What a blessing you received God bless

What do you mean ' it was powerful' how, in what way ?

my skin chills reading your heart thoughts here.Oh,I am SOOO with you,Amen

Thanks !.

The image according to scientists is a result of intense light that emanated from the body at the moment of Resurrection. So the image has all the torture signs endured by Christ during His passion and Crucifixion, but the expression on the face emanates peace of the victory over sin and death.

Hallelujah!

@@JayJay-yz5gb Are you sure they were scientists?

The Jews still hate Jesus . .The same jews who rule america/hollywood

haha

Exactly!

Scripture solves the controversy, Jesus was wrapped in several pieces. John 20:7 KJV *And the napkin, that was about his head, not lying with the linen clothes, but wrapped together in a place by itself.* Luke 24:12 KJV Then arose Peter, and ran unto the sepulchre; and stooping down, he beheld the *linen clothes* laid by *themselves,* and departed, wondering in himself at that which was come to pass.

The cloth on Jesus face I believe was folded by Him. It signifies his return. At dinner if the napkin was laid across the plate and not folded it meant they were done. If it was folded it meant that they would return and were not done eating. Jesus showed us through this simple act that he is returning!! Anything is possible with God. I try not to limit Him because after all he is God the creator of all things on earth as in heaven✝️💜

@@conniewood7587 That is beautiful,. Thanks.

Our One God .Jesus Christ.Better known as God the Father that became flesh to shed Holy Blood for renditions from sin. All we have to do is except it and believe by faith and His grace.

,

@@bonnielucas153 Could you elaborate just a bit more?

Amazing experience.

Jesus was looking like Osho Rajneesh

Amen !

Leave it to the RCC to make something an Idol. You'd think they'd read the 10 commandments by now, but no, not them.

Amen! I'm a believer 😌.

@@theodorab.2482 I’m not Roman Catholic and neither was the Shroud till 1994.

Hey Paul... I am a National Laboratory Scientist with expertise in Chemistry and Physics. I spent 34 years in ionizing radiation detection developing techniques for medical ionizing radiation detection and I measured radiation fields in operating Nuclear Power reactors, and I measured nuclear weapons emissions for Nuclear Arms Control Treaty enforcement. My degrees are BS in Chemistry and BS in Physics, and I completed my PhD graduate Physics coursework at Purdue University. I have been intrigued with the Shroud of Turin since I saw the Images in my Catholic buddies summer school pamphlet in the 1970s. I started studying the results of the Scientific Studies authorized by the Catholic Church. The papers on the scientific evidence on what may have formed the intriguing images especially interested me, because I am an expert in all forms of ionizing radiation including charged particle energy deposition. The images were Scientifically determine NOT TO CONTAIN ANYTHING LIKE PIGMENTS or PAINTS and it was determined the darkened images in the linen fibers only penetrated a few hundred nanometers deep! The only way to darken linen fibers to that shallow depth is to use energetic charged particles. Energetic charged particles can only be created by a particle accelerator if the Shroud was made by the hands of man as some claim. Particle accelerators didn't emerge till the 1970s. The Shroud can be traced back to the pate 1300s or early 1400s!! The other intriguing aspects of the Shroud is the weave is very characteristic of 2000 year old wealthy Jewish people. There is pollen impeded in the linen that is from the Jerusalem region. At the feet of the Shroud is a very unique travertine aragonite mineral that can only be found at the Jerusalem gate that lead to the Hill of Golgatha where Christ was crucified. Jesus had the mineral dust particles on his feet because he walked carrying his cross. I do indeed thing this is the real deal. Faith should not depend on the Shroud, but it's a unique calling card of the Crucifixion IMHO....

@@salmonkill7 Hi Steve. Thanks for your expertise in this field. I have none but have studied the Shroud closely and agree that the formation of the image is something very unique indeed. To be honest I still can’t understand why people are so closed to facts that it is the real deal?

A Spanish guy?

Even if it isn't, it doesn't matter at all.

@@johnlynch5300 It does when so many people are claiming it is Jesus 100%. That's deceptive

Hello, Good Shepherd Films! 👍

haha

@@brightbite hello there

Jesus is the only One to be worshipped, glorified, honored and we live our life for him. NOT OBJECTS...not the shroud, not the ark of the covenant, not the rod of Aaron, no icons, statues, necklaces...JESUS DIED ONCE FOR ALL!!! Stop looking for more...HE IS ENOUGH!!

@@lilpoohbear653 Easy there haha. I don’t think they meant the shroud should be worshipped. Just simply stating the importance of it, that it is the shroud our blessed Lord and savior was buried in. His precious blood is on it. I personally would be absolutely excited and humbled to be able to see it.

You cannot convince people that it is real and then they go back to the carbon dating . I get so tired of explaining to people that it was because of the wear and tear on the shroud that in Medieval times They added a strip to the cloth and you cannot tell that it is there. When under a microscope high-powered you can tell that the weaving was interlocking and you can see the difference. Plus the fire and how it survive the fire and why Jesus’s body was not destroy just the sides of him. Then watch William guy the comprehensive analysis of the shroud and he goes into detail of how forensically accurate this cloth is and that it tells the scene of the crime accurately

Hmm. Not in this World.

The fact that it is isn't should tell you something? "Christians Worship Medieval Sheet" that'll be the headline.

I have watched about 1,000 videos on it . The fire 2x. Was a miracle

This scripture is absolutely beautiful to me…..blessed of those who have not seen but believe🙏

Similar thoughts crossed my mind years ago, once I realized it was indeed genuine.

fair enough but can you please explain to me how we can explain the letter to the Pope in 1390 saying someone confessed to forging the shroud. Why does no one address this?

@@aquila813apologetics3 it's been addressed hundreds of times for hundreds of years. The question is why do you ignore how that's been addressed and debunked so many times. Those determined to misunderstand, will.

@@InfoArtistJKatTheGoodInfoCafe Ok please show me a source of a video by any shroud apologist mentioning and debunking it. Because everytine I watch a pro shroud video they always conveniently leave out the Pope's 1390 letter.... all they talk of is the carbon dating. Yes I get that and I think there is a good case for the dating being wrong but now I want to hear about this letter and the proof that its not legit

When the Aristotelans were confronted by Galileo with an alternative to their physics, they discredited him. They were helped by the incompleteness of his theory. Not until Newton did the new physics begin to be verified. The this theory begin to be extrapolated and treated as a “theory of everything” and identified with philosophic naturalism. As chemistry began to be developed, the old Greek atomic theory, which (Correctly) saw matter as consisting of particles, allong with out growing knowledge of electricity, and finally our investigation of the phenomenon of radioactivity, have we begin to realize that materialism is based on a misconception based on the limits of our perceptions. Each body is in effect analogous to what we see in the starry heavens above.

@@aquila813apologetics3Who was the “someone” Forging it how? Or just claiming that it was forged and then to doing it? Do you ignore that the Shroud did matter at all until the 20th century when scientific methods came into play? The x-ray negatives showed that was looked to the undiscerning eye like some scorch marks on the cloth concealed a very detailed image. You sound very much like Emile Zola, the journalist whose understanding of science was, like Voltaire’s, that of a very bright gymnasium student,

I feel for you living in fantasyland & getting religious about some tatty cloth from the middle ages.

The Catholic church happens to be in possession of the shroud. The Catholic church itself is an apostacy on steroids. Anyone who has performed a modicum amount of research on the catholic church, its history and beliefs would know this. Don't sit in the pew and have someone tell you what the bible says/means. Read it for yourself, and when you do, you will leave the Catholic church.

The Church hasn't confirmed it's authenticity

HOW AMAZING!!THANK YOU!!! doesnt that figure!AB also means Absoleute Blessing......

Thanks !.

AB are the first two letters of abomination. Any relevance there?

@@shoeshineboy5869 ab are the first letters of many words, that is obvious, but the blood is type A, B, AB, or Zero, and in hebrew AB is a word, the celestial Father. A coincidence, yes, but a good coincidence. Jesus has the type of blood of the Father because he is the Son of God. As the video says, the cloth is the saint grial with the blood of the Son, and the blood of the Faher.

@@shoeshineboy5869 ab-omination has not sense but ab-solution is the solution given by AB.

Yeah, that is pretty cool.

That was very interesting. Did not know. Appreciate you sharing.

But it was Carbon-14 dated to "1260-1390 A.D. [which] brings us into the world of the Penitentes' patron saint, Francis of Assisi (who died in 1226), to his stigmata (the miraculous wounds on his hands, feet and side) and, especially, to the lay brotherhoods that his piety and his cult of self-mortification engendered." In fact there is quite a bit of evidence that points to the reality being that this is "expertly forged". While all of the funded researchers avoid this, and put 100% into their conclusion that its Jesus in the image. I find that quite terrifying that so many people would fully believe this is Truth with all of their Faith... when that Faith need only be applied where it belongs... not to raise conclusions that the Shroud is of Jesus. What difference does that object make to your soul? What if it was someone's image done from a mock crucifixion...? Hypothetically if that were true, the situation would be much different, and would it would be best to take a different look at many things.

The best comment I’ve read on the Shroud. I feel sorry for the skeptics. ❤

When the Shroud image is put through a 3D image enhancer, it forms a perfect 3D image. A 2D image would appear extremely distorted and no one even knew about 3D imaging until the 1600s, much less on how to create a 3D image on a 2D canvas, shroud.

Right?the sickening hardness of hearts and mockery never fails to amaze me.THIS SHROUD HAS TURNED SCIENCE AND PHYSICS UPSIDE DOWN!!!and they still wont believe.....pray for fools.

The first rude cameras were available in Medieval times, but not until the 19th century did people figure out how to make a permeant impression on materials. The question skeptics have to answer is how to make such so fine image on a material so crude with the techniques know to people at that time? In short, the burden of proof is on the skeptics.

Incredible mate.Thanks for sharing that.

I think the shroud is an expertly forged item... and it was Carbon-14 dated to 1260-1390 A.D. in "the world of the Penitentes' patron saint, Francis of Assisi (who died in 1226), to his stigmata (the miraculous wounds on his hands, feet and side) and, especially, to the lay brotherhoods that his piety and his cult of self-mortification engendered" Mock crucifixion? Researchers proclaiming loudly that it is Jesus? while completely ignoring the results of the Carbon-dating?

What about the face cloth?

@@peggystanford2395 Theoricality... Is the Sudarium of Oviedo.

But what if this one is an "expert forgery" ... it was Carbon-14 dated to "1260-1390 A.D. "? Yet none of the researchers bring this point up! It was even only to be displayed in the church by the Pope under one condition... it was to be made clear "that a priest be in attendance to announce to all present, in a loud and intelligible voice, without any trickery, that the aforesaid form or representation [the shroud] is not the true burial cloth of Our Lord Jesus Christ, but only a kind of painting or picture made as a form or representation of the burial cloth." Something is very... very... fishy about this. Especially considering the expertly funded experts being so adamant that its Jesus without asking the questions first about what it implies about it being carbon dated SO late? I don't know the truth, but I know these points are important! They've brought up points such as mercury degrading, but nothing debunks or brings the date back to 30 AD or so. I think because of this, I mostly can discern deception... its the people who are 100% Sure about their Hypothesis/Conclusions about the Shroud and its connections to Jesus beyond a doubt... 😐 Faith is a silent knowledge that is true and has no opposites...

More than GOLD !.

Adam antium !!

It's all been done It's real. There is also a 3d print of the actual body of christ taken from the image on the shroud

Yeah, ellie is right. Also, are you familiar with the doppler affect? I am, only because i was a sonar technician in the Navy. The body is in motion.

The DNA is damaged on them, but the blood on the shroud, sudarium-and incidentally all of the existing Eucharistic miracles-are all type AB. The blood on the Ark (not sure what you're referring to) would be animal blood though.

Ron didn't get his blood from the A.O.C. He got it from the crack in the rock above the A.O.C.

I find I have to do that ith many videos on YT, but with this one, 1.25 served well for me.

It's Christ who heals.

Simeon held the Ransome from death unto life in his hands who happens to be the baby Jesus but we can be more assured than Simeon because the Ransome was paid on the cross so certainly us Christians can look forward to the grave without fear

There is another cloth on which the image is less well defined.

Joseph took the body, wrapped it in a clean linen cloth, and placed it in his own new tomb that he had cut out of the rock. Matthew 27:59 So Joseph bought some linen cloth, took down the body, wrapped it in the linen, and placed it in a tomb cut out of rock. Mark 15:46

Peace and blessings

That is my question. But no one has answered it. I want to believe it, but until this answered, it's up in the air.

@@peggystanford2395 Search for the Sudarium of Oviedo. That's the face cloth.

The DNAs data would have such as ethnicity and I bet new mysteries. The Shroud was made in India and was in Jerusalem. This is from DNA testing on pollen, seeds and fabric testing. If it has the DNA of an Indian, for example, it would make it highly unlikely it was from a Jew from Nazareth. It wouldn't be "God's" DNA. The Bible states Jesus was born a man, conceived by the Holy Spirit. It would have Mary's DNA.

Plus, it would debunk the maligning and insulting of Mary by those who look to discredit the Shrouds authenticity.

@Steve Bishop I would say to the one that was found by Ron Wyatt, in the cave in Jeruzalem, at the mercy Seat of the ark of covenant … look the documentary on KZfaq.

dna test was done its normal blood but it has no full profile it cant be compared to anything

It's been done. The blood did not show his father dna strain only his mother's

You and billions of others, lol

There is an article mentioned in the description: David Rolfe: "Who Can He Be"

Joh 2:19 Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up. Joh 2:20 Then said the Jews, Forty and six years was this temple in building, and wilt thou rear it up in three days? Joh 2:21 But he spake of the temple of his body.

@TheMoneyPresident: There is no side view because the shroud was placed under the body and then folded on top of it, without any side covering it, like this: ⊂

Hi There can’t be a side view because of the radiation burst being only vertical! Which is the only reason there is an image at all! Like a laser scanner! Shalom to us only in Christ Yeshua returning soon to reign over the world government from Jerusalem.

​@@toosiyabrandt8676 Christ's kingdom is a new SPIRITUAL Jerusalem. What you are spreading is an attempt to judaize Christianity, and an attempt to re-impose the old covenant, which Christ abbolished by His sacrifce on the cross. What you are doing is negating His sacrifice and spreading "evangelical zionism" and it is a heresy.

The sides did not touch the Shroud. Top probably fell away.

He is of the tribe of Judah

@@sscot720 thank you 😊

Except that de Molay was not born for hundreds of years after the Shroud of Turin was first being shown. *Period.*

I agree Si

The tomb is known as the church of the Holy sepulcher in Jerusalem built originally by Constantine’s mother I’ve been in it.

@@Crusader33ad hmmm...but is that where they found the shroud at, is the real question. Because my gut tells me Ron Wyatt was correct and the Garden Tomb, with the channel in front of it, to roll a huge stone in front of the opening to the Tomb....i think is the real place where they laid Jesus down with the shroud covering him.

@@dr.davidbannerf.e.s.6217 - the early church revered every artifact belonging to Christ or His Mother and apostles. That’s why they hid the shroud (and the scriptures) from enemies like pagan Rome and later Islam. The Church of the HolySepulcher was built over the tomb of Jesus because early Christians knew best where it was. Constantine’s mother, Helen led a search for the cross of Christ and other artifacts in the 4th century. I’ve read Mr Wyatt’s work and it’s thoroughly discredited. He’s also said that he discovered the chariots of Pharoah on the bottom of the Red Sea. Again discredited. I trust the early church which revered every article including the shroud, crown of thorns, etc. wouldn’t all of us??

That thought came into my head too