I saw a review comparing this to the Rokinon 12mm f2 and they noted that the 16mm warped the image much less, especially with the correction profile applied and worked really nicely for astrophotography. I'm afraid I cant remember who made the review but try searching Rokinon 12mm vs sigma 16mm?

The kit, 16mm 30mm and 56mm keeps me on Sony apsc, it's an incredible value, the full frame ecosystem is too expensive for equivalent lenses, not switching anytime soon

@@thripper5332 rank of sharpness : 56mm, 16mm and 30mm for me 30mm image quality is the same as the most cheap lenses out there, but 16mm is the good performer, and the 56mm is the sharpest lenses of this trio

a6600

Your nikon z wish is granted now.

I'm thinking of waiting for it to come out on Canon EOS M mount and trying it then :-)

Focal length determines what kind of image you will get. The 11-22 is wide. Wider than the kit lens. It will be new to you and useful for architecture. The at and 32 mm focal length give you better low light and more background blur. And more sharpness. But no new field of view.

pizzablender Thank you so much for your response. I prefer prime lenses, if i had to choose between the Efm sigma 16mm, 30 mm and 56 mm, which one would you recommend. Keeping in mind i want a bit of flexibility in my prime lens.

For double the price? Dude..

Probably in a couple of weeks, I'm still working with it

This is an APS-C lens. On a full-frame camera you'll just get heavy vignetting and have to shoot in crop mode.

A review is coming

Canon 55-250mm IS STM all day everyday. The 2nd ver ofc.

Personally I'd go for the 55-250 STM

@@christopherfrost thanks a lot for your reply Chris.

current mount of the lens?

Make sure you buy the correct mount type. These come in three different mounts if I’m not mistaken.

It depends on whether you want the much wider angle of the 12mm lens

A review of that lens is coming...

@@christopherfrost What about their last 2 XP lenses ?

@@lazerman121 I don't think the 35mm f/1.2 is coming out in Europe, but I'll try to test the 10mm f/3.5 when a review sample is available

@@christopherfrost why would it not be available in Europe ? That sucks. Maybe someone can send you one from the states LOL

Lutfur Rahman This is from an interview in mid-March 2019: In a recent interview to lenstip, Sigma CEO Kazuto Yamaki said regarding making Fujifilm X mount Sigma lenses: "I really would want to but, you know, our resources are limited and it's all a matter of priorities.” Sigma really is at peak capacity, but I have a feeling there’s more going on in the background. It seems clear Fujifilm would rather not have another (very well made) 16mm f/1.4 lens made by a 3rd party that sells for about half he cost of theirs. Still, I think not having Sigma on board does more damage to Fuji than whatever sales they’d give up at those 3 focal lengths. For one, it props up Sony’s otherwise deserted (lens-wise) APS-C system, keeping Fuji from taking a larger percentage of the crop market. Maybe Fujifilm is demanding too steep a license fee for their X mount, or maybe they’re refusing to let Sigma use it at all, which they could do via their firmware updates. I think Sigma would sell more Fuji versions of their three f/1.4 primes than MFT, but I could be wrong. Hopefully Fuji and Sigma make it happen soon. Fuji’s worked so hard on APS-C I feel they deserve to have a much bigger percentage of the market to show for it. Not saying that this is an issue here, but pride and greed can unravel just about anything quickly.

Dasa Auto Well at the end Fujifilm‘s APS-C lens lineup is unbeaten, they don‘t really _need_ third party lenses while Sony doesn‘t have a good APS-C lineup. I can imagine that Fujifilm is proud of their amazing lenses and they want people to use them and not go for third party options. Sony on the other hand is probably happy about some third party APS-C lenses because their offer is really limited. Fujifilm really invested in APS-C and it‘s paying off because they got a lot of attention in the last few years and with their latest cameras even more. And everyone I’ve seen talking about Fujifilm admire their lens lineup. So I don‘t think the lack of third party autofocus lenses is a problem at all. In those two years I‘ve been using Fujifilm, I’ve never missed any lens in the system, their offer always pleased me perfectly well. The only lens I‘ve been slightly interested in that Fujifilm doen‘t offer an equivalent to is the Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8, but I‘m not 100% sure if I‘d really buy it because it‘s rather bulky lens and I prefer the tiny f/2 prime lenses. From my experience and from what I know, I don‘t think the lack of third party autofocus lenses is a problem. But I could be totally wrong obviously, I‘m no expert. People that want affordable lenses still have a great choice with all the quality f/2 lenses (23mm, 35mm, 50mm), the latest 16mm f/2.8 or the 18-55 f/2.8-4 kit lens which is plenty fast and high quality. And basically all their lenses, except the XC line, are optically amazing. There are only very few exceptions.

I can't remember what I said in this review exactly, but I'm probably talking about the full-frame equivalent depth of field

You mean distortion? Yes, depending on what software you use

@@christopherfrost yes distortion

For jpegs, the camera can apply the corrections automatically. If you’re editing RAW format, most editing softwares have this lens profile available.

I don't know anything about Nikon lenses, I'm afraid

I don't think there's an adaptor you can get. You probably need to sell it and get the right lens

it seems like its just a C logo, standing for contemporary

@@avery417 Thanks.

If you can't hear the sound over the very quiet background music, that means you'll barely be able to hear it in the real world :-)

Yes

You would get 16mm on a full frame body by switching aps-c mode off. You will however, get a lot of vignetting doing this, and will have to crop to about 20mm FOV manually.

?

sigma is planning to release it for the canon M mount, also 30 mm & 56 mm f1.4

You don't have long to wait

@@christopherfrost Maybe you gonna have AF 85mm for Canon also and check it with MC11 on Sony mirrorless? ;)

Either it was broken, or you were doing something wrong

Sigma seems to be sharper wide open, close up image is slightly worse though

@@CianMcsweeney do you have some samples/links? btw thanks for info

@@chtojeetovsezanyali kzfaq.info/get/bejne/hcuSiqWKm83VY2Q.html I just watched both this video, and Christopher's video covering the Fuji

Christopher's testing methodology is highly standardized so it's quite easy to compare lenses from his reviews

I would like to see the sigma 30mm 1.4 DC DN compared to the Canon ef-m 32mm f/1.4

I think so too! Although, that made me wonder how beautiful this lens looks from the inside... 🤔

A review of that lens is not far away

I have both cameras and this lens. I would not recommend using it on a full frame. Pics only comes out in 10mp size witch depending on subject might not be enough

You can use it on your full-frame camera but only in crop mode. What's the point of buying a FF camera but only using crop lenses?

Almost, I think, but not quite

Sure

No. As I said in the review, it's for mirrorless cameras only