True even same feeling

She didn't modify her game. Stayed too passive. Imagine if she had a bit more power and aggressive mindset combined with her court sense and craftiness could have won a couple of slams. Plus i think Dementieva was the other best player who didnt win a slam

Definitely not as good as Dementieva, who was one of the few players during the time of the Williams sisters that could stay with them on groundstrokes. She definitely could've won multiple slams had she improved her serve earlier in her career. Radwanska reminded me a lot of Jankovic, who also only made one grand slam final, when she, too, lost to Serena -- at the 2008 US Open. She was kind of between Jankovic and Capriati for me in terms of style and physical attributes. A lot of people compared her to Hingis, too.

Radwanska sometimes depends too much on her opponent to make errors, unfortunately for her in GS the good players like Azarenka and Serena dn make that much errors so she din do well in GS.

Radwanska is the most frustrating player I've ever watched. She was just never aggressive enough. People say she was crafty and had finess, but finess and court craftiness alone are not gonna win you a slam (esp in this era)

Aga be!

@Robin Vaeyens *Pushed* her to three sets is stretching, practically every Radwanska’s service game was under pressure. She did well to wrestle out the second set from defeat when Serena was leading by a set and a break in the second set but at no point at all in the match you feel Serena is being pushed

@Amanda Cerny No one is mad :)

@@znamir1493 you are

@@amandacerny8145 haha keep deleting comments mad mad

her best is 2012 and 2013

Serena didn’t play well in 2015, even at the Slams-somehow found a way, but awful error count, was unhealthy and lost the first set in sooo many matches. 2002, 2003, 2012 and 2013 are by far her best years.

Also it’s worth noting that Radwanska did beat Serena in Hopman Cup in 2015-sure it’s an exhibition, but one Serena still takes very seriously as she considered those loses “real” whenever someone brought up that she was undefeated before Madrid 2015. And that was the only time Aga ever beat Serena.

@@bryanmartin5901 totally agree but still 3 grand slams in 2015 are impressive.

Radwanska played fantastic! Serena is just too good on grass, wimbledon is her best tournament

Aga deserved that final more than Serena. But Kerber and Halep still plated pretty good and I say that they would have had a chance against that « super Serena ».

Serena was definitely not playing her best in this match lol.... If you want a real battle then search azarenka vs Williams 2013 us open final....I'm sure you're gonna change your mind on the best final

@@alexfrosa2163 How did Radwanska deserve this title more than Serena? Serena had a perfect 13-0 grass season that year and beat a bunch of top players in both Wimbledon and the Olympics. At Wimbledon she hit a hsitoric record of 105 aces throughout the tournament and knocked out defending champion Kvitova in the QF and Azarenka in the SF who spent most of 2012 ranked #1.

@@Empy003 I'm pretty sure they meant best Wimbledon final of the decade. I'd still argue that it was the 2016 final though.

@@regulusarcturus but they just used the phrase" best of the decade" amd not "best Wimbledon"

She lost concentration in the 2nd set . It could have ended in 2. The charity queen gave Radwanska something to remember and her box to cheer about

@@ayoayo7730 For sure it could have ended in 2, she was the better player, but I think she lost her focus because of nerves after all she went through in 2010, and the two years without slam

She lost 2nd set because Aga was better player in 2nd set. Don't praise Serena by taking away from Aga.

Actually she had her best chance a year later in 2013, when she faced Lisicki in the SF and lost after a very close match in 3 sets (I think it was 7-9 in the last set). Had she won she would've played Bartoli in the Final and their H2H was at the time 5-0 for Radwanska. I'm sure it would've been an easier final for Radwanska than the one against Serena and she would've been a clear favorite... At least Poland finally has a GS champion, now that Iga Swiatek won the French Open!

Luck has nothing to do with it.

@@MyPumpkin00 HTH was 7-0 for Radwanska.

@@MyPumpkin00 The thing about GS finals is you just never know how both players are going to come on court. Despite the H2H, Bartoli was fearless, and maybe Aga would have felt this really was her chance, causing a horrible performance. This also was the case at this year's UO.

@@orbitalwarrior indeed! Fear and nerves get to any player. Just ask Serena. Look what happened to Venus in Wimbledon 2017 against Garbine. Ofc Garbine is lethal player when she’s on, and Vee possibly could have been fatigued but to get throttled in the second set of Wimbledon like that? Her first final since 2009… Nerves are killer. I have them and I’m not even pro

@Nathan Marc Juste in 16,17, it were power hitters again also in 2011.

Including doubles?

Really?. 😳😯, 102 aces in 2012 wimbledon?..

@@vishalsharma_0705 Yes, really (over 7 matches) She sort of won Wimbledon twice in 2012 because the Summer Olympic Games were played there in August.

In under a minute hahah

lepiej tak niż jak setki jej współczesnych z całej siły wszystko, kilka czy kilkanaście mega efektownych zagrań i finalnie przegrane mecze o najwyższą stawkę...tenis to nie jazda figurowa na lodzie czy skoki narciarskie, gdzie są punkty za styl, tenis to gra, w której wygrywa ten kto raz więcej przebije piłeczkę w kort i nic więcej, jak starczy tylko przebić to po co więcej...i żeby było jasne piszę to z perspektywy gracza, a nie kogoś kto tylko patrzy na tenisowe mecze i myśli, że z perspektywy widza, który nigdy nie trzymał rakiety tenisowej w dłoni wie o czym pisze...a tak swoją drogą to ciekawy fenomen, że na świecie wszyscy się Radwańską zachwycali, a my potrafiliśmy tylko narzekać jak to słabo gra i że to co osiąga to zasługa słabości rozgrywek a nie jej ciężkiej pracy, szkoda, że odnośnie piłkarzy nie potrafimy być aż tak do bólu "obiektywni" w ocenie ich poziomu i osiągnięć...

Which is like asking her to serve 155mph.

Bo gdzieś tam w pewnym sensie można powiedzieć że niespełniony. Aga dysponowała NIESAMOWITYMI zagraniami, ale wydaje mi się że gdyby zmieniła trenera, wygrałaby szlema (z takim talentem powinna wygrać 10 tytułów!!!!). Federer zmienił trenera, po czym polepszył serwis. Ten trener Agnieszki tylko spijał śmietankę z nagród z turniejów niewielkoszlemowych, i z poznania z Navratilowej. Żaden inny tenisista czy tenisistka nie miał tak ogromnego talentu "od Boga" jak Radwańska (no może Nadal czy Federer).

STEROIDS NOT HER THING

She’s weak.

She's not built that way. Look at what happened to Jankovic when she tried to ignore the strengths of her game and tried to become a power player. I think Aga knew to focus on what she does best which is to outsmart, outrally and outmaneuver her foes than try to overpower them.

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/orN8oNeV2deUqaM.html&ab_channel=TENNISANALYSIS

What you would “rather see” means nothing. The person who wins EARNS the title. That means the person who loses wasn’t good enough. Your preference is irrelevant.

@@fixthatface483 cry at the US open 2018 final idiot:)) The "rather see" has very different meaning with the fact and you can't event distinct it? The "better" player deserve winning doesn't have nothing to do with my wish to see my favourite player to win so your comment is so nonsense.

@@triviennguyen5191 The “rather see” has NO meaning at all because YOUR desires are IRRELEVANT in sport, you silly fool. Your favorite player LOST because she is a LOSER. Now shut up.

@@fixthatface483 we all have our fans and desire player and not a robot. Seeing an idiot like you go throw every comment and barking such childish stupid and rude language make me laugh my ass off:)) The world preferrence never depends on individual thinking. Now cry at us open 2018 final because your " BETTER PLAYER" is not only a SORE LOSER but a DRAMA QUEEN:))

I beg to differ. Hingis is the nemesis of the Williams. Hingis is relentless. Hingis is not that kind to be toyed around.

I think hingis would've put up a good fight, but yeah prime serena is obviously just the best

Man I really hate that term. Wish people wouldn't use it anymore

@@evanh7072 why u hate that term ?

@@santoshthapa8398 because it oversimplifies and takes away from all the skill involved in aga's game

It is a big misconception that Aga is a just pusher since she uses the whole court so well and is potent on the baseline or at the net. Also, the signature shots she pulls off are very difficult to execute even for the average pro tennis player.

wait what? radwanska plays the same as swiatek? Swiatek is a power hitter, for example average Serena Williams Forehand speed is around 118-119 km'h, while Iga Swiatek's is often in the average range of 117-127 km/h with more topsin than serena williams, Radwanska was hitting on average at 106 km/h, in many matches this season iga swiatek was hitting harder than average serena, not talking about serve of course

You have no idea what you are talking about.

@@kamilkrupinski1793 Why?

XD

Sierota wyszla na kort sama nie wie po co, zeby sie poplakac

Technika za Agnieszka jak najbardziej... Sila za Iga. W latach 2000 tak silnych zawodniczek nie bylo, przynajmniej na poczatku lat 2010. Wtedy Aga szla. Potem kazdy skumal, ze silowy tenis daje sukces no i sie zaczely problemy dla Isi... zaczely sie Halep, i inne, ktore graja "mocną" pilke czy to kros czy po prostej, a Aga wiecznie bronila, wiele ma szotow technicznych swiata za to ja doceniam, swiat idzie dalej i tenis tez...

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/orN8oNeV2deUqaM.html&ab_channel=TENNISANALYSIS

Po pierwsze, to był chyba jeden z finałów Wimbledonu, gdzie Serena była zmuszona grać w 3 setach, więc o czymś to mówi, Po drugie, to Iga ma tak słabą głowę, że ona absolutnie NIE JEST w stanie zmieniać styl gry, po prostu brak jej planu B, C, D i tak dalej... To było to, w czym Agnieszka była tak genialna- inteligencja na korcie. Tego brakuje Idze, i chyba już zawsze będzie brakowało. Po trzecie, to na pewno pokonałaby Igę, ponieważ Iga oprócz siły nie ma absolutnie żadnego planu na zmianę gry, gdy widzi że coś się jej nie udaje.

What’s funny is that Serena really cares about your comment. LOL!!

@@lloydwhitty6780 lol exactly

and fyi, you dont even deserve to watch her godly body

What about Sharapova, Vika and Muguruza? or you just have a problem with Serena? It’s not her fault if Aga doesn’t have any power or doesn’t have another game plan. It went to 3 sets because Serena lost focus in the 2nd set and also to give something to Ago to improve her resume if not Serena would end it in 2 sets.

And u are high class gd for u

Why is the go to here about class? Serena may not be the classiest player... but why cant we appreciate what she does bring to the court... passion and gritt!! Where is your sense of difference and diversity in character? :/

lol screaming makes you a low class lady??? that means your mother's one too? when she let that tragic thing happen on your birthday??

@@luciansanchez8100 she is one of the classiest, if not , the classiest out there. the intense passion for tennis inside her is just too much to handle for dim witted people. accept that and respect her.