Show that u + v + w = 6

  Рет қаралды 7,617

Prime Newtons

Prime Newtons

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 46
@Ron_DeForest
@Ron_DeForest 3 ай бұрын
Love how excited you get when you solve a problem. Awesome.
@mscha
@mscha 3 ай бұрын
Note that you can also find solutions where u + v + w ≠ 6, so the premise is wrong. (Example: just replace ⁶√6 with ¹²√36.) The question should be something like: “Find u, v, w with u + v + w =6 such that ...”.
@PrimeNewtons
@PrimeNewtons 3 ай бұрын
I agree.
@estanley0131
@estanley0131 2 ай бұрын
One of my favorite videos of yours; the excitement building as you approach the solution and the flash when it becomes clear 10/10 would watch again
@darkemperor3946
@darkemperor3946 3 ай бұрын
Hi Prime Newtons, I gave this question a try. I did show that u+v+w=6. But my working had a slight variation. Whereas you took the negative sign into the csc(6x), from "-csc(6x)" to csc(-6x)" ( which is also ok because csc is an odd function). I took the negative sign in the square root. Just like 4^(-1/2) = (-2)th root of 4, so is 6(-1/6) = (-6)th root of 6. Both methods prove u+v+w=6, only values of u and v change in each method. Just wanted to point this out. Appreciate your work!👍
@Samir-zb3xk
@Samir-zb3xk 3 ай бұрын
lol i did that too
@Jon60987
@Jon60987 3 ай бұрын
Very nice problem and nice presentation. This is one of your best videos. Thank you!
@satyapalsingh4429
@satyapalsingh4429 Ай бұрын
You are a great mathematician .Keep it up !!!
@ukdavepianoman
@ukdavepianoman 3 ай бұрын
Very nice solution. It looked slightly baffling at first...but following through the differentation steps it become clearer where it was leading. Nice trick to spot that the minus sign could go inside the csc function.
@kereric_c
@kereric_c 3 ай бұрын
NOTE that we can make sure that u = -6,however ,we could just find that w^(1/v) = 6^(1/6).for example there is a solution that w=36 and v = 12. in this condition u+v+w = 42
@Morgyborgyblob
@Morgyborgyblob 3 ай бұрын
I got to the top level of high school maths in Scotland, and did 1st year maths as an under grad at uni. I never encountered cosecent, cotangent, etc, until I went on youtube. It feels like a whole part of maths was just left out.
@nothingbutmathproofs7150
@nothingbutmathproofs7150 3 ай бұрын
Easy problem. As always, you did a great job in solving it!
@milko5143
@milko5143 2 ай бұрын
Amazing stuff
@ThePhotonMan110
@ThePhotonMan110 3 ай бұрын
Definitely required the biblical pasy after getting 666 at the end of the solution! Jokes aside, love the vids and your enthusiasm!
@mr.renovator4859
@mr.renovator4859 3 ай бұрын
Thanks for your great content! Keep it up. Like your very pedagogic explanations @ perfect speed!
@darcash1738
@darcash1738 3 ай бұрын
Looked pretty weird to me at first, but I got it. f(x) = ln cot(3x)/ln6 f'(x) = 1/cot(3x) * -csc^2(3x) * 3 / ln6 = -1/sin^2(3x) * sin(3x)/cos(3x) * 3/ln6 = -3/ln6 * 1/sin(3x)cos(3x) = -3/ln6 * 1/(1/2)sin(6x) = csc(6x)/ (-1/6*ln6) = csc(6x) / (ln6^(-1/6)) = csc(6x)/ -6th root(ln6) 6 - 6 + 6 = 6 Not sure how you properly rewrite negative fractional powers, but that seems about right
@lucien346
@lucien346 3 ай бұрын
It was beautiful the derivative can be simplified very easily
@rolandbole5824
@rolandbole5824 3 ай бұрын
Check check check!!!! Love that.
@surendrakverma555
@surendrakverma555 3 ай бұрын
Excellent explanation Sir. Thanks 👍
@jennifertate4397
@jennifertate4397 3 ай бұрын
Thanks man. Love your vids, and that you use a blackboard like when I was in school!
@vitotozzi1972
@vitotozzi1972 3 ай бұрын
What a amazing exercise!!!!
@trunks5614
@trunks5614 3 ай бұрын
beautiful
@GURPARASSINGH-sg8sv
@GURPARASSINGH-sg8sv 3 ай бұрын
Hi sir ❤❤ First
@THN--ue2yn
@THN--ue2yn 3 ай бұрын
I got 73/6. u=6, v=6, w=1/6. Instead of putting the negative sign inside cosec(6x), I put it inside the ln function.
@Harrykesh630
@Harrykesh630 3 ай бұрын
Easy !!!
@HasanOtoom
@HasanOtoom 3 ай бұрын
So satsfine❤❤
@robertcotton8481
@robertcotton8481 3 ай бұрын
Csc(x)/(ln(1/6)^(1/6)) if put negative on bottom instead of top sums to 4/3
@robertcotton8481
@robertcotton8481 3 ай бұрын
Added wrong 43/6
@THN--ue2yn
@THN--ue2yn 3 ай бұрын
@@robertcotton8481 But it's 6x instead of x inside csc.
@robertcotton8481
@robertcotton8481 3 ай бұрын
My point was that with the negative being able to go both up and down there is not just one sum
@THN--ue2yn
@THN--ue2yn 3 ай бұрын
@@robertcotton8481 I know, when I did the sum I got 73/6 because I put the -ve sign inside the ln instead of csc.
@Reaper69377
@Reaper69377 3 ай бұрын
What will be the inverse function of f(x) = xe^x?? Someone slove please🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻.
@5Stars49
@5Stars49 3 ай бұрын
You win the race 😮
@pdfr3aderYT
@pdfr3aderYT 3 ай бұрын
why is w omega
@sammtanX
@sammtanX 3 ай бұрын
AMEN TO THAT
@Orillians
@Orillians 3 ай бұрын
Can i get the source forr this question?
@shahadahmed7235
@shahadahmed7235 3 ай бұрын
Do you have any online courses?
@domedebali632
@domedebali632 3 ай бұрын
noice
@moeberry8226
@moeberry8226 3 ай бұрын
The problem can have more than 1 solution it is not necessarily the case that u and v and w have to be just 6 or -6.
@ppbuttocks2015
@ppbuttocks2015 3 ай бұрын
The problem just asks to show the sum of these three numbers to be 6. It doesn’t matter the value of the numbers just the sum
@moeberry8226
@moeberry8226 3 ай бұрын
@@ppbuttocks2015 understood my point is the total sum changes, it is not the case that it’s always 6 that’s my point.
@omograbi
@omograbi 3 ай бұрын
666 and so this problem has summoned the demon here
@temporarytemporary-fh2df
@temporarytemporary-fh2df 3 ай бұрын
god forbids... this equation is fomented by the devil.
@slytherinbrian
@slytherinbrian 3 ай бұрын
Love the math, could do without the evangelism.
@PrimeNewtons
@PrimeNewtons 3 ай бұрын
Thanks. I wish I could.
@true7781
@true7781 3 ай бұрын
a) u + v + w = - 6 + 6m + 6ᵐ // u = -6, v = 6m, w = 6ᵐ b) u + v + w = 6 + 6m + (1/6)ᵐ // u = 6, v = 6m, w = (1/6)ᵐ 𝒇'(x) = csc(-6x)/𝒍𝒏(⁶√6) = csc(-6x)/𝒍𝒏(⁶ᵐ√(6ᵐ) = = csc(+6x)/𝒍𝒏(⁶√(1/6)) = csc(6x)/𝒍𝒏(⁶ᵐ√((1/6)ᵐ), m∈ℕ
Bernoulli's Inequality
12:13
Prime Newtons
Рет қаралды 8 М.
A Diophantine Equation  @drpkmath1234
14:11
Prime Newtons
Рет қаралды 12 М.
Ouch.. 🤕
00:30
Celine & Michiel
Рет қаралды 37 МЛН
No empty
00:35
Mamasoboliha
Рет қаралды 12 МЛН
My Cheetos🍕PIZZA #cooking #shorts
00:43
BANKII
Рет қаралды 23 МЛН
Это реально работает?!
00:33
БРУНО
Рет қаралды 4,3 МЛН
My all-in-one calculus problem
11:54
blackpenredpen
Рет қаралды 108 М.
the most creative definition of sine and cosine
16:56
Michael Penn
Рет қаралды 21 М.
Integration By Parts Full Explanation in 4 minutes
4:32
Yeah Math Is Boring
Рет қаралды 11 М.
Why The Limit Does Not Exist
11:31
Prime Newtons
Рет қаралды 33 М.
This Integral is Nuts
23:03
Flammable Maths
Рет қаралды 71 М.
Lambert W Function
14:35
Prime Newtons
Рет қаралды 593 М.
How to prove monotone sequences
15:29
Prime Newtons
Рет қаралды 6 М.
Proof of existence by I.V.T.
10:07
Prime Newtons
Рет қаралды 15 М.
How to Solve Palindrome Equations
13:01
Prime Newtons
Рет қаралды 11 М.
The Clever Way to Count Tanks - Numberphile
16:45
Numberphile
Рет қаралды 926 М.
Ouch.. 🤕
00:30
Celine & Michiel
Рет қаралды 37 МЛН