Most people in every field make more from education later in life, than in the actual business they're involved in. It's nothing new. Everyone's got something to sell, and everyone's buying, so why not

Well that’s has been the feedback shared by many

They never will either

@@Paid2TradeFX if you are right and they dont have longterm performance to show, i dont know why interviewer give people a place to speak, who dont show they are good traders and speak often even wrong facts. when you dont have extrem good performane, all your words are useless (because they did not understand anything what it really means) because they cant use their own infomations for good wins , but their students can ? such people sell because they dont win or win by luck and know it was luck thatswhy they can not present a long term running account.

The ironic part is that the best traders don’t have a lot of attention on social media. They are considered boring and are in their 40s and 50s. These are the ones trading 100+ million dollar accounts.

@@wlbw1 yes. when comments are even deleted when you mention that interviewer should check that this people are profitable, then you know that he will not check and the words are not true. so only marketing without any value

LOLS

Some do that for sure and probably don’t provide additional value. However; I know there will be those where it maybe the case but now you’re being coached 1-1 or in a group setting which is definitely more than the free content

@@wordsofrizdom depends on who teaches! when they dont have verified accounts for many years with much higher win then a nasdaq etf buy and hold strategy + better calmar ratio, then what will they teach? they cant do for themself so cant do anything. thatswhy first thing is verified performance shown with a big account (some 100k or more) over longer time with thousand of trades, so you know this person is not talking about what they dont understand and you can learn something.

@@wordsofrizdom I agree but Mentoring is completely different from selling a course. Mentoring absolutely, but I am referring to just putting up a bunch of videos behind a paywall and you having to figure it out yourself. Plus 1 on 1 and groups usually cost more.

Of course you don’t need to if you’re profitable. There’s many factors that go into it for sure. Not everyone will want to or should. As trading and teaching are two different skillsets. Also a more secure sense of income is great for aiding trading too. As well as demand being a big factor also.

@@wordsofrizdom well it does come to if your profitable you don’t need to mix other income with trading. If anything the trading funds should build income not the other way around

Cause you never know who’s serious or not, majority will be a waste of time and there’s no stability of income that way

How many people build apps from free information? I bet not many at all. Most probably got a higher education which already costs $10,000’s. Sure a very small number may use free information but the vast majority of any successful people in any industry pay for education/mentorship/guidance

What exactly is a scam? You’re just sour they are successful at both trading and business by the sounds of it

It's an opinion that's not fact based that people don't respect what's given for free. People go to college for free and pay attention. There are also people who pay for college and fail out of school because they do not pay attention. It's a trash excuse. By all means charge if you want to but stop making silly claims as the reason for doing so. The other claim is "I want to help people", how? What people? When you charge a premium too high for the average consumer, who are you actually helping?

Well each one has shared proof of profitability? And all agree that they make money from having a service too. What the problem with that?

These guys all kill it.

I think if people who r paying for it are happy then its fine but if they pay for it and its bullshit then thats a problem the respect shit is obviously not that big of a factor honestly 😭

Lmao I love Tom Hougaard definitely one of the best, but he literally tweeted today for his seminars teaching his methods and mindset which cost money? So just stop arguing for the sake of arguing and just accept it’s fine to charge if you have the value to charge for and backing up with good teaching ability that gets results

Well you can and many have 🧐

Facts.. they don't respect peoples time, I'd know.. they know what they talkin'.. it's also about the money but that's not like the main reason

Well that’s obvious we want to know outside of just money otherwise anyone can do it.

Not sure what you mean?

not when its useless content from traders who are not proven strong profitable (when you cant win from your own informations, maybe your informations are then worthless and not best way). so for this people can all be without value or when they some day prove of longterm high accounts they can have value. until this time of proof, chance are high that they just repeat what they read in a book. performance splits good traders from bad, not words or how high you sell a course.

Well, if the trader is really very good, I would have no trouble being attentive to his advice even if it is free. In truth, I strongly doubt that the best traders give lessons because they simply have other things to do. If I were profitable and rich from trading, either I would continue my life without wasting time giving lessons or, if it amused me, I would share my knowledge for free. For free, because I simply wouldn't need the money

@@Phi1.618 but then you get really the fact, that people dont value it. in this fact they was correct ( a lot of study did show this). but it eeds to be good same time to be worth the money - this you dont know without knowing if this are just words from big profitable trader or big word losers (that is an extrem difference).

I don’t sell a course? Plus they didn’t say to pay for respect it was to mention that people value what they pay for. ICT has made $10’s millions from selling education before going this route on KZfaq so how do you explain that?

@@wordsofrizdomcan you comparing your course with the knowledge that ICT has provided in the industry, that guy has spent over 3.5 decades to collect that knowledge there is no comparison of you and him and now he is giving a huge knowledge to the community, not like you, the kind of marketing funnel that you are making in your channel is strong to charge those huge bucks for that tiny knowledge that u gain from KZfaq only, how do you explain that?

@@genius7953 your words mean absolutely nothing because I don’t sell a course!!! You are so funny. How are you accusing me of having a funnel or charging big bucks when I don’t have a course of any kind? You were the one to bring up ICT. He’s had a massive impact on the space; I respect what he’s done massively as he well knows. Doesn’t change the fact that he’s made more money from courses than trading that is something he has said himself. Nothing wrong with that either as I have no problem with people who sell courses.

Firstly I don’t control what other people decide to do. Secondly what’s wrong with people selling something exactly?

@@wordsofrizdom a wise man once said there are only few people in this world that will actually do good to improve another human being life stay blessed

@@MosesMoodley yes I agree out of 8 billion people here we have 4 doing just that 🫡 stay blessed!

@@wordsofrizdom i think you do it good, but you really should do an interview about what you need to see from a trader, so you know its a real winner and words are worth it to listen or this is just a fake it until make it version of a trader (how big needs to be account, how many years or decades would be good, fake broker , live account with real take a look in so all the photoshop fakes away, thousand of trades, performance so high you can live from after all costs and taxes, higher performance then opportunity costs of have a job and nadaq ETF investing buy and hold... and and and). with this you really would have people listening.