*_God Bless_*

I know. It's sweet isn't it.

Science doesn't always match your religious beliefs.

​@@vladtheemailer3223 because science is discovery and your are drawing conclusions when science hasn't said anything

Yes. But unfortunately, science is used by the enemy and their agenda of death and destruction.

​@@vladtheemailer3223ะำำำำำำำำำำำำำำำำ😅ภ

​@@vladtheemailer3223 Well that's scientists using their own faith with making the claim there is no God without bringing up the facts there is no God. Science doesn't go against God or the Bible, it's actually man's knowledge and interpretation of the world with their own belief of atheism behind it.

Huh? Just take the birth of a human. Science certainly describes "what happens", but we have a torrent of information describing exactly *why* that human is born. It's quite fascinating that from 2 microscopic cells we get a human with 26 billon cells 9 months later. And note that 2k years ago, people did not have any idea of these "whys".

You're not actually answering the why question. Example, how does the body know when it's time to give birth. Science can't tell you that. Why is your life valuable? Science can't tell you that. Science can't tell you where water arrived from. Where did humans come from? Science can't tell you that. You can believe you came from a worm who decided to turn into a fish 🐟 that eventually decided to crawl out.

Torrents of information still doesn't tell, "why?" Sure, we know how cellular processes work based on human interpretations of those processes. But WHY do those processes work the way they work in how we humans view it and doesn't work some other way?

Of course science can explain the why…..why do earth quakes happen or hurricanes for example…we know why certainly without question. Limiting science to only description is senseless and concretely wrong. Thank goodness science has given us the ability to understand washing your hands can prevent the spread of germs…..and we understand why or how that takes place. The list is endless.

We were never asked to be born or created, yet, "somehow" we were, but only by a "magical omnipotent supervisor" wanting and claiming credit for doing what the universe already does naturally, and constantly has for infinity throughout the constant endless continuum of time and space. The universe doesn't need creating, it does it itself, it's called adaptive growth and expansion because time and space are actually the same thing, the "two sides of the same coin", so to speak, and we as evolved human beings are all a part of this same process of adaptive growth in the universe. The universe has no beginning or end, just constant cycles everywhere within and throughout the universe according to astrophysicists. Planets and star systems go supernova and new ones are formed all the time over eons of infinite time and space. Furthermore, the universe does not have a purpose, it just has a direction. It's just expanding and evolving as is everything else within it, the planets, stars, black holes, life, us, etc. "Purpose" is a human emotion that has evolved in us over eons of time, and purpose is something different to each individual

Keep telling yourself this over and over and over...................

​​​​​@@markb3786That works for some people. It certainly seems to be what academia, media and entertainment rely on to create bias. But "everyone else" is subject to that, right?

Mark, you have been watching Professor Dave again, haven't you? Next you will be wanting to leave Gilead. Tut, tut, tut.

!

​@@markb3786keep denying it over and over.....

It is difficult though to know each argument in depths.

@@e.n.6079 Especially when they are not true. Makes it really really difficult

@@markb3786, The notion that chemicals on the pre-biotic earth coalesced into a living organism and that all life evolved from it is 19th century mythology that can _only_ be believed by *faith* with no support in modern molecular biology.

You don't need to know every argument in depth. The Holy Spirit reveals all truth. In the light you are able to see through the darkness. Ask for wisdom and discernment, let the Holy Spirit guide you. ❤️✝️

"Not many of you were wise by human standards; not many were influential; not many were of noble birth. But God chose the foolish things of the world to shame the wise; God chose the weak things of the world to shame the strong." 1 Corinthians 1

Very well organized and presented. Simple, objective thinking.

the firmament sheweth his handiwork. Big difference.Day one. GOD created the Heaven and the Earth. Day two GOD created the firmament to divide the water below from the water above.

It's even worse than time of the gaps "We don't know but given enough time, it is possible"

In science a hypothesis is not just simply guessing. To simply guess is a personal assumption from an individual's own perception and is not valid science. A hypothesis is, in fact, an educated guess based on limited facts and evidence that can be tested with study, observation, and experimention and absolutely falsified if it indeed really is false up to that point until further analysis reveals complete proof of that hypothesis, until then, it would still only remain a theory. And science is not based on any faith at all, just factual evidence only. Faith is based on no proof or evidence. Science is not bias at all, people are, science is just a methology of study, it proves or disproves---period. The scientific methods are purposefully designed to eliminate bias because every study must be objectively verified and there must be a way to prove it wrong if indeed it is. Accuracy and accountability are the hallmarks of study in science, no exception. Inaccuracies are put to the test constantly until obvious evidence bears accurate findings that are factually true or false indisputably. And science is for the purpose of educating and discovery for human advancement, it's methodology of study is designed to eliminate any falisies or errors.

Mankind can make up magic, but mankind cannot make up science, only misinterpret it or try to change it to their agenda. Yet, no one can change factual knowledge that evidence proves or disproves. True evident facts and proven knowledge do not require beliefs to support it at all. Undeniable facts can withstand any and all harsh scrutiny and examination, whereas beliefs need to rearrange and reinterpret facts to support those beliefs. Beliefs are not facts, just beliefs. Any faith is not evidence to anything factual. Magical creation by a supernatural god will always get contradicted by real facts and experienced educational knowledge. So, yes, the so-called "apologists" are grossly misinterpreting science. The moment a religion needs an academic pursuit called "apologetics" is admission that their deity is non existent or so impotent to require mortal assistance to prove it. No God should need anyone to explain or apologize anything at all on their behalf. That's because gods don't exist, and neither do fairies.

Science is a constantly advancing and evolving field of study. Science uses only factual evidence to prove a hypothesis. There is no personal guessing or assumed opinions that are outside of educational, factual knowledge. When studies are put to the test facts, observation, experiments, applications, and more studying are not just simply assuming or making up stuff. Misinformation gets naturally corrected by the very processes themselves unless not enough evidence can finalize a finding, then it stays a theoretical hypothesis, which is an EDUCATED guess, until further study accurately proves or disproves without reasonable doubt.

Are those assumptions valid or invalid?

​@@vladtheemailer3223they are reasonable

The collected information and knowledge from many centuries of study is not mistaken misinformation at all. Professors and teachers did not earn their degrees by any misconstrude means or misconceptions. It's safe to say with certainty that the schooling you received from kindergarten up to your senior graduation is true and accurate. The educational system as a whole naturally follows the strict ethics of teaching educational factual knowledge, just ask any teacher or professor of any school or university that has earned their degrees, every teacher I've ever known is just trying to honestly educate, and not fool, confuse, or lie to anyone or else they should certainly be fired from their teaching careers. Educational information that is taught has no personal bias of any kind as far as politics, personal feelings, and religion goes, just straight forward educational information. Teachers want to educate and challenge thinking, not teach lies like they have some other agenda. These are gross false notions by conspiracy theorists, religious apologists, and political activists with an agenda. Science is a constantly advancing and evolving field of study. Science uses only factual evidence to prove a hypothesis. There is no personal guessing or assumed opinions that are outside of educational, factual knowledge. When studies are put to the test facts, observation, experiments, applications, and more studying are not just simply assuming or making up stuff. Misinformation gets naturally corrected by the very processes themselves unless not enough evidence can finalize a finding, then it stays a theoretical hypothesis, which is an EDUCATED guess, until further study accurately proves or disproves without reasonable doubt.

Discover is a better word as if you find truth. It was already there.

Why not just call them "big dumb meanies?"

Unlike those who worship 2000 year old poorly written fan fiction? Oh please, that's the most ridiculous thing to say because you know absolutely zero atheists let alone atheist scientists.

Science is not dogma. We accept evolution

Is science the only way to know objective true facts about reality?

And the "facts" change daily.

Science may be “a” study of facts but not “the”.

And " science" has always said many many things that ended up to be very false. It is constantly changing, and that is evidence that it is not accurate.

Science is a human activity. I think it is time humans stops drawing conclusions on observations. Either we bring politics into it or More observations or data may be needed. I need data I don't need your science

Except that the argument can be stated that man imagined and created a God from his constant workings and experience of nature. And historical evidence shows he has in many cases.

Um, that's just a wildly assumptive opinion. I can say that "the revelations of science are in perfect harmony with the universe being code created by a 15 yr old hacker in an encapsulating universe". And, actually, this conjecture is a better fit, as it explains suffering perfectly. But do you believe it? Do I believe it? Yeah......no.

@@hongotedesco8931 Athiests see all of reality and conclude “Yeah all of this created itself from non existence”. It’s as equally as absurd as someone believing in false diety

@@zenvultra Nonsense

I think it's hilarious that atheists say that science explains EVERYTHING...science is just now figuring out basic information about the universe.. but atheists use it as a basis for God not existing. Science can't even explain what's in the ocean yet. It's embarrassing to listen to someone claim that science somehow disproves God when science can't even explain why interstellar objects behave.

Exatamente o que pensei na hora que ele comentou 😊 Palestra mto boa mesmo :)

Creation of Religion and God is no different than creation of Harry Potter.

The problem with religions is that it claims ownership over us and all the resources of the earth. It makes us pay ransom to the agents of god who rule over us. Our lives and deaths depend on these lunatic agents whims and fancy. Literally, these godmen enslave us.

​​​@@skagraw2A problem with people not believing in Harry Potter or Santa is that there aren't enough people around you from your birth to tell you every day that these characters really exist. Religions like christianity, islam or judaism was created for gaining power over a certain community by imposing a common idea which then is the highest truth you better do not doubt. I am not saying that there isn't a higher intelligence, if there is, it's the whole Universe in my opinion. One big ever present existence. And we are the expression of it.

Is it? Why?

​@richardgregory3684 Because it is design. And to have design...there must be a Designer. Because it is information. And to have information...there must be a mind. Quite simple really.

Why do the likes of Mr Turek always speak on the verge of ranting?

Evolution is an ongoing process... For every new intermediate species found there will be two new missing links. Evolution doesn't rest on the missing links but on the massive amount of evidence that IS available (but you creationists love to ignore)

Science in of itself doesn't even explain reality. How could you even explain reality using science? You can't.

You didn't watch the video

Who created the creator ?

@@Bugsy0333 happenstance

Of course, the entire scientific community revoked their PhDs and their positions in university faculties, and were careful to never again allow any false science inroads into the academy or popular scientific understanding.

Archaeopteryx, discovered at the time of the American Civil War remains the most referenced so-called transitional fossil. Evolutionists always say there are "many" other examples, but there has never been anything else discovered like the extinct Archaeopteryx

Every scientific theory in existence has always been based on ASSUMPTIONS.

“For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ.” ‭‭John‬ ‭1‬:‭17‬ ‭KJV‬‬

🥳

God is infinite and lives outside of time. He has no beginning or creator because he is infinite.

LOL you can't confirm scientifically weather your atoms where once from a star. By how often atoms change their molecules, you're more likely to be dinosaur piss than for you to be a star 😂😂

1. I agree, but before we can perform any experiment we have to pressuppose things that we take for granted, like that mathematics and logic are reliable along with our cognitive faculties and uniformity in nature. We can't accept this as brute facts, we need justification to do so. There's an assumption being made here that isn't scientific. 2. I wouldn't say science says nothing about God, that would just depend on your interpretation of the data. Take the wave function in quantum mechanics for example, what causes it to collapse? Answering this question might not mean anything to you. But if we can conclusively determine how it collapses and if it does require a conscious observer to collapse the wave function, then we would understand that you can't separate conscious observers from reality. This would mean we would need a cosmic conscious observer to collapse all matter into objects we perceive and experience. 3. I'm not so sure about that, would you say people like Copernicus who gave us the heliocentric model for our universe and Francis Bacon the one who gave rise to the scientific method would agree with you? What about Tycho Brahe the great astronomer and imperial mathematician who created the most accurate tabel of astronomical observations, or his student Kepler who discovered that the planets rotate the sun in elliptical orbits? How about Galileo or Robert Boyle father of modern chemistry or Issac Newton the one who discovered Newtonian mechanics? I would have to say they would disagree with you on this point Isaac Newton when he discovered gravity, he didn't say I understand how gravity works therefore God doesn't exist. There is no God of the gaps when it comes to science because things look like gravity is a mechanism not an Agent, comparing the two is a category error. All these brilliant minds believed in God, their faith was absolutely central to all of their life's work and discoveries, because they believed that by studying the heavens, they were discovering the mind of God. This is the very assumption and driving force that gave rise to modern science. All of their science derived from theological questions, so to say science and faith are not harmonious and that they are incompatible is intellectually dishonest.

@@ronaldorivera4674 1. "We have to presuppose things that we take for granted". Again, it's about what I mentioned in point 3, that we do take things for granted. But it's because they work, it doesn't really matter if philosophically "you can't be sure". If I hold a glass of wine in my hand, and I let it drop, I can trust that there's going to be a mess on the floor. And so can you, and everybody else on this planet. It works. 2. The whole "wave function collapse" is a complex area of physics, with no real answer. Different scientists will give different interpretations. It's really TBD at this point. 3. Yes, many of those scientists you mention would certainly disagree (Kepler was a priest!), but they would just be wrong. I'm pretty sure that if they lived today, they would actually agree with me. It's just historical context that makes them believers.

@hongotedesco8931 wrote, >>>1. What is science: Simple.."The systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural world through observation, experimentation, and the testing of theories against the evidence obtained."> 2. What does science say about god: Simple...nothing.

P.2: wrong. Evidence is E=mc2

Evolution didn't create our brain, laws of nature and Energy did that. Matter behaves according to laws of nature thus everything what happens in matter is deterministic process determined by initial cause at Big Bang. If our mind is caused by matter then we are absoutely deterministic machines without any free will. Think about it. So evolution has been planned process at the beginning of Universe or it is driven outside of matter like our mind is able to break determinism which shows clearly that our mind is not matter.

Science is human and human are science

How’s that? It was god of the gaps