Improving Curved Surfaces | Design for Mass Production 3D Printing

Рет қаралды 233,715

Күн бұрын

Curved surface finishes on 3D printed parts can often be challenging, especially with the appearance of layer lines as the part moves up the curve. In this video, we delve deep into the details of why these layer lines appear more distinct, especially on the top of curved surfaces. We'll guide you through multiple solutions that will help you improve the appearance of your parts. Whether you're aiming for a smoother finish or seeking innovative ways to enhance aesthetics, these design tips will open up new possibilities for your 3D printed parts.
If you would like to learn more about how to change your approach towards manufacturing products with Mass Production 3D Printing, make sure to SUBSCRIBE to Slant 3D!
00:00 What Causes "Stair Stepping" on Round Prints?
00:56 Increasing Print Resolution to Improve Surface Finish
02:04 Print Vertically for Consistent Surface Finish
02:42 Use Angles and Flat Edges When Possible
03:48 Pixelated Parts Can Offer a Unique Aesthetic
04:52 Utilize Textures to Blend Layer Lines
🔗 IMPORTANT LINKS 🔗
Get a Quote for Your Production Project: www.slant3d.com/
Slant 3D Etsy Plugin: www.slant3d.com/slant3d-etsy-...
Get Our STL's: www.angled.xyz/
Get Affordable High-Quality Filament: www.tangledfilament.com
Try Shapr3D (Use Code: Slant3d): www.shapr3d.com/download?utm_...
Our Favorite Products: www.amazon.com/shop/slant3d
About Slant 3D
🏭 High-Volume 3D Printing: Scalability Meets Flexibility
Slant 3D's Large-Scale 3D Print Farms utilize 1000's of FDM 3D printers working 24/7 to offer limitless scalability and unparalleled flexibility. Whether it's 100 or 100,000 parts, our system can handle it reliably, while still allowing for real-time design updates, ensuring products evolve with the times. This adaptability is key in today's fast-paced world.
🌿 Sustainable Manufacturing: Eco-Friendly Efficiency
Embrace a system that drastically reduces carbon emissions by eliminating carbon-intensive steps in the supply chain, such as global shipping and warehousing. Our approach minimizes this footprint, offering a more sustainable manufacturing option.
⚙️ Digital Warehouses: Parts On-Demand
Think of print farms as a "Digital Warehouse", meaning we can store your parts digitally on a server rather than physically on a shelf. parts are available on-demand, reducing the need for extensive physical inventory.
As an Amazon Associate, I earn commission from qualifying purchases.
Produced by Slant Media

Пікірлер: 260

@Litl_Skitl 10 ай бұрын

Suprised they didn't mention adaptive layers, that way you can have 0.3mm layers and transition to 0.1mm as the slope decreases. Same goes for the trapezoid shape.

@Kyle-dz9bm 10 ай бұрын

came to make sure this was said

@ArnaudMEURET 10 ай бұрын

😂👍

@leenunya2965 10 ай бұрын

I use this a TON! Great comment

@Intellicadms 10 ай бұрын

Exactly

@henriexel9963 10 ай бұрын

But the point was to have consistent layer lines, right?

@daves.software 10 ай бұрын

Another solution is variable layer heights. Use larger layer heights and only decrease when the horizontal stepover between the layers exceeds a certain size (down to a certain minimum layer height). This minimizes the amount of time spent printing at very low layer height, so the print times aren't increase as much, and you still get much better surface finish. Autodesk did something similar for their ember 3d printer. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/fqedociasZuRmoU.html Edit: Added a clarifying statement so that people don't think I'm there one who implemented it.

@Titan3DAZ 10 ай бұрын

Not sure if you're aware, but there are variable layer heights in almost all is not all slicers now. It allows you to set really thick layer heights for vertical surfaces while creating a gradient down to a finer say 0.05mm layer height for those rounded cases.

@KeithOlson 10 ай бұрын

Another option is 'non-planar printing'. In this case, an app would warp the top surface to make it flat, the warped model is sliced, then the app unwarps it, resulting in extruder moves in 3 dimensions per layer--rather than the standard 2--and the result is a smoothly curved top. (Obviously, there are limitations to this method, but it works fantastically well within them.)

@oasntet 10 ай бұрын

I would love for this to be implemented in a mainstream slicer without additional post-processing scripts. The problem is it doesn't apply universally to all models, so making the slicer do it automatically is very tricky. It'd be nice if Prusa or Ultimaker added it as a manual modifier, though, if they can't work out an algorithm cheaply enough to safely apply it automatically...

@simonschneider5913 7 ай бұрын

@@oasntet thats a tall order for slicer codebase. i dont think you can get away with less maths than in CAM for milling. i am into this, and will try to do something like this when my printer is rebuild. there are lots of possibilities.

@oasntet 7 ай бұрын

@@simonschneider5913 Yeah, I'd expect it to need to be an advanced feature, probably a plugin, and it'd require a lot of hand-holding by the user. There's still a lot of rough edges in the external-to-slicer scripting approach that a slicer plugin could polish off, even without making it a mainstream feature.

@Spencer-wc6ew Ай бұрын

@@oasntetunfortunately, Autodesk patended non-planar printing in 2015 (and never used it for anything).

@Crokto 10 ай бұрын

if he says to just print it on the side im gonna scream. e: lmao

@dsp4392 10 ай бұрын

Yeah, most of those tips were cop outs. "How to improve the curve: Get rid of it!"

@TheAndyroo770 10 ай бұрын

In prusaslicer I add a height range modifier and choose a range that covers the curve and choose to halve the layer height for that section. You can then click the adaptive layer height icon in the toolbar and choose "smooth" to blend the transition area. I also add a low level amount of fuzzy skin - 0.03mm depth, 0.06mm distance to try hide the layer lines more.

@roysigurdkarlsbakk3842 10 ай бұрын

Well - adaptive layer height works, which works well in PrusaSlicer and friends. Also, Fuzzy skin, also in PrusaSlicer etc, does what you mentioned lastly, only without any work for the 3d model.

@slant3d 10 ай бұрын

adaptive is the same as high resolution. The tradeoff is is slows down print time adding cost in mass production

@dsp4392 10 ай бұрын

@@slant3d It's not. Adaptive doesn't increase resolution everywhere, only where needed. You should check it out as it's a nice compromise between fast printing and increased detail.

@Cryous 10 ай бұрын

@@dsp4392 the whole point of the video was how to reduce this issue while keeping print time low. Adaptive is fine but it typically results in variable surface finish and quite a bit of extra time.

@johnheaney3349 10 ай бұрын

@@Cryous Not sure you are understanding what adaptive layer height means. In the dome example of the video if only the top 10% of the model would be printed at the 0.1 mm layer height then the total time would only be increased by about 7%. Moreover, the dome shape itself means the area of the top layers are dramatically reduced, which means the time increase is only a couple %, barely noticeable. Of course the actual impact depends entirely on the specific print, but generally adaptive layer heights increase print times by minor percentages, which I think he alluded to time increase of 50%, rather than 200%. It would have been clearer if he explicitly mentioned adaptive layer heights.

@treborrrrr 10 ай бұрын

@@Cryous That "pixelated" "solution" also adds quite a bit of time as you are now introducing extra top layers to the part which need to be printed.

@geezerreviews7920 10 ай бұрын

Hey I just want to give you a big thank you! I enjoy your videos so much and they help us little guys print better parts. I know you could keep this information to yourself and say its trade secrets etc. but you don't. I feel you truly care about the 3d printing industry and want to see everyone be as successful as you, and put out quality parts. Kudos to you and your team. Thank you again for all your awesome videos!

@slant3d 10 ай бұрын

The industry is so small. The more we can get people to use 3D Printing the more we all can win. When the industry is fully grown then we can hold our cards close.

@ForTheGreys 9 ай бұрын

im confused, why did you add the chamfer to the bottom when it would be printing vertically? if the cylinder is printed vertically there wouldnt be any steep overhands right, just up and down. Im new and trying to learn best practices.

@acekozmo 5 ай бұрын

At 2:06 was there a reason to put a chamfer on it even though that profile was flat already? (not sarcastic)

@lucianoag999 10 ай бұрын

Adaptive layer height. It would be great if you could use a formula to determine h as a function of z For example h = min(max(0.1 , 0.4 sqrt (R^2/z^2-1) , 0.3). That would give you the necessary height to have a constant step of 0.4 mm but having 0.3 and 0.1 as upper and lower limits.

@FilmFactry 10 ай бұрын

Can you show how you do the CAD Fusion 360 Noise Texture. You mentioned that previously, And I'm not a fan of Fuzzy Surface in Cura. Thanks.

@paultouya6552 5 ай бұрын

“How to prevent stepping”… “make a different part” 😑 Why no mention of variable layer heights?

@alexandrosmarinos5958 10 ай бұрын

You could try high resolution just on the top portion, getting most of the value for a fraction of the delay. I suppose a slicer could implement gradual layer height reduction to make it even nicer, but even without that, you can improve things a lot for a minor delay.

@Cenedd 10 ай бұрын

You can do adaptive layer height with Prusa/Orca/Bamu slicer and I think Cura as well. You can specify just the top parts too. It does help without adding too much time but doesn't get rid of the stepping completely.

@lucianoag999 10 ай бұрын

Yup. It is part of Prusa slicer for some time now.

@collie147 10 ай бұрын

Yup variable layer height. I use it all the time. Theres also a small layer height with an infill multiplier or different layer heights for infill compared to external surfaces. Saves time but preserves layer height. I've done this with .04 on the outside and .3 on the inside and the part is super smooth.

@CurtWelch 10 ай бұрын

I love using the stairstep approach to design. I will often go all the way down to .3mm steps, and then the part will perfectly match my designed shape and eliminate the layer effect that happens when you design and try to print curved parts!

@DerSolinski 10 ай бұрын

Cura has dynamic layer height exactly for this reason. While I find the stock settings somewhat lacking you can customize them to something that fits your need.

@sriharishjayakumar758 7 ай бұрын

How can I print the sphere/spherical structures with these layer bumps and get the smooth surface finish and I also I didn't understand the last solution mentioned someone explain please

@Eleven7D7s 10 ай бұрын

How do you add noise in CAD? Does Fusion 360 have this option? Is it just applying a texture/material in the CAD software? If so, could you elaborate on what method you use for this?? Thanks in advance!

@jeffhaas9577 10 ай бұрын

Can you explain the digital noise technique? That looks interesting.

@dsp4392 10 ай бұрын

It's usually achieved using a setting called Fuzzy Skin. The slicer will simply add 3D noise to all vertical surfaces. The amount of noise is configurable too. I really wouldn't recommend doing it in CAD as it increases the polygon count and might cause unneeded detail loss.

@AlexGontmakher 10 ай бұрын

Nope, fuzzy skin is hard to apply selectively like they seem to do

@TheCraftNut 3 ай бұрын

@@dsp4392 thanks for actually explaining that. that helped a lot

@schi_ni 10 ай бұрын

thx for your videos. i am also very interesting how to make noise or a texture on a surface using cad or maybe other tools? fuzzy skin is not always the right thing, because its difficult to disable it in specific surfaces like holes and so on

@jakhva 8 ай бұрын

What if you could use thiner layers on the outter wall only? like 0.24 on the inside and 0.12 on the outter wall...

@TheGeneral75746 10 ай бұрын

Maybe I'm the odd one out, but I really don't mind the sort of stair-stepping appearance of layer lines towards the top of a curved surface like that. That said, I understand there's a lot of considerations that need to be made if you're producing and selling parts like this that I as a hobbyist don't really need to consider. I still really appreciate and enjoy your videos, and have incorporated some of your tips into my own designs already.

@slant3d 10 ай бұрын

Thanks. Every descision always depends on the context of the product being make.

@Audio_Simon 9 ай бұрын

How do you apply physical surface textures in CAD?

@MsAdsdf 6 ай бұрын

How did you Texturize or add digital noise to your surface? I thought features such as textures are lost when put into a slicer and printed.

@AlexGontmakher 10 ай бұрын

Can you explain in some video what kind of settings you use to add the digital noise to the surface?

@treborrrrr 10 ай бұрын

In Cura you can search for "fuzzy skin". It's a feature they've had for seven years or so and I'm sure other slicers have an equivalent as well.

@Pyromuffin 10 ай бұрын

you can also try vapor smoothing with some plastics, batch processing is possible with large containers as well.

@teamcyrmining3673 7 ай бұрын

How do you add noise? I do that manually but on curve I don't know how to do it.

@nathanp3366 10 ай бұрын

Can you do a video about interfacing with already built items? A lot of these design patterns don’t seem to apply when I have to work around an already existing item. I know it’s very broad but would be helpful.

@rickybobbyracing9106 10 ай бұрын

Can you cover, or provide links, or even terms we can google to learn how to utilize textures? I love that idea, but struggling on where to start.

@h3ath3n99 8 ай бұрын

I've found that just by adding extra walls helps to hide the effects of stepping. It obviously wont rid you of the layer stepping on a curve but more or so camouflages it instead. Giving you a cleaner looking finish. You could also just change the orientation of the line fill to be concentric rather than on the standard default 45. Consider if your part will be under stress, the latter may weaken your part slightly. Alot of people commented adaptive layer height and that would be fine for some things like this videos example but it can really make your prints look stripey. Which i dont care for at all. Id much rather have uniformity and a little bit of stepping than stripey layer height changes throughout my prints surface.

@AngriestAmerican 7 ай бұрын

Um,,,,,Your print quality is exceptional.

@kelvin1316 10 ай бұрын

Embrace the layer line, the layer line is art

@nickoutram6939 10 ай бұрын

I had a sphere to print on my Bambu Carbon, I haven't checked if the slicer can do variable layer height, will check! As well as using concentric infill for the topmost layers I used a bit of post processing using primer and sanding...

@CarlosGaldamez-ur7ov 10 ай бұрын

you can always slice it on prusa and send the gcode to your bambu

@faizaanmirza9108 10 ай бұрын

You could just print the part on its side. The other examples/suggestions are to change the geometry in its entirety which is not printing curved surfaces anymore. The scope for improvement here is null. How do you improve something but not doing it? Print in ABS and acetone vapour exposure. That is the ideal solution for mass producing curved surfaces.

@AntiKipKay 7 ай бұрын

Using the adaptive layer function of the slicer is good too. It only reduces the layer height over fine areas like the top. Saves on printing time.

@stevenjacobs6608 4 ай бұрын

When is your mug 3d print file going to "in stock" again? The one with the regular handle says out of stock which is odd for a print file.

@richkaiser9453 10 ай бұрын

how do you create the surface layer you keep talking about in CAD? that is the biggest issue i am facing right now with my designs i dont like the surface layers i am getting

@engine0991 6 ай бұрын

How do you do the noise in the last option? 🤔

@deucedeuce1572 7 ай бұрын

I wish I could find a good option for over-hangs in Cura. I end up with the worst possible surface finish imaginable anytime I have a near flat overhang. On some cases I can tell that the coarse crisscross support layer is fused to the part, but even if that layer comes free, there's a layer of a mess of coarse, partially fused, not flattened "lines" fused to the part... and I can't tell if that's a layer that should be wasted or if it's the actual first payer of the part. It's very rough and not dimensionally accurate too, so any flat over-hang parts can't be used in mechanically functional parts. They're just too thick and too rough. (...and sometimes the very coarse lines aren't fully fused to the part. They can be picket off with a finger nail and/or are already broken free in some places). Forgive the long explanation. Just trying to accurately describe the problem. I can say I've been Very lucky though. Got an Ender 3 just a month ago and it's printed almost everything I've tried to print very good. This has just been the one problem I couldn't easily find a solution for).

@charmio 10 ай бұрын

Non planar printing! It's a real pain to set up given the lack of support in most slicers, but if you're doing the same part again and again then it makes more sense. Absolutely no layer lines.

@elsunshine9976 9 ай бұрын

How do you do that ?

@PrestonStephens 9 ай бұрын

How do you add noise to the surface of your parts? I am really interested in learning more about this!

@filipbystricky7301 8 ай бұрын

Great video! Another option that works for certain materials is to smooth out the entire surface with a chemical process, for example leaving an ABS part in acetone fumes for a little bit can give nice and smooth results.

@jameslmorehead 10 ай бұрын

I like the solution I use of having the layer thickness adjust for the model geometry. That way, I can still print normal or extra thick layers on straight vertical surfaces, and infill. Then, as the model has angled or curved surfaces, the layer thickness adjusts according to the angle of the surface. I don't remember my exact formula used to calculate this off the top of my head, but it's something like: If (nozzle diameter * 1.1)/ ((previous stepover - current stepover requested)/2) > previous stepover Then current stepover = previous stepover * 0.75 Else If (nozzle diameter * 1.1)/ ((previous stepover - current stepover requested)/2) < previous stepover Then current stepover = previous stepover * 1.25 This isn't runnable code by any means, but you get the idea. There's also a check before this that spans multiple layers to see if it is even necessary to go into the modified layer height sub routine.

@garydurn7983 8 ай бұрын

Big thanks for this - great discussion. Sometimes ironing is necessary to smooth flat tops - I wondered if you had thoughts on how to optimise slicer settings to achieve best surface quality when ironing?

@kelbybueckert8434 10 ай бұрын

it would be nice if someone made a slicer that would do perimeters at .1 and then infill then infill at .2 or .3 I don't see why this would not work but I'm not an expert in this.

@AgentOrange96 10 ай бұрын

Another solution is non-planar 3D printing. Basically you can move in 3D space rather than relying on stacking a bunch of planes on top of each other. There are some experimental slicers for this, but it also will be limited by the nozzle configuration of a 3D printer. Many 3D printers would cause a collision between the hot end assembly and the print because the nozzle doesn't protrude far enough down from the hot end assembly.

@lajoyalobos2009 10 ай бұрын

You could probably do an entire video entirely on digital noise and fuzzy skin

@MrHeHim 10 ай бұрын

Would be nice to see variable layer heights and infill with thick layers. I can see an issue with adhesion as there can be air gaps, but adaptive wall thickness can also fix that.

@rpmmaster8661 7 ай бұрын

whi hellow. Thanks for your help!! Which 3d software do you use at thiw video??

@techdiyer5290 3 ай бұрын

It would be nice if i could do 3d ironing and be done with it. sort of like 3D printing, not 2.5 D printing if you know what i mean. OR, there should be a setting where if im printing the entire model with .8 layers, the outer layers can be printed at .4 layer height just to get the surface to look ok, but it wouldn't take as much time as doing the entire model in .4

@MrKyle700 10 ай бұрын

found your channel based on your videos about filament and found it super interesting. You said you make your own filament in house, but do you have any suggestions for purchasing filament until you guys are making your own? great video.

@michaelrobinson9643 3 ай бұрын

The stair steps are simple and something I never considered. Thanks for the suggestions :). I'd like to know how you create the "noise" you mention.

@AngriestAmerican 7 ай бұрын

What about smoothing ABS with acetone?

@RDUBTutorial 7 ай бұрын

Great video. The concept of digital noise is interesting….is there a video on just that topic? Would be interesting to see how to add that to models in blender and or if it is just slicer settings that could be adjusted.

@user-lx9jm1wo3h 10 ай бұрын

I have been designing my screw hole parts with hexagon holes instead of circles because the slicer always messes them up and makes them flat at the top.

@zapl80 10 ай бұрын

It's not really the slicer, the upper layers are sagging because they are unsupported, so it appears flat at the top. You can counter that by exaggerating the upper side of the circle and make a teardrop instead of a circle. But hexagons are probably a better solution because they don't have that problem, their sides are 45° and support themselves, topped by a bridge.

@jeffreygordon7194 9 ай бұрын

The angles of a hexagon are 60 degrees. 45 degrees is an octagon.

@zapl80 9 ай бұрын

@@jeffreygordon7194 oops you're right, octagon is that I meant, hexagon would work when oriented with the flat side up, the side would have an overhang angle of 30°. But even with the tip up, 60° should give you better results than a circle, 60 is still quite printable.

@zachsss1916 6 ай бұрын

Im a new printer here, and this was a very well made video

@gooncocoon2465 10 ай бұрын

I never realized Mac from it’s always sunny was gonna be my favorite 3d printing teacher. nah for real though i’m still a beginner, bought my first Ender-3 in july, and this channel has helped me more than I could have imagined, and is helping me achieve my maker dreams. big huge MASSIVE thank you to not keeping everything to yourselves and trying to make things more accessible and understandable for the rest of us. much love from NOLA. ❤

@matthiastilly5480 7 ай бұрын

Adding noise (or "fuzzy surface") is the most underestimated feature of most slicers - I use it a lot on visible faces on commercial products and it almost completely conceals the 3D-print look (=visible layers), what still a lot of customers associate with low quality. The products look more like injection molded with a nice texture. It even helps with overhangs as the lines "wobble" in x-y direction and are therefore a lot wider and can span shallower overhangs. Downside is: You have to carefully chose what surfaces you want to be treated like that or you will dramatically increase print time and overall wear of your printer because of the vibration it causes.

@MsAdsdf 6 ай бұрын

So you add the noise in the slicer program itself and not in the CAD model? If so, I am assuming you can do this in CURA

@quantisedspace7047 10 ай бұрын

I build an outer wrap with the layer lines going in the æsthetically optimal direction and slide the bulk of the part inside that wrap, that bulk having the layers in the direction optimal for strength. Made a toilet roll holder like this. Print outside cylinder vertically; print inside cylinder horizontally. Either that or I just remove the layer lines from the PLA with clove oil.

@erin.anderson 9 ай бұрын

Care to explain what you mean about the clove oil? Are you just sanding it using clove oil as a lubricant? How does clove oil help with removing the layer lines?

@peterkiss1204 10 ай бұрын

Variable layer heights may help a lot while not increasing print times drastically. Or there are options (at least in Cura that I know) to define the wall and infill layer thicknesses separately. Print the walls with 0.1mm height and the infill with 0.3mm!

@TheRealPlato 10 ай бұрын

in prusaslicer this is: Print settings > Infill > "Combine infill every [ 3 ] layers"

@TS_Mind_Swept 5 ай бұрын

I was going to mention variable layer heights, but it looks like everyone else already beat me to it... I suppose I shouldn't really be surprised, but it would be nice to be (at least one of) the first on something 🤷🏿‍♀️

@DJacKnifeAlpha 6 ай бұрын

PLEASE cover how to introduce "noise" to the part! That effect looked absolutely awesome

@Kollingl 2 ай бұрын

Slicers could have an outter wall layer hight option. So it could print the wall first in a higher resolution and the rest in a normal height.

@jasonkatsikaris 5 ай бұрын

Very helpful, thank you. I am new to the 3d printing world and would like to ask what software you are using?

@vejl 8 ай бұрын

Adaptiv layer hight is made for this. Who says that infill needs to the same layer hight as perimiter (Cura can do this). The outer perimeter could also be finer than the inner perimiter. (not sure if this feature exist, but I have tested it myself, with source code editing the g-code file.)

@cailinglas_pb 10 ай бұрын

With that solution, I'd like to keep my problem.

@jacobmurray3621 10 ай бұрын

I appreciate the info you provide. I’ve been designing a box for some fans with using your methods. What methods do you use to reduce costs? The box takes 1.2kg of filament at 2 walls and 10% infill since it’s a fairly big box.

@Reese_000 10 ай бұрын

The easiest option is to use lightning infill though the part will be somewhat weak. Another option is to skeletonize the part by removing material in the cad model where it isn't needed. If you decide to skeletonize the part you can also reduce the thickness of the walls to a point where you don't use infill at all and just use a couple millimeters thick of solid material.

@TheRealPlato 10 ай бұрын

use cardboard for the walls and only print the mating surfaces

@jacobmurray3621 10 ай бұрын

@@TheRealPlato well the idea is this is a product I wanna try to sell

@atvheads 5 ай бұрын

It should be possible to print the outer layer with say 0.05mm 4 times first, and then the infill 0.2mm one time, so that the layer height match.

@codylund2169 10 ай бұрын

You mention printing on its side, but I'm surprised at how often printing at any angle will remove stairstepping rather than rotating a full 90 degrees.

@calmarcalmar 5 ай бұрын

awesome, once more

@UltimatePerfection 7 ай бұрын

Depending on the print, it may be preferable to have the lines though. Like, when 3d printing wheels, the lines may provide extra grip, like tracks on the tires.

@PrintermanBln 5 ай бұрын

How about variability layerhight like Bambu Studio? It‘s Genius!

@aware2action 10 ай бұрын

Could do adaptive layer height, followed by vapor smoothing, no layer lines anywhere.❤👍

@proaudiorestore8926 10 ай бұрын

I must be the only one but I find laters lines like this quite appealing

@danarrib 10 ай бұрын

Can't beat Epoxy Resin + Sanding

@AGILISFPV 5 ай бұрын

What about variable layer height?

@DoTheDiy 10 ай бұрын

Changing the design that someone has put lot of effort is the last think i would attempt to do. Instead of fixing the problem at print end you always ask customer to redesing 🤣

@ivanzhytkevich8903 10 ай бұрын

Ty for the information:)

@slant3d 10 ай бұрын

No problem!

@Spinname 5 ай бұрын

Thank you sir obviously!

@Hemeralopie 5 ай бұрын

I don’t understand why there was put a bevel on the part when printing it on the side. I looks like a perfect flat surface in the side wall

@Liberty4Ever 10 ай бұрын

I like how the problem is clearly demonstrated and explained, and then several possible solutions are provided, again with examples and excellent close up photography, allowing us to choose a solution that works best in our application.

@littlefrank90 6 ай бұрын

But they are all very obvious solutions to people who 3d print.

@Liberty4Ever 6 ай бұрын

@@littlefrank90 - I wouldn't say they're all obvious 3D printing solutions, much less very obvious. I've been 3D printing since before the time of consumer 3D printers, when we built our own 3D printers, and I learn quite a bit from the Slant 3D videos. It's helpful to have another perspective. Nobody knows everything.

@ninjafruit816 10 ай бұрын

Non-planar printing might be an option in the most edges of cases. True 3d printing.

@EugenioNS 9 ай бұрын

great content as always

@Xorealosu 26 күн бұрын

would a resin 3d printer make curves a little easier

@CarlosGaldamez-ur7ov 10 ай бұрын

theres no way of getting rid of that weird elongation if youre printing a sphere right?

@PetterStetter 10 ай бұрын

I think you already showed another solution - to use splines instead of circles. So where the stepover becomes too wide, you put spline with greater curvature, so it mitigates that.

@drabberfrog 4 ай бұрын

Idk why but for me those layer lines are fine, I hate visible tesselation and regular layer lines but I just don't see the problem with the top of curves. I'm 3D printing a quadcopter and there's a part of the arms where there's a top curve and I'm just fine with it.

@nyyotam4057 6 ай бұрын

My favorite solution: Print in ABS and simply do acetone vapor smoothing later.

@mcjaggerify 9 ай бұрын

This was a helpful video, but not exactly what I was looking for. But thanks for the ideas

@pathetic9705 7 ай бұрын

what app do you use to model??

@Clooney003 6 ай бұрын

Fusion360 was what he used in this video.

@keenheat3335 10 ай бұрын

I think there was a DIY 3d printer video where the author made a 5-axis 3d printer that print along a non-planar contour. So even spherical surface is not an issue with minimum layer line without needing to sacrifice print speed. But that machine does require custom 3d model slicing instead just regular planar slicing. I think i saw it 8 years ago, not sure why that 5-axis design didnt spread beyond university research project to the general public.

@travers114 10 ай бұрын

Everyone commenting variable layer heights, but my take is that often there is a texture difference on one or more sides which can look worse than the low angle steps.

@rescuemethod 10 ай бұрын

Great video!

@beaconofwierd1883 5 ай бұрын

Just use adaptive layers and non planar printing for the top, perfectly smooth.

@RichardRiendeau 10 ай бұрын

Non-planar slicing?

@NabilTouchie 10 ай бұрын

0:52 "getting around this" I saw what you did there!!

@WillCouch 10 ай бұрын

Seems like the most obvious solution should be software. Maybe eventually most slicers will have a factory default enabled that detects a certain slope angle and automatically starts increasing resolution the closer it gets to the top. So you could print the whole thing at a big layer height then the last few be small.

@cpu_1292 2 ай бұрын

This already exists

@MrGTAmodsgerman 9 ай бұрын

I don't understand why FDM printers don't able to rotate they extruder around an object in the first place. It won't add much more struggle to the printers we already have and it would be an nice alternative option. Only slicers would need to get updated for this. It would allow us to use smoothing layer option that we can see for ex. in Cura, while also it would allow to make parts way stronger and lightweight at the same time as we could combine different print orientations of lines on one object. While also getting rid of support needed for many situations where the head just move diagonal. Also you may then would able to avoid that you could kick a already other print from your print surface because a detection camera or something could calculate to print around it.

@IainMcClatchie 10 ай бұрын

Why not tilt the part on the print bed? Isn't that standard for SLA printed parts?

@slant3d 10 ай бұрын

We don't care about SLA

@IainMcClatchie 10 ай бұрын

@@slant3d Sure, but their solution (tilting the part so there are no surfaces tangent to horizontal) works well for your problem (layer lines). After all, they have the same layer line problem.