I am currently studying LLB Law in the UK and have had the unfortunate experience of working on a task where we were advised to use the IRAC method after our group had already submitted the work. You can only imagine how many "mistakes " were made since we did not follow any set format. Thanks for your detailed explanation it is very helpful.

I have watched lots of videos, but none is as detailed and well explained as this. This is really helpful. Thank you very much. Please keep the videos coming.

Thank you!! I am currently working on Laws of Cyberspace and Laws of Evidence so I was overwhelmed. You're appreciated!!

I was just introduced to this concept for my Legal Business class.

I really enjoyed this video because I have been struggling with identifying whether to smoosh or go deep. Well, let me get deep in practicing now.

It is really useful for a newcomer in the JD program! Thanks a lot!

Thank you so much for this great lesson.

This is great. Quite helpful.

Great explanation. Thanks Prof

I like you very much the way you elaborate

I'm doing my assignment now a days so I'll use this... Thanks

Professor, I am going to use this methods so I can understand more about it?

Thanks. You helped me a lot with my exam and also you are handsome.

Perform legal reasoning: General overview: Be exposed to facts that a client brings , determine what legal issues arise from those facts. What constitutes a single issue? Apply the facts and the fact pattern to the rule. Analysis/application section is where: you make analogies (similarities) & distinctions (differences) State only the rules that pertain to the issue. The cases you have read corroborating Conclusion, what would a court likely conclude on the issue, tend to do/conclude Conclusion in line/parallel to analysis , which will show that what you wrote is strong, so conclude on what a court will likely hold for each issue

😀