This was a scope review and I appreciate it being such. Thermal scopes have come a long way and down in price considerably. Ease of use is a big factor, and the quality of imaging is paramount.

Milstuff is completely right: I too miss Matt and Mr Saunders, for that matter, I would very much appreciate you to show some airgun stuff again................Greetz from the Netherlands!!!

For foxing and serious pest control at night this stuff is fine. Still far too complex for many of us of a certain ilk and age. I admit to struggling to master a Pard add on. Too many buttons to fanny around with in the dark and wet, and many of us do not want "record" facilities because we are there to do a job. That job is to shoot vermin. The maker who produces a "thermal Hawke Vantage", ie simple, one reticle, an on/off switch? They will sell loads. And I agree with others commenting. This is a scope review, nothing to do with the broader aspects of shooting.

A very nice little unit.

Pard DS35 out soon. Wilh range finder. Could be another choice.

From the vids I've seen the Stella pro has a crisper image....still not as clear as the Pulsar c50 digital tho

Bună dimineața cît costă luneta?

Jeezz fellas... the video is titled, 'scope review short'... which kind of tells you what its going to be about. It's about balance lads, some hunting stuff and some kit reviews. 'Genuine' reviews are important especially when it comes to costly kit. Personally I like the fact that there was some honesty there about the 'comfortable' identification and shooting range capabilities of the scope. I can shoot further with my IR set up than I can with my thermal... but out to 200, the thermal is the winner on foxes generally. As for the 'bring back' whoever comments... that's just a bit personal isn't it. Two different chaps that's all.

The few people that might want to buy that scope can read the directions if they buy the scope, otherwise we want to hear about the hunt. Yes certainly miss matt manning.😠😠😠👎👎👎