot the boats & let em swim home. Sharks gotta eat too ya know ! 😋 😊😊😊
@powerbadpowerbad
@powerbadpowerbad Жыл бұрын
Yeah,sharks love gotta eat too,they love fresh,pirate meat !!! LOL. Especially arms and legs. Shiver-me-TIMBERS !!!! LOL.
@ronaldmarcks1842
@ronaldmarcks1842 Жыл бұрын
The best defense a carrier has is distance from the threat. The Chinese Dong Feng missile makes life a little too interesting. Hope there's an antidote.
@chriswong9158
@chriswong9158 Жыл бұрын
China has missiles system attacking Guam, Carrier fleets will need to seat 467 km east of Guam on first strike.
@willwozniak2826
@willwozniak2826 Жыл бұрын
Lots of questions on these topics....we wont know really til it kicks off......we dont know if the weapons, the interceptors and the DFs will work as stated...the Americans are on a crunch trying to catch up...Russias Kinzhal missile failed...The Americans ARRW didnt want to fly and China seems to have a nice supply if they work as needed....first carrier they would go for would Be CVN 78.
@ronaldoromero5527
@ronaldoromero5527 Жыл бұрын
Indudablemente debe haberlo.
@amnesiai
@amnesiai Жыл бұрын
when we gonna get some orbital strikes?
@reptilexcq2
@reptilexcq2 7 ай бұрын
How is that a scary technique when nobody never attack them lol. It's never battle tested.
@user-ep3jh2yr4f
@user-ep3jh2yr4f Жыл бұрын
có gì đáng sợ đâu mấy quả GS28 là mất tăm.
@stanmans
@stanmans Жыл бұрын
The equipment is only as good as the crews assigned and trained to use them. One question that needs to be asked is how the crew will act and react to real combat and not make believe? Most of the crew will act as trained and some will panic.
@thurston905
@thurston905 Жыл бұрын
How will the carriers defend against a swarm of hypersonic missiles and kamikaze drones launched from mainland China & islands at the SCS?
@rogerwilco5918
@rogerwilco5918 Жыл бұрын
How will they get close enough, or even know where it's at? You knew you need to guide a hypersonic missile, or anything for that matter, right? If you can't get close enough to track it, you can't sink it, right? And you think Chinese hypersonic is better than Russian junk?
@louisbabycos106
@louisbabycos106 Жыл бұрын
There are strategies and tactics a carrier can use . For the most part without getting into the details they fall into asset protection and extending the range of the aircraft . However what we need is something with the range of an F14 tomcat and the radar crossection of an F35 . Sadly we don't have that but I can guarantee you we won't be sending the carriers into harms way blindly . We will use long range missile strikes of our own and when necessary sending in aircraft that will have their range radically extended through external means . Still it would be best to have aircraft that combine the range of a TomCat F14 and a radar crossection of an F35 lightening in one aircraft.
@rogerwilco5918
@rogerwilco5918 Жыл бұрын
@@louisbabycos106 look up the Navy's "FA-XX" 6th generation fighter
@louisbabycos106
@louisbabycos106 Жыл бұрын
@@rogerwilco5918 The problem is we needed that fighter a decade ago . Right now we don't have a proper fleet defense fighter and we need a proper fleet defense fighter now . We have ways of extending our F35s which are commonly known but have been in use since the Vietnam war but large subsonic logistic support aircraft are extremely vulnerable .
@rogerwilco5918
@rogerwilco5918 Жыл бұрын
@Louis Babycos don't know if I agree with a decade considering we haven’t been attacked, but it's coming.
@patkcorcoran
@patkcorcoran Жыл бұрын
Sadly, one missile can sink this carrier.
@RealMTBAddict
@RealMTBAddict Жыл бұрын
Hmm wonder why nobody has tried it since WW2.
@joemoore4027
@joemoore4027 Жыл бұрын
It's got to make it there first and be nuclear.
@nedkelly9688
@nedkelly9688 Жыл бұрын
Sadly you and most have no clue to US navy ships defences. hitting one with a missile is actually a lot harder then you think as it has a defence system that has been proved in 2016 when a missile attack was defended against on 3 US war ships. America didn't even invent it and is on over 150 US Navy ships and Australian and Canadian also.
@chriswong9158
@chriswong9158 Жыл бұрын
@@RealMTBAddict Almost did, Falkland Islands War of 1982, British aircraft carrier turn and ran away during battle. Third rated aircraft of Argentina taken down many British ship during that war and that was 1982. Today China's DF-21D is said to have a range of 1,500 km and the DF-26 a range of 4,000 km was design for any and all surface craft. You ask why, well because no one want to go down like the HMS Hood.
@chriswong9158
@chriswong9158 Жыл бұрын
Would be sunk site like the HMS Hood
@randypiedmonte7381
@randypiedmonte7381 3 ай бұрын
How would they defend if an enemy launched 250 cheap drones at it at once and completely overwhelmed its defenses. It wouldnt cost much. Any ideas? Just curious
@JaiBajRangiWildlifeRescueTeam
@JaiBajRangiWildlifeRescueTeam Жыл бұрын
Hatts off navy army❤🙏🙏😍
@jarmstrong8540
@jarmstrong8540 Жыл бұрын
Specifically, how is the carrier defended against a torpedo?
@kevinjohnson1139
@kevinjohnson1139 Жыл бұрын
By sinking the ships and submarines that launch them _before_ they launch them.
@chriswong9158
@chriswong9158 Жыл бұрын
The answer is from Falkland Islands War of 1982. Today Argentina would attack British fleet by land aka Missiles follow up by man "sub hunter aircraft" for the British submarines. Even then, Argentina third rate fighter aircraft turn the British aircraft carrier around before battle ended. There is youtube of the Falkland Islands War of 1982. Military action must see for all Chinese military generals. Why Argentina lost and Britain won? Because Britain want Falkland Islands back! US Arm Forces should remember that about the Taiwan island.
@chriswong9158
@chriswong9158 Жыл бұрын
@@kevinjohnson1139 Old school. Missiles targeting system is the new thing, remember Iran Air Flight 655 from Tehran to Dubai via Bandar Abbas that was shot down on 3 July 1988 by two SM-2MR surface-to-air missiles fired by the USS Vincennes. Launch first "before" unarm civilian vessel see it coming. Each year Iranian are reminded.
@Chu3505
@Chu3505 Жыл бұрын
Now those Super HyperSonic missiles can destroying or sinking an Aircraft Carrier
@comment8767
@comment8767 Жыл бұрын
Sum ting 2 tink about.
@Prowlerook
@Prowlerook Жыл бұрын
u wong chu
@FerrelFrequency
@FerrelFrequency 6 ай бұрын
Keep watching these, pal. 😌
@juracydiassantos3193
@juracydiassantos3193 Жыл бұрын
A verdade é que esse monte de chapa de ferro só assusta países tipo o Brasil agora diante da Rússia e china vira um monte de papel ultrapassado.😂😂
@andrevandiggelen-bg5fz
@andrevandiggelen-bg5fz Жыл бұрын
You would think with so much emphasis on Aircraft carriers that they and Destroyers and other surface combatants would be bristling with as much air attack weapons especially in the Chinese plan to openly overwhelm fleets with missile and swarming drones ?
@chriswong9158
@chriswong9158 Жыл бұрын
China only have a "Defense" military, their ship are not even "Blue Water". Not like Queen Victoria English ship vs Spain head to head, but will wait for US first sea vessel attack in reply China's swarm missiles & drones follow up by man aircraft to finish off what remain floating between island of Taiwan and island of Guam. If any launch detected from Guam, nukes will reply on Guam 15mins later. For the Sub., they had already been detected by their Nuclear signior.
@ListenNoTalk
@ListenNoTalk Жыл бұрын
These are just some valid concerns that drives many people to wonder if there is law governing US,UK,Nato wrongdoings: 1.what International law gives US the right to invade Iraq 2.what International law gives US the right to bomb Nordstream Pipes without any threat or provocation towards US (it is an Infrastructure that millions depends on) 3. What International law gives US the right to more than 860 military bases called Warmongering Forces globally, despite having UN Peacekeeping Forces. 4. What International law gives US the right to wage war with any country it wants to enjoy its power of destruction. 5. What International law ensures that UN votes are fair and just, for the peace of the world it is so designed for and NOT just taking sides like the Nordstream voting 6. What International law gives US the right to attack China's Sovereignty since Taiwan is under China rule from 1945. 7. What International law gives Taiwan the right to break away from China as it is under China Rule since 1945. It is the US law of fear and aggression 8. What International law gives Philippines the right to stage foreign US military bases and activities to threaten the peace of its neighbors and SCS. It is the US law of fear and aggression. 9. What International law exempt US presidents from war crimes committed as opposed to Putin to be arrested by ICC If at all China is wrong because it violates International law in SCS so designed for US benefits, then the “9-dash line” needs to be reviewed and re-inacted only by the countries involved under the supervision of UN(excluding US), provided it acts justly and impartially for the good of the world
@greenranger9428
@greenranger9428 7 ай бұрын
Biden:. We need to have all aircraft carriers to run on batteries. And fighter jets
@shamabdullah6891
@shamabdullah6891 Жыл бұрын
👍🇲🇾
@snowvipereverett3559
@snowvipereverett3559 Жыл бұрын
I say use lethal force on all pirate vessels. They will stop.
@Ronolein
@Ronolein Жыл бұрын
Mein Beileid den Trägerbesatzungen!
@arthurrogers2289
@arthurrogers2289 11 ай бұрын
Why tell, make u feel big
@cmillerg6306
@cmillerg6306 Жыл бұрын
What the hell is going to be done about the huge price gouging by single-source military vendors? It was negotiated to have vendors get a nice 15% profit. In reality, they are hauling 40% profit margins. This is killing our military readiness, which, in turn, puts our warfighters in greater danger.
@zahra_ir
@zahra_ir Жыл бұрын
خلیج پارس
@ryanfox6719
@ryanfox6719 Жыл бұрын
2013
@fiftycal1
@fiftycal1 Жыл бұрын
The USN focuses on Power Projection. Therefore we must neutralize threats to our ships. The Russians are geared towards Sea Control aka AAAD (Anti-Access Area Denial.) They have developed an impressive array of extremely deadly ASCMs. The Phalanx is being supplanted by The RAM - which has a further keep out range. Another major improvement is The Evolved Sea Sparrow Missile (ESSM.) Replacing earlier versions - the newer Sea Sparrow is able to intercept incoming missiles and aircraft at over 30 miles.
@chriswong9158
@chriswong9158 Жыл бұрын
It is also call "EEZ" 200 miles zone.
@dethray1000
@dethray1000 Жыл бұрын
no defense against hyper missile,none,zero--these boats are stupid
@arvind8302
@arvind8302 Жыл бұрын
Bay of Bengal and the Arabian Sea are adjacent to each other…. Implying that the aircraft boat for some reason loves the Indian peninsula?
@khirankumar4712
@khirankumar4712 Жыл бұрын
And they are controlled by indian navy
@chriswong9158
@chriswong9158 Жыл бұрын
It's the fruit, don't you know....
@jerryburnett5469
@jerryburnett5469 6 ай бұрын
There is no defense.... for an aircraft carrier...... against a Kinzshal Hypersonic missile
@zahra_ir
@zahra_ir Жыл бұрын
Persian gulf
@comment8767
@comment8767 Жыл бұрын
What is Persia?
@mkngani4718
@mkngani4718 Жыл бұрын
தமிழகத்தில் இருந்து வந்த பிரச்சனைகள் தீரும் வரை KL.. MKS தமிழ் மக்கள் மத்தியில். தமிழ் நாட்டில் இருக்கும் போது தான் KL கருணாநிதி வந்தே யில் இருந்து. 1923. கருணாநிதி வந்தே யில் நடந்த ஒரு நாள் கூட கருணாநிதி KL. தமிழகத்தில் உள்ள அனைத்து வணக்கம். NINAL.KL.
@KavehPedroud-fs8gp
@KavehPedroud-fs8gp Жыл бұрын
It is Persian golf not Arabian
@comment8767
@comment8767 Жыл бұрын
Is it a 9 hole course, or 18?
@_Informante
@_Informante Жыл бұрын
24 chinese missiles.
@EcEryda
@EcEryda Жыл бұрын
This comment translates to "24 Chinese Mussels" & I believe it!
@RealMTBAddict
@RealMTBAddict Жыл бұрын
You don't think we can track missiles? Lol China is a paper tiger.
@Justacogg
@Justacogg Жыл бұрын
Should the Navy of the United States be test with guarding container ships coming from China to the US? Isn’t China fully capable of guarding their own goods and having those goods navigate all the way to the US why would the United States waste resources oil tankers? I can understand Reebok sneakers I can’t…. Unless, of course I misunderstood..
@dethray1000
@dethray1000 Жыл бұрын
one nuke in the area and these ships are floating ash--russia considers all boats,things that fly,roll nothing more than targets---russia with 100k high end missiles,20,000 tact nukes are going to get the chance to prove it...
@roberthenry-leo2513
@roberthenry-leo2513 11 ай бұрын
Speak in french please
@tatuongchien7213
@tatuongchien7213 Жыл бұрын
Siêu cuồng bat đau nhan trim quan xâm lược
@jamesheath1025
@jamesheath1025 6 ай бұрын
I was 11 years navy. A rouge country would be foolish to go against US Navy on high seas. Not real smart at all.
@MusMus-bp5zn
@MusMus-bp5zn Жыл бұрын
This is no original no date time day youtube
@RealMTBAddict
@RealMTBAddict Жыл бұрын
Nobody would be stupid enough to attack a US carrier.
@JohnGPagani
@JohnGPagani Жыл бұрын
An aircraft carrier is a doable target for submarines, surface to air to surface missiles, AND air to surfce missiles. ALSO, consider sabotage by onboard Naval personnel.
@RealMTBAddict
@RealMTBAddict Жыл бұрын
@@JohnGPagani Do it then lol
@dethray1000
@dethray1000 Жыл бұрын
one nuke in the area and these ships are floating ash--russia considers all boats,things that fly,roll nothing more than targets---russia with 100k high end missiles,20,000 tact nukes are going to get the chance to prove it...
@ohyes490
@ohyes490 Жыл бұрын
항모도 이제는 낡은 무기. 벌떼드론 (동시 1-2천개의 드론)은 감당할 수 없음. 호르무즈 해협으로 못가는 이유
@billwhite1603
@billwhite1603 Жыл бұрын
Is that old as shit footage you are using or is the Navy still not using 5th gen aircraft in favor of 4th gen future aerial targets for our adversaries?
@philchurch1115
@philchurch1115 Жыл бұрын
I was in the Navy 1982 to 1988 AZ2 VS-41 and VS-33 west pac on the USS Ranger CV-61 Jul 83 to Feb 84 and the USS Kitty Hawk CV-63 1985 cruise and with all of the escort ships all around the aircraft carrier she is safe ..
@dethray1000
@dethray1000 Жыл бұрын
one nuke in the area and these ships are floating ash--russia considers all boats,things that fly,roll nothing more than targets---russia with 100k high end missiles,20,000 tact nukes are going to get the chance to prove it...
@chriswong9158
@chriswong9158 Жыл бұрын
And yet, during your service (Thank you for your service) US Carrier fleet was never tested, like the British. Remember Falkland Islands War of 1982. Argentina tested and made the British Carrier to turn and run... before end of battle. Today, if US Carrier fleet try to defend Taiwan island, China can take on the US Fleet without launching any ship. They have the DF-21D is said to have a range of 1,500 km and the DF-26 a range of 4,000 km, follow up 10 min later with fighter jets carrying the XASM-3 weighs 900kg and measures 5.52m in length, equipped with an active/passive radar seeker and a GPS system missiles to finish off remaining floating object and support of the Y-8Q aircraft tracks underwater submarines and is fitted with infrared detection system and laser devices. It reportedly has anti-submarine grenades and torpedoes for blue water target. Remember Midway 1942, Japanese Navy said the same and lost four carriers and some 230 plus pilot before then turn back running. Battlefield is changing each season. Today all surface ship will go down like the HMS Hood.
@Prowlerook
@Prowlerook Жыл бұрын
@@chriswong9158 u wong about dat super man
@user-fu9rb1xf8y
@user-fu9rb1xf8y Жыл бұрын
The pronunciation is too fast and worst. I could not listen to. Please keep in mind the international viewers always.
@greedyambitons4320
@greedyambitons4320 5 ай бұрын
An aircraft carrior is stupid now days. Why not male a autonomous ship that can shoot nothing but drones and rockets.
@LordOfLight
@LordOfLight Жыл бұрын
All meaningless. There is only one true test of a defence and that's actual warfare. In the event of a war with a worthy adversary those carriers will go to the bottom within weeks. They're basically big slow-moving targets - and before you tell me they travel at 36 knots, remind yourself how fast a torpedo goes. "No plan survives first contact with the enemy" ~Moltke
@eq1373
@eq1373 Жыл бұрын
You have to find it first
@chriswong9158
@chriswong9158 Жыл бұрын
@@eq1373 New invention: Satellite image system. Don't look up, for they see you. Can you imaging a "fleets" of war ship. Also proof: US are able to monitor oil tanker in & out of the Black Sea right now.
@chriswong9158
@chriswong9158 Жыл бұрын
Super HyperSonic missile with Satellite GPS million $$$ targeting system to take down a Billion $$$ floating island.
@greedyambitons4320
@greedyambitons4320 5 ай бұрын
In aircraft carrier is stupid
@Z24BL2
@Z24BL2 Жыл бұрын
As usual, the obeses make a show with flows of propaganda, forgetting that USA never won a war without a nuke bomb. Furthermore: now THEY DON'T WANT TO FIGHT OUTSIDE, they want to fight INSIDE.
@diesel-td1946
@diesel-td1946 Жыл бұрын
Il problema più grosso sono i sottomarini.
@spartan-ls3zz
@spartan-ls3zz Жыл бұрын
nothing gets close enough too attack the carrier they have destroyers ,at least 3 attack subs around them plus the fighters no thing gets in range
@nedkelly9688
@nedkelly9688 Жыл бұрын
weird Australian Collins sub got close enough to Ronald Regan in Rimpac 2000 to claim a sinking . Norway sub also sunk the Regan. Australia collins class subs have sunk 4 Virginia class subs and around 5 USA surface vessels also in war games.
@dethray1000
@dethray1000 Жыл бұрын
one nuke in the area and these ships are floating ash--russia considers all boats,things that fly,roll nothing more than targets---russia with 100k high end missiles,20,000 tact nukes are going to get the chance to prove it...
@philipbaca5675
@philipbaca5675 Жыл бұрын
Wow we waste money like Satan wastes souls
How did the Enigma Machine work?
19:26
Jared Owen
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН
Testing the Aggressive Design of the US F-22 to its Extreme Limit
20:07
WHY IS A CAR MORE EXPENSIVE THAN A GIRL?
00:37
Levsob
Рет қаралды 21 МЛН
UFC 302 : Махачев VS Порье
02:54
Setanta Sports UFC
Рет қаралды 1,4 МЛН
IS THIS REAL FOOD OR NOT?🤔 PIKACHU AND SONIC CONFUSE THE CAT! 😺🍫
00:41
How does a Tank work? (M1A2 Abrams)
9:49
Jared Owen
Рет қаралды 53 МЛН
I Visited The Most Overpowered US Navy Warship
16:34
Not What You Think
Рет қаралды 661 М.
B52 Bomber Boeing Plane | How it Works US Airforce Bomber
15:10
The Real Reason Why US Navy Has 11 Aircraft Carriers
10:33
Not What You Think
Рет қаралды 1,9 МЛН
How Many SUBMARINES Does Each Country Have?
22:55
NAVY Productions
Рет қаралды 459 М.
How Would the United States Fight a Nuclear War?
51:42
Modern Muscle
Рет қаралды 3,2 МЛН
High-Power LASER On US Aircraft Carrier SHOCKED The World! FULL Alert!
12:46
3 Nights Onboard US Navy's Largest Stealth Ship
19:52
Not What You Think
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН
WHY IS A CAR MORE EXPENSIVE THAN A GIRL?
00:37
Levsob
Рет қаралды 21 МЛН