Moin, ist die Zufahrt einfacher als bei der Sesselbahn, da mußt man ja top gewachste Ski haben mit voller Geschwindigkeit anfahren
@ixiseilbahnvideos4 жыл бұрын
Hallo, die neue Talstation ist ca. 30 - 40m weiter unten, dass heißt man kommt ohne Schieben zur neuen Station.
@julianhudson78114 жыл бұрын
This replaced a high speed triple iirc.
@CBF13 жыл бұрын
which they are going to regret doing. The old one was a first-generation Doppelmayr CLD. Those are the best Doppelmayr's. Not the demonic D-Line. It's the final killswitch to all old lifts
@notnow3917 Жыл бұрын
@@CBF1 Whats wrong with the D-line lfits?
@CBF1 Жыл бұрын
@@notnow3917 Not just Demon-Lines but all modern 21st-century ropeways except those from Loipolder Seilbahntechnik/LST because LST produced very few ropeways, only 4 detachables as far as I recall, with their first being a 2-MGD in Rudesheim am Rhein and their last being a completely custom-built 6-CLD in La Plagne, a system of which that was supposed to go into production but never did due to a Bartholet takeover. In the 21st century, all you have are 4 global ropeway manufacturers and none of their systems work differently at all. All modern ropeways are just the same stupid crap being repeated endlessly. Whereas before the end of the 1980's, you had Staedeli, Von Roll, Garaventa, Girak, Montaz Mautino, etc, and even before then you had Giovanola, Habegger, Mueller, Bell Maschinenfabrik, Waagner-Biro, Pohlig, Heckel, Bleichert, PHB/Pohlig-Heckel-Bleichert, Hasenclever, Weigmann, and other wonderful ropeway manufacturers, each of which were LOCAL to their own countries and all of their lifts worked differently. The old lifts have mechanical differences, simpler mechanical design, a much nicer intergration into the mountain because of their old-fashioned or alpine traditional chalet-style or retro-style appearance, they take up less environmental space due to their narrower gauge, and there's no unnecessary additional crap that modern lifts have. Modern lifts have a wider gauge and therefore require more deforestation(and are less environmentally appropriate), they are CRAMMED with LOTS of new technology that has NO raison d'exister, which does nothing more than over-complicate the modern lifts and set new laws and standards that only promote HATE and EXTREMISM against the old lifts, their capacities are getting far too big and will one day overload the ski slopes, which also forces the old lifts to be destroyed, they don't integrate properly into the landscape because they look so plastic and city-like, they are much harder to fix because of the additional crap that they have, the manufacturers of the modern ropeways(Doppelmayr, Leitner, Poma, Bartholet) lobby governmental agencies into imposing too-strict of laws which force the old lifts to be destroyed, they set unnecessary speed, capacity and comfort requirements(DON'T GET ME FUCKING STARTED ON THE COMFORT PART...), and they are nothing more than global, corporate, standardized, monopolistic pieces of complicate scrap with no mechanical differences or any alpine character or charm or tradition to them at all. Modern ropeways are global and totalitarian, old ropeways are local and innocent. The manufacturers also charge insane amounts of repair costs for the old lifts because they just simply want to force their "pRoGrEsS" on the mountains against the old lifts. These are at least the most memorable reasons why modern lifts are complete scrap. I'll let you know if I can remember more, and I did make an entire commentary against modern lifts. It is 1 hour and 30 minutes long just to let you know. It's on my channel called "CBF1's Ropeways". The channel is here: kzfaq.info/love/nwO_iguE2mEMovXQwBgGkw
@stanwalnoot12914 жыл бұрын
Wait has it 2 Doors?
@ixiseilbahnvideos4 жыл бұрын
Yes the cabin has two doors. Because there was no room for an exit on the right side at the middle station, so the doors were opened on the other side so that you can now get off to the left.
@stanwalnoot12914 жыл бұрын
ixiseilbahnvideos ah okay thank you
@Stahlseil4 жыл бұрын
Because the planner was called: Ing. Angus MacGyver ;-)
@flohausner78804 жыл бұрын
Aus welchen Grund sind die Stützenfundamente teilweiser"U"-förmig?
@lukespitzegg4 жыл бұрын
Das Gelände dürfte die Höhe erklären. Fürs Verschrauben scheint da unten nicht viel Platz zu sein. Dazu noch der Hubschrauber der alles Hochschafft. Das U dürfte Materialsparen sein. Is aber nur eine Vermutung.
@michellemair84534 жыл бұрын
@@lukespitzegg stimmt. Das gelände ist hier relativ instabiel und datum haben wir solche fundamente gebaut
@valentin68243 жыл бұрын
Das ist nur Lavienenschutz :-) bei der gigjochbahn in Sölden kommen auch solche stützen zum Einsatz und dort wurde es sogar von Doppelmayr selbst bestätigt
@MrPummi884 жыл бұрын
Die alte Bahn hatte wegen des Reliefs eine Bergebahn, da abseilen nicht möglich war. Inzwischen geht das wohl plötzlich? Seltsam.
@michellemair84533 жыл бұрын
Nein die Bahn hat in der Tal und Bergstation einen Notantrieb sie ist so zu sagen redudant ausgeführt. Es braucht daher keine Bergebahn mehr.
@heizoeli9 ай бұрын
@@michellemair8453Und wenn das Förderseil "entgleist"? Was macht man dann?
@KapitanPisoar13 жыл бұрын
They ruined the best chairlift, this really sucks...
@CBF13 жыл бұрын
they certainly did EXCEPT Schindlergrat isn't the best chairlift in my opinion but it certainly was a beauty altho I never rode it nor did I ever go to Arlberg. My favourite lift is Combe des Juments of La Clusaz which I have ridden and it still exists. I call the new Schindlergrat "Shitlergrat".