In 3022 ad these type of people will say that sikh people originated in Canada and migrated as far as India.

Wasn’t the original cast system based on the work people did and capable of doing rather than based on birth which is what it is now?

Only agenda 👎😠

Arya is a sanskrit word which means one who is forward looking. It was used as a title for persons in high social position.

"The Veda was the most precious gift for which the West had ever been indebted to the East" - Voltaire

What about sinauli related to Vedic period where weapon, chariots of the time parallel to Harappa

For them Mahabharata and ramayana is a mythology.... And for us aryan invasion theory is mythology........ Hisab barabar😂🤣😂🤣😂

This guy is telling racist european view of india

I'm interested in knowing about these things but at the end of the day I just want to sleep peacefully in my bed....

Russia and Europe did not exist during the Ice Age... and Central Asia was part of Eurasia India and Persia. Most of the languages ​​come from Vedic Sanskrit and Avesta... So this is proof that there is no Aryan migration in history....only India and Persia's culture, languages, people, gods and civilizations are found all over the world.

Very enlightening and truthful video. Humans never stayed at one place. We all migrated from one to another place for thousands of years. Looking forward to read the book. ❤

Side effects of British imperialism of India 🤣😂😂there is no Aryan theory read ambedkar book they say this is propoganda of birtish leading at present india follow birtish leaning rather than what own leaders say that this theory 🤦

Indus people are our ancestors

Man you yet believe in Aryan theory?🙄 I won't be reading this book

Thank God I am The First Indian But discriminated for 5000 Years By some group of people know as Upper caste

That's wrong because you cannot build such a big ivc without slavery hence discrimination started with ivc

I have the answer = we all came from mother's womb !

Whatever the matter is main thing is that we are Indians and it our duty to protect and value our identity

Nice propaganda

Who were living in this land before all these migrations happened?

From the UK,a proud Celt…I have to say India was easily the single most fascinating country I ever visited;and I have been fortunate to visit many countries in Asia and elsewhere. India has a diverse,distinct and rich culture…everyone should attempt to go there once in their lifetime,it’s simply amazing!!!

Now i know where the original ''tukde tukde'' gang came from :)

Sanskrit is a Aryan language you can say it was influenced by Dravidian language but it wasnt the indian language at all

They say they thought us our culture, then accept vedic culture and leave Christianity.

We are aryans biggest joke of century😆😅🤣😂

everyone were Africans... end of conversation.

In the end we all are from pengea✌️

abey quint wale agenda leke misinformation post karte hai. matlab bilkul pureeee misinformation. i hope people realise how wrong this is and research on their own without using these quint, scroll or the wire as sources!

Tamil...oldest....close to elamite, a language of people from zagros mountains in southern Iran...these people were the ancestors of harappans...so, everyone of us is a foreigner except the indigenous onga and sentinelese living in the Andaman...bohot gyaan pel diya😂

He said everything about indian civilization without giving any evidence to support its theory...these are called great people.

I have 75% Persian ancestry and 25% ASI ancestry. I am living in Karnataka.

This is just Theory. Who knows what Really happened.

this tony joseph theory is fully bogus, he is a journalist with an agenda, not a archaeologist.

He is factually correct.

I'm from Indonesia, most of us, specially those from the Islands of Sumatra and Java would have 15 - 80% South Asian, vary from place to place.

Teach it to dalit army calling themselves moolnivasi and using it as an excuse to show hatred towards upper caste calling them aryan or invaders while real theory says migration

So many triggered " Aryans " , who are not even pure breed😁😁

A society always settles into a hierarchy - remember the Romans (patricians and plebeians) and monarchy and feudalism which has operated in the world for past 3000 years do not regard equality of humans as central. It is in the modern times that humans are trying to pivot societies around meritocracy where birth and background matter less for social and economic mobility. So my Christian brother please do not force fit your Tukde gang analogy to indicate that all societies beyond South Asia were based on equality.

He fails to mention another group which is mainly found in Himalayan and East Indian - Sino-Tibetan people.

Baseless theory

India doesn't need any theory,

so this applies for whole south asia ?

Bal Gangadhar Tilak and the Arctic Bal Gangadhar Tilak's emphasis on cultural-historical geography, evident in study of the Vedas, was an important intervention when geographical determinism was gaining dominance Sri Aurobindo, the renowned Vedic scholar, in his work, The Secret of the Vedas, appreciates Tilak’s interpretation noting that by examining the “Vedic Dawn, the figure of the Vedic cows, and the astronomical data of the hymns”, a strong probability of the Aryan race “descending from the Arctic regions in the glacial period” emerges.

This is a sensitive topic for many Indians as well since many have their identity attached to greatness of noble Vedic culture and Aryan ancestry. A few questions that pop in mind: * If India's political boundary today also included all the ancient Vedic cultures (Europe, Iran etc) and was called "Bharata", would one still be trying to prove "Out of India" theory? * Why not have a "Out of Kishkinda" theory where forest dwellers of Kishikinda jungles moved northward and mixed with Indians living in the gangetic plain (sure they do have some common genes)? or an "Out of Mexico or Brazil" theory where European migration into Americas never happened but it was the reverse? * How does one account for the fact that Europeans and most other Indo-European speakers in West Asia DO NOT HAVE any (that is, zero or virtually zero) South Asian IVC-related admixture in their DNA? (IVC = Indus Valley)? Does it not clearly show the direction of migration? I think an Aryan "Migration" happened and not invasion - IVC was already on a decline when Aryans came to India. Sure there were some initial violent interactions between Aryans and early settlers people in IVC, but that was a norm between different tribes/races around the world at that time and shouldn't be judged by today's moral standards (Classic books such as Sapiens or Third Chimpanzee is a great read in this area). My admiration for "Maryada purushottam" Lord Rama or Vedas still stands tall despite Aryan migration. An example of invasion is what Putin is doing in Ukraine today which is totally immoral. I do understand there could be a political ramification of this where a certain section calls "descendants of these Aryan settlers" (read "upper castes") as "foreigners". Many fear this has the potential to divide India and I acknowledge that sentiment, however in today's connected globalized multicultural world, people of all cultures/castes/races are "melting", does it matter anymore? If one reads books such as Sapiens and The Third Chimpanzee, we would understand how homo sapiens around the world are all connected, and have continuously migrated & come together to bring about big changes in how we live since we were hunter gatherers. No ethnic group around the world can claim an “original” homeland anymore, including the aborigines in Andaman or in Papua New Guinea. People need to be educated about this and the one-ness of entire humanity and not fall into trap of "one group is more exclusive/superior than other". Ironically, isn't this what "Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam" is about which we Indians are so familiar with? We shouldn't judge history by today's moral standards. History should be accepted as it is without any shame - be it good or bad. Glory of our ancient past doesn't become any less, and I am still proud of our Aryan forefathers. In conclusion, I would like to say that choice of words do matter as it has the power to send subconscious messages when we hear them. The words "invasion / raiders / annihilators / barbarians" isn't the right one to use for reasons mentioned above - context and history should be taken into account as well. Historians have a moral responsibility to be sensitive to perceptions created by the words they use.

THE MOST IMPORTANT PART OF VEDAS IS NOW FORGOTTEN THE VEDANT PART (ADVAIT). BUT EVEN IF WE JUST BE HONEST NOW THEN WE COULD BECOME A BETTER SOCIETY.

Iranian are the original Aryans who invaded India from the west, this what we call it as ARYAN INVASION. The country Name Iran itself means "Land of the Aryans" and Iranshahr. The very close relation between Iranian and Indo-Aryan groups has never been doubted. They share linguistic features to such a degree that Indo-Iranian is generally described as a distinct subgroup of Indo-European. The term Arya has been used by the Iranian people, as well as by the rulers and emperors of Iran, from the time of the Avesta. The well-attested Indo-Iranian languages are Vedic Sanskrit, Avestan and Old Persian. Sanskrit and Avestan are very closely related languages with exact grammatical principles and numerous cognates [Blood Relative]. You can find words which are exactly identical, like Sanskrit/Avestan naman (name), ushtra (camel) etc. Language, literature, epics & poems evolves every century. In Vedic/Hindu literature, Asuras (Ahuras) are bad guys while Devas are heroes. In Zoroastrian/Persian literature, Ahuras (Asuras) are heroes while Daevas are the villains. When the Vedic Aryans moved further, they arrived in the Indian subcontinent they were faced by the native Dravidians, Dravidians that got conquered were placed as low caste in Vedic Aryan society. The Vedic Aryans continued to call the enemy as “Asuras", but the description of the Asuras changed to Dravidians (i e. present day south-Indians) with dark skin, large facial hair etc. This itself is a proof that Rigveda evolved in Persia i.e. present day Iran and moved to Indian sub-continent. Initially Asuras (Ahuras) were referring to Zoroastrian/Persian and in later days Asuras were used to refer Dravidians. We have all the proofs for Aryan invasion in Rig Veda itself. Dasyus were the people who lived in India when the Aryans arrived here. They were having a dark-skin and flat noses. Battles depicted in the R̥gveda are directly referring to Aryans migrating into India which is native land of dark skinned people Dravidians. Rig Veda - Dasa: 54 hymns and 63 verses and Dasyus: 65 hymns, 80 verses. The accounts of conflict between the Aryans and the Dasas and Dasyus are acknowledged in Rig Veda. Rig Veda describes that Dasas and Dasyus were people who do not perform sacrifices. Aryans had to fight with these people for land. The Aryans defeated them and did not treat them well. The Aryan chief who overpowered Dasyus were called dasyuhatya (slaughter of the dasyus) this is repeatedly mentioned in the Rig Veda. Read the following to know more on this same subject Aryan by Birth - Upper Caste Fair Skin NORTH Indian (Brahmin, Kshatriyas & Vaisyas) Dravidian by Birth - Lower caste Dark Skin Sudras & Paraiahs / Panchamas (Dalits / Tribes) People living in Indian Sub continent who are ALL fair in complexion have mostly Steppe land R1A1 genes in their DNA these people are basically Aryan. More than caste it is the Skin color which decides whether some one is Aryan Or Dravidians. People living in Indian Sub continent who are Dark in complexion have mostly South Asian Hunter Gatherer genes in their DNA these people are Dravidian [Tamils] basically. Tamils means all Sudras & Paraiahs / Panchamas (Dalits / Tribes) lived/living across Indian sub - continent. Even today, you can see dark skinned and pale dark skinned people living across India in all places, they were all Tamils only in ancient India. "Justice H N Nagamohan Das Commission panel" says, Indian Vedic philosophy lead to social inequality and caste system, All these happened because of Brahmins, Upanishads, Manusrmiti, and epics like Mahabharata and Ramayana...” the commission said in its July 2020 report, which the BJP government formally accepted. The panel report also says that people belonging to Dravidian race resided in North India once upon a time. “Many foreign invaders such as ARYANS, Persians, Greeks, Huns, Turks, Mongolians, Europeans etc came and fought against local people. The rulers who won the war developed relations with local women and consequently emerged mixed races” About Kasthriyas, who ever had the courage and willpower they counqured the land [It is very difficult for a Sudhra to achieve this], for them even if they are from lower caste, Brhamins did NOT had any choice. So, Brahmins accepted who ever won the war as Kasthriyas except Muslim. Kasthriya Kings always married fair and good looking girls mostly. So, Kasthriyas community have a mix of Upper caste and lower caste DNAs in them. The ancient text Manusmriti designate the Shudra as Peasants and Artisans i.e. Farmers and All Craftsman, Shudra is NOT to mean slaves. Read the following facts about DNA Studies. Why R1A1 DNA originates in EUROPE, but not in india. why it is it not found or too less in percentage among South Indian people ? Why M haplogroups DNA is not found in Upper caste Aryans or North indians ? If found why so less ? If you have read Vedas there are lots of mention about a food made of Horse meat, then why HORSES are not native to INDIA ? Why copper hoard culture found only with Aryans, but not with Dravidians ? Why antenna swords found in Sinauli - India which belongs to BMAC - Bactria-Margiana Archaeological Complex ? Haplo M is found among 60% of modern day indians. It is in every person from south. But here’s the main catch ! It’s only found in depressed classes of northern and tribal peoples of northen india. But, almost to zero to 1-4% among Higher caste Aryans or North indians. Just like R1A1 not found in south in the same way south’s M groups are not found among R1A1 peoples of north. So, it is proved beyond doubt that "ALL upper caste Fair Skin North Indians are ALL ARYANS, and all lower caste Dark Skin Sudras & Paraiahs / Panchamas (Dalits / Tribes) are all Dravidians"

True.. I always think why some people from tamilnadu are black than majority of North? some say due to heat and warm weather then how Arabs are white? Then they should be black as well.. So there is a migration happened from Africa.

Alternate truths as usual by Quint. My dear sir while I agree with most of what you say. The term Aryan is more like a quality than a race or person. There is a slight almost undiscernible twisting going on with the truth.

India is just a mixture of various old civilisations then

Basically Sanskrit language are similar to old slavic

Wow!! What a history sir... 9000 years where India filled Africans, just 5000 years wher sanskrit came to India. Then what about Ramayan written in Sanskrit found more than that time with evidences. Indo-European language, are u serious?? If we can't trace a thing doesn't mean that it is false... First of all understand the Civilization.

Why only migration from outside not from India to outside

Tony Joseph presents facts based on scientific approaches. Unfortunately many might not appreciate it because it doesn't fit their political or racist agenda. Anyway, he's done a good job.

but what are the percentage of dna of these 4 groups generally in today's people from different regions in india currently?

The caste system is living proof that genetics will always find a way to separate themselves and create identities of their own. there is no avoiding it. It is nature at work and nothing more

I have a copy of the book by Tony Joseph, "Early Indians" in front of me as I write. Overall, his opinions are in close keeping with a recent DNA study done by Priya Moorjani and her colleagues at the University of California, Berkeley, published in 2024. This was of of over 2700 Indian individual genomes. She also published a smaller study in 2018 of around 600 genomes. The studies state that the earliest migrants into India arrived starting around 50,000 years ago as a single large migration. Fast forward to 4700-3000 BCE, Iranians moved here, followed by herders of the Eurasian Steppe such as Tajikistan starting around 3000 BCE. I would class the last two as "Aryans." Sri Joseph mentions a genetic study done by Priya Moorjani in 2013 on page 211. It was of 571 individuals, published in the American Journal of Human Genetics though he did not quote that reference. Seems to me that Priya Moorjani and colleagues have conducted multiple studies. The 2024 publication shows the genomes of the largest collection of genomes yet. But that said, Sri Joseph's theory about the "Caste" system developing in the first century CE is completely WRONG. The Buddha is said to have lived around 2500 years ago. He is documented to have admonished Brahmins countless times. Seems to me his main focus in life was to ridicule Brahmins. If that is the case, it is as clear as daylight that the "Caste" system existed even prior to the Buddha. In any case, the word "Caste" needs to be thrown out the window. Why? The word used in Vedic times was VARNA. The word Jati (pronounced Jaathi) was also used to refer to communities. Varna (Reference, Chapter 18, verses 41-45 of the Bhagavad Gita) refers to the COLORS OF PERSONALITY INHERENT IN ANY PERSON. Varna is NOT based on birth, as per those verses. Please do read those verses for details. Even the Rig Veda clearly talks about the divisions of humanity based on functionality. The word "Caste" is a modification of a PORTUGUESE word, CASTA. The British adopted it with great enthusiasm in order to divide up Indians in their "Divide and Rule" policy. Sadly, the Indian Congress government after independence has pushed the caste divisions far far more aggressively than the British ever did. So here we are today in India, being torn apart into pieces but yet achieving great success economically.

But Harahan civilization is a thamiz civilization 🙄. How is this 65k years migration came🤣🤣. Dude have u ever studied history in your lifetime

" हे आर्य " That was how people used to address each other in the past. It was a संबोधन . Aryan theories developed after british started colony here by british Researchers. It was so glorified everyone wanted some drops in their body. असली में हिटलर ही कुछ उखाड़ा, बाकी बकवास करता चला

What caused beginning of endogamy if people were already mixed pretty well 🤔? Was there any king or huge kingdom that can make the system work in every part of subcontinent even in small villages?? I find it wierd

Historians and Geneticists see an opportunity here to map human migration and history Politicians see this as an opportunity to divide people and complete the Trinity of divide, With religion, caste and finally race

some hardcore Abhijit Chadha fan-followers seem not to digest these scientifically explained hard facts😄

Great sir👍. its very fact if u can just research.👍 10000 years history, u tell us only in 6 mints.

I think the quint should look into Abhijit chavda sir's recent research about the Aryan invasion myth Oh oh sorry but why would you it would not support your ideology

Exactly this is what I've been trying to explain to one of my friends, i was trying to tell in more scientific way and she was freaking out and asking me which book ? Where is it written? Aisa kuchh nahi hai, Kya genetics. I was quite shocked to see what the current ideology of leaders and other so called "sanskriti preachers" have done to educated students. She's a science student but doesn't accept such logical research.

Which is older Tamil or Sanskrit on you tube

Question when a person of India descent and take a DNA test or 23 Ancestry test what are you call I thought it was East Asia?. That the Asian was chinese.

No matter if we came from outside or were there in india from long.. right now we are all indians.. People might call me secular as if it any derogatory term..infact these extremists have romanticised their conservatism while demonised liberalism for which people died..

The main "sensitivity" comes from the concept of the 1900s theories of the migration which was seen as an "invasion" that was postulated by the West and used warpedly by the Nazis. Also, it stems from the concept that Indian history starts from a Euro-Centric perspective- That the Vedas were given by some invading culture, though as the video mentioned, it was formed in India from various influences. European culture developed very differently from Indian culture, so it shows that the mixing of the different people of India is what makes the Indian culture "Indian" and European culture "European". Many of the well known Indian Gods are black in Skin color like Krishna/Rama etc but that was neglected. Also, the speculations of culture being within 6000 years is due to Europeans seeing the Indian cultures (as well as other cultures) from the perspective of the Bible- At that time, the Bible was the main authority of cultures, but cultures also predate this from the Indian tradition. The other issue comes from the fact they wanted to make Mesopotamian culture seem like it was prior to Indian, when in reality, many civilizations actually developed simultaneously and go older than the Biblical 6000 years. Most Indians are fine knowing that they are "mixed"- that is what makes them now known as "Indian."- they have the concept of Vasudeva Kutumabgan (the world is our family) because that is what they see- A diverse society where brothers and sisters can be different colors and many within the culture wanting to transcend the very notions of concepts of form. The sensitivity is due to the fact that Nazis appropriated certain concepts of Indian culture without actually understanding the essence of Indian culture/spirituality/philosophy in a warped way unfamiliar to the very essence of Indian culture- Like telling someone that Taco Bell is part of Mexican culture, or that Yoga was developed for Rich White Americans and not listening or caring to hear a different perspective. The issue mainly was from lack of respect of the understanding of Indians and their history and being told their history is only relevant if seen from a Western perspective of racism and subjugation- Indians these days are literally taught their history from a Western perspective. And those in India who continue the Aryan/Dravidian divide, are very ignorant of their own texts and sources and are ravaged from a time of racism.

Moral of the story Ariyan are politically sensitive tribe may in Europe or in India.😂😂😂

This is superb! Wish the evidence of science, archeology and history would penetrate the pachydermic mantle that clouds the delusional reasoning of hate-mongers who are determined to rip apart the unique and rich weave of our ancient and diverse land.

AIT show aryan people come to india at the time of1500 bc and they formed rigvedas and chariots. But oldest chariets was found only india at sinoli and saraswarhi river was dried up at 2000 bc and is mention in new vedic texts. This shows that aryan invation theory is false. This was put forward by communis, europians like british because they have idendity. Europen is an idea not a idendity. There is a story, war of ten kings where he expels tribe outside india after a victory in vedas.

The person speaks without studying Vedic literature. It is very evident that vedas are a minimum of 15k years ago. Manusmriti recommends to walk on the bank of saraswathi to clear some of the sins. Saraswathi extincted 4k-5k years ago. So, manusmriti is minimum 5k-6k years ago. Then think vedic literatures which are much much older than manusmriti.

Nowadays no one in india is Aryan or Dravidian...we all r mixed up.... I'm a bengali nd i know I'm mixed....I know my dad's ancestors were Aryan and mom's Dravidian...

The Aryan trash theory was used as a justification for colonialism by the British and the toxic left wing even today. Tum bhi lootere the, hum bhi lootere hai. It has no basis in reality. The basis of this theory is that there was a hypothetical Proto-Indo-European language in the Steppe plains of Eurasia which gave birth to all the major languages on this planet. But there's not a single trace of evidence that such a language existed and was spoken. No proof whatsoever.

Very enlightening. Thank you!

Aryan invasion theory > Aryan Migration theory > Aryan Tourism theory > Aryan Honeymoon theory > Aryan love theory > Aryan miracle theory

Aryan migration issues are actively discussed online in the main English-speaking segment. Some commentators jokingly describe the tendency of the Aryan theme as an attempt to transplant them on horses. I think the historical data do not tend to this. But there are pressing problems faced by politicians, economists, the military, etc., these are communications around the Himalayas. Communication is possible when there is peace in the region. Therefore, around the Himalayas we need: Trust, Consent, Goodwill. It would also be understandable and expedient: 1 transport: road and rail links. 2. “Circular Caring Grid. Where energies are accumulated and sent to the addressee through correlated consolidated power systems. Logistically connected gas and oil pipelines. 3. Tourism. The Himalayas is a nuclear-free zone, such should be, with a clean ecology, clean energy associated with tourism, sports, and recreation along the entire route. The Peace March can become an additional conductor of a new outlook on life, the prospects for mutually enriching good intentions around the Himalayas. 4. “information flows. Nonviolence around the Himalayas. Information resource conducting the ideas of peace and non-violence (M. Gandhi, Abay and others). 4. What do we have on this issue. Almaty, monument to Mahatma Gandhi, School named after M. Gandhi on the street. M. Gandhi. Cultural heritage of Abai as a peaceful coexistence of countries and peoples. Start near the monument to M. Gandhi. Photo for memory, media, television and radio broadcasts. New opportunities for a world without violence, which were guided by M Gandhi. “… Central Asia is located at the crossroads of Eurasia. He was caught in the streams of history, and that is also his form. He has seen the rise and fall of empires. He has witnessed trade and prosperity, the ebb and flow. For monks, merchants, and monarchs, it was like a destination and passage. It was the mediator of cultures and faiths from all over Asia. Your gifts to human civilization have been rich. Your imprint on the progress of mankind lasts ...”(from the speech of the Prime Minister of India N. Modi at Nazarbayev University, Astana). Stops on the route. 1. Stop in Lhasa (China), speeches of gratitude to the Chinese leadership for the opening of the M. Gandhi center in Beijing, and the possibility of creating a working corridor on the parikrama route along the Himalayas. 2. Stop in Delhi, near the centers of M. Gandhi, puja, offering flower petals to the place of Gandhi. Peace through culture program. 3. Stop in Multan (Pakistan), suggests a rally on the occasion on the occasion of the end point of the passage of TAPI for peace and non-violence, in the region, the entry of TAPI through the Fazilka point into India. Opportunities for advancing to the borders of China, mention of Gandhi 4. Stop in Herat, confirmation of the ideas of non-violence for peace in the region on the occasion of the passage of TAPI through Afghanistan, a short meeting - a demonstration for peace and non-violence, a mention of the construction of a dam by the Indians. 5. Stop in Mary (Turkmenistan), involves a rally on the occasion of the completion of the passage of TAPI, with slogans for peace and non-violence, a mention of the Gandhi monument in Ashgabat. 6. Stop in Dushanbe (Tajikistan) involves a rally near the monument R. Tagore, mention of what R. Tagore called Gandhi - Mahatma. Mahatma is an Aryan term in the Mahabharata it is applied to the vizier Vidura. Guest speeches for peace, non-violence and prosperity. 7. Stop, Tashkent (Uzbekistan), a meeting for friendship and non-violence, it is also possible to visit the M. Gandhi corner at the University, or the L. Shastri monument. 8. Stop in Bishkek (Kyrgyzstan) involves a rally, near the monument to M. Gandhi, for peace and non-violence. Arrival in Almaty means the successful completion of the parikrama route around the Himalayas, for the happiness and prosperity and peaceful future of the peoples of the region.

There is a very strong out of India theory present now a days .... Countering this video ..... Anyone interested should go through it ...

Nobody was superior than anybody, some were good at one thing, others were good at other things and together a new culture was developed in present day India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal and all the rest. We are all mixed, very true that's why you find Indians with huge contrast options....haha....

"to call other's information as misconception" Do you think this proves you an INTELECTUAL?

Thank you for this presentation on Indian history and the origin of caste system.

"We never came from We went from Bharat "

Try explaining it to my relatives 🤷

I felt really depressed watching this video

Thank you for this information. The conflict created by the Aryan migration is not a surprise. My high school history course did not explain Indian history this way; DNA technology has cleared up the history of India and many other places around the world.

India is a mixed country Everyone come from Africa And Aryan invasion/migration is wrong

Somebody from Jat Punjabi caste in Pakistani Punjab did a DNA analysis and it turns out they have persian and central asian ancestry.

I'm happy that much of my people (Indians) are welcoming & questioning science. But still a lot of ignorant blind believers are blaming archeological, linguistic and genetic sciences with baseless arguments. They even disagree DNA profiling and sequencing results. 2min silence for them. Science is meant to be questioned, explored and challenged with non-biased ideas. This is what we educated people need to do. Many of the comments here still simply yells with baseless blind immature patriotism, religious concerns and race concerns. Think wise, Learn from multiple sources, Go out of the box, Read research articles, Explore your own. Be an educated proud Indian.!

There is no word called aryan in ancient Hindu scriptures likes of Vedas. But there is a word called Arya which means noble man.... even there is no proof of any invasion other than some genetical and linguistic similarities.

All Bull Crap. Aryan is mentioned in Bhagwat Gita which I am reading. Aryan Invasion theory is absolutely wrong

Indian went to Europe Not indians came from Europe Foreign funded media exposed 😂

You didn't mention abt Rakhi Garhi findings and their place in your analysis ....how it will impact more on our identity !!!

I have read of a theory that kind of makes sense to me. The first people migrated along the coasts from Africa eventually to the Ganges area. From there, groups divided and evolved into 3 races. Turanians to the east, Aryan (who were brown) on the west and the Indo-Africans who scattered to the south, southeast, and back to Africa. The brown Aryans eventually migrated west, northwest and north up along the Indus River to the Pamir Mountains and what is today Western Tibet. Turanians migrated East, northeast and north as well into the eastern Tibet area. The people in the cold regions of Central Asia lost their brown pigmentation and became the so-called white Aryans and white Turanians (Mins). From there various groups evolved and migrated (after the Ice ages) to add to the scant populations of Europe, northern and Eastern Asia and the Americas.

Discoveries in Sinauli have changed the dynamics of history. Putting the invasion theory aside and rendering it baseless.

Indians didn't come from anywhere else, it is everyone else who came from India.

Tamil and north fight for Aryan and Dravidian. Me who is telugu guy who don't bother either I am a Aryan or Dravidian just I say పరమేశ్వర🙏(parameshwara) and కృష్ణ (krishna) and say all gods and languages are one. It's ur wish, telugu is my mother tongue, learnt english can speak Hindi,tamil and I knw how sanskrit

Aryan invasion theory 1900 😂😂 Aryan migration theory 1990😂😂😂 Then it will become Aryan tourism theory 2030😂😂 basically it actully debunks itself .. first they say they bring vedas and now they are saying vedas are inherited in india only .. because proff of river saraswati debunks them ... remains of Lost city of dwarka debunks it 😂😂 rakhighari debunks it , sinouli debunks it... Rest u all are experts do your own research and find the truth don't believe anyone by watching just a video

After seeing this video, I'm afraid to eat Pizza!! I'm afraid to chew Indian History, Anthropology & Genetics!! I don't wanna History sheeter!!!😮

Whatever in sanskrit is aryan's making.. they were invaders with horses came to north india.. they created sanskrit, vedic system, caste system by making themselves as brahmins of the highest hierarchy.. the true indigenous ppl are the dravidians(tamils) likely originated from harappa civilisation at the lost river of sarawathy.. there is even an ancient tamil city of Harappa in pakistan.. u guys can google and see.. but indian government is covering up because mostly are aryans and they will nvr acknowledge tamil as the oldest spoken language in the world.. soon links to indus pictograph are being decrypted using spoken Tamil.. incredible breakthrough.. that would bring back glory to Tamils whom were suppressed by the aryans for centuries till today.. so dont believe onto whatever the aryans made.. they are the crook brahmins plundered india's wealth and followed by british.. the original proto-shiva seal found in harappa civilisation in a meditative state can be directly linked to south india... incredibly the harappa civilisation emphasised on drainage system, fertility, equility, animal rights, self and social well being plus also meditation.. all these with emphasise to water can be seen in our Tamil culture.. the aryan's are from mesopotamian blood where they believed in gods, kings, pyramids, zigurats, temples, hierarchy totally different from harappa civilisation where there was not even weapons or war.. that is the ultimate shiva's teaching brought over by the dravidians to south india.. aryan mixed and destroyed most of the authentic Tamil teachings.. by right dravidians dont even pray during their civilisation, they only meditate because they have already came to realisation thousands of years ago.. om namah shivaya

Not convincing.