A side panel on an Alaska Airlines plane blew out midair during a flight from Portland to Ontario, California.
Пікірлер: 1 000
@isabellahodge41625 ай бұрын
This is why (a) you keep your seat belt on during a flight when sitting, as advised and (b) you listen to the safety briefing at the start of the flight, every time. I think the recent Japan Airways crash should be an object lesson to all passengers as to the necessity of keeping calm and following instructions from the cabin crew during any emergency.
@j.m.85455 ай бұрын
And the Japan flight wasn't filled with a bunch of 350 pound Americans slowing everything down and blocking exits.
@gottfriedheumesser19945 ай бұрын
Hearing always the same safety briefing every week or month is a simple punishment.
@FredPlanatia5 ай бұрын
@@gottfriedheumesser1994 if you are a routine flyer, you should take the time to locate the emergency exits in front of and behind you, and you should certainly keep your mouth shut while it is aired for the inexperienced flyers. Your life could depend on them knowing and following those instructions.
@gottfriedheumesser19945 ай бұрын
@@FredPlanatia Everybody keeps their mouth shut during the 'mask ball'. But when somebody tells me how important it is to listen every time to that sermon it gets odd.
@FredPlanatia5 ай бұрын
@@gottfriedheumesser1994 I get that, i also Heard it so often, i just check the exits and don't talk. Let them do their job, its no joke, they're not just there to serve us drinks.
@planeguyb77995 ай бұрын
If you’re wondering why the panel on the outside that blew out made a perfect square, it’s because it was a plug door panel. Boeing has an option on the 737-900ER/MAX 9 for an extra pair of exit doors if it is a high-capacity configuration, however ASA doesn’t have any
@timduggan14615 ай бұрын
Exactly. The photos on the ground after landing show where a slide bundle would have been IF that were a designated exit.
@timduggan14615 ай бұрын
The Alaska Airlines emergency info card shows the four main doors, L1, R1 L4 and R4. Plus, the four overwing exits. The overwing exits are NOT plug type, they have locking pins that engage when the airplane lifts off. There are MANY sensors and items that depend on whether the airplane is on the ground or in flight. Thrust reversers, for example, will not deploy until ground logic sensing is fulfilled. ETC
@Delta_NWAB747fan5 ай бұрын
As an aviation enthusiast, this was the one thing I could never figure out. I’ve never seen an airline use the door option. The first time I saw it on a Delta B737-900ER, I was puzzled to not see the door from inside.
@user-mb4eh2op8m5 ай бұрын
Alaska has those doors dude
@povertyspec96515 ай бұрын
Ryanair would have an emergency door at this location since they cram so many seats into their planes.@@Delta_NWAB747fan
@claudiomoles5 ай бұрын
737 MAX is a very safe air plane, as long as it stays on ground with the engines OFF!
@jeffb.1405 ай бұрын
They need to be scrapped completely and replaced by a different type .. They will never become safe
@Kpoole355 ай бұрын
I find it funny that all you arm chair pilots don't even realize this can happen to any plane that has a pressure system at any given moment.
@Jere-iy2yv5 ай бұрын
@@Kpoole35 Yea it can happen but if you didnt realize yet, it didnt and it shouldnt! Boeing and the FAA have already been exposed for corner cutting and corruption with the MAX series and this is just yet another result of poor quality. Boeing fucked upbig time and this plane should NOT exist
@garydunken79345 ай бұрын
I hate flying on 737. Most of the time they make hard landings, I believe due to not recommended long flairs during landing. Ryanair is expert on sinking them quickly! And, now this 737 Max junk with endless quality issues. Airbus A320 is much better alternative.
@Graemebo20085 ай бұрын
@@garydunken7934what a load of nonsense. Clearly you know nothing about aviation beyond what the internet told you 🥴
@kimloy80195 ай бұрын
Imagine sitting next to that when that happened, after you landed you got an auto email from Alaska saying: We see you have landed, please rate our trip and leave a review!
@spvillano5 ай бұрын
"You owe us one shirt and two sets of underwear".
@pizzablender5 ай бұрын
It is a 737 MAX 9, only a few months old. Incredible.
@aro80005 ай бұрын
MAX is cursed. I'm kidding, but there's something wrong with the quality.
@Kpoole355 ай бұрын
@@aro8000 it was human error on a filled in door.
@gottfriedheumesser19945 ай бұрын
@@Kpoole35 'Haneda' was also a human error. Making the MAX dependent on only one angle-of-attack sensor was also an incredible human error. Why have Airbusses three of them?
@Kpoole355 ай бұрын
@@gottfriedheumesser1994 The AoA design takes a team meaning Quality assurance. Plugging a door takes at most 2 people "Human Error". get out of 2019 first then come to the table. Know the difference when its the Airlines fault and NOT the MFG.
@michaelford33915 ай бұрын
@@Kpoole35 This is Boeing's version of the Edsel
@sann51465 ай бұрын
I recently flew to California for a trip. While selecting for flights, I always checked on the type of aircraft for each flight, making sure to avoid any utilizing Max aircraft. There were several Alaska Airlines itineraries with pretty good prices but I skipped them because they were on Max planes. Same with some United offers.
@anngcampbellbower43855 ай бұрын
Luckily everyone aboard that flight had landed safely on the ground. Kudos to the pilots & crew for getting everyone off the disastrous plane on the ground.
@jackmehoffer78195 ай бұрын
This is called a plug door. It is built for high occupancy routes and a door could have been installed by the factory but Alaska airlines did not order it. It’s common on airlines in foreign country’s that are not equipped with easy access to the aircraft like we have in the US.
@molybdomancer1955 ай бұрын
You seem to be saying Alaska is not in the US?
@jackmehoffer78195 ай бұрын
@@molybdomancer195 no when you put a period at the end of a statement / sentence that means the statement has ended. The new sentence is about other countries.
@grandrapids575 ай бұрын
interesting! Sometimes comments can be so very enlightening !
@gang2085 ай бұрын
@@molybdomancer195 Alaska is in Russia.🤣
@stevenclarkson18535 ай бұрын
It's the budget version. do away with the door and put extra seats in. What could go wrong ?
@BigEightiesNewWave5 ай бұрын
My niece died on Alaska Air flight 261 in 2000, which was blamed on their lack of maintenance, to save money! A part that was supposed to be checked and greased every 5,000 hours, Alaska pushed it back to 25,000 hours, and the part retrieved from the ocean, HAD NO GREASE on it. "a loss of airplane pitch control resulting from the in-flight failure of the horizontal stabilizer trim system jackscrew"
@paulforester69965 ай бұрын
I am surprised people didn't get charged extra for the view.
@RealMTBAddict5 ай бұрын
Just wait for the bill
@cjmillsnun5 ай бұрын
This isn't Ryanair! They would...
@kendallevans40795 ай бұрын
They all got vouchers for new underwear.
@NUNVAROV5 ай бұрын
🤣🤣🤣🤣
@wasabiginger69935 ай бұрын
😂😂😂
@GH-oi2jf5 ай бұрын
It wasn’t a door, it was a plug in a location which could have held a door.
@sidensvans675 ай бұрын
Got it . Thank you .
@dougaltolan30175 ай бұрын
Time for NBCLA to find a new expert.
@jetuber5 ай бұрын
That's what I thought. The hole was very clearly door shaped. I am assuming that this is part of the aircraft's design, that it can have more or fewer doors based on the customer order.
@gang2085 ай бұрын
This sounds even worse. How many of these "plugs" are there on a Max?
@majorminor33675 ай бұрын
Emergency exit doors are optional on Alaska Airlines. But air con is standard equipment😂
@eddieraffs59095 ай бұрын
Good reason to keep your seat-belt fastened the entire flight.
@spvillano5 ай бұрын
Turbulence is another. I always keep my seatbelt loosely fastened, just in case.
@NUNVAROV5 ай бұрын
And good reason to never fly in a 737 MAX. Too many accidents for being a "new" model.
@spvillano5 ай бұрын
@@NUNVAROV yeah and the aircraft vaporized in flight, killing all aboard and blowing up a major US city, amiright? Rather than, maybe a maintenance screw-up that never should've happened left an optional door loose to fail and the aircraft safely returned to the airport with zero casualties beyond some soiled underwear.
@largol33t125 ай бұрын
I frequently loosen my seat belt in the middle of the flight but I keep it buckled. Have seen too many horror videos of sudden turbulence where everything gets thrown up in the air in the blink of an eye...
@encinobalboa5 ай бұрын
16,000 feet? Very, very lucky for passengers. The pressure differential was not close to maximum which raises questions about the plane.
@spvillano5 ай бұрын
A bit over a year old aircraft, only a few months before it got recertified. Yeah, gotta wonder if the inspection manual is missing a step that'll now be added. You'd be surprised how many aircraft get many pages added to their inspection manuals after introduction, typically due to less impressive failures. Typically, compared to some wire chafing issues that resulted in the loss of aircraft and similar severe, drastic failures.
@timduggan14615 ай бұрын
Actually, that airplane was delivered new on October 31, 2023. That door is an emergency exit that is ONLY needed if the airplane is configured with more than 200 seats, which is not the case at Alaska Airlines. The real questions being investigated are going to examine the Boeing assembly procedures and Alaska Airlines maintenance.@@spvillano
@dee420lee5 ай бұрын
This is a BRAND NEW plane....BRAND NEW.....not been off the assembly line more than a few weeks! How TF does this even happen and it wasn't even the emergency door!!
@garymartin97775 ай бұрын
newly manufactured items are at higher risk of failure. it's called infant mortality.
@kendallevans40795 ай бұрын
Glue wasn't dry yet?
@svetlanaisayeva26245 ай бұрын
@dee420lee And the aviation expert is bringing up metal fatigue as a possible reason 🙄
@TheRealWindlePoons5 ай бұрын
Statisticians tell us that failure frequency of any manufactured product follows a "bathtub curve". Most failures are either when nearly new or nearly worn out. This is just a very scary one at the new end of the scale. Totally indefensible but that's the current state of things at Boeing. You'd be safer in a 20 year old jet.
@justing425 ай бұрын
@@kendallevans4079yawn
@mikesimms33805 ай бұрын
Luckily, they were only at 16,000 feet. The initial decompression was far less violent than it would be at 35,000.
@garymartin97775 ай бұрын
not so much. remember airliners are pressurized to resemble pressure between 6000 and 8000 feet, not at sea level. "1000 mb is near the surface (sea level), 850 mb is near 1,500 meters (5,000 ft), 700 mb is near 3,000 meters (10,000 ft), 500 mb is near 5,500 meters (18,000 ft), 300 mb is near 9,300 meters (30,000 ft)."
@49rockon275 ай бұрын
Luckily no one was in the seat beside the blown out section of wall. Plane was still climbing, so passengers were still strapped in with seat belts. Things could have been very different otherwise.
@entropy225 ай бұрын
Agree. Couple years ago a woman was sucked and only the window was broken. Imagine entire door.
@-Primer-5 ай бұрын
It was a door, not a wall. You can see the hinges at the bottom. Someone probably rotated the door handles on the previous flight, and either the indicators are not working or the flight crew missed it.
@chrischarla4245 ай бұрын
@@-Primer- It's not a door. It's a place where you can add an optional door for boarding. It's behind the wing, probably row 22. Alaska exits are over-wing in rows 16 & 17.
@LukeSalaiz5 ай бұрын
100%. Thank goodness they were still in seatbelt mode. Would have been much different mid-flight. And thankfully (miraculously) that seat was empty.
@-Primer-5 ай бұрын
@@chrischarla424 This is a different tail number, but it sure looks like a door to me. cdn.jetphotos.com/full/6/58687_1599859146.jpg
@craigennis91415 ай бұрын
Now that's a window seat!!
@svetlanaisayeva26245 ай бұрын
With the view that will take your breath away!
@gjmob5 ай бұрын
Styrofoam and superglue are not adequate for making a door plug.
@macbook8025 ай бұрын
They needed duct and cow bell
@muppetrowlf14735 ай бұрын
There was a time when the people running Boeing knew that. Sadly these days……
@KarlDahlquist5 ай бұрын
@@macbook802 held together with tortillas and bubble gum
@user-cv2ud6yf2j5 ай бұрын
😂gorilla 🦍 glue
@justing425 ай бұрын
Ahhhh the people that don’t know jack about aviation.
@papagen005 ай бұрын
If it's Boeing, I ain't going.
@pizzablender5 ай бұрын
It was a new 737 max 9. Ouch. Boeing is not what it was in the past. Dennis Muilenburg destroyed that company forever it seems.
@matthewb.71725 ай бұрын
On paper, their aircraft have never been safer, yet it’s certain their culture of putting profits ahead of safety will eventually cost lives.
@IndonesiaMajapahitNDPCA5 ай бұрын
it was a 727-100 🔥🔥
@skalet66a5 ай бұрын
@@IndonesiaMajapahitNDPCAIt was a new plane
@mackydog995 ай бұрын
Better than scarebus!
@fantasip5 ай бұрын
"I'm not going if it's Boeing" 😒
@paulvincent34105 ай бұрын
I'm sure your personal absence will make Boeing re-think everything.
@sharp35525 ай бұрын
@@paulvincent3410…don’t you just love self centered people!!😂🤣🙄
@sharp35525 ай бұрын
@@mp2431 …yet you feel triggered to respond to me, what does that make you?👏🏼😂
@Thunder_Dome455 ай бұрын
What will you do, the Airbus?
@TheRealWindlePoons5 ай бұрын
@@paulvincent3410 "I'm sure your personal absence will make Boeing re-think everything." I'm not going either. Boeing are getting the sort of safety record only Sukhoi would be proud of.
@childofGod3n15 ай бұрын
It sure looks like a door panel. It's amazing how the passengers remained calm. Thank the Lord they all made it safely back. The pilots did an awesome job.
@firstsoldier42575 ай бұрын
they have to oxygen mask on nobody hear another person
@silentkillermd5 ай бұрын
Any news on the panel that got blown away? Imagine falling from above....glad all the passengers and crew are all okay, Thank God!
@firstlady36745 ай бұрын
OMG! So happy everyone is safe!!! I was in tears watching this - I can't imagine.
@jkardez47945 ай бұрын
Boeing passengers are the most calm people - they have been practising for a long time .
@vvvxt5 ай бұрын
And they will have plenty more in the future
@DeereX7485 ай бұрын
Who is the "armchair expert" in the last part of the video? That door on the Max-9 is an optional door, and although there is a door opening on the outside of the aircraft, it apparently isn't used by Alaska Airlines and there is a plug in its place. Looks like whatever is used to hold that plug against cabin pressure failed, and the interior trim panels , which are not structural members of the airframe, got sucked out when the exterior plug failed. Emergency exits do not have a seat row directly next to them and there was a seat row where the panel blew out. Luckily it went at a relatively low pressure differential and the decompression wasn't as extreme as it could have been. Time of useful consciousness in a rapid decompression is about 15 minutes at 16,000 feet, so even though the emergency oxygen system activated, there was little danger of hypoxia to the passengers, they were back below 8000 feet in a matter of a couple of minutes. 8000 feet is the normal cabin altitude during flight (equivalent atmospheric pressure) and does not require supplemental oxygen to survive at that altitude. The outrush of pressure when the door failed was enough to make loose objects in the cabin fly out, and had someone been within several feet of the opening and not secured with a seatbelt, they would have been in danger of being pulled out. My experience and training in this scenario is courtesy of 8 years as a USAF aircrew member.
@judiber20885 ай бұрын
Maybe one of the 6,500 people who work at Boeing in South Carolina....MIGHT know something 🤩
@TheSuperi95 ай бұрын
as a pilot i left a particular airline once i found out i was next in line for an upgrade to the max. its a very safe air plane, as long as it stays on ground with the engines OFF!
@Av-vd3wk5 ай бұрын
You’re not a pilot…
@fastlaynem5 ай бұрын
I imagine the line for 737 Max duties moves very fast!
@otal07215 ай бұрын
@@Av-vd3wkyeah all pilots cease to exist
@Reyubb5 ай бұрын
I'm glad all our passengers are safe
@bishop_985 ай бұрын
Boeing is digging their own grave, still after the Max catastrophe. I love it.
@3-2-1-.5 ай бұрын
That was all computer override problems. This is purely mechanical. The bolts holding it in may not have been torqued properly, or they could have failed. It happens. The hardware that failed probably came from... wait for it... China.
@kendallevans40795 ай бұрын
The problem is they are another example of "to big to fail". The Gov. will extend them every loophole, courtesy, extension, design deviant etc....to keep them flying and making money.
@Orbital_Inclination5 ай бұрын
@@3-2-1-.Any hardware fitted to a Boeing aircraft should have passed through Boeing quality control, where examples from order batches are analysed for defects.
@gunsumwong39485 ай бұрын
There is no way anyone could convince me that the 737-max is a safe plane to fly with!
@GL-ls1eo5 ай бұрын
I'd like to know what happened to that piece that blew off.
@ShakespeareCafe5 ай бұрын
Finding this door assembly is now the urgent task. Meanwhile if you fly a Max keep your seatbelts tightly fastened and your phone in your pocket
@esphilee5 ай бұрын
And your will written.
@lughscanlan5 ай бұрын
It wasn’t a door. It was a piece in the fuselage that contained a window.
@ScottsFormula350TPI5 ай бұрын
this lane didnt have the escape door option,looks likek what blew out was the panel section that replaces the door on not optioned planes.
@lynskyrd5 ай бұрын
@@esphilee and YOU'RE not.
@QuicknStraight5 ай бұрын
@@lughscanlan That is a door, not a "piece of wall". It was a door included in the design, but not being used by the airline.
@mafiaboy875 ай бұрын
73M may be the most scrutinised airplane in history, but too many instances of corner cutting have emerged, from the design phase up to actual manufacturing. Who knows what else Boeing did/ didn’t do just to reuse this old airframe design
@thegotlandisfarmer87745 ай бұрын
The 737Max was just thrown together, Boeing did not intend to make a New generation of the 737 but when Airbus revealed the Airbus A320Neo with longer range and low dual burn, Boeing panicked because they did not have anything near to the A32N so the told there engineers to quickly designed 737 that Could compete Against the A32N
@FlyByWire15 ай бұрын
@@thegotlandisfarmer8774that’s not at all what happened, the MAX program was years in the making. Stop spreading misinformation.
@executivesteps5 ай бұрын
@@FlyByWire1KZfaq Comments only function is to spread misinformation. People who know nothing anonymously trying to sound smart.
@phillp77775 ай бұрын
@@thegotlandisfarmer8774 their
@ItsDeffoChris5 ай бұрын
@@FlyByWire1Or that's what they wanted you to believe! 😳
@brucel.5545 ай бұрын
Quality control issue. Let's start with that.
@FlyByWire15 ай бұрын
No it could very well be an Alaska airlines issue. Alaska airlines plugs that emergency exit so that would be done after delivery by Alaska aircraft maintenance personnel, not by Boeing.
@sharp35525 ай бұрын
I’ll start with, let’s find out what caused this problem first! Then go from there!🤦🏻♂️
@the_stormtrooper5 ай бұрын
@@FlyByWire1 No, that's made by Boeing, not by the airline
@jackdaniel74655 ай бұрын
Get the FACTS FIRST before you go making ASSUMPTIONS!!!
@tarui5 ай бұрын
this is why you don't buy Made in China stuffs, made with Chinesium
@nimbuskhannk6275 ай бұрын
What a bad image for Boeing, right after that amazing Airbus performance at Haneda.
@Inspirational-Racoon5 ай бұрын
Yes the Airbus did a great performance in safety and very well am surprised the wing didn't explode
@muppetrowlf14735 ай бұрын
Yes, Airbus nailed it there. Unbelievable performance from the A350 and it’s crew.
@latrinemarine8265 ай бұрын
It’s been a wild year for airplanes so far. The collision in Japan and now a blown out door on a literally months old aircraft. Thankfully no injuries or deaths and hopefully it’s not a design flaw!
@largol33t125 ай бұрын
Unfortunately, with the MAX series, some issues have been attributed to either poor quality control or design issues...
@svetlanaisayeva26245 ай бұрын
@latrinemarine826 And it’s been just a few days into the year 😳
@latrinemarine8264 ай бұрын
@@largol33t12 Yeah Boeing has really gone downhill.
@bobcousins48105 ай бұрын
Looks like it was a location for a door, which was replaced with a panel, so the airline can squeeze in an extra row of seats.
@GrimYak5 ай бұрын
Yup, Boeing cut corners again....
@kendallevans40795 ай бұрын
They keep stretching the basic 737 air frame instead of starting from scratch to save money. This looks like some sort of failure in the "plugs" as they call them, sections "inserted" to stretch the length for more seats.
@Bor-Time5 ай бұрын
Ca-ching!
@Rainkavick5 ай бұрын
Alaska airlines does sell seats next to the emergency doors, maybe not in this case
@cjmillsnun5 ай бұрын
It is a location with a door for the Max 8200. A special version sold to low cost airlines like Ryanair who squeeze in enough more seats than an extra exit is required by regulations.
@tbolton61565 ай бұрын
Remember: Aviation, Navigate, and Communicate. The plane is still flying! We're good!👍
@a-fl-man6405 ай бұрын
aviate
@tbolton61565 ай бұрын
@@a-fl-man640 alright captain! 👍
@svetlanaisayeva26245 ай бұрын
@tbolton6156 Roger that! 🧑🏻✈️
@burkeandrew59115 ай бұрын
Have they located the panel on the ground?
@alm41325 ай бұрын
Over water....so probably not.
@kayesdigginit15195 ай бұрын
Thank goodness nobody had been seated right there 😮
@telosfd5 ай бұрын
Are we replacing latches or hinges now?
@hebrews11vs55 ай бұрын
When you fly ALASKA know it's going to be a 🥶 cold flight.
@ariyaa29615 ай бұрын
Is this one of the 737 max planes that were grounded due to plane crashes like 5 or so years ago?
@matthewb.71725 ай бұрын
No, this is a newly manufactured plane, and the MCAS issues have been addressed. MCAS had nothing to do with this incident. However, Boeing’s culture of cost cutting and putting profits ahead of safety probably have everything to do with this.
@IndonesiaMajapahitNDPCA5 ай бұрын
MCAS did nothing to this
@Paramart5 ай бұрын
yes it's a 737 MAX.
@schnitzel19845 ай бұрын
Yes -absolutely
@garymartin97775 ай бұрын
no. this is a Max-9. The Max-8 was grounded.
@philipslighting82405 ай бұрын
Amazing they were so calm. Glad no one was injured.
@molybdomancer1955 ай бұрын
They had oxygen masks on. They could have been 💩 ing tgeur pants but unable to scream
@TD_YT0665 ай бұрын
O2 level at 16,000 slows you down quite a bit if you're not acclimated.
@johnrobb94085 ай бұрын
Looks like a door blew out. Lucky good luck for the safe landing.
@ScottsFormula350TPI5 ай бұрын
this plane didnt have one,the panel that covers up where door would be gave out. Escape doors I heard on these are optional depending on who orders it. Faulty panel installation at door area though for sure
@kshepard525 ай бұрын
That is an emergency egress door where the slide is located for rapid disembark.
@Caperkidd-qs8vq5 ай бұрын
wow, glad to know everyone is ok
@thomas57145 ай бұрын
Typically, if a critical component, like this, catastrophically fails on a commercial airliner, the entire fleet is grounded for inspection. But now the politics come into play and Leslie Nielsen shows up waving his hands, "Nothing to see here folks." Boeing is on standby.
@kendallevans40795 ай бұрын
Boeing and government/economy are to cozzy. It took 2 MAX's to crash before it was grounded. The politicos will need many more parts blowing off this model mid-flight before they even consider grounding their golfing buddies cash cow.
@gentlemanbirdlake5 ай бұрын
Boeing just asked for exception for new MAX variant and WTF they can’t keep their planes in one piece! Get it together Boeing - should have fired the McDonald Douglas management when they merged.
@spvillano5 ай бұрын
Air Alaska has grounded their fleet of 737-9 MAX. The aircraft was just recertified, so they'll be looking at inspection records first. If, during inspection the panel and plug was removed for inspection and a step got missed reinstalling it, does it make sense to ground every single aircraft of that model in the world?
@thomas57145 ай бұрын
@@kendallevans4079 Dig. I came out the nuke industry. If a major component failed, the NRC issued orders to either shut or repair to all facilities of, or with, like manufacture. I should've known better, the FAA is now run something qualified by its fairy status, as if that one actually fly's as in flying eff @ && 0 + Oh we're so screwed up.
@justing425 ай бұрын
@@kendallevans4079cozzy isn’t a word
@billbright17555 ай бұрын
Be interesting to see what the cause was of the failure. Any cabin debris ejection has potential for tail structure damage due to collision of slowing debris contact with flight surfaces. Also debris could cause damage on ground structures over populated areas. Possible tampering with door closing systems. Too early to tell but entire fleets of aircraft type typically grounded until verification of failure cause. A logistics nightmare for air carriers flying the model.
@Claudio62515 ай бұрын
That was the emergency door exit; did someone accidentally open it? it doesn't look to me like the fuselage was compromise.
@timclarke53765 ай бұрын
That panel looks like a missing door.
@ayamhitam97945 ай бұрын
It could be a mechanical interlocked failure of that side panel door.
@GoShiggyGo5 ай бұрын
Where did the door/panel land?
@theodorehaskins37565 ай бұрын
My question is, shouldn’t quality testing/inspection have found this flaw before this incident happened? So I think they need to look at the entire process of how these vehicles are finally certified by the FAA air worthy inspection teams, along with the manufacturing processes use to ensure that this could not possibly happen, because there is a fail, safe safety system that supposed to ensure that something like this couldn’t happen in the first place.
@slapper2235 ай бұрын
It’s not a panel - its a deactivated door.
@justing425 ай бұрын
It was never activated. It was a plug in lieu of a door had the airline wanted one there.
@admiralbenbow50835 ай бұрын
The interior of the cabin, passengers etc is only part of the story. That door could have taken out the left side tail in a major way, but appears to have missed it.
@jproductions62085 ай бұрын
Could have been a repeat of AA96, thank goodness it wasn't.
@justing425 ай бұрын
You mean the horizontal stabilizer?
@kshepard525 ай бұрын
@@justing42 Be sure to correct all the spelling mistakes. Most of us ducking hate spellcheck.
@gregodianne5 ай бұрын
What happened to the window, where did it end up, anyone found it yet? just asking for a friend.
@dragonfly69085 ай бұрын
It has been reported that the aircraft involved in this incident was only two months old.
@anonymous4gent5 ай бұрын
Good thing the cockpit didn’t fall off.
@Luca.1215 ай бұрын
But the question is... Where did the missing panel land?
@svetlanaisayeva26245 ай бұрын
Hope it landed safely at the destination point 🤓
@northeastscotlandrailwayvi74275 ай бұрын
So so glad everyone is fine, I can tell you I would need new underwear no matter where I was sitting. Everyone seems so so calm
@simonclarke10285 ай бұрын
Is that window/panel a emergency exit behind the Wing?
@AirmanBrown5 ай бұрын
Thank God that didnt happen at a higher altitude
@readesiun9885 ай бұрын
It is quite obvious that it is a door that blew out, not a panel.
@lughscanlan5 ай бұрын
So the report is wrong; they point out in this video that it’s a not a door.
@readesiun9885 ай бұрын
@@lughscanlan Yes the report is wrong, it is the emergency door
@_Just_Another_Guy5 ай бұрын
From the other photos looking at it from the outside, it's even more obvious that it was a door due to the uneven window pattern length. If it had been a panel, then it would've fit clean evenly right between the windows but the hole is oddly shifted nearer to one window and farther from the other window.
@AshrakAhmed5 ай бұрын
in this particular aircraft this was not an emergency exit, they were configured for more seating so the optional door area was plugged up with body panel, you can see it on other Alaska Air 737 body @@_Just_Another_Guy
@TheRealWindlePoons5 ай бұрын
@@readesiun988 "Yes the report is wrong, it is the emergency door" Its a "plug" where an optional door could have been fitted if the airline had ticked the options box for one.
@steveeuphrates-river73424 ай бұрын
Great job to the passengers for keeping calm!
@restrepoce5 ай бұрын
This does not look like a regular panel, it looks more like the emergency door, or a door that got cover up, you can see that the structure of plane was intact, only that opening that reveal a door.
@robertanavarette74245 ай бұрын
Poorly made
@KM-sr9cc5 ай бұрын
It could have been worse, but luckily nobody got hurt, everybody was saved and so was the Boeing and 737 Max.
@jb5music5 ай бұрын
AI bot GIGO redundancy feel good broken record push-the-real-commenters-to-the-bottom... pork BS fluff fill for censorship... comments
@rocknwash5 ай бұрын
Nothing to do with Max 737 someone failed at there Job. This should not happen.
@halberderdier80735 ай бұрын
@@rocknwashsomething to do with Boeing.
@zms80924 ай бұрын
I literally can’t believe nobody was seated next to this or even in center seat. The flight only had a few total unoccupied seats 😮
@MikeBaxterABC5 ай бұрын
I think it's important to note, that this is a removable service hatch (Where another door could be added if ordered that way) and was not the result of structural damage to the aircraft. Why did it blow out? Good question! .. Obviously an error, perhaps during assembly? It's a new plane so nobody would have been messing with the plug in maintenance. As a few posters noted also!! . THIS is why you keep your seat belt on until the light goes out.
@TheRealWindlePoons5 ай бұрын
"THIS is why you keep your seat belt on until the light goes out." Seasoned air travellers keep their belt on whenever seated, myself included. Sudden unexpected turbulence is more likely to cause injury to those not belted in.
@TheTrueOnyxRose5 ай бұрын
As someone from Portland, I have to say it must have been the longest 20 minutes ever. That’s one way to be in the here-and-now….
@pamelah64315 ай бұрын
What does being from Portland have to do with it? 😂
@svetlanaisayeva26245 ай бұрын
@pamelah6431 As someone from Portland as well, I didn’t get it either… not quite 🤔
@pamelah64315 ай бұрын
@@svetlanaisayeva2624 as someone who has visited PDX, my opinion is irrelevant. 😁
@TheTrueOnyxRose5 ай бұрын
@@pamelah6431: Oh nothing…except I was on a couple of Alaska planes not too long ago…one flying from SeaTack back to Portland…and also, this incident practically happened in my backyard. Imagine booking that plane that ends up getting a gash ripped out of it. I’m surprised you didn’t get it.
@PeDr0.UY1315 ай бұрын
Boeing construction standards 👌👌👌👌
@hekterr66775 ай бұрын
Hopefully Alaska Air will issue parachutes and a briefing on use for the 2 rows of seating next to these plug doors.
@restrepoce5 ай бұрын
this is a brand new plane, first flight 15 Oct 2023 Boeing 737-9 MAX
@jungbolosse30345 ай бұрын
Just a bit of ducttape and she’ll be in service again
@garymartin97775 ай бұрын
some bondo needed on this one.
@davetuffney58855 ай бұрын
Max is a death trap.
@ChrisL-oz4lp5 ай бұрын
Where did they land?
@dville81035 ай бұрын
was it a "panel" or was it one of the emergency exit?
@UQRXD5 ай бұрын
Guess hot glue was a bad idea.
@JohnKeeble-kg1wu5 ай бұрын
This plane is not safe same old thing with Boeing profit before safety?
@povertyspec96515 ай бұрын
It's a plug that fills in what would be an emergency door on higher capacity passenger configurations. From the inside it looks like a regular window and you can sit right beside it. It is held in by four bolts. How this could happen is mind-boggling. This plane was brand new.
@spacecoyote66465 ай бұрын
Was it a panel or was it one of the emergency exit doors?
@markknowles81595 ай бұрын
Side Panel? That’s a DOOR missing!
@TD_YT0665 ай бұрын
It's a coverup panel for an Optional door that Alaska did not order. Not the full door mechanism, much cheaper and obviously not built as well.
@TheRealWindlePoons5 ай бұрын
@@TD_YT066 What did they make the panel from? Balsa wood?
@TD_YT0665 ай бұрын
@@TheRealWindlePoons Given that it blew out so cleanly, I'm suspecting counterfeit bolts or used the wrong grade of fastener. They can't be so bad that they RTVed the dummy door seal and forgot the bolts?
@gerardolramos5 ай бұрын
Boeing 737 Max is unsafe 😮
@FlyByWire15 ай бұрын
It’s perfectly safe. This could very well be an Alaska airlines issue. Alaska airlines plugs that emergency exit so that would be done after delivery by Alaska aircraft maintenance personnel, not by Boeing.
@executivesteps5 ай бұрын
@@FlyByWire1Seems unlikely. More likely that Alaska ordered the no door option for that location on this aircraft.
@TheRealWindlePoons5 ай бұрын
@@FlyByWire1 "It’s perfectly safe." Safety is always a relative term. I'd say Boeing is safer than Sukhoi - but the margin is narrowing.
@FlyByWire15 ай бұрын
@@executivesteps many airlines make those modifications after delivery, this could be a case of that.
@papa-dt1cv5 ай бұрын
Wow. Good video. What if happened at cloud level? 😢 if there is a passenger sitting next to open exit, not sure what would be the survival chance? Keen to know whether it is better to change seat or remain seated?
@TheRealWindlePoons5 ай бұрын
"Keen to know whether it is better to change seat or remain seated?" Change seat. To an Airbus.
@user-mb4eh2op8m5 ай бұрын
Here’s a life lesson for Alaska and Japan Airlines “just because an airline is good doesn’t mean that they’re safe”
@thefrener7945 ай бұрын
If not for the recent Japan Airways crash they would have been up and fighting the flight attendants for their luggage. And someone would have jumped out calling the hole fake.
@TheRealWindlePoons5 ай бұрын
"And someone would have jumped out calling the hole fake." A supporter of Donald Trump?
@otal07215 ай бұрын
What do politics have to do with this…
@michaelkennedy25285 ай бұрын
What they often fail to mention on these stories, is where the heck did that piece land? I would imagine it is pretty heavy, falling from 16K at terminal velocity (about 125mph). Someone could have one hell of a headache, yard art, or been killed.
@FondelMikeRotch5 ай бұрын
Who cares where it landed. You realize it could have taken out the rear control of the plane. Very easily. Catastrophe narrowly avoided. Instant loss of control was capable of.
@garymartin97775 ай бұрын
fortunately Oregon is not heavily populated.
@michaelkennedy25285 ай бұрын
@@FondelMikeRotch I have flown for 38 years, not jet but twin and single engine aircraft an can tell you my fiend know nothing. Tell me how that door coming off is going to take out the control? It may damage it pretty good, but not to the point of being uncontrollable. There have been NUMEROUS aircraft, be it in war, structural failure or items hitting the "tail feathers" and the plane lands fine. Yes, it would be more difficult, but these folks are well above my level and can handle such. There are people that care where a 200 pound, 125 mph object lands.
@TheRealWindlePoons5 ай бұрын
@@FondelMikeRotch "Who cares where it landed." You might if it landed in your yard while you were standing in it.
@svetlanaisayeva26245 ай бұрын
@michaelkennedy2528 Yep, hopefully not on somebody’s head (s)
@louisstennes35 ай бұрын
"Dear did you take the dog out?' "Yes, but I have a question, do you know who put that airplane door in our backyard?' "Maybe I should call someone, we do live near the airport." "nah, just put it with the other pieces we find behind the garage."
@lezbriddon5 ай бұрын
I'm so old I remember when boing made safe airplanes......
@scruffy46475 ай бұрын
So Boeing is on "standby to assist in the investigation". I hope so, it's their aircraft.
@flyoverkid555 ай бұрын
This isn't a " panel ". It's an exit portal. The airline has chosen to not use it as such, but the outline of the portal is clearly visible. At any rate, Alaska Airlines has some explaining to do.
@Patriot-bn9om5 ай бұрын
That was not a panel that blew out. It was in fact an emergency exit door on the left side behind the left wing toward the back of the aircraft. Losing a door seems to be a much more survivable scenario than losing a random panel from the fuselage.
@stephenjarzombek29035 ай бұрын
It was a panel/plug that is installed in place of an emergency exit door that is required if the airline opts for a higher density seating arrangement than Alaska.
@neilkurzman49075 ай бұрын
Others are saying that it’s a panel that covers a location where a door could’ve been placed, but was not on this particular aircraft
@jennifermarlow.5 ай бұрын
This makes Air Canada look ... not so bad! lol
@andrewdewit47115 ай бұрын
Boeing: “Oops”
@Themilkmanskid.5 ай бұрын
Aside from the door, was there anything sucked out?
@kevinnapier89965 ай бұрын
Glad that everyone is safe.
@nicolelovesbiggie22695 ай бұрын
The quality of work and output has vastly declined over the past few years.
@AsmarterWorld5 ай бұрын
It's a deactivated emergency door 😬
@jkardez47945 ай бұрын
The shape and size definitely looks like it - Boeing simply forgot to use loctite .
@Make-Asylums-Great-Again5 ай бұрын
Beautiful window.
@2075225 ай бұрын
Weird, not a single mention about where this large piece of the plane landed or if anyone on the ground was injured.....
@user-xq5oz9ik7e5 ай бұрын
Опять B737 MAX ославился! О опять новая проблема! Похоже таки запасной выход вырвало. Уж больно снаружи все ровно. И просто ЧУДО, что никто не пострадал...