merci quand meme mec

@@vloggeur9412 de rien =)

Merci

Merciiii!!!

mrc

good going teacher ;-)

Trouble is when they get to the universities (with their own agendas) will this experiment be accepted?

@@chloe7seven22 Yes some school accept that as some proof of you scientific background.

@@WebmsJUWindows, sorry I don't really express myself too well. I meant the agenda of the universities. They will take a kid with talent and truth and try with all their might to get the child around to THEIR thinking.

Ben A1 it’s only because they’re not American kid who think they’re too kool to do nerdy things which in fact ARE the kool things

😂🤣

My thoughts exactly, hard to find footage like this without a fisheye which doesn’t add anything to the footage except curvature. Seems fairly flat here doesn’t it?

Flat

ON KZfaq.. " JET FUEL HOAX " THE ENGINES ARE FREE ENERGY....INVESTIGATE..

Gustavo upper case text + flat earth claims = ignorant and safely ignored comment.

Wow!!! People still have sense... we are not moving, everything else is.

round its already been proven

@@alanclark2416 dumbass lol so when a plane crashes why is it on fire?

Kevin Burnes Don’t be silly Kevin.

Kevin Burnes Haven't you heard? Failed Earth is *DEAD* (Flat Earth to you) but since you asked the question I'll add to the answers already given: You *SMALL* Earth *BIG* as in really big and not just something you can compare to your backyard! So no, there is no massive flat disc, smh

Rudolf Ramseyer yes you are so correct, they way it separates into fine lines is amazing !

Je suis d'accord avec toi on a vas faire pareil avec mon collège et ils faut des normes très stricte et il faut l'accord de la C.N.E.S

Oh je viens de comprendre : le losange gris bizarre, ce serait pas justement un réflecteur pour aider les avions à l éviter ? Il y a des formes identiques devant tous les pilliers de ponts sur la Seine, c est geometriquement la forme appropriée pour renvoyer tout signal à sa source quel que soit son angle d incidence. Pour faciliter la détection radar ... Les avions récents sont équipés de radars d évitement avec correction automatique de trajectoire Ce qui m étonne est la faible vitesse relative entre l avion et le ballon, les deux se déplaçant dans la masse d air ... Relativement à l air le ballon devrait avoir une vitesse nulle, et l avion dans les 300-500 km/h ...

Je trouve que la vitesse élevée de l'avion est bien évidente, relativement au ballon. Il apparait au loin à 4:25 et il disparait tout aussi loin à 4:29. 1 km parcouru en 4 secondes, pas mal.

pourquoi le ballon éclate ? il ne peu pas continuer...dans l'espace ?

Avec un objectif grand angle, c'est normal qu'un objet semble s'approcher/s'éloigner rapidement. Quand je suis au bord d'un trottoire en ville, une voiture à 50 passe de ma droite à ma gauche en 2s ... en ne roulant qu'à 50.

I strongly agree

Wake up, you can see the curvature, it's not much because you are still to close to the ground. Don't give me, it was 100k+ feet. That's still to code to see more of the curvature.

@@aixaburlison4 man look this, kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ad9goauZq628dKM.html you can see the curvature when the balloon is still in the ground, when it passes the clouds you clearly notice a spherical earth, but of course with fisheye lenses

flat brain

I think we have a monkey brain hunter

The plane part is obviously a fake; the sky is bluer, the camera is moving and u can find the sequence in other vids

Hello. Moi....Magnifique images grâces au superbe travail de ces élèves et professeurs.

Maxime Bourjon: Oui, comme par exemple qu'à 32000 m d'altitude on ne distingue toujours pas cette fameuse courbure terrestre ! Eric Dubay a raison, la terre est bel et bien plate. Dommage que le ballon ait pèté, j'aurais bien aimé savoir à quelle altitude il touche le dôme à l'aplomb de la Suisse ?

Charly Brown misérable idiot si la Terre est plate, comment dans l'hémisphère sud tu ne peux pas voir l'étoile polaire et comment dans l'hémisphère Nord tu peux pas voir la croix du Sud ? comment un mec pourrais faire Paris New York en 7h, mais le Cap- Rio En 7h aussi, parce si la terre était plate, les distances dans l'hémisphère sud seraient immenses ! l'antarctique aurait 100000km de côtes soit 8 fois le diamètre de notre terre sphérique ! Pourquoi les phases de la lune ne sont pas les mêmes si tu te trouves en France ou à Madagascar etc...je pourrais continuer des heures mais ça servirait à rien

Sadiq Mohamed Thank you, sir. At least the balloon got up to 21000 meters, even if it didn't really catch a perfect video of an airliner!

Someone at French ATC needs to be spoken to. You DO NOT launch uncontrolled balloons into civilian airspace, no exceptions. There is no way an airliner travelling at 800km/h could see something like that in time to avoid it.

Ses une vide o francaise

That's why they included the radar reflector. Per regulation for all weather balloons, worldwide. ATC was also tracking it. France is a fairly sophisticated country, they know how to handle things like this.

Yes and in France everyone knows the earth is round, the last person who thought it maybe flat died in the 17th century!

The wings really aren't needed at that alt and speed. Notice the very small or non-existant wings on such aircraft as the X-1 and the scramjets. It's basically a rocket at that point and only needs very small attitude surfaces.

@@tomthumb1322 o ya that's right. Like how the Israeli f15 flew with a missing wing.

c'est légèrement visible

Biensur que la terre est plate ya que les lobotomisés qui croient le contraire

Merci pour la France 🇫🇷

Pouvez vous nous certifier en temp que pilote de ligne, que la terre est plate?

J'ai pensé la même chose que vous mais en temps que pilote de drone ! Je suis très contraint par les règles en vigueur pour un drone de moins de 800g et maxi 500 ft d'altitude

Étonné que le ballon n'est pas été secoué par le passage de l'avion.

J'allais justement le demander: elles sont où les turbulences de sillage ? Et puis le fait que la caméra suive la passage par une rotation idéale pour le voir passer.

Les turbulences de sillages perdent rapidement en altitude et s'étendent peu dans le plan horizontal; c'est basiquement un vortex de petite taille premièrement qui s'agrandit en descendant. C'est assez difficile à évaluer sur cette video mais on peut penser que le ballon est à la même altitude si ce n'est plus haut que l'avion...aucun risque. Cela dit, la vue de la caméra peut laisser songeur...

C'est pour ça que l'humanité n'habitera jamais ni sur Proxima B ni ailleurs.

It does get colder… that’s negatives in Celsius

​@@Flywithjon Did you understand what he meant? I don't think so. When the temperature of the negatives goes up (-50 -48 -46 -44) , it means it's not as cold.

Am I the only one who sees a flat horizon

That's because the highest layer of atmosphere is boiling hot due to high radiation levels. It's where asteroids burn up and the aurora hangs around.

@Fly with Jon the temperature gets warmer the higher it goes up. Just translate it into English subtitles and you'll see.

+Gan Ning tais-toi toujours les mêmes commentaire

Donc en montagne et en face d'une vallée, l'effet devrait être visible suivant que vous regardez vers le bas, l'horizon ou le haut. Curieux je n'ai jamais observé cet effet... Cela montrerait que l'horizontale est privilégiée. Ou alors votre interprétations des effets de la perspective est erronée! Peut-être est-ce dû au faite que la majorité des illustrations montrant cet effet le montre sur l'horizon. - Mais cet effet est général, il est dû à l'éloignement et les lignes de perspective se rapproche de la direction du centre géomètrique de la lentille. Photographiez un puits avec différentes focales, vous pourrez le constater! Donc testez et vous constaterez que l'effet d'horizon se produit dans la direction d'observation, aussi bien à l'horizontale que vers la bas ou le haut. C'est valable aussi bien pour un œil que pour un objectif. Bonne recherche, merci de nous tenir au courant de vos résultats...

@Sony Maire: Curieux cette manie de vouloir faire taire ses contradicteurs sans justifier ou il se trompent!

Mets une règle sur l'écran. Que prouverait le "ciel très noir au-dessus du ballon" ?

J’ai jamais vu quelqu’un d’aussi idiot. Ça s’appelle la pollution lumineuse. Il est impossible de voir les étoiles tout simplement car la lumière reflétée par la terre est bien trop importante. C’est la même chose qui se passe lorsque tu es dans une grande ville en pleine nuit. Impossible de voir les étoiles a cause de la lumière émise par la ville. Tu peux seulement voir les étoiles en campagne ou dans un endroit où la pollution lumineuse n’est pas trop importante.

Wait a minute... Were's the ice wall edge dome and god??? What's going on?

@@nebula6362 What ice wall? What edge?

@@johnmontague69 Are you new to your idea or what

omg where is the sun under the dome =O

I can see the curvature easily.

😀Its flat my bro

100% flat. They forgot their fish eye lenses! KZfaq will probably remove soon. They went to 90,000' with zero curve but you can click on other videos right here that show you a curve at 35,000'. EVERYTHING is faked to promote a globe planet that does not exist.

@@FloodItAll Sorry but a flat earth is physicaly impossible.

@@WebmsJU prove the earth is round. Go. I can do this all day. Did you even bother watching and reading comments before you vomited on your keyboard? 90,000' flat. 120,000' flat. You cannot prove curve without a fisheye lens and a NASA lie.

YOUR EYES DO NOT LIE BROTHER

Ca c'est de l'amusement, il y a des expériences en labo de physique plus valables que ce genre d'expérience, qui malgré les autorisations reste dangereuse. L'avion n'est pas passé loin, et si le parachute n'avait pas fonctionné.

Et aussi ça les fera quitter les émissions télé qui ferment plus leur esprit que ne les ouvrent.

​@@doug4307 Et si, et si Paris était malléable on l'aurais réussi à la mettre en bouteille. Des expériences en pleine nature sera TOUJOURS plus bénéfiques que ceux effectuées en laboratoire ; et peu importe de quoi il s'agit en labo.

Le plus marrant c est la platitude de notre planète 😉😉😍😂😂😂

Un ballon sonde ne va pas lien dans l'atmosphère, 30 km au dessus c'est très peu . On ne voit qu'une très petite partie de notre monde de cette altitude

The Earth was very Flat that day.

😅😅😅

Ils ne sont pas aussi cons que toi....

@@micheleclerget6912 r/wooosh

A quelle moment

Tu raconte quoi toi

yeah, but did you even question the lack of curve at over 90,000'? or the fact that after all those hours above a "spinning earth" they landed right back in France where they departed? That's the lesson here. The earth is flat.

idont thinkso I don’t thinkso!

@Carbon Proksi Every lens will alter a picture differently.

Prove it

@@WebmsJU It's pretty obvious at this point. look for yourself

No my friend. I Work in Norway and its 6 mounths night and 6 mounths day

Must be mutch Higher to see round earth

@@PauloOliveira-td5te I understand that this balloon does not prove anything. I have investigated and understand the mechanics of both models. And I believe that the globe model is a lie.

Do you use illegal drugs, or the prescribed kind? Tell me how that camera stayed at speed with an airliner doing 600mph? I'll be standing by.

The airliner part is obviously fake. If you were really familiar with aerospace you would know that ATC would never let aircraft anywhere near a high altitude balloon, let alone a few hundred feet. And the radar on an airliner is tuned to water droplets for weather and is not used for detection or avoidance of other aerial vehicles. If these students had actually caused a near hit with an airliner it would be in the news and they wouldn't be so stupid as to post it.

I agree on ATC seeing the balloon thanks to the radar reflector. But the airliner would not see it as airliner radar is either meteorological or secondary, i.e. dependant on an active radar emitting source.

didn't u all see the plane part was over zoomed? the plane was not that close and that part was edited so as to make the plane look closer, remember, the camera was a wide angle HD one, the plane appears pixelized, proving the zoom was made by editing. Also given the fact that the plane was probably in the jet stream, it's relative speed was probably not more than 300km/h

rewatching the video and according to the position of the sun, the plane is going roughly north to south (sun getting down to the west). no jet stream applicable. maybe the plane was slowing down before landing? quite possible given the fact that the plane is from the company "swiss" and the baloon landed in switzerland. also it mayhave slowed down because of the baloon? The shiny metallic thing at 3:51 is a radar reflector, so we can assume the plane detected the baloon. community.balloonchallenge.org/t/radar-reflector/656 BTW my previous statement was on relative speed, not ground speed of the baloon. at 12:11 u can see the average ground speed of the baloon is 78.6km/h therefore, u can assume is has been caught at some point in a wind that was more than 100km/h. therefore the relative speed of the plane would be "speed of the plane" - "100+ km/h" so relative speed could have been somwhere nearby 300kmh, very similar to our high speed trains in france, no problem to catch it on camera, they mostly were lucky the camera bounced so well as the plane passed. TBH, i was mostly angry at the comments that stated "the airliner part is fake" by ben thare and veev m.

Which suggests that there may have been more planes, but the camera looked the other way.

Too much work for a lazy flattard.

right on!

Bc of temperature inversion, other KZfaq’s likely talk about if you google atmosphere temperature gradient or something

Maybe the sun was heating it up and because the air pressure is so low it can't take the heat away fast enough? It is a myth that you freeze instantly when you are exposed to the vaccum of space, vaccum flasks hold their heat because there is no air molecules to take the heat away. The only way to cool down in space is to give up your heat as radiation because there is no conduction.

@Joe Cosgrove The heat is transmitted by radiation mostly IR and light. This "heat" travels at the speed of light through space to earth. Because air is transparent light doesn't heat it much, as the light hits the earth it heats up the earth which in turn heats up the transparent air. A vaccum doesn't have a temperature as such because it doesn't have any mass. Space is like a "black body" in that is absorbs or "accepts" all radiation so that if an object is left in the darkness of space it will give up all of its energy as radiation until it reaches absolute zero (has given up all its energy).

If you microwave an egg you are heating it with radiation. If you boil an egg you are heating via conduction. The air in a microwave is still cool after you have cooked your egg. So the heat must have been transmitted another way other then heating the air.

Joe Cosgrove I've heard somewhere that the sun emits lightwave particles, and not heat. As the light is converted/compressed and charged by the atmosphere, it transmutes also into heat radiation waves, as well as functioning as light.

Pas mieux, c'est navrant...

Non mais Galilé était complètement "rond" quand il a pondu sa théorie! 😆🌍

33panther33 Quelle théorie ?

Joël Le Bras Et bien comme quoi la Terre est ronde. Mais à l'époque de l'inquisition, il a bien fallu abjurer.😊

33panther33 Galilée n'a jamais dit que la Terre était ronde. A son époque, on le savait depuis longtemps.

Martin Clark Nope.

Just realize for a second that 30 kilometres up is absolutely NOTHING

09:03 you can clearly see the curve and there is little or no lens effect throughout the video.

Shawn Clarkson Yeah, from 70000 it can look flat can’t it. Doesn’t change the fact that it is a sphere. A big F off sphere.

@@Mark-Stone no its flat ive talked with to many pilots and i know one so besides the fact i studied and researched for about 2 and half years both side geocentric and heliocentric and its a flat plane. The horizon is called the horizon for a reason and sea level not sea curve buddy. God bless.

@@dunuth yeah ok buddy

Shawn Clarkson “Ive talked with many pilots...” no you haven’t. Stop lying. No pilot would support the ridiculousness of flat earth. “I studied and researched for about 2 and half years both side...” The only way that’s true is if you only ‘researched’ by watching flat-earth conspiracy videos. “Sea level not sea curve” oh please. This is pathetic. It’s called sea level because that’s where elevation is measured from, not because it’s level. You have all the hallmarks of someone totally unaware of the overwhelming evidence proving that earth is not flat. You also give every impression of someone who will lie and say anything to support your absurd belief. To cling onto any shred of credibility you may have, explain these two simple questions from a flat earth model; 1) how is it now summer south of the equator, and winter north? 2) people north and south of the equator see different stars at night. Explain that.

Exelente video es el mejor y muy real con varias cámaras es marabilloso como se ve la Tierra y el horizonte espano que lente uzaron desde afuera no se ven estrallas bravo!! Muchachos !! Les felicito!

The cube

Yeah...the Firmament

Watch others then. They do not 'hit something', the balloon will burst due to expansion. Some get to over 114,000 feet.

Please use the metric system for serious science.

Surprised? I would've been PISSED! Know what a balloon can do to an airliner? Why do you think that toy drones aren't allowed to fly high enough into commuter airspace anymore? One in the past collided with a helicopter and nearly brought it down the hard way. That balloon could've cost the passengers their lives. I hope the airlines and authorities find this video and pay their teachers a little visit, 'cause it's great evidence.

I'm struggling to believe that it's real. It looks real enough, but how did they track the airliner so well with the camera, where are the contrails and why did the pilot fly so close to the balloon if ATC was aware of it? Edit: I guess a 360 camera would explain part of that and contrails don't always form... I suppose.

@@PistonAvatarGuy I think it's fake, they also got permission from the ATC I read that somewhere in the comments long time ago

The passengers saw a UFO and will swear to it 😂

in deed is 1 word example : Indeed.

@@aaronkeeth651 you cannot educate a flattard.

Your heads flat

Globetardz always so salty

If it’s flat explain tides to me. Why does the water go out then come back? Why not roll off the edge?

Notei isso tbm...muito interessante

@ Também reparei nisso e, na verdade, até já estava esperando que isso acontecesse. Essa inversão da temperatura é bem conhecida em meteorologia. Veja aqui, por exemplo (figura à direita): acmg.seas.harvard.edu/people/faculty/djj/book/bookchap2-8.gif

Exact, ça m'a immédiatement tilté aussi

Au dessus de la troppopause la température remonte jusqu'à 30 000m environ, c'est comme ça

merci

Middle school common knowledge : The atmosphere the baloon is in move with earth

@@nibwa4798 ok but in that time of ascending and descending it should have moved further away according to earth's rotation speed when it descended it landed about 121 miles away IF the atmosphere moves with earth then it should have traveled further away due west roughly between 600 to maybe 1800 miles now stop think and ponder on that

Looks curved to me. Lol

Bob Artor , really??? Are you serious?🤷‍♂️

@@wyclifguedes3082 The earth isn't flat, get over it.

10.41 the line of horizont is curve, and consider that the lens tend to convess if the camera is pointing below horizont, and vice versa, (no distortion exactly at middle of frame) so is more curve as you can see.

Dum Mag, we see what we wanted and accept the same too. I believe that God create the earth not the science.👍

Mais aussi des plateaux oui

Non c'est juste un fake complet (l'avion)

oh ! par magie la caméra suit le mouvement de l'avion ! incroyable !!!

@UCm2bcun3HbUTKzLM7up_zqg il y a 3 cameras (voir description), dont au moins une qui fixe le bas et l'autre le ballon. Je doute fort qu'il y ait une caméra commandée car ça suppose une utilisateur derrière pour regarder pendant tout l’ascension les caméras et ayant la possibilité de les contrôler à distances. De plus si c'est le cas, la caméra est posée sur le côté de la "boite jaune" (voir 1:10), hors une rotation ici n'est pas possible sans rencontrer un obstacle, surtout que cette boite tourne dans le sens opposé au déplacement supposé de la caméra. On m'a déjà proposé un stage pour lancer un ballon sonde. Le type de caméra est du genre fixe pour un ballon sonde. Surtout que si on contrôle la caméra, il faut un 2eme communicateur car il faut aussi recevoir les données T°, pression et autre... Ca complique pas mal de chose alors que normalement on ne s'attend pas à vouloir la contrôler. Enfin, comme le poste très bien une autre personne plus bas, la pression indiquée est proche de l'absurde. Va voir par toi même car il détaillera mieux que moi pour ça

@@frozentime-mif7213 Hello. étrange, mon com à disparu... bon.. Sans doute y a t'il un gyroscope à bord ? pour contrôler de façon précise ce genre de mouvement, ça ne me semble pas déconnant. EDIT : Après, c'est peut être du Fake, mais je ne vois pas trop l’intérêt sur une vidéo de ce type.

Prove it

Do your own research...there’s plenty out there

@@stephhuskisson404 LoL, you can't prove shit because you are a moron that quit high school because "Uhg science is borinnng !" If you know the basis of an argument is that you say something that you could prove with sources and defend your argument. So everything you say is false. The famous "Ugh do your own research !" Go fuck yourself you MORON.

c a quel minute l avion ?

Mama Gayo 4:22

HAL NineOoO Swissair n'existe plus depuis longtemps . Maintenant c'est Swiss Internationale Air Line .

Protection Civile CH ils ont fait faillite?

Oui cela fait bien longtemps maintenant c'est "SWISS" Version courte - Version longue (Swiss Internationale Airlines)

Prove it with math and science.

​@@WebmsJU type in on KZfaq, Canada Laser Test Proves the Earth is Flat"

​@WebmsJU no scientific proof of spherical earth, at all. Here's scientific proof of a level, flat earth- please type in on YT, "Canada Laser Test Proves the Earth is Flat" its Real scientific evidence of it and there is much more out there if you look for it

Ali Digitali Merci

Putain merci !!! Ct qd mm le titre de la video !! Et pas 15min de documentaire putain !! Bande dencules a la recherche de vues

S A mais tu es bête ma parole, si tout ce qui t'intéresse c'est le sensationnel ben va en chercher y en a plein YTB

Ali Digitali merci

heroes amoung us ,,, respect a toi

It usually is up to a point, then reverses.

I wonder how heat from the sun looses energy enough to be -52 degrees.. and then gains energy again for surface temperature?!

@@cpvsgvmnt2116 The reason why the air higher up is cold is because the actual space radiation is traveling through is almost completely a vaccum in the atmosphere so the rays can go without hitting any atom warming it up but the ground is a lot denser so a lot more rays get absorbed by atoms so it heats up more and the radiation is transmitted trough convenction into the lower layers of the air so thats why its a lot colder when really high up. And for the slight increase of temperature in the stratosphere this is caused because the ozone is absorbing a lot of the highly energetic uv rays which the lower atmosphere is not really capable off

In my video, it's showing a decreasing temperature as the balloon elevates. 4 mins into the vid, they're showing temperature at -62 °F. Hackers stink. They're desperately trying to hide the truth. And the truth is at extreme temperatures whether high or low, nothing can survive.

exactly what i was thinking.

Gravity makes light curve as well

rob barret No, it’s not gravity it’s something else. Gravity does not exist. Closer to Electromagnetism which indeed does hold things in place but gravity no.

rob barret. It's the refraction of the icedome.

@@sp4rtyon Then prove it with marh and science

Windows XP watch. This has been proven over and over again. There is no curvature. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ic19ZLt4ldPLknk.html

Jim Lord. Mee too. And where's the dome?

Not high enough sorry

Harley G how high does it need to go? Always seems like people say you need to be higher to see the curve. Well how high?

They were useing an anti-fisheye lense that makes the world look like it's flat!

The curvature decided to not show up for this one. Maybe it was tired or just felt a little flat on this particular day.

Hector RAM. With an icedome that reflects the hologram stars.

@@christsrevenge8030 I dont know about that, but I am doing more observations. If that is true that will explain why the East see a double sun...

Hector RAM. The east meaning Russia? The stars are holograms from the pyramid in Greenland.

@@christsrevenge8030in Russia, India,Iraq..

I remembered in 2000 in California they launched a rocket and it hit something in the sky. ever sense that day I been asking questions and how NASA just talks about building hotels, and other B.s, but nothing ever happened.

Ditto. Dodgy being so close though...I thought launches would need clear airspace.

As the balloon gains altitude the atmospheric pressure outside gets less and the pressure inside the balloon expands until it reaches the bursting point or until a signal is perhaps sent to cause a burst. That's just my basic take on how it works. Different materials are another variable. A great project and wonderful video.

GoPro rocket has a video that show it hit something through water

@@truearther Link?

Mark N is right, if the balloon bursts. If the balloon doesn't burst from expansion it will reach an altitude where it's internal pressure equals the atmospheric pressure and simply won't go any higher.

So the question is can we make a balloon that can allow its pressure to be changed by using sensors to read the pressure as it reaches these critical points, and then eject a different kind of gas that will allow the balloon to pass the zone where the pressures are equal as J Richardson pointed out causing the balloon to go no further. I feel like the government has the capability to do this already. It'll take a strong balloon material and a new balloon design.(perhaps put three balloons inside the one balloon each with their own gas) so when one balloon with its own special gas reaches its point and is no longer helpful with climbing in altitude another balloon will fill up with a different gas of different density and pressure value just at the right time to bypass that zone and so on... and deflate the other balloons if need be. I feel like we're acting like cavemen with sending one balloon up with its one type of gas(or gas mixture if that's the case) where it just pops at a given height every time. Also is the air so thin up there that if a Drone was strapped to the balloon programmed to turn on and fly on auto-pilot when the balloon pops.. Would the drone be able to create enough thrust to continue going higher?

IS FLAT.

@@tiflahtovah1147 for sure

Cunca Gamesdroid go away, you’re a waste of skin

Cunca Gamesdroid Ur mom gay

@gaminglabrador5 lol according to who , you? Lol weak asf

Here ? No one ! Why ? Because we're living in the 21st century, in a world were everybody uses a new thing called the Metric system in stead of the archaic Imperial one :P

Wow

Wtf hors sujet vous êtes partout les soldats propagandistes même quant on vous cherche pas

I was waiting to see curvature and just like every other video without a fisheye lens did not show that famous 8 in per mile curve. I notice also that it was very short views of the horizon

@@dinopharis2876 I see that. But a H balloon can only go at 32km. The earth is big, and if you pause at 9/10m you can see a little curve.

@@WebmsJU I will we watch the video I am not saying it doesn't have a curve. But after nine years of researching theology and about 45 years of studying geography on my own I have a lot of questions. We should always question everything and never takefor granted that we are very intelligent. I have questioned doctors and ended up being correct and slowly figured out that even the most educated people in the world are not infallible. It is good that you are a science nerd my sons were all science nerds and today they are all successful and great young men. You have to remember there are evolution scientist and creation scientists. We are creatures and the word creature means something created. Our bodies are mere advitars we are temporarily using as a vehicle to experience this world. If you look deeper into quantum physics you will see that they do not always obey our laws of physics.

@@WebmsJU I agree. That bloom didn't seem like it could make it over 1000 feet in the air. I am suspicious of this video.

Infinite consciousness Yet you still think that the 8” per mile nonesense is relevant. Go back to school.

Again. The Earth is Flat. Globettards crying again hahahaha

@@in-inteligencianatural6216 👏👏 falando sobre balões os japoneses tb estão com aterra plana ,em agosto d 2014 LANÇARAM um balão q foi até 30mil metros ,são honestos pois na descrição consta uma go pro

your Brain is ________________________________________________

@@nebula6362 👍👍

IN - Inteligência Natural Yet one could clearly see the curvature of the horizon. Let me guess, it was a special camera that made the horizon look curved but not everything else. 😝

Are you people thick? Its obviously not far enough away from the earth to see the planet as as sphere!!!

@@ythinder O.K. you go try to measure the curvature. 8 inches per mile squared. Find a civil engineer or any structure that allows for curvature. If you can't measure a ball then it's flat. DUH. What's your best PROOF that we live on a ball/spinning/chasing the sun. Good luck HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

@@sportydiver Your brain must be flat, the earth has been measured and photographed from space, it doesnt look flat to anyone with half a brain, it's been researched out of sight, I spose you morons need something to cling to now that 9/11 is a distant memory......and have you ever witnessed a lunar eclipse? What shape is the shadow??????

@@ythinder Obviously he does not have a brain.

​@ythinder it's not a sphere, sorry

Kkkkkkkkkkkkkkk

Le pilote à sans doute remplis un rapport de "near miss"... Pas la première fois qu'un porteur croise un ballon météo ou autre objet volant (drone personnel) grrrr

Le pilote qui a des centaines d'heure de vol et qui connaît bien ce que c'est qu'un ballon météo. Un jour il oublie complètement ce qu'est un ballon météo et il appel la tour de contrôle. C'est fou seulement les pilotes d'avion oublie ce qu'est un ballon météo

😄😄😄😄👍👍👍👍👍👍😁😁😁😁😁

9:23 29km... I already see the curve

@@Santos3170 I know how lenses work, I'm a photographer, anyway in only one possibility you can tell "the earth is flat (or curved)": travel to the space and see it with your own eyes. But, you can see the other planets 🤷🏼‍♂️, all spheres and sattellites orbiting around them (for example, you have more examples, just choice)

PS iPeck Thanks for showing your wilful ignorance and Dunning Kruger. Better climb back down that rabbit hole it's obvious the world is too big and scary a place for you.

didn't go high enough, we would need to go up at least 10x more to prove that.

PS iPeck needs to be "Just thinkin" before they are, "Just sayin."

yeah, it left from France and returned to France because the earth isn't round or spinning.

@@FloodItAll important thing!

Earth is so flat it's undeniable , from such an altitude the horizon should not appear at eye level...only if cameras pointed down you would see a curved horizon of a sphere ...so far Flat Earth disc Geocentric theory reality wins...heliocentric tiny space balls faked theory looses..

@Genna Tuelz silly answer ....the creator sends you a merry Christmas wish !

@Genna Tuelz answer this first, so according to you, how high (kms or miles) would you need to hover above ground level to be able to see the horizon curvature under eye level, say looking down to "your globe, your theoretical sphere"

Bravo : Vive la science ! Ératosthène revient, ils sont devenus fous !

John Bull† Wick the atmosphere is part of the globe, otherwise we would have crazy stong winds

Can someone explain to me the science behind the atmosphere and how it travels the same speed as the rotation of the earth? Genuine question, I cannot seem to find the answer to this. Thanks!

@@Zackychan if you are right how you could expan the wind come from north to south and from east to wist.....why the wind is not part of the glob......how could you belive in the earth move with speed 1800 k. Have no efect in this huge alttiute

@@levarbutler7032 ask nassa how their rokkit get out from this speed of the earth to the space and how it come back to the earth....its fake man

Qualquer um pode encher o balão com hidrogênio e soltá-lo com uma simples câmera.

It is easy to explain. If the earth surface is traveling at 1000 km/h, so is the balloon and the atmosphere at the moment the balloon rises. So relative to eachother, both earth and the balloon aren't moving. The balloon drifts away due to the wind, but if there was no wind blowing, the balloon would come down even more near to the starting point. The only deviation it then experiences is the fact that it covers less distance at 1000 km/h because the circle it travels along is larger than the surface of the earth.

@@rinse-esnir4010 : Thanks for your explanation. I will do some research on it and get back to you. Have a great day!

Nice little curvature we see :)

Yes, incredible view on our globe earth 👌