Technically it’s not a 1x6, it’s a 1-6

@@Sparks00psnyou're right

Same here. Found mine for 1200 and even though all i had was a Zastava M90 you bet i bought that thing and slapped a “brembos on a civic”

Same. I got the VCOG 1-6 and it’s solid built like a tank

This is the new intro lol

Lots of things they CANT show. Mags. Reloads. Thank youtube or did yall forget *already*

This new intro is one of the most homosexual things I've ever seen

​@@bobbyberry5559That changed.... again.

Why you so whiny

3.6 ounces heavier

@@RB-qd1zi That seems like a reasonable trade-off when you consider you're getting 33% more magnification and a forged aluminum housing.

Perhaps you got an eotech vudu 1-8 scope?

@@militaryarchive4840 I have the 1x6 vudu with the SR1 reticle. I’ve throughly enjoyed it and have competed in 6 Run and Gun comps with it. It’s super tough and has not yet failed. Zero leaks after swimming thru 8 foot of water.

@sbenoit22 what do you like better about the VCOG?

@@doktorfaustusglass is a bit cleaner and pics up those hard to see targets in shadows and low light better. The last run and gun comp has black or no paint on steel targets hidden in the brush or trees. Also the 77gr BDC made hits on target faster. I’m finding myself going back to the more simple reticle design than the tree type. For faster acquisition. The tree reticle is hard to beat if your sitting and have time to use the information in the scope. But for comps. I have 3 minutes to complete course

I aint running over my VCOG :c

Great point on the MIL system. I've been making cards using my Kestrel. Let's face it, the money we've all spent over the years, might as well go all in!

I’m waiting till we throw nightforce in the mix then I’ll list them in order…also waiting to see which one breaks first in the continuation of this comparison. 😅

And then an Army qualification.

Lol 🔥

I thought SOCOM went with the SFP version of the sig

While I wouldn't disagree with your preference, it's not a clear win across the board for the NF. The VCOG's 1x is noticeably closer to a true 1x, with better FOV and less of the scope body visible. The reticle is much easier to pick up on the VCOG without illumination (with illumination the NF is much brighter, however, but without it is very fine in the middel at 1x, similar to the way he described the Tango 6T). One nice point in favor of the ATACR, however, is that even with a mount it is still lighter than the VCOG 1-8. The VCOG is a bit of a pig, even for a 1-8.

@@dickizzinya9085 Thanks.

Results are predictable. As is the difference in weight.

VCOG is made with 7071 with its integrated mount and the Sig is 6061.

I am a child. 😂

@@magdump_morgan bro, same. 🤣

Also you can generally find vcogs for 1800-1900

Great choice in the PWS MK116, never had a hick up or misfire after 6000+ rounds, by far my favorite AR15, had to have 2. Tried to get the MK218 308, seems PWS isn’t doing any runs now or in the near future.😡 Had to part with 2x the $ and went with a LWRC REPR308, not enough time on it to form a good opinion but you can’t compare the price vs performance of the PWS.

Honestly, 300-400 yds is not much of a challenge for either of these optics. You'll need to take it out to 600 yds or so to realistically evaluate how easily a trained shooter can get hits with the 6x and its BDC vs the 8x with the mil reticle. 5.56 shoots so flat that for a 300 yd shot the BDC does not come into play.

It can be removed easily either to clean or get the hell out the way lol

It's a simple concept: the reticle the USMC chose for the SCO is graduated in mils. You do your own computation for your bullet BC, velocity, etc, and hold the appropriate subtension for the range you're shooting at. This requires a much higher degree of training on the part of the shooter than a BDC, but is flexible across different weapon platforms or even a different load fired from the same rifle.

@@doktorfaustus Great reply. Thank you for taking the time to help me out.

I’ll take it off of ya 😂

What 1-6 are you comparing the VCOG to for weight? It is extremely light when you factor in the integral mount: ~23 oz. total (equivalent weight of optic alone would be about 17oz).

I’ve always looked at it like I can actually get some eyes on something at range even if I’m not shooting at it. Positive target identification is also a plus.

Answer please???

“633 hours (26.4 days) at setting 6” for the VCOG 1-8 per trijicon’s website, which is phenomenal for an lpvo. Sig won’t even admit what the battery life is on their website.

@@dashdotdashdot8583 thank you that helpful

Tbh there’s only one or two lpvo’s that are worth owning that are under $1000 imo. The Delta Stryker HD and the Vortex Viper PST Gen 2

I've been running a sig msr 1-6 for about a year . I absolutely love it for the money. Scope and mount with flip caps for 300 bucks at the time. Last I checked , they'd gone up quite a bit in price. It's abused constantly because it bounces around in tractors and trucks every day on the farm. Regularly take out coyotes out to 400 yards with ease. Reticle is great for hunting. It pairs up with the sig buckmaster rangefinder that gives u holds for whatever range u need.