Should Protest Groups Be Treated Like Terror Organisations?

Рет қаралды 5,499

19 күн бұрын

A new report is urging the Government to treat protest groups such as Just Stop Oil similarly to proscribed terror organisations and there are calls to introduce a stringent ban on 'extreme protest groups'. So, should protest groups be treated like terror organisations?
Broadcast on 14/05/24
Stream Good Morning Britain live, every weekday from 6am on the ITVX 📲 daytimelink.itv.com/WatchGMBYT
Subscribe now for more! bit.ly/1NbomQa
Like, follow and subscribe to Good Morning Britain!
The Good Morning Britain KZfaq channel delivers you the news that you’re waking up to in the morning. From exclusive interviews with some of the biggest names in politics and showbiz to heartwarming human interest stories and unmissable watch again moments.
Join Susanna Reid, Ed Balls, Kate Garraway, Richard Madeley, Charlotte Hawkins and Sean Fletcher every weekday on ITV from 6am until 9 every weekday!
ITVX: daytimelink.itv.com/WatchGMBYT
Website: bit.ly/1GsZuha
KZfaq: bit.ly/1Ecy0g1
Facebook: on. 1HEDRMb
Twitter: bit.ly/1xdLqU3
www.itv.com
#GMB #juststopoil #protests #palestine #terrorism #debate

Пікірлер: 61

@MarianneSunshine 18 күн бұрын

Why is this even a question. Anyone who says yes doesn’t realise they’re eroding your human rights in the U.K. and this adds to it. The U.K. is no longer a free country.

@ruthhadfield9726 17 күн бұрын

these groups are the ones ruining it. these groups are getting out of hand

@andyquelch5754 17 күн бұрын

People have a right and should retain the right to peacefully and lawfully protest. I think many people now believe that right includes causing criminal damage, major disruption and even threat to life. The Terrorism Act 2000 defines terrorism, both in and outside of the UK, as the use or threat of one or more of the actions listed below, and where they are designed to influence the government, or an international governmental organisation or to intimidate the public. The use or threat must also be for the purpose of advancing a political, religious, racial or ideological cause. The specific actions included are: serious violence against a person; serious damage to property; endangering a person's life (other than that of the person committing the action); creating a serious risk to the health or safety of the public or a section of the public; and action designed to seriously interfere with or seriously to disrupt an electronic system. If their actions fall within that definition then treat them accordingly.

@emmastyles6936 11 күн бұрын

@@andyquelch5754beautifully put..❤

@jake751 11 күн бұрын

@@emmastyles6936said no one ever

@clemedwards5563 9 күн бұрын

funny how people tried to warn you over free speech and you sided with governmental powers and now your complaining, also this is happening across Europe, not just the uk

@tommywilliams9414 18 күн бұрын

IF they simply protest then no, if they go beyond protesting and cause riots and intentionally disrupts people’s daily lives and wellbeing then yes.

@enfja 18 күн бұрын

There are already laws preventing vandalism and public harassment. Trying to justify government to treat any protests as terror organizations and hypocritically claiming "No body is calling you terrorists" is beyond immature. The lady consistently brings Palestine protests into the issue is disgusting and shameful. Everybody has an agenda that they claim to be justice or 'Right thing to do'. Nobody should have the right to takeaway one's ability to protest and demonstrate. That's that.

@andyquelch5754 17 күн бұрын

@jake751 11 күн бұрын

That's no lady 😢

@jintyc9133 12 күн бұрын

Why on earth is Hamilton even allowed on TV we don’t forget what she and her husband did

@jake751 11 күн бұрын

Exactly 💯%

@peterlee584 18 күн бұрын

If you want to protest, go ahead. Do it peacefully, don't block the roads and prevent the ambulances from going through

@JosephWood1941-iz6mi 17 күн бұрын

Without inconvenience and disruption protests are simply ignored. History doesn't lie.

@peterlee584 17 күн бұрын

@@JosephWood1941-iz6mi They're being ignored anyway. On top of that, they've onlu earned the people's enmitty, not their empathy and support.

@JosephWood1941-iz6mi 17 күн бұрын

@@peterlee584 Are they being ignored? How do you know? Where's your evidence? Perhaps I support them. You only read or hear about the ones who don't support them. Time will tell. Especially if climate change becomes irreversible. Then it's too late. This is a very dangerous experiment with the planet because you can't repeat it with a different set of parameters. As I said, it would be too late.

@leet3207 17 күн бұрын

Only if you want a totalitarian gov. Whether you agree with the protest or not the right to protest should be allowed

@blaxtru 18 күн бұрын

When Mrs Hamilton directs the moral compass, given the sole reason she is famous and on TV is because hubby was immoral (see Tatton Gen. Election '97), GMB might try to put a more convincing person at the helm.

@andyquelch5754 17 күн бұрын

@johnmoore9862 11 күн бұрын

The audacity of Hamilton lecturing anyone about anything 😂.

@Cherrytune386 18 күн бұрын

No. It should be a human right to protest!

@cantthinkofausername8698 18 күн бұрын

Not when they vandalise.

@XAVR_ 18 күн бұрын

@@cantthinkofausername8698 Normalise defacing corporate property in the name of climate justice. Normalise stealing from multi-million pound companies if you or your family would otherwise go hungry. Criminalise the destruction of the planet in the name of profit. Criminalise food profiteering. Legalise shoplifting. Eat the rich.

@benward4538 17 күн бұрын

Not when they block traffic and damage property

@sibbydems 17 күн бұрын

@ Cherrytune386 yeah you’re right it’s legal to protest but illegal to stop the public’s right of freedom of movement what about this don’t you understand!?

@ruthhadfield9726 17 күн бұрын

yes to protest....not to vandalise and stopping people from getting to work and ruining their day. a women couldn't get her baby to hospital because of just stop oil. one person couldn't get to their fathers funerals. this shouldn't be allowed

@krisdrake9529 11 күн бұрын

The look on his face at the end when she said they should go protest in China. Yeah Just Stop Oil is super disruptive but its not like politicians have taken action or listened to them.

@lennywhite2833 18 күн бұрын

Ban protests for everyone and see what people feel then to not have a voice about anything that happens.

@andyquelch5754 17 күн бұрын

Nobody is saying ban all protests. The right is to protest peacefully and lawfully. That does not include causing criminal damage, obstruction, endangering life and threats to life. It's as if people now believe they can do whatever they want so long as they call it a protest . They cannot.

@ericsynchrona5495 18 күн бұрын

Yes... the answer is probably yes because then you'll finally lose the battle. Ya know? They'll win. It's the same as asking "should you surrender?" when you're already defeated.

@jamesdrummond8650 11 күн бұрын

Yes.

@sibbydems 17 күн бұрын

It’s legal to protest but it’s illegal to stop freedom of movement so sitting in the road and restricting the public’s right of freedom of movement is illegal…the end!

@ralphmaver1489 18 күн бұрын

The Advisor!

@mohamedmagdy4015 17 күн бұрын

I want to eat ice cream with you.

@ramona7283 17 күн бұрын

Is that awful old Hamilton woman still around.

@jake751 11 күн бұрын

Yes unfortunately 😔

@TimKerman 17 күн бұрын

Well said Mrs Hamilton

@jake751 11 күн бұрын

😂😂😂😂

@aethellstan 17 күн бұрын

personally i think it's a step too far. there are already tough laws. what i would suggest is that the police actually do some policing and carry out more arrests of people for example shouting from the river to the sea which is promoting genocide, showing support for hamas which is a proscribed terrorist group and so on.