I love your vide! I have watched a few videos lately where the people are just annoying, but you are so laid back and well-spoken! As to the content, I understand that you are a videographer and you are giving that perspective. I am 99.9% still photography, and, frankly, I didn't like the Everyday Filter at all. I could see zero "blooming highlights" or "halation" or and kind of softening effect that brought on a more film-like quality to the images I tested it on. I super appreciate that you showed actual comparison shots your video; you are the first one I have found that did that. I only wish you had lingered on those comparisons a bit longer and went back and forth with the slider for slow people like myself! In your video and in one other I recently watched, it seemed to me that the only reason there is any "mist" apparent is that the shots and either shooting directly into the sun, include blown out sky, or are taken on misty days. I get a softening, misty effect in photographs when I shoot into the sun without a filter on it! People and the Polar Pro advertising always talk about a cinematic feel and "filmic" (didn't know that was a word) quality that can be obtained with the Everyday Filter. I didn't see that. I went out and shot around town for 2.5 hours and made several images where on the first one I had the Everyday Filter on my lens, and then I took a second of the same image without it on there. Other than the effects of the polarizer on the filter, I saw absolutely no difference when looked at them side-by-side and zoomed in. All shots were straight out of camera, zero post-processing. I took shots from daytime into the darkness. Some had sky, some had artificial lighting and I literally noticed zero difference in how the highlights were displaying. I am wondering what I am missing in this experiment of mine other than not shooting directly into the sun or over-exposing the sky. Sorry for the long comment! I am genuinely curious if I just missed the point of the filter, but then I realized it is billed as something you can leave on all day to bring a "filmic" look. Thanks again for providing comparison footage in your video and for NOT going on and on about what a great box it comes in.

Agreed. I wasn't expecting it to be so heavy on the effects. I got the 1/4 shortstache.

Super well produced video dude, love seeing the example videos of each filter 🙌🏼

So happy to see you’re in MPLS! I shoot at the Pavilion once at week at least!

Great review! bought one for my x100vi to try out. And if that goes well i'm thinking of adding it to my GFX kit.

Great video. Picked up the Mist-PL one myself and I do love it but agree it’s a bit too soft for some general use cases. For getting “cinematic” footage and vlogs it’s great though. Will be picking up the Everyday one soon but just spent a bucket load on the new Peter McKinnon VND one so might have to wait a bit😅😭

I wish it was 1/8 instead of 1/4. Would have been more of my taste. 1/4 is a bit too much in my opinion, because I also prefer sharper look but still want subtle softening

love these videos mate - nice one

Yurrr yurrrr 🎉

Hi Soua, I just have one question about this filter, how does it work together with a variable ND? and in what order would you place them? first the ND and then the EVERYDAY or vice versa. Thanks in advance 🤜🏼🤛🏼

nice video thanks for making this

I want it for my 24-105 but don't know if it will get vignetting when wide in 24mm. Any experience with that? Thank you man! Great video

Did you stack a polarpro nd filter in outdoor settings too?

Did you use it together with a ND filter?

Mist effect is so overdone with this filter