Support Digital Mimbar, Shop Khalifah Klothing: khalifahklothing.com Subscribe to the Digital Mimbar KZfaq Channel and click on the notification bell: kzfaq.info​ Like DigitalMimbar on Facebook: facebook.com/DigitalMimbar/ Follow DigitalMimbar on Twitter: twitter.com/DigitalMimbar

One point I picked up from this video is that.. you cannot learn tawheed and its essence by just reading or watching some few videos, you really have to dedicate some of your time to seek and study/learn the concept of tawheed. Only then, one can understand and internalize Tawheed. May Allah make us amongst those who truly affirm Tawheed in our hearts and also make us amongst those who reflect/apply the affirmation on our limbs and action.

May Allaah protect shaykh Taahir from every evil

Such a refreshing and much needed way to challenge someone else viewpoint WITHOUT trying to embarrass them. ماشآء الله May Allah bless Sh. Tahir

May Allah protect us from shirk, major and minor, and guide those people who are lost or misguided ameen

Aslalmalaikam wr wb.Very good video. JazakAllah khair.

Jazakh Allah for the clearcut explanation...❤️❤️

May Allah reward you abundantly shakyh for clarifying this very important topic

May Allaah preserve you in good health and increase you in a beneficial knowledge. Masha Allaah!

A valuable brother for those who are from Philly especially and the West generally.

Alhamdulillah This was very good to listen to. BarakAllahu Feek

"Do not say of those who are killed in the way of Allah that they are dead; they are alive even though you have no knowledge of their life" (2:154)"Never think of those who have been killed in the cause of Allah as dead. Rather, they are alive with their Lord, receiving provision" (3:169) Do not take things out of context. The meaning OF THIS AYAH does not imply that a dead can somehow hear you. Dead is dead even Rasullulah is dead. That is exactly what Abubakar said shortly after the death of Rasullah. He said "for those who used to worship Muhammad, Muhammad is Dead. For those who learn from Muhmmad the way to worship Allah, Allah is always alive. There is not a single word recorded in the history of Islam that indicates that after the death of Muhammad Rasullulah people were coming to his grave and asking any kind of their needs or interceptions Allah (Azzawajal) is closer than the vein of your neck to you. Even if you are next to the grave of Muhammad Rasullula his body can never be closer than the veins in your neck to you. Muhammad is Dead. Allah dies not. Asking Allah (Azzawajal) for your needs in WHORSHIPING HIM.

May Allah bless you and reward you. It is really an amazing lecture. Now I admire Muhmmad ibn Abd Al-Wahhab even more. May Allah have mercy on him. I really benefited from this lecture and the sources you presented. Thank you a lot!

The bottom line: 1) The essence of tauheed is to single out Allah s.w.t in ibadah i.e. worship. By implication, worshipping others besides or along with Allah is shirk. 2) In the case of the people of Ibrahim a.s, they worshipped idols whom they did NOT believe could hear or benefit or harm i.e. they did NOT consider them to be gods. Yet, what they were doing was referred to in the Qur'an as ibaadah (i.e. "maa ta'budoon")!!! 3) So, based on the 2 premises above, can one then perform an act of worship to other than Allah, absolve himself of shirk whilst claiming he does NOT consider his object(s) of worship to be gods besides Allah? The answer is a categorical NO. May Allah guide us all and keep us firm upon tauheed

As we can't judge a book by it's cover, we can judge a man by what he says, but should look into his actions. And Wahab has so many vile actions which he committed in this world.

His understanding of shirk does not give him the right to sanction rape robbery and murder of Muslims or anyone for that reason

Amazing. Ma Sha Allah. This man is a legend

and other contemporary scholars have discussed the reality of shirk in the Arabian peninsula. One example is shaykh dr. Sultan al omayri.

Mumtaaz lecture tabarakAllah. May the sheikh be amongst the rabbaniyeen.

cant believe this is even a debate... Allahu mustAn

What a scholarly way of responding to the issue. This is how you respond not with a 5 or 10 minute video. May Allah bless the shaykh and increase him with knowledge.

JazakAllahu khairan. Q - Where can i get madarij as salikeen english trans 46:53 47:12

BarrakAllaahu feekum.

ماشاءالله تبارك الله

Brothers the evidences start at 18:32. And I recommend also watching "THE MISCONCEPTIONS ABOUT SH. MUHAMMAD IBN ABDUL WAHHAB | SH. JALAL ABUALRUB" from channel "One Dawah". Barak'Allahu feekum!

thanks to brother yasir qadi... his criticism towards muhammad bin abdul wahhab ends up having more people get adressed by muhammad bin abdul wahhab and fell in love with the great da'wah of him...alhamdulillah,I have now more love in my heart for shaykhul islam ibn abdula wahhab than in past

Shaykh Tahir's adab in dealing with this phenomenal, Barakallahu feehi.

Masha Allah

To some commenters ! It is not a Shaykh competition! Be nice

JZKL for this. There are many MA and PhD books now available online to download such as the Efforts of the Hanafi Scholars in refuting the Grave Worshipping Beliefs, the Efforts of the Malikis in clarifying the matters of Tawheed, similar for the Shafi'ees and Hanbalis. Also more research on their efforts in clariying the issues of Emaan, refuting the Soofis and warning against Bid'ah in acts of worship, a book for each of the 4 Fiqh Madhabs. These books have proven how these issues were clarified way before Imam Muhammed ibn Abdul-Wahaab spoke about the exact same things. The only difference was they usually never had leaders of authority to put it into practice on a state level. But still, their efforts helped enormously to limit the spread of Shirk and Bidah.

May Allah protect all of us from all types of shirk. Aameen

Why does shaykh Tahir Wyatt meant that he does not believe this person who said this things act independently of Allah سبحانه وتعالى؟

Jazak'Allahu khairan very nice the evidences.

MashaAllah Jazaakallahu khayr

Glad people clearing Sh. Ibn Abdul Wahab, and path to an imam who revived Tawhid which along with the sunna is the foundation and what we can unite on. Tawhid is not just tied to safety in the next world but this world too in Qur'an 24 :55. See Sunni lands level graves and having safety while sufi & shi'a grave worship lands are colonized.

It is trendy now to be against Ahl Al-Sunnah just to be welcomed among Ahl Al-Bid'ah and christians. And how do they accomplish that? It Is by attacking _Mujaddid_ Muhammad ibn 'Abd Al-Wahhab. Some fanatic sectarian have no problem to adopt shirk itself just to be against that great man. May Allah reward ibn 'Abd Al-Wahhab and grant him Jannat Al-Na'īm.

Beautiful explanation by Dr.Tahir with beautiful manners, kindness, wisdom and open mindedness . A good example of dialogue or debate of different opinions and or advise to ones of oppsing understanding. May Allah bless him and Dr.Yasir. Both are great scholars with good characters. May Allah bless them and make them the best scholars

Salaam Tahir Are you claiming that ‘a creation’ can be worshipped without it being taken as a god ?

Brilliant JAK! Yasir Qadhi is tragically confusing potentially thousands of laymen listeners who sincerely try to better themselves. He is spelling out HIS PERSONAL doubts and struggles, HIS confusions to thousands and in the process abusing the social media Platform he has access to. His approach is devoid of wisdom.

Do not cheat Dr.Tahir by changing the name of his lecture.

العزة والكرامة والعدالة والمجد والخلود والرحمة والمغفرة والاكرام والكرم والجود للله عز وجل و لرسوله الكريم وللمؤمنين والمؤمنات الاحياء منهم والاموات الله أكبر ولله الحمد و الشكر والفضل 🕌🕋🌍💯💜🌹

Sheikh Abdulwahab book named كتاب التوحيد alone can tell you who Sheikh Abdulwahab was and what ideologies he profess. If the antagonist of Sheikh would only refer to this book and read it cover to cover with open mind, I'm sure they will have a glimpse of who he was and surely realise how pure hearted his approaches were pertaining Islamic injunctions. It will be difficult for an author to write a book without stating his opinions but that's unlike Sheikh Abdulwahab. You will read "kitaab Attauhiid" and you won't see a single opinion of Sheikh himself. All content are Qalallaahu, Qalarrasulu, Qalassahabatu..., which are the basis of Islamic Knowledge. Alhamdulillaah! May Allaah forgive Sheikh's shortcomings.

First Daleel cited: See Imam Al-Baghawi's (d. 516 A.H.) tafseer of Soorah Ash-Shuaraa', 26:69-74. The actions of the people of Ibrahim a.s. was referred to as worship i.e. ibadah. In aayah 26:70, it says "maa ta'budoon" i.e. what do you worship? This is despite the fact that that they (the people of Ibrahim a.s.) did not believe that the idols could hear their supplication or benefit/harm them i.e. they did NOT consider them to be gods.They merely followed the ways of their forefathers.

موفق بإذن الله تعالى

Agree or disagree, gotta love the respecful way of disagreeing of the shaykh

40:21

also sh ibn abdilwahhab did not make al udhr bil jahl in these matters (contrary to ibn taymiyyah) which led him to make takfir and fight and kill his opposers. Wallahul musta3an

مشاء الله تبارك الله اللهم صل على سيدنا ونبينا وحبيبنا محمد وعلى آله وصحبه أجمعين

Esselamu aleykum verahmetullahi.subhanallah.allahumagfirli.maşallah barekallahu fiik allahümme amin.ecmain.inşallah.ceza.kallahu.hayr maşallah maşaallah

Dear viewer, at the very least, focus on 17:00-21:45 min of this video and inshaaAllah it shall be clear and obvious to all. You may fast-forward to 17:00 min of this video where Shaykh Tahir Wyatt asks the class for a recap of the first erroneous claim.

Is it shirk if a person is sitting at home and he ask a person lets say a wali who is absent not presen. So he calls out to that person he says to him to ask Allah on his behalf that Allah grants him a job is this shirk. Note that person who he is asking is unaware of his call but the individual believes he can hear him as a result he is asking. Is this shirk

Alhamdulillah... Well explained

What Abdul Wahhāb did was takfeer of ignorant Muslims seeking help from the dead. Then he made their blood and wealth halāl. And the *laymen* or scholar that did not do takfeer of these Muslims were also deemed kuffār by Abdul Wahhāb. من لا يكفر الكافر فهو كافر ... Abdul Wahhāb’s own father and brother refuted him and his brother wrote a book against him - try reading an actual critique. Or better yet, read tārikh al-Najd and see how his followers boast about how they murdered Muslims after they declared Kuffār. @51:42 the false translation. 5th line: The Arabic clearly reads مشركون And the whole context is about Pagans (people taking other gods). 52:00 YEA they are saying we are calling on other gods. The Arabic clearly says Mushrikoon (pagans by definition *believe* in other gods). 53:16 - the Arabic: he gives an example of the Mongols that used to keep *idols* (that they previously took as gods) and would still seek help in them and magnify them. This talk has some serious misconceptions and it does not represent Taqiyy al-deen Ibn Taymiyyahs opinions properly.

His understanding of shirk does not give him the right to sanction the rape robbery and murder of Muslims

Thanks.

أنا حقًا أحب كل أخ وهابي نجدي. الشيخ بن عبد الوهاب نجدي رحمة الله مجدد حقيقي من القرن

So you must not do nifaq and say La ilaha Il Allah Muhammad Ar Rasul Allah

Glory to the only one 1 God ALLAH swt the maker and controller and creator of the whole universe 🌍

I am sorry to nitpick, but at 1:03:42, the slide that Sh. Tahir skips over says clearly that "The one who comes to the grave of a prophet or righteous person...this is of THREE levels" then he only covers the first level without delving into the others. Please complete the statement by giving us the other TWO levels. Otherwise it would seem that you are hiding some information.

Hey man it's me YASSIR CADDY, C Mon man

May god expose Yasir in this life and the hereafter for defaming a dead pious man.

AllohuAkbar

Tawhid is 2 types, to know Allah (Marifah wa I'bat) & worship Allah (Qast wa Tala)! Qur'an 47 :19 Ibn Qayyim says fleeing (Hijra) from shirk to Tawhid. Quran 4 :48. Hadith Prophet peace and blessings on him said whoever dies making partners with Allah goes to the fire. Quran 31 : 13 Luqman said to his son when he was advising him: "O my son! Join not in worship others with Allah. Hadith Muadh Jabal ( Kitab Tawhid, Bukhari) - Let the first thing you call to be the Tauhid of Allah! Quran 3 : 80 - Scholar Rabbaniyun spreading the foundation before the branch or small issues before big issues. Tahir says how do we process info today as it spreads at a different pace. I agree! Quran 2 :21 - O mankind! Worship your Lord (Allah), Who created you and those who were before you so that you may become Al-Muttaqun (the pious - See V.2:2). Ibn Taymiyyah wrote about this ayat in his book Ubudiyah! 10 :00 - Claim, Ibn Abdul Wahab was first to say the shirk of Qayraish was in Ulluhiyah. (or godhood). Claim continues said Qayraish like all pagans gave demi gods independence and some lordship in addition to the Creator God Allah who was far away and Aloof! and Qayraish prayed to near gods. says sufis and shi'as are worse then Qayraish wrongly. Says nobody before ibn Abdul Wahab saw certain acts like du'a to the dead as shirk! YQ says Qayraish did shirk in Rububiyah and Ibn Abdul Wahab says he is first to make the shirk of Jahili Qayirah primariy in Ulluhiyah. Tafsir Imam Bagawi ( d. 516). Quran 26 : 69. And recite to them the story of Ibrahim (Abraham). 70. When he said to his father and his people: "What do you worship?" 71. They said: "We worship idols, and to them we are ever devoted." 72. He said: "Do they hear you, when you call on (them)? 73. "Or do they benefit you or do they harm (you)?" 74. They said: "(Nay) but we found our fathers doing so." 75. He said: "Do you observe that which you have been worshipping - Imam Bagawi says this means they do not hear any statement or bring any benefit or repel any harm. It's du'a & refutes Taqlid. This is called worship. 21 :30 - Says just like Muslims are on different levels so are the pagans. Even Imam Razi who is on the way of mutakalimin on Quran 10 :31 "and they knew that these idols did not benefit or harm. Meaning will you not fear making idols as partners and you admit that these idols do not benefit or harm. Quran 23 : 84 - 89 Ibn Kathir said : Those who affirmed Allah's Lordship and admitted that He has no partner in it, yet associated partners with Him in worship. Volume 14 page 380, Mushrikin of Qayraish affirm Tawhid Rububiyah and used to worship others along with Allah 30 : 45 - Rad Jahmiyah by Ibn Taymiyyah, v1 pg 514, re :Quran 23 :88 & 89. Malakut is what you can and can't see, more emphatic then Mulk. Quran 23 : 89 - They will say: "(All that belongs) to Allah." Say: "How then are you deceived and turn away from the truth?" Ibn Qayyim Rahimahullah says The which the Messengers called their nations to single out Allah with is worship and deification. From its necessities is Tawhid Rububiyah, which the mushriks affirmed for Allah. Hence Allah used it as evidence against them for affirming this ncecessitates affirming Tawhid Al Ilahiyah. There is always a level of ignorance with sin, like not knowing the punishment or reward for leaving it off. 40 :00 - Tahir says Scholars also combine Tawhid Rububiyah and Asma wa Siffat as Tawhid Maa'rifah! This affects our worship! Like Allah is All Hearing, Seeing Forgiving. So I know Allah is my Lord so I worship and repent to Allah, so thats how those 2 categories go together! Isti means seek, gawtha means rescue. can mean seeking Aid/rescue. Claim is Najdi dawa is first to say Istigawtha w/o intent of ibada and the one calling on doesn't have Rububiyah is shirk. Midarij Salikin, ibn Qayyim. Prophet peace and blessings on him said whoever takes an oath from other then Allah is shirk. In hadith a man said whatever Allah and you will, Prophet peace and blessings be upon him said have you made me a rival to Allah? Say whatever Allah wills then whatever so and so wills. 51 :00 ppl save money and do Hajj to graves and say to ppl you don't respect the dead but they are failing to respect the Creator. The act is shirk, person maybe excused due to ignorance. Ikna'iyah page 206, Ibn Taymiyyah says whoever calls upon other then Allah and does hajj for other then Allah is upon shirk. However he may not know this is shirk! Prophet peace and blessings be upon him forbade/condemned making masjids into graves as its the foundation of shirk of ahlul kitab. Polytheism is from worshiping graves like ppl of Nuh and worshiping the stars, whats below and above. Ibn Taymiyyah says even in torat Musa Alehas salam forbade worshiping the graves. Whoever seeks aid from teh onw who is deceased absent, such that he supplicates to him during difficulues and times of hardship and asks from him Oh my master so and so seeking help and aid in removing hardship, or he says this when he is sick, poor, and needing other things - this is one is misguided, ignorant, mushrik, disobedient to Allah by the ijma. - Jama'il Masa'il page 145-146. Ibn Taymiyyah says : the scholars said it is haram to build masjids on graves, If the graves of the Prophets and righteous are not to be taken as masjids, and if the Prophet in fact prohibited praying to Allah at the graves so that it would not be a stepping stone to shirk, then what about when the one in the grave is being invoked swearing to Allah by him and when sujud is made to his grave or its wiped, This is clear shirk! - Jama'il Masa'il page 147. 1 :00 :00 - If a person is ignorant and doesn't know its shirk, then he isn't to be punished until the proof is established upon them especially ebcause this has become widespread among the people claiming Islam! - Jama'il page 151. Majmaual fatawa v. 11, pg 662 : It is shirk for someone to invoke other than Allah, such as the one who seeks aid during times of fear, sickness poverty from the dead and absent... This is from the shirk that Allah and His messenger have forbidden by the agreement of the Muslims. Majmu'al Fatawa 27, pg. 72, If he says I ask due to them being closer to Allah than I am so that he may intercede for me on these matters because I seek him as an intermediary to Allah, just as tawassul is done to the ruler with an appointee, then this is from the acts of the polytheists. "people who prostrated to the sun, moon, planets, the would invoke them like they invoke Allah, fast for them, perform hajj for them and do worship for them. They would then say, this is not shirk. Rather shirk is only if they are in control of me. If I make them a means and an intercessor, I am not a mushrik." But rather is it known by necessity from the deen of Islam that this is shirk. We are taught to only call to Allah! Stick to beneficial knowledge. even in sufi and shi'a books they give so much rububiyah to the creation as those who join Islam ask, what's left for Allah! Closing Du'a!

I would suggest you research the age old hatred & inferiority complex of the najdis towards other muslims especially those from yemen & bilaad a'shaam (levant)

A bunch of cherry-picking arguments deludes the ignorants spreaded by ignorant of his own ignorance.

one of the most suspect claims of the wahabis is what is called "takfeer b'silsilah" meaning "daisy chain takfeer" & what this basically means & what the implications have been (supported by ample historical evidence & events) is: - all the main schools of sunni claim that for example visiting graves of saints to make duaa to those alleged saints is Haram is an Innovation But those who do it are still muslim and are not kafir - the wahabis classed the muslims that hold this view as kafir and formed alliances with original kafirs (like christians jews hindus etc) to fight kill rape & steal from those sunnis... which is basically what ibn saud did to form an alliance with the british to fight the ottamans & to fight all muslims that have refused to fight and/or class the ottomans as kafirs, with the self evident results on the muslim ummah including the establishing of the zionist state in palestine & giving them al-aqsa!!!

Spoiler alert! I made a deep read of many types of research since I wrote the above comment, I dedicated lots of hours, days, weeks and months reading up and you're going to be shocked with my conclusions and the researched books that I've come across are going VIRAL amongst the students in the Islamic Universities in Saudi Arabia. I'll post the links soon on my own channel, inshallah.

Salaam. The video is unnecessarily long for content given. Salaams to both Shaykh . We need to move on. Use playback speed 1.75 still sounds normal.

It would of been better if the Ustaad had more quotes from the Salaf regarding the beliefs of the pagan Arabs.

What a contradiction to his current Situation. Talking about Tawheed.

#SUBHANALLAH #ALHAMDULILLAH #ALAHUAKBAR #MUSLIMSCHOLARS #1UMMAH @SH.MUHAMAD ABDULWAHAB

When a person keeps repeating "shirk(!), tawheed(!)" then that goes against Quran 5:67. Hey you the ambassador, announce what has been revealed to you from your boss, and if you do not, then you have not conveyed his essay. And Allah will protect you from the people. Indeed, Allah does not guide the people of the deniers. Al-Ma'idah 5:67 يَٰٓأَيُّهَا ٱلرَّسُولُ بَلِّغْ مَآ أُنزِلَ إِلَيْكَ مِن رَّبِّكَۖ وَإِن لَّمْ تَفْعَلْ فَمَا بَلَّغْتَ رِسَالَتَهُۥۚ وَٱللَّهُ يَعْصِمُكَ مِنَ ٱلنَّاسِۗ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ لَا يَهْدِى ٱلْقَوْمَ ٱلْكَٰفِرِينَ O Messenger, announce that which has been revealed to you from your Lord, and if you do not, then you have not conveyed His message. And Allah will protect you from the people. Indeed, Allah does not guide the disbelieving people. Quran #GreentechApps

Will like to see yasir vs him on this issue face to face. Eventho I'm not a fan of yasir himself, I personally yasir will win against him in this topic. By watching both videos

Besides the aayat shaykh Wyatt looked at and went into, there are other examples throughout the Qur'an where it can be understood that the Mushrikīn did indeed have issues in affirming ar rububiyyah and that they did believe their āliha had divine abilities to harm and benefit. Just look at surat Hud when they said to their prophet إن نقول إلا اعتراك بعض الهتنا بسوء verse 54 .

May Allah reward. Dr Yasir Qadhi can create a damage to Ummah. May Allah reward and guide us All. Fear Allah. We all should reminds this every now and then. Covid is here to punish those who are arrogant..

Anyone who does not disbelieve in the Thagut, will never understand Tauheed. I would not take knowledge from persons who are followers and supporters of the the Thagut. Any teacher who claims to have knowledge and does not publicly denounce and reject the rulership and systems of the thagut, in reality has no knowledge and is a deciever. Be extremely careful oh people.

fearr allahhhhh

If you realise that you're anti wahhabis, then have it in mind that you're not learning about Islam. You're just following quote and quote KZfaqrs and the likes. Go and actually learn about Islam so that you may be guided and you will eventually realise that Sheikh Abdulwahab mean nothing but good for the Muslims in this world and the next. May Allaah forgive Our Sheikh Abdulwahab and grant him Jannah as abode.

There is a lot to unpack here, and honestly, if people who are taking up the task to "refute" Yasir Qadhi aren't going to sit down with him and go over it in an academic matter, then it is just more selective information that people are picking and choosing to prove or disprove a point. There was an attempt here to prove that Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab wasn't the first to call istighathah shirk-and some selective (and decisive) proofs were presented-but the question that should be asked is: Who prior to Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab killed people who said لا إله إلا الله for this issue? Contrary to what may be understood in some reports, The people of the time of Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab were not the pagan Quraish of the time of the Prophet صلى الله عليه و سلم; these were people of لا إله إلا الله , and this kalimah is a game changer, so much so that it changes the dynamics of how you approach these issues. It would have to be verified that these people who were Muslims understood with certainty that they were committing MAJOR shirk that took them outside of Islam that justified Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab going to war with them for a greater portion of his life and killing them, which is a historical fact. How did he verify that they were doing these so-called acts of shirk out out ignorance, conviction, etc.? Where did he get the authority from?

Yasir Qadi said what he said only to further his politics as he doesn’t understand the proofs of those who allow tawassul amongst who is Imam Shawkaani! You see the crux is that Dua has 2 main meanings: To call out to- 2 To suplicate to. They say because calling out to the dead can not be anything except worship and so shirk is proven. However those who allow such tawassul like suyooti and the jam hoot of allusion sunnah do so for those believed to be saints who are higher in rank or equal to the martyrs and hence ALIVE in their graves at least legally if not actually alive and hence calling out to them is merely a request for their duas to Allah! This is even more established for the prophet صلّى الله عليه وسلم because he is alive and no matter where a Muslim is in the world the angels take the salutations upon him directly to him in the grave and hence the alleged implication of worship is not proven and hence the position of the Hanafi commentator of Aqeedah Tahaawiyya. The blood and property of a Muslim is protected by his shahadah with certainty yaqeen! Only a yaqeeni proof of nullification can reverse this and even if there exists the slightest reasonable doubt as I have established herein then that represents a shubhah and this totally nullifies any attempt to do takfeer of those who do tawassul. The fact is the established Sunni view is that tawassul is lawful. Sheikhul Islam’s position is completely valid and prudent and safer, however those Muslims who perform such tawassul do not intend any sort of worship of them rather they only seek a waseelah to Allah via those of his slaves who are his awliyaa and performed miracles whilst alive in the dunya. Worshiping anyone besides Allah is Kufr and it matters not if you believe wether they can harm or benefit you because worship is only for Allah and belief in them not possessing harm or benefit only benefits those who request the awliyaa for dua because there’s a difference between requesting and worship. Because of this certain groups and scholars have gone out of their way to prove that the dead in the grave cannot hear and much disagreement exists regarding this which makes takfeer of these lot all the more impossible. And so no Muslim should regard others as polythiests and murtad because of the doubt. The prophet عليه السلام told the blind man to do tawassul through him directly in his ABSCENCE and limiting this to when he was alive is unacceptable because the angels take all such communication directly to him in his grave and so there is no shirk in this at all due to the established principle تأخير البيان عن وقت الحاجة لا يجوز للنبي “That is not permissible for the messenger to delay clarifying something essential upon being essential to clarify” and there is no such clarification to the blind man that” only do this in my lifetime”. Ive studied the sheikhs books with ijaazah and sanad and respect his view immensely, however my intention herein is that this issue is very detailed and not yaqeeni and not a license to do takfeer.

This is not a response. This is a lecture to a closed group of people. Al-Ahzab 33:70 يَٰٓأَيُّهَا ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُوا۟ ٱتَّقُوا۟ ٱللَّهَ وَقُولُوا۟ قَوْلًا سَدِيدًا O you who have secured, be cautious of Allah and speak words of appropriate justice. Quran #GreentechApps

In simple English, many activities that are considered Shirk ARE NOT SHIRK. ASSOCIATING PARTNERS WITH ALLAH SWT and ASKING SOMEONE TO GET YOUR MESSAGE TO ALLAH SWT because that someone is a FRIEND OF ALLAH SWT are totally different. This is so simple English that I find it difficult why many brothers do not understand. Further, many speakers try to oversee quite a few hadiths. Is that voluntary?

8 dajjal bin iblis dislike it..

Watched 47 minutes of it

❤❤❤❤

while dr yasir qadhi quoted verses from the quran to support his views, I see this shk quoting from different sources

Refuting Dr.Yasir Qadhi 😂🤣🤣

to be fair but ibn abdULWAHAAB also claimed the imams of the sunni schools (hanafi/hanbali/malki etc) including in the haramain were also worse than abu lahab / abu jahal, adding to that, in his book, the elder brother of ibn abdULWAHAB, also accused him of the takfeer of the entire muslim nation that is not following/agreeing with his school... Based on this, the claims of shirk/takfeer made by ibn abdULWAHAB were practically against all muslims that do not follow his school, including innovative sufis shia etc. The ramifications of this? the wahabis allied themselves with the colonialists (British etc) against other muslims under the justification of "seeking the aid of a kafir (eg British) against another kafir (all non-wahabi muslims)"

People do realize that even though the Jews and Christians asserted that Jesus (AS) and Uzayr (AS) were sons of God, the Quran still never called them mushrikeen and allowed marriage to them, right? If a people assert themselves as monotheist, the Quran treats them as such practically (existentially it’s a completely different issue) while still criticizing their beliefs. In fact, the Quran still allows marriage with them and there are even traditions in the Muwatta about the Zoroastrians being viewed as Ahl-Kitab. “Why do you take your rabbis and monks as Lords?” The issue, as YQ pointed out, is primarily the practical, ground realities of murder and assassination of Muslims, irrespective of this issue, by Abdul Wahhab under pretenses that these Muslims were mushrikeen. That is what he was addressing. He acknowledges the practices as abhorrent and that scholars throughout history viewed it even in light of shirk. What he clearly stated is unlike these scholars, Abdul Wahhab PRACTICALLY put the Muslims outside the fold of Islam and shed their blood. This point is continually avoided by his defenders. We do understand that one of the major principles of Islam is the “sanctify of human life”, let alone those that identify themselves as Muslims, even if they have beliefs and ideas that are problematic? You can correct and reform Muslims without declaring them mushrikeen for, what is in reality a political agenda, like groups like ISIS or people like Abdul Wahhab who openly assassinated political leaders in masjids going for prayer even though he had political alliances with them, right? Why can’t people call out blatant murder and assassination when it is blatant murder and assassination? How is this is small issue when groups like ISIS and al-Qaeda recruit followers on these grounds, plant bombs in streets, and justify this killing of Muslims via these types of belief, which are to them, clear grounds of ‘apostasy’? This is even if one views the punishment of apostasy as death penalty, which is a completely other topic that traditionalists from both sides avoid or try to get around it by saying that it exists, but only a real political ruler can implement this punishment. ISIS in fact tried to get around this issue by saying their ruler is the khaleepha and the traditionalists basically refuted this on a technicality that nobody accepts their claim or even pledges allegiance to them. But this is meaningless for the followers of ISiS. No, it is not a small issue no matter what these religious figures say. It’s a very relevant issue that has practical implications, especially if a certain type of people gain political power. This is what happens when the moral conscience or TAQWA is completely divorced from the Shareeah, which the main example is the Rabbis and Pharisees. Then you get the KHAWARIJ. Unless Taqwa is there, people will try and manipulate the even the law of God to suit their whims. If the ground is not fertile, the real understanding of religion isn’t going to root itself in the person.

Before Abdul bin Wahab all the Muslims had become mushrakeen. Maaz Allah min zalick. What simplistic foolishness. The beloved nabi-r- kareem said . My unman shall not engage in shrik. You failed to mention the Muslims Abdul bin Wahab murdered in he’s quest to implement his new sect.

If you are talking about Yasir Qhadi’s videos, he says that IBN Wahab was the first who called Muslims mushrik. I don’t know why you are beating around the bushes and making people confused. IBN Wahab’s followers killed Muslims and accusing them of shirk in Mecca and Madina and other parts of Saudi Arabia and Iraq. It is documented in history and you can’t erase history. All other scholars before him and after believe making dua at grave of anyone is haram and big sin but not shirk. You cannot call a Muslim Mushrik who reads Quran , believes in Allah SWT and our prophet and prays. May Allah SWT give you hedayah shaykh. Please accept that IBN Wahab made mistakes and let’s keep unity of Muslims and not divide them. Non- Muslims are doing this work and you should not help them in their endeavors please, and don’t make yourself sinful and ahle naar.

The best course of definition of tawheed for a layperson like me is to follow a majority. The bulk of Ummah is upon guidance. So, no thank Wahabinism. Ibn Umar reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Verily, Allah will not let my nation agree upon misguidance. The hand of Allah is over the united community.” Al-Tirmidhi said, “The interpretation of the united community, according to the scholars, are the people of Fiqh, knowledge, and Hadith.” Source: Sunan al-Tirmidhī 2167

What honor does Muhammad Abdul Wahhab have that you are trying to defend. He is the founder of Najdiyya Salafism or Wahhabism as it is also known. Because of his teachings and the blind followers of his ideology, Najdiyya Salafism has caused untold suffering and harm to innocent Muslims. He is the father of extremism, intolerance, anthropomorphism, takfirism and his teachings have spawned evil from Boko haram, al shabab, abu sayyaf, Isis and countless other extremists whose major victims have been innocent Muslims. He is not even considered a major figure in the Hanbali school. His brother the esteemed Hanbali shaykh Sulayman Abdul Wahhab was more learned than him and he denounced the misguided teachings of Muhammad Abdul Wahhab. Read his book al sawaiq ilahiyya fi radd al wahabiyya the divine thunderbolts against the Wahhabis where he refutes the misguided teachings of Muhammad Abdul Wahhab. Muhammad Abdul Wahhab has no honor to defend. He is to be condemned for being the father of the most extreme, intolerant and parochial sect in Islam, whose legacy Muslims are still suffering from.

To clarify Yasir qadi point of view in simple terms. A Muslim that says shahadah, believe in the pillars of faith and Islam and and commit the following sin (devout portion of supplication to someone beside Allah) is not equivalent to a pagan. He is committing a major sin but nevertheless, he is a Muslim and his blood is sanctified

Dr Yasir Qadhi made more sense and was more consistent, this video has so many blunders and inconsistencies, how so many people can't see that from the Najdi Da'wah is embarrassing.

Wahhabism (Arabic: الوهابية‎‎, al-Wahhābiyah) is a religious movement and doctrine attributed to Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab.[a] It has been variously described as "ultraconservative", "orthodox"[1] "austere",[2] "puritan(ical)";[3][4] and as an Islamic "reform movement" to restore "pure monotheistic worship" by devotees.[5][6] The term Wahhabi(sm) is often used polemically and adherents commonly reject its use, preferring to be called Salafi or muwahhid,[7][8][9] claiming to emphasize the principle of tawhid[10] (the "uniqueness" and "unity" of God).[11] The term has also been described as a Sunniphobic slur.[12][13][14][15] It follows the theology of Ibn Taymiyyah and the Hanbali school of jurisprudence,[5] although when Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab first began preaching he was opposed by the Hanbali leaders of his town.[4] Wahhabism is named after an eighteenth-century Islamic scholar, theologian, preacher and activist, Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab (1703-1792).​[5]​[16]​[17]​[18]​[19] He started a reform movement in the remote, sparsely populated region of Najd,[5][20] advocating a purging of widespread practices such as veneration of saints and pilgrimages to their tombs and shrines that were practiced by the people of Najd, but which he considered idolatrous impurities and innovations in Islam (bid'ah).[5][11][21] Eventually he formed a pact with a local leader, Muhammad bin Saud, offering political obedience and promising that protection and propagation of the Wahhabi movement meant "power and glory" and rule of "lands and men".[22] The alliance between followers of ibn Abd al-Wahhab and Muhammad bin Saud's successors (the House of Saud) proved to be a durable one. The House of Saud continued to maintain its politico-religious alliance with the Wahhabi sect through the waxing and waning of its own political fortunes over the next 150 years, through to its eventual proclamation of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in 1932, and then afterwards, on into modern times. Today Ibn Abd Al-Wahhab's teachings are the official, state-sponsored form of Sunni Islam[2][23] in Saudi Arabia.[24] With the help of funding from Saudi petroleum exports[25] (and other factors[26]), the movement underwent "explosive growth" beginning in the 1970s and now has worldwide influence.[2] The US State Department has estimated that over the past four decades concerns in Riyadh have directed at least $10bn (£6bn) to select charitable foundations toward the subversion of mainstream Sunni Islam by Wahhabism.[27] The Saudi Crown Prince Muhammad Bin Salman, on the other hand, denied that Wahhabism ever existed and that "No one can define this Wahhabism".[28] (As of 2017 changes to Saudi religious policy by Crown Prince Muhammad bin Salman have led some to suggest that "Islamists throughout the world will have to follow suit or risk winding up on the wrong side of orthodoxy".[29]) The "boundaries" of Wahhabism have been called "difficult to pinpoint",[30] but in contemporary usage, the terms Wahhabi and Salafi are often used interchangeably, and they are considered to be movements with different roots that have merged since the 1960s.[31][32][33] However, Wahhabism has also been called "a particular orientation within Salafism",[34] or an ultra-conservative, Saudi brand of Salafism.​[35]​[36]​European Parilament accused Wahhabism of supporting "armed rebel groups" involved in global terrorism,[37][38] inspiring the ideology of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL),[39] and for causing disunity in Muslim communities by labelling Muslims who disagreed with the Wahhabi definition of monotheism as apostates[5][40] (takfir) and justifying their killing.[41][42][43] It has also been criticized for the destruction of historic shrines of saints, mausoleums, and other Muslim and non-Muslim buildings and artifacts.[44][45][46]

He was a British agent ! Wolf in sheep’s clothing who was disowned by his entire family.

People of Ibrahim a.s. believed their gods can harm cos they threaten Ibrahim with harms from their gods. This is also is Tafsir Baghawi. You were dishonest to leave that out to suit your views.

You adopt thei bid’ah of the division of Tawhid, and invent false meanings of Ibadah, so that you can do takfir of Muslims for doing tawassul and istighathah.

absolutely rubbish.