@Calvicious77 Жыл бұрын
Might want to consider looking into software that enlarges the image like ON1 Resize or a similar software. The software can enlarge and sharpen the image without creating artifacts.
@MacnTeensVisuals Жыл бұрын
Oh really, I haven't heard about it. Sounds interesting though 👍
@devroombagchus7460 Жыл бұрын
Thanks! I think the title was confusing. Of course you can make excellent prints from 35mm. It has been done for decades, also by geniuses such as Cartier-Bresson. The question is what do be aware of with the digitalising and printing process. In the past, it was the paper itself that was photosensitive. I have very limited experience. Only from MFT in JPEG directly to 15x18 in an album by a lab. The results very good. B ut I don't know what scan I need from 35 negatives.
@MacnTeensVisuals Жыл бұрын
Hey there, yeah you may be right on the title haha Yeah it's all about the quality and size of the scan. I look forward to printing more and trying things out to see how far you can push when it comes to print size and paper etc.
@MacnTeensVisuals Жыл бұрын
Print your photos people 📷 Also anyone got any questions ?
@michaelstanton8363 14 күн бұрын
where did you order your print from?
@Blackmind0 Жыл бұрын
my personal thoughts and everybody can do the own way ! I shoot film since nearly 40 years and i shoot digital since 2003. i print the digital photographs and i do all analogue things in my darkroom. Developing film, and exposure on photopaper , BW and colour. Wyh not " printing " film? to shoot with film means for me that i want an analogue procedure, an analouge look, an analouge finish. scanning, maybe change the look in PS ! to give the film a digital look ? what for? thats not logical for me. crazy world, people try to emulate analouge look on pics with filters in PS or useing LUTs and when they make analouge photographs they scan and finish it in digital ways. even when only changing sharpness it is to much for me, it has to be the sharpness of film, the sharpness of an enlarger ( analog) , the sharpness of the photopaper, not more.... greets BM
@MacnTeensVisuals Жыл бұрын
Hey there. I totally get what you are saying and to be honest it does make sense. The process has definitely changed and does take away somewhat from the whole film experience. I think the main reason is just speed. I would love to try the darkroom process at some point but with how work is currently shared online it would be impossible to do everything this way. Film for me is definitely a slower more satisfying process and that's just me doing the actually shooting process. I think digital is getting to a point where it is almost to easy which may be why people are getting back in to film again. Who knows haha Cheers for sharing your thoughts 👍
@Ortopedija1989 Жыл бұрын
yea i agree with you. I do all processing analoge! Just yesterday i spend 4 hours in darkroom to print out photos of my film. Whats the point shooting film and then scanning with dslr camera to get digital output! Nonsence! Shoot digital in the first place!
@allanflynn2704 6 ай бұрын
I think most 100 iso films are somewhere in the 20-25ish MP range. I assume if the lens is good quality you can get a rather large print. might be grainy but then again viewing distance is a factor.
@MacnTeensVisuals 6 ай бұрын
Cheers for the info I didn't look in to it in that much detail but the print looks great and could definitely be printed bigger, as you say viewing distance is important.
@carlossousa1575 Жыл бұрын
Nice work . 😊
@MacnTeensVisuals Жыл бұрын
Cheers Carlos appreciate it. Printing is quite a satisfying process 👍🏼
@eller9703 Ай бұрын
What do you ask for when scanning your film?
@MacnTeensVisuals Ай бұрын
I just get high res tiff files. I don't ask for any particular look. The lab I use has just got consistent results that I really like.
@grainificent Жыл бұрын
great video and amazing photo! but I did think you will be printing it in the darkroom yourself ;P
@MacnTeensVisuals Жыл бұрын
Thanks very much appreciate that :) Hopefully I will be able to give that a try at some point too haha
@grainificent Жыл бұрын
@@MacnTeensVisuals yes, a darkroom is very fun, at least to me ;P I only have experience making black and white prints but im putting together a darkroom currently to be able to do color as well 😃
@loui.e0241 Жыл бұрын
@@grainificentwow if u get a c41 color processing settup u should follow up. That’s super cool, never gotten to try one even in school cause of costs now a days
@loui.e0241 Жыл бұрын
I shoot 35 mm a lot. I easily print at 24”x30” with really great quality, especially when you flatbed scan.
@grainificent Жыл бұрын
@@loui.e0241 i will be getting some soon after i finish. Already got all the equipment for that 😃
@101homz 10 ай бұрын
Hi there. Where did you send your image off to be printed please? Does anyone have any good recommendations for online printing tools?
@MacnTeensVisuals 9 ай бұрын
Hey! I used ThePrintSpace to get this photo printed. I've used it a few times now and been really happy with the results 👍
@Kitsaplorax Жыл бұрын
I think you are seriously short changing the image. A scan on a PM tube spot scanner would not add noise or digital artifacts. Though pricey, an analog scan or a proper darkroom print will bring out a lot more of the true character of the film.
@MacnTeensVisuals Жыл бұрын
Hey Gordon, honestly I don't really even know what a tube scanner is, similar to a drum scan? I would love to try a dark room print of one of my photos at some point, hopefully in the near future.
@tommytomsky Жыл бұрын
Did you think about buying some printer something like old good canon 100p??? Great job 👏 not many photographers are now printing a photo. I like holding photo and feeling paper make me feel proud 🥹
@MacnTeensVisuals Жыл бұрын
I would love to get a good printer at some point actually. Thanks very much and totally agree, every photographer should print more I think.
Friendeez
Рет қаралды 16 МЛН
SmarterEveryDay
Рет қаралды 4 МЛН