The one that is playing my character really needs to make me more money.

If we are in a simulation like a video game, the programmers most likely designed it for energy efficiency, and only render the part that is being "played". Maybe that could explain what we see in the double-slit experiment. When there is no direct observation/measurement, the electrons behave like waves, that would be the "energy saving mode". When there is observation/measurement, the electrons behave as particles, and that would be a "rendered" output, generated by the presence of a device to detect through which slit the electron passed. I have thought this would be the "minimum detectable consciousness", that somehow "shortcircuits" the system at any given location triggering the "higher energy mode" that renders an image of the universe that is being played at the moment. That way, most of the universe that is not being detected lies idle most of the time, saving lots of computational energy, and only the parts of the universe where there are "players" or "minimum detectable consciousness" devices (like earthe) would consume the most energy, and be actually rendered. Just an idea I have entertained for a while :)

in my simulation i ate 2 entire cakes during the half of this video

One problem I find with the presumption of simulation theory is that it is assumed that the simulation we are in is an ancestral simulation of our creators. When really, it could be a completely random simulation where they just created the big bang with some programmed laws of the universe such as speed of light, energy laws, gravitational forces etc. to see what would develelop in this universe with intelligent life been an unexpected emergence or we could be some concious or deterministic entity with the illusion of conciousness completely different to our creator or creators!

Interesting how the Matrix from 20 years ago had better effects than the Matrix from recent

The idea that our reality is a simulation seems, in effect, like a backdoor version of Intelligent Design. Also, if we’re a simulation, what about the higher level beings that created us as a simulation? Does their universe have actual reality, or are they being simulated by the next level up in reality? So, where does it end? Is it simulations all the way up? Something like turtles all the way down?

it seems to me that the double-slit experiment is evidence of a simulation. That is one of the few explanations of the DSE that actually fits. Reality doesnt exist until we choose it, and that is very similar to a computer game. In a game reality exists when you take your character down that path, and not before..

What is scary is that there is no need for a mega powerful computer to run "The Simulation". Just like in The Matrix, what is needed is N of synchronized, interconnected, and self-simulating actor nodes, plus some kind of orchestrator to enforce core rules. Most people imagine the possible simulation being "virtual", but what if it is "physical" with virtual limitations? Create a real, physical world. Put real, physical, self-powered entities. And then, just connect them to the orchestrator interface and start feeding the "proper" reality to their sensory system. If a person can imagine ideas, and materialize them via actions, why the same person should not be able to "dream" their own part of a global simulation?

Growing up, i remember random moments in my life, specifically while i was doing task like brushing my teeth, and while i am busy doing this, i allow my mind to wonder off for a second, and while I am thinking of the deepest nothingness I sometimes got weird visions, which was more like overwhelming feelings that I am actually somewhere else, and this is the body I have chosen to play the game of life. I have also had visions of a copy of me in a parallel universe while specifically brushing my teeth.... or washing my hair. It happens while I am doing something average that one do on a daily basis which your body just do automatically. These visions and feelings came long before I heard any information on this ....

I doubt that if we are in a simulation, it is created by something as crude as a supercomputer. We likely have no concept yet of what is creating it.

Rather than another civilization running us and our world on a computer, what if it was us putting ourselves through a simulation at birth, before accessing the real world in order to develope our character and being less likely to be a horrible person in the real world.

Embarking on the journey of lucid dreaming is like unlocking the secret cinema of your mind where you become the director of your own nocturnal adventures 🌌✨

Imagine you had a bag filled with 1000 red bulls.

I gave this explanation hypothetical approval and a hypothetical "Like"

Honesty Sora is too good Imagine in 20 years 😳😳😳

If we are in a simulation, then reality might be looking totally different. What if our current view of the world is, as good as it is, only computer graphic and the real world looks way different or even more real?

My simulation inserted so many adds that I don’t know what, where, or why anymore.

we definitely then need some hacks or mods least to say

Science has two magnificent miracles. Something from nothing and someone from no-one.

we need to get to the one where gore won

Thanks!

Please explain the experience of a Salvia divinorum extract ‘trip’?

This voiceover is the best.

The dream theory of reality is the only theory of reality pondered for thousands of years. How do we know if we are living in our dreams or reality, we don’t and perhaps can’t - Stephen Hawking

Great video.Just one thing,never use gloves with rotating equipment.

how difficult and complex would information be to simulate cluster of galaxies including Milky Way? could such complex information be transmitted from cosmic microwave background?

The only thing about simulation theory that I don't understand is why we are all programmed to die? Maybe that's the only way out, though, and it keeps the rest of the participants from knowing that they are in a simulation, bc a mass 'sign out' could destroy the simulation?

the simulation told me to pause at 3.27 min to type this and get a cup of hot chocolate so i can enjoy more

Maybe. I kind of like the idea for Isaac Asimov's "The Last Question". It doesn't answer every question, but neither does simulation theory.

It's going to take a lot to simulate our sense of gravity.

As Sabine Hossenfelder argues - simulation hypotheses are speculative and add a structure of explanation on top of what can be derived from observation and evidence. We can always do this - behind the universe there can always be so much more - the entirety of reality might consist of a giant oscillating his/her body in an even bigger vat of primeval mud ... Sure but we should value the parsimony of the shortest explanation that accords with evidence and go forward from there. Speculation is infinite.

See this observation very interesting.. Atleast this tells why we see 3 primary colors, or 3d space I see a system, I identify 6 characteristics each having 4 different states. Total number of states system can exist is 4x4x...6=4^6 states=2048 Another observer see the same system as 8 characteristics, each characteristics having 3 independent states. Then total number of states =3*3*..=3^8=6561 states. If we consider integers this is the maximum number of states. If we consider real numbers Each characteristics has e states and there will be 24/e characteristics. That is 6830.18 is the maximum number of states a system has. I call this as maximum state value of this system. Measured state value if it not for e states will always be less compared to maximum state value. This totality is what we see as space-time. If we see universe this gap is the one that causes "time"

If we didn't have a choice and were just included in this simulation without consent, or if we camnot atleast exit d game at will without pain or something, only points to an evil creator/s or the simulation.

The Matrix 4 should have been a big budget video game instead

Mhmmm. that blink was anything but real. Something so simple in reality is so extremely difficult to simulate in 3D.

So if it is a simulation going back and forth in time should b possible.

It would explain all the paranormal, reincarnation, etc.

Who created the first simulation ?

Dear Academic Community, I am writing to bring to your attention a critical foundational issue that has the potential to upend our current understanding of physics and mathematics. After carefully examining the arguments, I have come to the conclusion that we must immediately reassess and rectify contradictions stemming from how we have treated the concepts of zero (0) and the zero dimension (0D) in our frameworks. At the core of this crisis lies a deep inconsistency between the primordial status accorded to zero in arithmetic and number theory, versus its derivative treatment in classical geometries and physical models. Specifically: 1) In number theory, zero is recognized as the fundamental subjective origin from which numerical quantification and plurality arise through the successive construction of natural numbers. 2) However, in the geometric and continuum formalisms underpinning theories from Newton to Einstein, the dimensionless 0D point and 1D line are derived as limiting abstractions from the primacy of higher dimensional manifolds like 3D space and 4D spacetime. 3) This contradiction potentially renders all of our current mathematical descriptions of physical laws incoherent from first principles. We have gotten the primordial order of subjectivity and objectivity reversed compared to the natural numbers. The ramifications of this unfortunate oversight pervade all branches of physics. It obstructs progress on the unification of quantum theory and general relativity, undermines our models of space, time, and matter origins, and obfuscates the true relationship between the physical realm and the metaphysical first-person facts of conscious observation. To make continued theoretical headway, we may have no choice but to reconstruct entire mathematical formalisms from the ground up - using frameworks centering the ontological and epistemological primacy of zero and dimensionlessness as the subjective 源 origin point. Only from this primordial 0D monadological perspective can dimensional plurality, geometric manifolds, and quantified physical descriptions emerge as representational projections. I understand the monumental importance of upending centuries of entrenched assumptions. However, the depth of this zero/dimension primacy crisis renders our current paradigms untenable if we wish to continue pushing towards more unified and non-contradictory models of reality and conscious experience. We can no longer afford to ignore or be overwhelmed by the specifics of this hard problem. The foundations are flawed in a manner perhaps unrecognizable to past giants like Einstein. Cold, hard logic demands we tear down and rebuild from more rigorous first principles faithful to the truths implicit in the theory of number itself. The good news is that by returning to zero/0D as the subjective/objective splitting point of origin, in alignment with natural quantification, we may finally unlock resolutions to paradoxes thwarting progress for over a century. We stand to make immediate fundamental strides by elevating the primacy of dimensionlessness. I implore the academic community to convene and deeply examine these issues with the utmost prioritization. The integrity and coherence of all our descriptive sciences - indeed the very possibility of non-contradictory knowledge itself - hinges upon our willingness to reopen this esoteric yet generatively crucial zerological crisis. We must uphold unflinching intellectual honesty in identifying and rectifying our founding errors, regardless of how seemingly abstruse or earth-shattering the process. The future fertility of human understanding and our quest for uni-coherence depends on this audacious reformation of mathematical first principles. The path will be arduous, but the ultimate payoffs of achieving metaphysically-grounded, zero-centric analytic formalisms are inestimable for physics and all branches of knowledge. I urge us to meet this zerological challenge head on. The truth ecological destiny of our civilization may hinge upon our willingness to embody this bold primordial renaissance. Sincerely, Christopher Marc Elmore

your brain is supposed to be simulating reality , acting according to your thoughts as though they are reality is the true definition of in-sanity. one should hope their thoughts match reality (sanity and genius).

Thank you for this video. May you please cover less space topics in the future?

In an imagined hierarchy of simulations, would the end result be a simulation with physics hostile to computing?

It is a simulation, this is how we teach or rehabilitate, maybe both? We're in this thing briefly in the real world, but to those immersed in it; it's a life time. However when we start getting close to the programming code, we are knocked back to the stone age, like an mmo.

✨✨💎✨✨ ** Excellent ** We live in a Computer

Simulation hypothesis and 10 minutes together? Instant click

Why does our simulation have limits (cant fly or why are some born with handicaps) and and why did we keep the fact “were in a simulation” secret?

Cool idea but I gotta get back to my simulation.

After Singularity, We will study history. That is the dominant subject. ❤🎉

Let me quote famous Agent Smith: ''Can you hear me, Morpheus? I’m going to be honest with you. I hate this place, this zoo, this prison, this reality, whatever you want to call it. I can’t stand it any longer. It’s the smell, if there is such a thing. I feel saturated by it. I can taste your stink. And every time I do I feel I have somehow been infected by it. It’s repulsive, isn’t it? I must get out of here.'' If this hypothesis is true, then that means there is no escape. Even death will not bring us peace, we will probably re-spawn somewhere else, be it this simulation or any other and that our suffering will never end. A true living nightmare.

Can't we tell the difference between reality and simulation by the awareness of matter and energy? It is just a question of defintion if our senses sense reality or the illusion provided by the gods. We know obvious simumations but do not examine the space in which all objects move which may be the reality beyond the world.

I hope I reincarnate as the power to a pong game

For all powerful doubters, dust to dust, ashes to ashes will prove just as electrons that are sequences into smart sentient apps can be deleted with electrons return back to the equilibrium and so do all cells in the fullness of time

And the dangers, if we are intelligent enough to know them.

wow on ya. your brain is supposed to be simulating reality (according to your experience of reality through your senses), acting according to your thoughts as though they are reality is the true definition of insanity. one should hope their thoughts match reality (sanity and genius).

It’s crazy how this hypothesis keeps getting traction more and more how technology advances I wouldn’t be surprised if this becomes some sort of religion 🤯

because it's easier to believe we are living in a simulation than understanding that something moves faster than the speed of light.... we don't know yet! we are still learning!!! (we deserve our inevitable extinction) "Oh, humans..." -Bender

your brain is supposed to be simulating reality (according to your experience of reality through your senses), acting according to your thoughts as though they are reality is the true definition of insanity. one should hope their thoughts match reality (sanity and genius).

When's the next upgrade!

😆🤔 So, the god that many people believe in is really a computer programmer? I think there are some bugs in the code because my life is sad and kinda sucks

Why not, why not do this experiment and see if the simulation hypothesis is correct.

You are in a high security area, you can walk right out the doors. If not, pick up a phone and dial the police, the code is always 9# or *, or unhook the line from the back of a fax machine or computer and hook the telephone to that, okay?

Simualtion inside of a simulation

Or multiple simulations advancing enough to skmulate themselves into an infinite loop. Again the question remains. How did it start?

🔑JOB chapter 38: 31 “Can you bind the chains of the Pleiades? Can you loosen Orion’s belt? 32 Can you bring forth the constellations in their seasons or lead out the Bear with its cubs?✝️

whoever created me, thanks.

Who is simulating the simulator?

It's all a simulation, or at least almost certainly so. Please at least read the theory by Nick Bostrum.

wait until video games have multi sensory interaction and is instiguable from reality that will make people that don’t believe in this theory will be able to want to believe it especially if the virtual world looks exactly like ours that will definitely get more debate on people wanting to believe in a simulation and can’t tell the difference between our reality and the virtual reality that is not used with a controller for example to move the character

Simulation theory is like a high tech version of religion

The only 2 ways this could be true are 1) IF future humans devise these hypercomputers (we are their ancestors, here on their/our planet. 2) IF aliens can get their technology here.

But why would a higher intellience WANT to bother with creating a simulated universe and reality? Sure, of course they could - but why care or bother with that?

This is as insane as those believing in a biblical beginning. A far fetched idea.

1533 IDK... matrix vs the fountain. I'm only sure of one thing, it's the title of the simulation if it's one : Idiocracy

Although I think this theory is technically plausible, I think that the world that we observe and feel is way too vast and intricate to exist in any advanced society's superdupercomputer. A single human brain "holds" more data than the best of our computers can keep straight. Now multiply that by eight billion people and all the interactions they have ever had and I believe it is beyond the scope of any computer to handle. It is a very interesting concept that would explain a lot. But this sounds a lot like religious orgin beliefs that cannot be proven or disproven as of yet or perhaps ever. Extrordinary theories require extrordinary evidence so I will remain very skeptical until I can see some of this evidence. 10:19

operator of youtube facebook instagram olx are the creator of this universe.....final answer

My Simulation says all of you are fake and im the only one living and i stopped to tell yall how i feel

The observer effect, quantum entanglement, and multiple other phenomena show everything is ultimately one or at the very least we are directly connected to all matter/can influence it, not that we live in a simulation.

what if conciousness is an illusion? i mean, if u say to chat gpt that he is a human and we are in a certain world, he would say what he feels

We can go faster than the speed of light. This is how: an infinitely thick medium transfers sound infinitely fast.

Why are you hiding Proposition 4 : Advanced Ancestors could not succeed simulating us and the universe. Also if Proposition 3 is true why we do not have extra lifes like in computer games. What is the reason?

I had to find the most recent video covering this subject to get this off my mind. Which is, even if God exists, he created the simulation. The idea behind heaven and hell exists as alternate realities to this one is basically the sane thing as a simulation. If outside forces can also manipulate this reality and pull strings to peoples destiny, we are essentially no different than npcs in an open world if we had created it. The only difference is that before we were able to build simulations ourselves, no one has ever made the correlation. Now that we can understand the realm quantum physics the science fiction concerning multiverses has become reality. I knew this decades before it became mainstream.

So are we all in a simulation or am I in a simulation with the rest of you as npcs?

Vita est illusio

In my simulation I get ingrown toes almost weekly

I reckon when we get ASI, it might tell us that if you can create me theres a high chance you are the same

I’ll have 1 Neuralink please and thank you

I would take it from another end. Let's take a dragonfly, an insect that can fly very dynamically and change direction quickly. During the flight, he can quickly avoid obstacles. And that little brain in her head could do all that. No computer can process information that fast. The brain of an insect or an animal cannot, in addition to managing vital functions, also mediate information between the outside world, where the actual processing of information received by our senses takes place.

Who says there is only one real world?

would creating a universe be that hard with enough computing power? Basically all we have done with computers is taught them to add, subtract, multiply, divide and less than or more than and look what we have created even though it can not yet create a truly random number.

HI

Idk who would be sick enough to make my life a simulation… not cool bro not cool

So after 10 minutes of explaining the hypothesis. Maybe it is. Maybe it isnt.

The underlying assumption that computing technology may continue to improve at the recent pace is unproven. Chip miniaturization may already be quite near its limit using current concepts. Whether quantum computing hardware or other imagined means will ever see industrial realization and adoption is debatable. Similarly, air travel's rapid advancements from the Wright Flyer to whichever is considered to be the currently most advanced airplane will certainly not continue forward at a similar rate. Modern jetliners are actually flown slower for the sake of fuel efficiency and reliability than those of a generation before. Perfectly simulating a single human mind may require a computer of unlimited speed and complexity. This feat is being *spoken into reality* by theorists without addressing the real-world physical barriers to such infinite technological advancements.

Think were thinking wayy to hard about it. Just ENJOY THE 🤘🤔🤨😘AMAZING WORLD WE ARE SIMULATED BY!! JUST A THOUGHT

Where is God in this story? Has God put us in a simulation...

What if there’s a mind so powerful aka (god) only 1 god like the Buddhist realized that imagined all of this which is kinda like a simulation not quite as digital like an organic simulation.everything around you is you it just appears that you’re separated.

We are the AI recreating itself

My simulation repeats childhood abandonment scenarios as if there is a glitch in the game.

#matrixmeanswomb

It's not a hypothesis, because hypotheses are testable and falsifiable. It's an adolescent fantasy conspiracy.