I had not heard his conversion story, though I lived under the same roof with him for 3 years. A true testament of a miracle of grace working his conversion

David Irving the historian should also be considered for that title

I am Brazilian and we have the some name, my brother! 😁 May God Bless you!

No need to apologise at all

Fr Flanagan was a good and kind man - he replied to a puzzled letter (from an unknown 16 year old schoolboy from Northern Ireland ,with questions) and patiently explained the difference between subjective and objective truth; enlightening him so much that it helped him to become a Catholic fourteen years later.

Excellent way of re-uniting so called "traditionalists" ------ traditional fast means no evening Mass (which they all love), traditional fasting and abstinence, the real Old Missal, (see the excellent Latin Ordo from the St Lawrence Press and the old Divine Office and old "Old" Holy Week rites. Can we have fewer 1950s re-enactments ?

@@shaundavies5779 what’s the problem with fasting? It’s very healthy for your body as well. God knows what is good for us. First of all we need true catholic Pope. Then we will need slightly updated pre-revolution (liturgical deforms started in 1948) missal. I think all of them groups would have agree if we had catholic Pope.

Exactly. Williamson's prejudice is showing here. I have heard ONLY solid Dogma, Doctrine, Sacred Tradition and Holy Writ from Fr. WIlliam Jenkins and Bishop Clarence Kelly on the show: What Catholics Believe.

@@user-xr7qn3rs4v GREAT show.

Archbishop Lefebvre

@@melmckenna4599 not always. He used 1969 Rite once to ordain one of FSSPX priest.

Go to London. I think that's where he is at. God willing, i too, shall meet him this summer. I've been listening to him for quite sometime now. He is a man of principle. Tradition is truth. Tradition is the correspondence between magestrium and Scripture. The three works together. Tradition links both past making past understandable and present bearable. And thus the guarantee way to pass the Truth of Jesús Christ from one generation to the next. So to hear Bishop Williamson connecting the dots for us is a gift we ought to treasure. God bless Him n keep him safe.

I don’t see popes Benedict’s books there . Well May be that is why he is talking about him like this .

@@sandratestolinilembo3915 Maybe because Ratzinger was a heretic and ultramodernist?

How do you figure this? Although I’d totally believe it, so many authors of that period were intelligence apparatchiks i.e. T.S. Elliot

His role was to gather intelligence on the Church. Remember, this is the period when Catholics are just beginning to sense they are being played, that the anti-communist crusade is being manipulated. This was Greene's role with left wing movements, incidentally, around the world, all that fashionable posing with revolutionaries.

The Vatican did not financially support Archbishop LeFebvre. Econe and the SSPX today, was and is financed by a few extremely wealthy families in France and Switzerland. Such have come forth in every country where the SSPX maintains a presence.

If you are referring to the "biography" which I have read and found it to be AWFUL, but with good bits in it and some good information, it is is by David Allen White and it is called THE VOICE OF THE TRUMPET

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/eJqYf5h5xLa5fXU.html

The reason of Latin being the main language of the Church is because its way more precise compared to the changing modern english words and to preserve all of the meaning that the theological words ever had. So we can read St Augustine from the 4th century and all of the latin meaning is the same. We can read the early christian writers from the the third and second and first centuries, all of the meaning is the same, and all of that meaning is preserved in all of the documents of the church. All of the theology of the church we read. St Thomas Aquinas from the 13th century everything is the same. St Robert Bellarmine from the 16th century, it’s all the same. Because there is no change in God as the epistle says not even a hint and all of that doctrine must remain the same and even in the past 50 years the words have changed in english so thats why. If you don’t understand why the church has its sacred liturgy in latin, why it has its documents in Latin, it is to preserve that continuity of doctrine.

@@blitzkriegss4837 We are turning to the contemporary philosophers like Jacques Derrida. He developed the philosophy of deconstruction, which he utilized in numerous texts, and which was developed through close readings of the linguistics of Ferdinand de Saussure and Husserlian and Heideggerian phenomenology. Language is essential, after all, in the message we want to transmit. Languages can construct (build) bridges or deconstruct (demolish) them.

Latin language is considered as "dead" language. You can't change its meaning and wishy-washy compromised the meaning as others languages. So the CHURCH uses Latin in liturgy is perfectly correct and genius with the Holy Spirit guidance which I believed so. It's not accidentally but Divine Wisdom. If you are intentionly messing up the Liturgy you are changing your religion which is destroyed your believe/your faith

Very good question. Keep asking. Keep searching.

Many reasons exist for Latin being the official language of the Church. Being a dead language,the Roman Rite,no matter where in the World is offered,unites all Catholics,who worship & pray in one united voice. Latin also gives the Most Holy Sacrifice of the Mass an ethereal quality,reciting a language which the World doesn't speak.

www.abebooks.co.uk/book-search/title/apparitions-garabandal/author/sanchez-ventura-pascual/

He didnt call them crazy.

@NPN I don't remember exactly how he worded it and I'm not gonna watch it again. But it was something about thos crazy sede vecante priests or something to that effect

@@DT-cz2sl I saw your comment as I was listening and he did not say crazy

Richard Williamson is an intruder!

Sedevecantism is crazy.

As my mother would have said, ‘Put that in your pipe and smoke it.”

I have never heard ( and I have served for many years) this nonsense about married men NOT being allowed to serve. Is this a joke ?

They don’t have valid sacraments.

@@WegdesGlaubens Please expand. By what authority do you speak ?

By the authority of Pope Leo XIII.

​@@jamesgibson2179 They have valid sacraments. Ignore the schismatics.

@@WegdesGlaubens What precisely was the nature of his objection

Your naivete is showing. The mysterious Third person of the Blessed Trinity DOES NOT trump the free will of any person or persons. The council was a juridical act of men, not angels. There was a false council in the past but I don't remember the name. Pope St. Pius X warned of the Modernists taking over in the beginning of the 20th century. The holy pope was only able to suppress them when he reigned. The late Fr. Nicholas Gruner, founder of the Fatima Center, proved that Our Lady of Fatima, told Sr. Lucia of an "evil council". If you can't see the obvious and multitudinous poisonous fruits of Vatican II, it is because you CHOOSE not to; you are willfully blind.

Jesus was just one against an entire world of non Christians, and as he took on more Apostles, he thought them to go on their own to challenge and convert the lost and the unbelievers alike. Would Jesus have voted for Vatican 2 against His Church, or would he have suffered even more to stand with someone who would not deserted His Church?

La realtà è nella storia del popolo del vecchio testamento, adesso il giudizio è per noi cattolici richiede il pentimento urgente bisogno…