📺 Watch the full episode here - kzfaq.info/get/bejne/f5mHiMx1na69nmw.html&ab_channel=TheDiaryOfACEO

"Social animals that have over indexed on rugged individualism". Quote of the decade for me. Going to get that printed on a T-Shirt

Tate simped women into simping men then simped men to fix that simping

Andrew Tate is a problematic Jocko Willink. Young men are looking for Warrior Archetypical men to draw inspiration from and have found Tate who's a dysfunctional version of it. I'd recommend researching Jungian archetypes if you really want to understand what these kids are going through.

grift recognize grift

I love your channel. Really good content. And I AM subscribed (obviously) 😀

- Jack Sparrow, you are without a doubt the worst pirate I have ever heard of! - But you have heard of me😁

Not Wojak in the thumbnail 😂😂😂

Thank you for being a voice of reason. Much needed, especially now.

very useful and informative. Thank you.

Sinek's observation of connecting 'incels' to radicals is very astute. Radicalization comes from frustration and the only cure is honest dialogue. It's just that, for some reason, people get extremely triggered when having to listen to radicals.

Only way out is to stop pedestalizing individualism: CEOs, famous people, KZfaqrs and become more connected with each other. All these people didn't make it on their own or if they did they are miserable and psychopaths.

There is nothing wrong with what he said. Its not calling out tate, but providing another view of how tate takes and helps people. Sometimes we need to question things as they are and that liberate us and give us multiple options.

Simon underlines the fact that we, as humans, are designing our own extinction 😖💜

I don't know if we can entirely blame it on individualism. As pointed out, shame-based cultures are experiencing similar problems and shame-based cultures tend to be more collectivist. Japan is the most collectivist and the most shame-based culture in the world, and they have some of the most lonely men and one of the worst birth rates. I feel like something deeper is going on that is causing all forms of societies to have these issues, and the issues simply manifest differently between individualist and collectivist societies.

Simon, you are reaffirming your comments by saying "right" after every statement.

*Finally someone with the balls to criticize a self-admitted scam artist (yes, Andrew bragged about being a liar and a cheat. Thats not honorable.*

I love my solitude thats everyone else's problem if they can't deal with being by themselves

Simon just gets more and more insightful as the time passes 🥰 thank you for sharing this gold!! 🤩

I think it's less victimhood and more just many men feeling like they are still expected to be men, but at the same time not allowed. Then Tate comes along and gives you permission to be a man again and reclaim your masculinity, and it's really easy to fall for. You don't feel like a victim, you just go about your day having accepted that you'll never be anyone of note, you'll never find someone special, your whole life is going to be just another day. But I never felt like a victim. I just felt like those were the cards I was dealt. Nothing an xbox, a pack of cigarettes and a fifth couldn't solve.

Exactly what society does... Create a problem and give em the solution

Excellent.

"When you want to see how civilised a man is, just look at his manners and language." Money can buy you first class ticket, but will never buy you any class in manners nor language.

0:50 emotion has always been one of the most powerful vehicles for motivation.

WHO says that anyone’s opinions are perfect or the answer. Just as any human is different opinions are different . I only believe what i see or experience.

I think you should get Mr Tate on as a guest, Steven. Would get a lot of views

It's a real problem because it's also that even buying a home is nearly impossible. Inflation is high - the younger generations can't afford kids.

Develop a philosophy that is guarenteed to make any sensible woman avoid you like the plague, sell that philosophy to young inexperienced men, then monitize their resentment and loneliness, amplify it, and buy another Bugatti.

I did enjoy this interview. Some great insight from Simon Sinek. But even as a woman, I find Andrew Tate's content compelling. The stick, not the carrot. "You'r ebroke!!". There's just something very compelling about an articulate person like Andrew Tate that commands respect and attention. I don't want someone telling me i'm doing okay and things will come in time. I want a kick up the ass

Lmao for sure this man has never seen one Tate interview. So he'll never know why so many love him

The topic and interview are amazing! However, the creation of short video content, pictures, and titles feels lowbrow, akin to tabloid headlines, which undermines the quality of the solid interview you conducted.

Also i will add to the other comment i wrote - the goal of building confidence in a child is quite dangerous and stupid if u ask me. Confidence should alway go hand in hand with clarity, confidence without clarity will always end in a desaster

Connection between people is always the right answer! Amen to that

The point about Tate and victimhood - see the movie Fight Club. They predicted this back in the 90s.

You are also a clickbait person....selling half truths from psychology. These people are not qualified psychologists, yet the whole world celebrates their words.

Cool video, My relationship of 5 years ended a month ago. The love of my life decided to move on, I really loved her so much i can’t stop thinking about her and the memories we shared. I’ve tried my very best to get her back in my life, but to no avail. I’m frustrated, and i don’t see my life with anyone else. I’ve done my best to get rid of the thoughts, but i can’t. I don’t know why I’m saying this here, but i really miss her and i wish i could get her back.

People change

Simon Sinek is a great guy. Very compassionate. But that approach doesn't work with everyone. Some guys like the kick in the ass and the challenge mindset, rather than the "poor baby, you need to help yourself and heres why that's good." Some people help. Most hurt, out of ego or jealousy or resentment or just plain hatred, wanting to watch the world burn or just enjoy bullying. The reality is for some, it's them against the world until they can develop enough to be accepted--which may never happen, even if they try as hard as they can. For those men, the only option is rugged individualism. Their respective perceptions on the world is likely a function of how they obtained success. Simon was likely supported a lot more than Tate was. Tate had to literally fight mother fuckers, getting punched and kicked in the face. Simon, you can tell, had a highly compassionate upbringing. Simon often puts most of the onus on the community. Sure. That's great. But what happens to the guys who don't find a good community? A lot of them turn toxic, sure. A lot of the other ones need the motivation to set a valued goal, say finding a chick or hitting the gym, and the way to do that isn't by pointing a finger at community, but at the individual to get off their ass and start moving. That's the difference. Simon is "we want you to feel." Andrew is "no one cares about your feelings [factually true as a man, though maybe it is true for some, like Simon who provides value and is loved.] Take the good, leave the bad. I love some and hate some of the messages from both Simon and Tate. Both great men. I've learned a lot from both of them.

He definitely has amazing communication skills and draws attention to.😊

My sons have watched Andrew Tate and don’t share most of his views but some things he says resonate.

You see a lot of comments in here calling this guy a grifter and calling Andrew a grifter. You can always understand somebody's mindset through how they see the world. And that is the lesson folks.

Why would my parents care about me that statement sums up someone who only cares for himself.

Which one is more twisted? Andrew tate being ‘x’ way to sell a product? Or someone who recognizes ‘y’ way can be better and more socially acceptable and thus puts a better cover in order to sell? They’re both selling😅

5:25 tremendous amound of work to overcome when parents always erniedrigen Kinder

These muppets play the same game; they’re just “nicer”

It is an exploitation of lonely men, and I do think that it's that same individualism that's creating loneliness in the first place. In men, it usually shows up as turning to videogames and adult websites, and in women, it shows up as making adult content. It's a vicious cycle that creates lonely people and profits from them.

i love that im a selfish person for thinking about my well being first

Tate does not inspire men to heal and become the best version of themelves, mind body and soul...he exploits desperate men and women by catering to their egos and flashing his wealth as a carrot. Money does not buy happiness. If you stripped Tate of all his money and "fame", he'd be a shell of a man because his self worth and image is wrapped up in a facade.

Always interesting how guests, occasionally, call out the dysfunctional cultural elements that Steven promotes and makes money off, and he always lets it glide by with a deliberate lack of curiosity. (Ref idolising "CEOs")

It's called psychopathy. That's what it's called.

It's just what works for people... Some people prefer Tate's message, some people go for Tony Robbins, some go for your message.. But If it gets people to improve their life not at the detriment of others then it's still has value... There are extremes, but everyone has free will to take and apply anything they hear. This channel has lots of value, but many guests on here I wouldn't trust.. such as so called nutrition or medical experts

The more I've listened Simon Sinek there I realised I don't like listening to him, lots of words but nothing said.....Tate on the other hand is an orator of note...indont agree all the time ,but I'm always engaged!!

i believe the best thing would be to make inner engineering manditory for mothers - in maybe one generation we will have a completely transformed society

loneliness have always existed this theory as if there is something new its just a market

Excellent word salad. Sinek has done it again, and by done it I mean talked and said nothing

Simon Sinkek is a Geek - Andrew Tate

I have seen a few commentators like Simon talk bad about Tate yet not really say anything positive about him, and it makes me wonder if they have ever listened to a full length interview of him or they don’t want to get cancelled. Tate does say some stuff that I do not agree with, which is what usually gets clipped up and what people see, but I’d say he says a lot more stuff that makes sense especially when he talks about the nature of the world and humans and how there is a concerted effort to try to emasculate men. What Tate does is not beat around the bush and says things with no filter. It’s kind of a similar concept to why people like Trump. People are sick of being told lies and want someone that will just tell it how it is. Like Trump, that is encompassed in a brash comedic type of personality. Of course that isn’t everyone’s cup of tea. I think people don’t understand Tate, either because they aren’t a guy or they are older like Simon and grew up in a different time, and I think it is hard to imagine what its like growing up as a guy now where if you are masculine it is seen as something toxic. Not saying Tate is perfect and everything he says is right, but I’d say he does have a net positive effect on society. Of course you shouldn’t take everything he says at face value, as you shouldn’t with anyone, but he offers a different perspective that I’d say is worth at least thinking and conversing about.

There is nothing more dangerous then an Angelic narcissist

Agree about Andrew tate. He just learn how to manipulate youngster by language. Disagree about he view on anger in the Middle East because of family culture matters. India also shares same arrangements in regard to sex, and given the amount of people per block there is no violence. Violence is cause by dissatisfaction and insecurity

Tate army will come for you ,

The commentary of Tate seems to treat what he says as manipulative only, but it fails to consider that it might be true. The pathways for young men, and men in general, are pretty poor. Work horse for a company, then stuck in a rubbish marriage

Andrew is a business guru

Cavemen living in caves for million of years no problem whatsover. Some desert gypsi: THIS IS HORRIBLE! YOU MUST RUN AROUND AND TRADE AS NOMADIC PEOPLE! NOMADIC PEOPLE !

Andrew Tate is also pretty funny. Not everything he says is to be taken literally.

So essentially he is talking about individualism. But Tate and the other fake gurus before him are actually offering people a community based on common life choices. So really it is community that is taking advantage of downtrodden people rather than an individualistic lifestyle. Individualism can be very good, but it is not for everyone. Now, he may argue that individualism has led these people to a state of being able to get manipulated in such a way. However, what they are really doing is not a solo career individual lifestyle, but rather a deep depression and lack of vision prior to getting assimilated into Tate's online cult.

Just sitting back and looking at the toxic audience try to come to some type of defense for Tate and toxic masculinity lol I wonder why these types gravitate to to channels like this and others … why are audiences who view business and grift type content always the same audiences that try to rationalize Tate and his lunacy?!?

Dance Dance Dance 🕺

...what are you talking about? I loved that part 😂the greatest response

It does work because life sucks… and he sees that and uses

True True True 🤔

Have children Steven, best experience in the world, if done well. Also get married first.

You really need to read Daniel Quinn (or John Zerzan for a leftist version). This post-industrial human landscape is a version of Luke 8:5-15 where the sower threw all of his seeds on concrete and asphalt. There's your real problem. Yes, the human is "adaptable," but only temporarily. Eventually we have to get back to the sweet spot. Which is NOT urban/suburban. The proto-urban human with all the OCD/personality disorder/emotional immaturity could be seen already in, e.g., Edwardian London. Take Virginia Woolf and (fictional) Sherlock Holmes. For Holmes just watch the 80s TV series where Jeremy Brett plays Holmes: full-on OCD/PD/addictive personality with huge outputs of self-discipline to keep it all on the rails. And then Woolf who exudes a creepy proto-feminist emotionally unavailable vibe in any photo of her. People, trust me, _you can't fix the urban-suburban human!_

Tate is way more articulate than this guy. That says it all for me and his not wrong in what he says.

I bet Tate has motivated more men to do better and get in shape then anyone in the last 10 years. Hes said alot of crazy shit. If he inspires people to be better then so be it.

misleading title

rugged individulism - 💡

Jordan Peterson called Tate fans undeveloped. Sam Harris called Tate radioactive. Now this guy is trashing him too. Maybe they should just admit that they're not as good as Tate at leveling with guys in a way that they feel understood. The flash and brash are for entertainment. Tate's critics are intelligent people. I look up to them in many ways. But they're dweebs who obviously either haven't been through difficulty in a way that guys connect with. Or they're crappy at explaining it. It's a lot of condescending and dismissiveness that shows their lack of depth. They're afraid of admitting ineptitude and instead just trash Tate and people who respect him

Simon Sunek, the guy interviewing him and Andrew Tate all discussing who the biggest grifter is. LOL. I gotta say - the podcast host probably wins. He never has anything to add ever. Those three and Scott Galloway are all grifters exploiting lonely men - just because Tate does it in a slightly more aggressive way then Galloway or Sinek means nothing. Their fundamental purpose is all the same - tell men their life sucks and sell them a book or a course that the allegedly contains solutions. I bet Simon Sinek doesnt realise he is cut from the identicle cloth to Tate. In fact, I would bet Sinek secretly harbours some jealously of Tate - who far and away has been the most succesful at this grift.

Yall are wasting your precious life

Roosh V had to die for Andrew Tate to walk. “Medium is the message.” Holds true once again.

Where do they talk about the rise of Islam? Or people turning to Islam?

Tate has a way of speaking that inspires men to do better. He cuts through the bull. Steet smarts, not book smarts.

This speaks of someone who fundamentally does not understand andrew tate’s message. As an avid follower, I don’t feel victimized or insulted, I feel empowered knowing that finally someone believes I can do it

I can listen to Andrew all day long but I got sick already in half of the video

No. Tate doesn't go around telling men they are victims.

Honestly, the narrative if ppl not having children is because they're selfish is so toxic. Theres a myriad of reasons why ppl decise to have/dont have children. Many ppl also have children for selfish reasons such as keeping up with their friends, completing a checklist, having "mini me" as an extension of themselves. And many ppl decide not to have children because they live in poverty or has mental health problems or dont want their children to grow up in a toxic environment. Having kids is a huge decision and responsibility and it's NOT just because people wanna work longer hours. Who tf would wanna work longer hours? Ever occured to you that a lot of ppl have to work longer hours these days just to cover the basics? Most can't even afford stable housing. And bringing children into the world when you cant even housed them is cruel and irresponsible. How out of touch are you, Steven?

Ive read 3 of simons books. They arent bad but nothing really new either. Really juat a rehash of a dozen other books that have already come out before his.some of the ideas in there i flat out disagree with him on. Hes one of those guys that tried to position himself as a buisness thought leader yet has never built one. Tate does the same thing but with more aggression and bs.

Still people attacking Tate without knowing him to get attention. Ok. Whatever. Tate did already ten times more for young people around the world than whoever this guy is.

❤

Simon 😆What you’re talking about😂

Put Andrew tate on your show , and let him elaborate everything he thinks a man should do

Andrew Tate tells a lot of truth but it’s between the lines where the grift occurs. He’ll say he’s a billionaire making a 4 million a month but that’s not true he has money but no where near a billionaire. He is good with words but not very good at concealing his intent.

Wasn't this the Tate not that toxic guy who exploits & abuses women for basically fun & profit and was kicked out of his country and hides out in some Eastern European country because he awaits jail? 😂😂 Hope he ends up with a lot of charges.

People are different. Everyone name dropping Tate jealous asf

As some one who livee in middle east I thought you were on of the smartest one in the world but just by saying like religion extrem in middle east and Take a shame society you meant we are wrong with out knowing much about us you do not have even know anything about us Andrew is far better than you when he is talking about someone or something he definitely know what he says

His criticism is disingenuous: he is telling victims not to be victims which makes them victims. An example of sophist intellectual idiocy.

Victimhood sells.

Everyone : we are animals but we r also human. Andrew tate : yeah yeah yeah blah blah blah we are human..whatever but we are ANIMALS.. andd that's imporrrtaant. Pffff

dude is 1000000% jealous

I am very open to changing my view, but we have a record high population.. one could say too many people.. and now that nature is self regulating by people not wanting to have as many kids its somehow a problem? Isnt that the solution to over population.. to slow it down a bit? People acted like it was a horrible thing for over population and now its a horrible thing to balancenit out a bit? Naturally, by choice... Is there something im missing?